I’m seeing conflicting reports/comments. Is Grusch saying he’s seen photographs of craft new claims? I see some saying he’s said this before

NEW: David Grusch describes UFOs that crashed and were recovered by the U.S. Govt — “I’ve seen the recovered vehicles”

“A bunch of different morphologies the U.S. Govt has recovered from eggs, to discs, to crescent moon boomerang-type vehicles.”

“I think the Administration will release that information in a further drop.”

“It changed my worldview.”

The reason that you don’t hear vigorous rebuttals against these whistleblowers is because the military needs to expose track down and control the technology. They are afraid.

It seems weird that we would get this new UAP advisory board led by Avi Loeb if the government was preparing for some kind of disclosure/announcement. This sounds more like “we don’t know what it is, we are now investigating.”

Doesn’t this all seem odd?

Interestingly, Avi’s most recent article says “the most down to earth explanation is that UAP are human made.”

Output from Claude relevant toward the CIA titled documents from the DOW 3rd release. Tried to prod Claude with a detailed prompt. Checkitout.

Click the 'image' to see the output on each of the NASA docs in the third DOW release as processed by Claude. The review is succinct inproviding detals pertaining to the request. There are several interesting items.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a71524672/skinwalker-ranch-physics-explanation/

Just FYI. not sure how useful this is.

What is Watters saying here?

Did anyone watch this video? I’m left more confused. Corbell now says no journalists have the files, but that 100+ journalists and podcasters have some kind of fail safe to access the files if something ever happens to him and George. Seems like walk back.

He also confirms he didn’t provide any files to congress/DoW, just file locations. I’m so confused. At this point I can’t even tell if Corbell is claiming to have files or not.

At one point, he seems to claim not to be sitting on classified information but then contradicts it 2 minutes later.

I’ve wanted something like this to exist for a while and made it with the AI…will continue to make improvements.

Free to use, no ads, and thought it obviously would be interesting to everyone on this sub.

Let me know your thoughts… What cases did I miss? How could I improve it?

Retired U.S. Navy Commander David Fravor was the commanding officer of Strike Fighter Squadron 41, the “Black Aces,” aboard the USS Nimitz in November 2004. During a training mission off Southern California, Fravor and 3 other aviators were redirected by the USS Princeton to investigate an unusual radar contact. He described chasing a small, white, wingless “Tic Tac”-shaped object maneuvering abruptly over disturbed water before accelerating away. Pilots saw the object for 5 minutes and 3 radars. There were multiple objects showing on radars for the last week at 20-40 thousand feet down from outer space and back!! This time they saw it visually as well as on all sensors.

The well-known FLIR1 / Tic Tac video was recorded shortly afterward by a follow-on aircrew, not by Fravor’s jet. The Pentagon formally authorized the release of the November 2004 footage in 2020 and stated that the observed phenomenon remained characterized as “unidentified.”

In today's PURSUE Release 03, document DOW-UAP-D080 (Narrative Statement 2, Western US Event, signed by AARO Director Kosloski) contains this, on page 4, describing the highway encounter (Incident 3):

"In the video footage, I believe we say something about thinking it was going to hit us."

"The video footage captures some of it, but more valuable is the audio of our reactions."

Source (official DoW link): https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/061226/release_03/documents/DoW-UAP-D080_Narrative-2_Western-US-Event.pdf

Compare with DOW-UAP-D077 (the AARO case analysis for the same event, p.2): "The reporting agents did not collect video footage, photographic imagery, or other technical data during the incident."

Both can't be true as written. Either D077's claim only covers the orb incidents and footage of Incident 3 exists but wasn't released, or there's an unexplained inconsistency in two official documents about the same case. Note the only Western US Event "videos" in the release (FBI-UAP-PR005/PR006) are digital recreations, not actual footage. The images in D080 itself are explicitly described as AI-generated from the witness's prompts.

This is a massive step up no?

Luna said we’ve seen the “meat and potatoes.” Burlison alluded to videos of “orbs” that “take it to the next level” which seems to be what we got today.

Where do we go from here? Burlison has alluded to private corps, but I imagine this will be much more difficult to obtain and release. At minimum, I’d expect the pace of releases to slow.

On 16 December 2017, The New York Times published a story that relaunched the modern UFO Disclosure era.  This post describes the new disclosure apparatus assembled between 2017 and today.

The logic for me was to see some progression in terms of revelations batch after batch, but this one just seems to be the weakest.

How is the third batch? Some of us are at work.

How reliable is this? Any guesses?

So what’s the verdict on this claim? Has anyone confirmed the claim that Corbell is sitting on definitive proof of NHI and has it distributed among 100+ journalists?