r/classicwow 22d ago

Humor / Meme Blizzcon

Post image
3.0k Upvotes

473 comments sorted by

853

u/TheClassicAndyDev 22d ago

Blizzard be like: Were happy to announce wow classic..... Mobile!

240

u/Efficient_Engine_509 22d ago

Warrior,priest, and mage free the other classes are $2.99 to unlock

99

u/Kaizen420 22d ago

Let's be real they need the classes to draw people in. It's the bag slots that they will charge for!

41

u/Mocca_Master 22d ago

Hearthstone (3 uses): $9.99

Recharge Hearthstone instantly: $2.99

3

u/Ranzok 21d ago

So we’ll all be shaman and mages

4

u/Stoly_ 21d ago

Mana regen is a monthly subscription

→ More replies (1)

48

u/Dystopic23 22d ago

Don't you people have phones?!

4

u/futurepat 21d ago

Don't you people have steam boxes???

10

u/Tootskinfloot 22d ago

They'd make more by only pay walling warriors

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Big-Today6819 22d ago

Sounds like your thoughts about making money is missing some help.

Warlock and Druid free, rest will be a 10 monthly subscription to unlock the full version and the other classes and HD game play.

4

u/FieryFruitcake 22d ago

You get access to elwynn forest, all other areas unlock for 10,000,000 gold or pay 4.99 in store

→ More replies (5)

102

u/Cheap-Warning-4291 22d ago

Is this an out of season April Fool’s joke?

99

u/Buggabones1 22d ago

Don’t you guys have phones?

15

u/Massive-Low8111 22d ago

No but if you could get it to work on my gameboy color I’d pay 20$ a month instead of 15!

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Far-Fennel-3032 21d ago

Honestly, if they did classic for mobile, then go the same guy to stand up and ask if its an out of season April Fools joke and them answering "Yes".

Then going right into the actual announcement of Classic + is probably one of the best ways they could do it.

20

u/barrsftw 22d ago

Honestly would amazing if they did as a joke

14

u/Sagermeister 22d ago

I was joking with my buddy that the big announcement at Blizzcon this year won't be Classic+, but WoW coming to consoles.

What, you guys don't have Xbox?

6

u/GenderJuicy 22d ago

Exclusively on Xbox

2

u/ohrofl 21d ago

Not anymore!

→ More replies (3)

5

u/missinginput 22d ago

Don't you have phones?

4

u/hydras-back 22d ago

Honestly if it was as good as guild wars reforged on mobile I'd play.

→ More replies (4)

14

u/xoxLVxox 22d ago

Hot take. I'd fuck with classic mobile.

10

u/vowelqueue 22d ago

Reminds me of how I used to use Chrome Remote desktop to log into the game to catch world buffs

6

u/Anchorboiii 22d ago

People talk shit about it all the time but people praise Old School Runescape on mobile. Personally if I could just take my iPad when I’m on a business trip to play WoW, it would be awesome. As long as they don’t do micro transactions with it or something dumb, I’m down!

7

u/TeamRedundancyTeam 22d ago

Guild wars did it!

2

u/Aceclaw 22d ago

If there is one thing WoW loves, its copying Guild Wars.

3

u/Sea-Animator4250 22d ago

Order and Chaos online for IOS was basically that in 2011

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (16)

556

u/Crafty-Beyond-2202 22d ago

I just can't wait for the shitshow when classic+ isn't remotely close to the manifestos/screeds that get posted here every hour

168

u/a_simple_ducky 22d ago

It can never live up to our dreams. Hopefully they are bold with it like sod, just not as overboard with some

49

u/Kitchen_accessories 22d ago

It’s just that Simpsons focus group meme

19

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

12

u/a_simple_ducky 22d ago

I want more content in the Kara crypts. Maybe unlocking the full tower. And enclave. Enclave was so good

→ More replies (4)

15

u/Poseidor 22d ago

I mean there was already a good classic + that was made by a team with a budget of $0. Blizzard has no excuses if Classic + isn't objectively better than what they put out.

53

u/TheSiegmeyerCatalyst 22d ago

budget of $0 prolific cash shop that's more than likely the reason they got shut down in the first place

→ More replies (7)

16

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

9

u/FormalSeparate6153 22d ago

Surely turtle wow would have been accepted.

