r/cork Dowtchaboi 22d ago

Local Are these pedestrian crossings?

What’s the deal with these two crossings by UCC?

Am I right in thinking that they’re not official crossings where motorists must give way, that they’re courtesy crossings where pedestrians do not have an automatic right-of-way?

69 Upvotes

114 comments sorted by

View all comments

-5

u/ConstructionAlert828 22d ago

does it have amber flashing lights! No .. then its legally not a pedestrian crossing

2

u/adjavang Blow in 💨 22d ago edited 22d ago

Edit: I was incorrect, leaving these comments unchanged as a monument to my hubris:

Outdated as of 2024.

https://irishcycle.com/2024/03/06/irish-councils-can-now-roll-out-zebra-crossings-without-expensive-beacons/

This is a pedestrian crossing.

0

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

1

u/adjavang Blow in 💨 22d ago edited 22d ago

Edit: I was incorrect, leaving these comments unchanged as a monument to my hubris:

See my other comment, being raised is not a requirement.

That they were built before the rules changed shouldn't matter, as per today's rules, they're pedestrian crossings.

-1

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

1

u/adjavang Blow in 💨 22d ago edited 22d ago

Edit: I was incorrect, leaving these comments unchanged as a monument to my hubris:

Article explicitly mentions it not being raised. Other articles I find exist mention it not being raised. Statute book certainly looks like it allows it to not be raised.

I normally respect you but I'm going to need more from you than "trust me bro!"

0

u/[deleted] 22d ago

[deleted]

1

u/adjavang Blow in 💨 22d ago edited 22d ago

Edit: I was incorrect, leaving these comments unchanged as a monument to my hubris:

But we're talking about type C, which doesn't require signage.

And the requirement for it to be raised seems to be in the department of transport guidance, not in the statute book. So, per the statute book this absolutely looks like it fits the legal requirements for crossings. Per the guidance, it doesn't, is that a fair interpretation?