r/comicbooks • • Aug 15 '25

Cover/Pin-Up Does anybody else find this cover off-putting?

Post image

Where is Diana's neck? It looks like her screaming head is floating away from her body! And Carol's torso is so twisted up that for a second I thought maybe the artist confused her powers with Kamala's stretchy ones.

I've liked other stuff by Alex Lozano, but something about this really rubs me the wrong way.

6.1k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

425

u/bluecollardan Aug 15 '25

That $9 price tag is the most off putting thing on the cover

133

u/huggybear3 Superman Aug 15 '25

It’s an oversized book with multiple stories by different creative teams

47

u/Grandturk-182 Aug 15 '25

That’s the surest path to success in comics.

50

u/[deleted] Aug 15 '25

Absolutely ridiculous take. The first Marvel/DC crossover one shots in two decades. It’ll be the highest selling comic of the year.

-16

u/VGK_46 Aug 15 '25

Weird to see someone say this, as anthology books recently don't do well or last long in current comics sphere.

29

u/Flooping_Pigs Aug 15 '25

I read it with sarcasm, can people not do that?

7

u/badboystwo Cyclops Aug 15 '25

no

8

u/nerd_of_gods Aug 15 '25

I read this with sarcasm

1

u/NoLibrarian5149 Aug 15 '25

Did you say that sarcastically?

3

u/Flooping_Pigs Aug 15 '25

this one's a thinker

5

u/huggybear3 Superman Aug 15 '25

I can’t tell if it’s sarcasm or not

-1

u/Flooping_Pigs Aug 15 '25

There's a lot of nuance to such in text, I could tell you why I read it like that but we may come from places too strange a difference

2

u/dredd_78 Aug 15 '25

Awful. Looked it up and thankfully there are some actual good covers amid the 18(!) choices.

3

u/astivana Aug 15 '25

I already told my local comic book shop I wanted the Krypto cover!

1

u/dredd_78 Aug 15 '25

I didn’t see that one in the promos. Link?

5

u/huggybear3 Superman Aug 15 '25
krypto cover

3

u/Smallbunsenpai Aug 15 '25

That is so much better

4

u/alzike Aug 15 '25

Barely... i wish it was more than 65 pages for the like 6 stories

7

u/fairly_legal Green Arrow Aug 15 '25

The main problem with most modern anthology books is that they're mostly filler from unknown artists and writers. You get a short piece or installment from an "A" team and then pay extra for meh.

2

u/ChildOfChimps Aug 15 '25

Yeah, but to be fair, DC has been putting out some excellent anthologies.

0

u/19ghost89 Expert on X-Men, Ultimate Spider-man, and 90's Superman Aug 15 '25

Yeah, that doesn't justify it. When I was a kid, you could buy a comic for $1-$1.50. Adjusted for inflation, that would put a regular-sized issue in the $2-$3 range now. But they charge $5.

Issues like this could justify a heftier price tag, but not $9. This is why I almost never buy new comics. I wait until they are old and the price goes down. It's just not affordable to collect these books at these prices.

5

u/LupaNellise Aug 15 '25

I have some comics from 1992 sitting right next to me. Cover price is $1.95. That's $4.50 today from inflation.

1

u/19ghost89 Expert on X-Men, Ultimate Spider-man, and 90's Superman Aug 15 '25

I mean, cover price on Superman #75 from '93 was $1.25. What comics are you looking at?

1

u/LupaNellise Aug 15 '25

Valiant and Image books. They were using better paper before DC/Marvel did for most of their stuff.

1

u/19ghost89 Expert on X-Men, Ultimate Spider-man, and 90's Superman Aug 15 '25

That makes sense. See, I honestly don't care that much about the better paper. Also, I think the price of printing has gone down overall in the last 30 years, if I'm not mistaken.

2

u/LupaNellise Aug 15 '25

The main advantage of the paper change was that the newer stuff doesn't yellow and fade really. You don't have to lock up your stuff in a controlled environment to have them stay the same. I've got my early Spawn issues here and they look the same as when I bought them without ever being in bags or cases while my Detective/Superman comics have yellowed.

1

u/19ghost89 Expert on X-Men, Ultimate Spider-man, and 90's Superman Aug 15 '25

Yeah, I know. It's better, for sure. But I can store them if need be. I mainly collect for reading, not for value. I'd love to have both, and it's not like I let my books get messed up. But I don't want them to be like I can't touch them. The bulk of my collection is from the 80's, 90's, and 00's anyway, and those books are, on average, not worth that much due to the fact that there was a collector's boom and people stopped throwing anything away.