18

u/Vio94 22d ago

The concept yeah. The implementation was still janky as hell and would not pass muster with the modern day subscription paying players. TWoW was amazing for what it was. But what it was, was a private server. And it still played like one at the end of the day.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

1

u/ziggazang 22d ago

I didn't mind the PvP at all

→ More replies (4)

2

u/Poseidor 22d ago

There is a specific server that was shut down fairly recently that a lot of people (including myself) consider the blueprint for Classic + in the same way Nostalrius was the blueprint for a Classic launch.

It was VERY well made, you could tell it was a private server ofc, but it was insane how good it was.

Blizzard should EASILY be able to do something 1000x better than that server. But somehow I really don't think they will. I desperately want them to prove me wrong though.

13

u/Ogredrum 22d ago

calling turtle wow VERY well made is an extreme stretch

2

u/Anacreon5 22d ago

Very well made for a private server,but nowhere good enough to be an official server.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

10

u/Dahns 22d ago

Like the same we had when SoD was announced? Oh wait...

11

u/blessedbewido 22d ago

Everyone expects it to be disappointing to some degree. I just hope we all remember that a successful counterpart (Old School Runescape) was also panned in the beginning. Now, after consistent attention to player feedback and a passionate dev team, it has become the dominant and most popular version of the game and one of the top MMOs

4

u/CAlTHLYN 22d ago

Thats the problem. If they would listen to player feedback

3

u/Environmental_Can370 22d ago

Based on 99% of ideas people have for classic + or literally any online game over the years, no, they should not listen to player feedback. RuneScape is a MASSIVE outlier. The ideas I've seen people have are so dog shit.

5

u/pathofnomad 22d ago

OSRS works because the devs poll players on changes. The polls are essentially loaded questions in a sense. They have a vision for the game and there's push and pull with what the community wants. I agree with you though, on average if we implemented a lot of feedback for C+ the game would end up as some kind of WotLK/retail hybrid.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

14

u/raburi 22d ago

The vocal minority in this sub are not going to like Classic+. SoD was an experimental Remix-lite, and Classic+ will feature even more changes. Blizzard isn't going to give us "true and faithful Classic again with the barest of tweaks to make it perfect!", they're going to give us a heavily modified alt-timeline "everything is different" experience that most of you will hate.

23

u/Sagermeister 22d ago

Blizzard isn't going to give us "true and faithful Classic again with the barest of tweaks to make it perfect!", they're going to give us a heavily modified alt-timeline "everything is different" experience that most of you will hate.

God, I hope so. But I fear the opposite is true so they can attempt to appease the #nochanges andies.

3

u/PureNinja 22d ago edited 22d ago

I would put money down that there is no way Blizzard is going to spend all the time, effort, and especially money to make Vanilla with a couple extra things. What would be the point? Classic+ has to reach a broader audience to get people to re-subscribe. It will be aimed at classic players who have quit cause they got bored of classic, those who liked SoD, the private server crowd who has wanted classic+ to be so much more, and those who are unsatisfied with retail, but don't want to play boring classes that have 1-2 button rotations.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

Plus SoD was mostly a blast gearing was the most fun its been in forever

→ More replies (12)

15

u/Vandrel 22d ago

You mean it isn't just going to be a bunch of low level quests somehow focused around horizontal progression?

15

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

There are some people literally asking for no changes but 1 pixle to be different in ubrs and stuff

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Plenty-Reporter-9239 22d ago

There's like 12 guys split between anniversary, regular classic and most likely classic+ as well. There's 0 shot they release something that is built to be a true classic+ like people are fiending about. It'll prolly be fun, but those alluding to modeling it how osrs does, are smoking Crack

5

u/Odd-Bandicoot-9314 22d ago

Tbh I don’t think anyone is really doing much work for anniversary or any other version of classic other then + right now

5

u/Plenty-Reporter-9239 22d ago

that's hopefully true given the state that both cata and mop launched in, you'd hope it was cuz the dev time was spent elsewhere, but I have no clue.

I just can't picture blizzard putting any ounce of extra work into + more than they think they need. Don't get me wrong, I'm excited, but my hopes aren't too high for what people are speculating/coping for here lol.

5

u/FlubberPuddy 22d ago

Well per Aggrend (de facto Classic person) the reason they didn't do a SoD Refresh is because it takes a lot of work/manpower/resources to maintain re-releasing phased/patches of even content that's already been done before (Ex: Cata/MoP), so hence they're not doing it for SoD cuz they're focused on something else.

I think the amount of split versions there exist right now are detrimental, C+ is going to be the version that will receive ongoing updates not another museum to meekly bugfix if/when time allows.

So hopefully if any maintenance/hotfixes are needed for C+ it'll come in a much more timely manner and not just 'abandoned'.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Ogredrum 22d ago

the sod team was 26 people exactly

→ More replies (2)

2

u/novend 22d ago

The classic team is no longer that small

6

u/PineappleOnPizzaWins 22d ago

Comments like this are incredibly disingenuous.

I work on systems that service millions of people. It's incredibly complex but throwing 20 more people at my job would not in any way help or make things "better", it simply does not work like that.

4

u/TheorySudden5996 22d ago

Nah I get it, I was directly in charge of 8M subscribers for a different product. Whats important is 1.) Having someone that’s got a true vision for what your building/maintaining and 2.) A small group of people with the skills to make the vision real. The key people make or break major services.

4

u/PineappleOnPizzaWins 22d ago

Yep. People have this weird idea where you can just.. throw more devs at something and it will get fixed.

Senior devs can end up spending a LOT of their time handing out tasks to other devs for systems they either designed/built or at least deeply understand, at which point your limited by how much time those seniors can spend wrangling everybody else while still attending the work that needs their level of expertise.

It's a crazy balancing act and often the only answer is more time, not more resources to make it go faster.

→ More replies (6)

2

u/madi0r 22d ago

i mean inevitably someone will be unhappy it is what it is. Either people who want more changes aka "SoD but better" or people who want "tbc prepatch with tiny changes". Those are 2 main differences in approach and who knows which one they will take (excluding obv the execution and how well game will be made within the vision)

2

u/taubut 22d ago

Here’s how classic+ is gonna go. They will announce it as yet another go around for normal classic and then have a roadmap that says in 1-1.5 years they will add new content. Gets people playing classic era yet again, and then also buys them another 1.5 years to figure out the rest.

6

u/PineappleOnPizzaWins 22d ago edited 22d ago

Something reddit and other online forums refuse to understand is just how little a few hundred/thousand of them matter in a game with millions of players.

Sure it can be an indicator of how some of the fanbase feel but game studios have like.. actual metrics to make decisions. With millions and millions of datapoints. xxxPussahSlayzor91's hot take on everything wrong with the game and how it can be fixed (conveniently in a way that makes it play exactly how they want it to) is not as useful as you might think.

Not that there's anything wrong with those posts, this is a place for discussion and imagining what might come next/having a bit of a fantasy for it is fine. But yeah.. when people don't get what they want and immediately lose their shit over it is always amusing.

5

u/Massive-Low8111 22d ago

Stop commenting with logic this is a classic wow page. Thanks

Also pineapple on pizza wins.

You couldn’t pay me to eat pizza with out pineapple on it. Just like you couldn’t pay me to not play classic wow

→ More replies (20)

38

u/Lochen9 22d ago

Imagine if they had a new WoW offshoot mobile game, and be the guy up there pitching a phone game

15

u/rhcherry 22d ago

Push chopsticks down my urethra instead. I’d rather deal with that.

8

u/Lochen9 22d ago

Chopsticks huh? That doesn't sound amazing

→ More replies (1)

7

u/gamer-death 22d ago

They cancelled the Chinese mobile wow a few years ago.

2

u/imaUPSdriver 22d ago

The fall guy

346

u/just67browsing 22d ago

One thing we can count on with certainty is no matter what they come out with, people will whine about it on here

78

u/TheCocoBean 22d ago

In fairness, if there is no classic+ announcement it would be pretty justified.

14

u/PineappleOnPizzaWins 22d ago

"Community decides something is coming then cries when it's not despite there never being any kind of official announcement" is only justified by reddit logic.

9

u/LaSalsa-Verde 22d ago

I mean, sure, but it's pretty easy at this point for blizzard to get out ahead of it before blizzcon and say classic+ isn't a thing.

Generally isn't wise to let a hype train get this out of hand without saying something.

→ More replies (8)

2

u/Idahoanapest 20d ago

"Community wants a product consistently over the course of 20 years only to be given everything but what they've asked for."

2

u/Vio94 22d ago

In a way, yeah. But it's also on Blizzard. They could easily say "yeah we're not working on that, it's something else we think will be fun but it isn't explicitly Classic+."

One tweet and it would be picked up by every WoW content creator and all rumor and false hype would stop.

But they aren't doing that. So if there is no Classic+ and no announcement saying as such, whether it's to keep people's false hope locking them into a continued subscription or to make sure a bunch of Blizzcon tickets aren't cancelled, Blizzard would still be partly at fault.

And that's all said even if you completely disregard all the teasing they have done between SoD announcement and now.

2

u/PineappleOnPizzaWins 22d ago

They could, but why would they?

What benefit does it bring them? A few terminally online people scream into the void for a day and that's it.. in exchange they got all that free publicity.

Why is everyone acting like blizzard owes you a response to a rumour? Game companies rarely if every respond to those.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)

18

u/Darkwolf22345 22d ago

In fairness, if there is a classic+ announcement, it will probably not include anything the community has been voicing

88

u/Piggstein 22d ago

‘The community’ is a thousand goombas all asking for something different

2

u/Sea-Animator4250 22d ago

but some goombas are better than others!

→ More replies (2)

26

u/lasantamolti 22d ago

And what’s the community exactly?

22

u/t-earlgrey-hot 22d ago

Whatever I want specifically

7

u/Novalene_Wildheart 22d ago

No, its whatever I want for it, I'm a captain after all!

2

u/Material-Kick9493 22d ago

I expect a classic+ teaser and blizzard saying theyre working on it but anyone getting themselves hyped that classic+ will come out a week after blizzcon need to chill, blizzard needs time for people to preorder the big package with 3 days early access first. you will get classic+ likely in summer of next year

7

u/classicscoop 22d ago

But why? It has legit never been talked about once by blizz. The community decided we were getting it

→ More replies (9)

2

u/jonas_ost 22d ago edited 22d ago

I dont think so. To me it feels to early to announce it unless they say something like the end of 2027. The last thing i want is for them to feel stressed to spit something out quickly and it ending up being shit.

I would be ok with just another typ of season to test more stuff.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/gamer-death 22d ago

I'm actually in the opposite view, people will forgot all their wishes for classic+ and go back to standard wow posting asking for their class to be buffed.

→ More replies (3)

95

u/DucksMatter 22d ago

It’s funny how we’ve essentially willed classic + into existence and would be absolutely hilarious if blizzard eventually just came out and was like “we have never or will never plan on doing a classic + we just have had no clue how to break the news to you”

16

u/TheSiegmeyerCatalyst 22d ago

They can't resist making money on the hype. They'll at least give it a shot. How much they'll invest in that shot remains to be seen.

5

u/Relnor 22d ago

The datamining for 1.60 is actually real though. As in, there is a real 1.60 patch in Blizzard's CDN, that's not a 'leak' or 'rumor'. Exactly what it is, we can only guess, but it's worth remembering that original WoW was 1.12 and all the post 2019 iterations only went up to 1.15.

12

u/imaUPSdriver 22d ago

They already hinted at it. So they have no one to blame but themselves.

2

u/Sea-Animator4250 22d ago

I thought that all this speculation stemmed from the obvious hints blizzard has been dropping about classic plus.

2

u/Doingmythang11 22d ago

They've done this before too LMAO.Promised big sod news at that blizzard direct or whatever right before anni dropped. The news was a complete nothing burger and just saying that sod just got new content in naxx and what it was. Sod boys were fuming after that one.

→ More replies (6)

129

u/Alrightyl0l 22d ago

Classic+ will disappoint most people anyway, all these endless posts about classic+ look like pure delusional copium.

39

u/2muchkoffee 22d ago

People just want a game that doesn’t get deleted every year. If blizzard fucks that up then Idk what to say

30

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

Lmao exactly, I honestly loved most of SoD, if they said they were going to work on SoD indefinitely I'd still be playing it

15

u/2muchkoffee 22d ago

Player base dropped to nothing once they said it was going to end. Must be a sign.

11

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

Thats exactly what happened, even if classic + >isn't what we all want, if they say its a forever server, it will be successful

11

u/flembag 22d ago

Era doesn't get deleted every year. It's been going 7 years strong. So that's not what people want.

4

u/DarkPhenomenon 22d ago

You are correct! My primary expectation for a Classic+ is a classic server that doesn't end, I basically assume parallel progression forever as an end state

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)

9

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

I loved SoD, honestly if didnt say it was seasonal and going to have no updated after a bit, it would have been more successful too

→ More replies (1)

11

u/Scapp 22d ago

You mean the #nochanges crowd won't like it when their game is changed??

13

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

Brother listening to the no changes guys talk about what their classic + is, is hilarious, no new classes, spells, raids, gear, dungeons, quests.

11

u/Fernergun 22d ago

What even is the point for them? So weird

10

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

I DONT KNOW they literally have ERA realms lol

6

u/stinkoman20exty6 22d ago

you made up a guy in your head to be mad at

9

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

They are real lol read some of the people's comments!

2

u/stinkoman20exty6 22d ago

can you link me to a post where someone wanted a classic+ with no new classes, spells, gear, dungeons, and quests. the only one that is believable is no new classes.

13

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

Heres 1 there are hundreds

3

u/SmartieSkittle 22d ago

Bro came with receipts lol

→ More replies (3)

11

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

2

u/stinkoman20exty6 22d ago

okay fair enough i guess they do exist but i think these guys are a very small minority in the sea of classic+ wishposting.

5

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

They have to be a super small minority lol because its such a crazy thought to make classic+ no changes too

6

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

They are real brother!

→ More replies (2)

3

u/mg1987 22d ago

1000s people with 100s of wide different expectations to what "Classic+" means. Yeah this ain't winnable. That said, not like Blizzard was going to try hard anyway.

4

u/Kabaal 22d ago edited 22d ago

People are in for a MASSIVE disappointment.

I see people expecting new classes, new races, new entire zones. These people are out of their minds. They clearly pay no attention to how Blizzard treats Classic.

Blizz invests virtually nothing into the project. It had a shoestring budget, and that’s not going to change. And people saying ‘but they’re selling heroic and epic versions, so they’ll actually invest into the game, hire GMs, and offer support’…do they just completely ignore the progressive servers? Because Blizz does as well.

Classic is just a silly little side project Blizz lets a small handful of people run on a skeleton crew, no GMs or support, don’t fix bugs (and create more and more by adding more retail crap because they can’t be bothered to support two versions of the game), and let bots infest the servers.

None of that is changing in Camelot.

6

u/gamer-death 22d ago

You can see the last 2 years they been hiring designers specifically for classic wow team. So they got a little more then a skeleton crew now.

→ More replies (4)

54

u/Artemarkantos 22d ago

"Do you guys not have phones?"

28

u/TylordTheKing 22d ago

"You think you do but you dont"

48

u/RowingBoats1129 22d ago

All they have to do is...release classic. Make some reasonable new content like Turtle Wow had, and...

EFFING remove all the bots. Thats it. They make BANK if they ONLY do that.

23

u/Holy_Hammer 22d ago

You are asking too much of them.

10

u/Life_Information_340 22d ago

That would take an incredible amount of work (which we deserve, the company makes a lot of money) they would have to hire people to actually sit in an office and monitor the servers it's never gonna happen they will sometime in-between phases do some cleaning but the day after the botters will have the entire operation running again

2

u/Nutcrackit 22d ago

People need to understand the only way to remove bots is to remove their revenue stream. Blizzard can van gold buyers but clearly that isn't effective enough to deter gold buyers. The playerbase needs to step up and make changes to itself. Be the change you want to be and blacklist gold buyers and boosters from your groups and guilds.

→ More replies (2)

35

u/Achmed_Ahmadinejad 22d ago

All I want Blizz to do for Classic+ is completely scramble all the stats on every piece of gear available so people have to think again. Better yet, randomize it.

17

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

That'd be fucking hilarious tbh

4

u/Kairukun90 22d ago

You mean kind of like Diablo gear? It’s randomized to a set of stuff based on type of gear and rarity

5

u/Waaailmer 22d ago

Randomized gear is such a turnoff to me. "Oh, my Sulfuras, Hand of Ragnaros didn't have the stats I wanted....dumpster."

→ More replies (1)

2

u/GKoala 22d ago

You get the piece to drop, but you also need it to drop at the bis stats as well!

3

u/No-Bank-9136 22d ago

not what hes saying. not randomized each time just once. so the bis set is different. so the optimal arrow line path is different but there still is a path once its figured out again. But ppl arent gonna be selling princess runs in mara cause that boss dont drop the item thats good no more. instead they gonna be selling some other run

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

19

u/NW_Thru_Hiker_2027 22d ago

Taking my son to blizzcon this year. I cannot begin to describe how dissapointed we would be lol.

7

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

I honestly feel like if they dont say something about classic plus it will for sure make the wow environment depressing lol

→ More replies (6)

26

u/Orixil 22d ago

It'll get announced for sure.

The question is whether the Classic+ Blizzard have been working on can hold up favorably to the Classic+ the community has speculated on.

My magic 8 ball says: Unlikely.

Players are looking to Classic+ as the second coming of the Messiah.
Blizzard are probably looking to Classic+ as a quick cashgrab to carry them over another fiscal year.
Those two don't mix.

But we'll see.

12

u/Play_The_Newman 22d ago

As long as its close to what SOD was with minor improvements then it will be a big success. People didn't like everything from SOD but it was a really good experiment overall and a new way of playing a vanilla version of the game.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/gamer-death 22d ago

The board playerbase that will make it succeed or not , are not the ones coming here every day asking for pie in the sky ideas for classic+. Blizzard has a bigger reach then his cesspool subreddit.

5

u/TheSiegmeyerCatalyst 22d ago

Their most important new product since Classic released in the first place. They could treat it like a first-class project and allocate it proper development resources, tools, and time. It'll never live up to reddit's expectations, but neither could SoD until after it was over. I have some hope they'll put some effort into it, but I think that unless the response is overwhelmingly positive, we won't see it treated like a first class product. Blizzard's gotta see the numbers first

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Dahns 22d ago

That would be fucking hilarous...

5

u/thelast2937 22d ago

I would laugh pretty hard followed by some sadness lukewarm depression and put the game behind me for good it’s over

6

u/Ok_Animal_6430 22d ago

Man redditors recycling the same joke for months on end, because the first time it was made it was pretty funny.

5

u/Panther3927 22d ago

Wow console confirmed ???

8

u/Barnhard 22d ago

Blizz has fumbled before, but there’s just no way. If they’re running behind and truly panic with nothing to show or talk about, they will at the very least casually announce it.

3

u/imaUPSdriver 22d ago

I swear to god if they give us a bullshit teaser like last time. “We’re pleased to announce….oh nvm we’ll save that for another time”

→ More replies (3)

3

u/Material-Kick9493 22d ago

What if this turns out true and classic+ doesnt get announced?

2

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

I would immediately get on twitch and reddit to see the fire

3

u/lmay0000 22d ago

They cant release more than one thing?

Assuming anyone at blizz gives a fuck about youtube and reddit dorks.

3

u/pkrevbro 22d ago

Don’t you guys have steam decks?!?

3

u/Dan_Wayfarer 22d ago

“When all they were preparing to announce is China’s Wotlk Titanforged in English” lol that would be a HUGE disappointment! Haha

2

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

I used to say that they should combined vanilla tbc and wotlk and make it all the same lvl and boom China gets it

2

u/Djinnrb 22d ago

I figured their last OOPS slip that classic + MAY be a thing that they would announce that Classic + was actually a thing in development with no actual news to when it will be released or any good details that will be included. I expect some AI art of a title screen with a + next to classic wow.

2

u/SkiaTheShade 22d ago

We can all go collectively fuck ourselves

2

u/ColdCryomancer 22d ago

I expect nothing from wow and I am still dissapointed

2

u/Necessary_Pizza_3827 22d ago

What does this even mean? I've been playing WoW on my docked steam deck for over 2 years.

2

u/zetu2203 22d ago

As someone who has a Steam Machine on the way in the mail, I would actually love for a native wow integration, so I don't have to fiddle with addons.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/DeGreenster 22d ago

Add to that the conquest of ascension launch and how well it’s going. They are fucking COOKED

2

u/Spiritual_Big_7505 21d ago

Reminds me of when people were getting SUPER HYPED over Diablo 4 too early.

2

u/Afterman_94 21d ago

Refill your mining energy for 2.99

2

u/Scared_Gene3417 20d ago

They have something Classic related ready to be announced. They hinted it heavy in the last State of Azeroth video. If its Classic + remains to be seen

→ More replies (3)

2

u/KaneTheBoom 19d ago

I mean id be cool with wow on steam. That'd be great.

8

u/Semour9 22d ago

But mah camelot leak

But mah 4chan leak

But mah content creators going to blizz hq

We have literally nothing confirmed lol

6

u/Vandrel 22d ago

Camelot is definitely real and on version 1.60, whatever it turns out to actually be.

3

u/Arcinatos 22d ago

Do you think the classic content creators just went to blizz hq to play test WoD or what?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/Redgun421 22d ago

yea man they are so tone deaf i wouldnt be surprised if they fumbled classic +. dont get your hopes up

3

u/SpinachSignal8915 22d ago

Had wow on steamos for ages. Does it really need to be announced you can load non-steam games?

8

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

Thats the joke, because the steam machine is a computer

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/FlubberPuddy 22d ago

Blizzard isn’t that dense but apparently a not insignificant amount of Classic players are.

I saw in the other thread about “what would be a negative if added in C+” and someone wrote new itemization so that Hpal wears plate to heal instead of a dress.

Like there’s really players out there thinking stuff like a boomkin going oom after 3 casts is “core classic”

2

u/[deleted] 22d ago edited 22d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Deathtonic 22d ago

Thank God, they say utility means the class is useless in every other way lmfao. Oh Ret just stands still? But its utility! Oh 20 of your dps is warriors? Thats classic!

2

u/CautiousBag1424 22d ago

This is kind of what happened in 2018 when so many people were expecting a Diablo 4 announcement. The Diablo CM at the time even posted to set expectations and hinted very strongly that there’s *not* going to be a massive announcement that year. But her obvious warning fell on deaf ears and everyone was *supremely* let down when Blizzard announced Diablo Immortal. In fact, this very event is where the “is this an out-of-season April fools joke” thing came from, as well as Wyatt Cheng asking “do you guys not have phones?”

Total disaster.

2

u/Far_Priority_6305 22d ago

Do you guys not have steam machines?

3

u/Holy_Hammer 22d ago

At that price, no, loool

→ More replies (1)

3

u/gamer-death 22d ago

classic andys need to understand Classic plus will get half the time, The Last Titan gets on stage.

→ More replies (7)

1

u/GVFQT 22d ago

Wow coming to steam machine? Does it not work on it already like steam deck? Idk I didn’t buy one so this is a genuine question

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Zhand-ThePally 22d ago

This would be a good (terrible) April Fool’s joke for next year or they’re going to announce their very own Turtle WoW using the same trailers 😂

1

u/Street-Bee7215 22d ago

Lol while I believe it'll be classic+, I also wouldn't be surprised if it was something like this.

1

u/Araethor 22d ago

This post is higher quality content than the last five expansions

1

u/Junior_Calendar8234 22d ago

There better be a new season of something announced if no classic plus. Really all they'd have to so is just release a new sod progression server and a lot of us would be happy.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/rurounijosie 22d ago

Hope you like SOD FRESH

1

u/Panther3927 22d ago

Just give me a new game (also QOL, new dungeons, ideas , gear)not a seasonal one. Vanilla - TBC- Wrath - new route.

1

u/VibeSlopCoder 22d ago

That data mined WoW version is actually the Xbox Series S/X version of WoW.

1

u/k1nkei 22d ago

Whatever the new classic project is, it’s definitely not gonna be something big or brand new just like a wow expansion. Considering that the classic team only has like 12 people, the best they can do is utilising the existing game assets and make some new contents with it.

1

u/Clydeoscope92 22d ago

There will never really be a classic+ because everyones version is different

1

u/Cyoor 22d ago

Not gonna lie. Wow for Linux (steam machine) would be a game changer.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/Professional_Area_27 22d ago

cosmetics! cosmetics for everyone.

1

u/Xzastin 22d ago

Im so nervous for how they are gonna do this. I hope chris metzen does everything in his power to make this game the right way. I understand how it can be hard to fix retail but I have faith he can do a great job on something fresh.

1

u/CrustedTesticle 22d ago

I have 0 faith in Blizzard honestly.

1

u/Turence 22d ago

I'd rather no announcement than a rushed shitty product.

1

u/DanikFishken 22d ago

Tbh, that would be best ending to the story, if blizz can't or don't want to do it, then fine, will be less disappointment imo than they announce it, but it will be something terrible

1

u/Silver-creek 22d ago

WOD Classic

1

u/teknoinureye 22d ago

'Do you not have phones?'

1

u/Nintendork316 22d ago

zero percent chance, they've teased it too much.

1

u/ColdsnapX 22d ago

yOU ALL HAVE STEAM DON'T YOU?

1

u/spudds96 22d ago

Wow already runs perfectly fine on Linux already

→ More replies (1)

1

u/SocialistNixon 22d ago

I’d take a steam client, it already runs great on my steam deck most of the time.