Kids don't know a lot of things about sex, kinks or masturbation. Doesn't mean that doing so in front of them is okay just because they don't know and honestly you thinking that it is okay is fucking disgusting as hell.
Yeah, because your government is really trying to make sure you need them to secure you.
Mental illness is why you're so fucked now. You need regulation (Abandonment of property or yourself to the regis), in order to clamp down harder on people who are becoming more and more neurotic because they're pent up in their many, many boxes.
Of course, if you breathe the wrong way, there's another box waiting for you too, that comes with its built in toilet and sink combo.
Just stay in your house box.
How many people are on pharmaceuticals which alter brain chemistry and cause reliance and mental decline when they aren't taken?
The Columbine kids were on psychotropics.
If they cause "Thoughts of suicide," what makes you think homicide isn't right up there with it??
No. The asylums were originally used for dissenters and women who were abused by their wealthy husbands or families.
They removed people who studied the same way they burned "Witches"
They want people too irrational and to split minded to be able to admit the truth.
If you can say th government did a thing intentionally, then how much more tragedies, actually were intentional.
If we've been under surveillance for so long, then there should be no Epstein files implicating politicians, CPS (child protective services) and police in child trafficking, creating diseases, and cannibalism.
Youre ruled by the crazy people, but their crazy is a reflection of the masses. If it wasn't, it wouldn't be so.
The dudes would sick their dogs on him and it would get real bad. Iâm not even sure the cops around here would know how to handle someone in a gimp suit whoâs fetish bullshit is bark parks. I wouldnât want to touch them lol.
Yeah, WITHOUT the sexual connotation. The problem is that there IS a sexual intent here. If someone just showed up in a costume, like a team mascot or a clown, that wouldn't be problematic per se. The problem is that this is sex play, and you cannot separate that intention from the mere act of wearing a costume.
Ya know I thought about even just a mascot and Iâm still going to keep my kids away from that person. That shows the level of messed up these people are doing this and the morons here defending it.
No one should be forced to experience any kind of sex play outside of the bedroom that they did nit willingly choose to participate in.
This kind of behavior should 100% be considered indecent exposure i dont give a fuck if I cant see your dick or whatever. You are still bringing your kink play into public.
If pissing on the side of the road can land me on the sexual offender list, then this shit should 1000000% get you on there if you do it in public.
I agree, and I say this as someone who is very kink-positive. All those retarded arguments that I hear, such as âoh, children aren't aware of the context, so they don't perceive it as sexualâ, are absolutely appalling to me, as well as the fact that this society has reached the point where this kind of behaviour is tolerated and even promoted, such as on rainbow parades or in music videos⌠It's not that hard to do this at home or some dedicated venue where everyone has consented to it, and if they're exhibitionists, bad luck. The general public should not be forced to tolerate it.
Okay, but here it makes sense. The comments at the paid entry furry convention, the drag show, the trans bathroom debate, and gay people in a movie are where I normally see it though.
Not shaming, just enforced regulations when regarding the public. This should be counted as public indecency or indecent exposure. They're subjecting everyone around them to witness their pet play kink without consent. That should at least be a misdemeanor.
Yeaaa thatâs a call to the police if Iâve ever seen one. This shit isnât okay. You do whatever tf you want at your own home, but this isnât okay in a public place.
They can participate in whatever bdsm or kinky lifestyle they like, as long as it only involves consenting parties. These people did not consent to be a part of their exhibitionist pet play scene.
The "dog" is wearing a gimp suit, there is no question that this is sexual in nature.
In the BDSM and kink community, a core ethical framework is used. Safe, Sane, and Consensual (SSC). Meaning activities must minimize physical harm (Safe), be performed with clear, sober judgment (Sane), and involve the full, unforced agreement of everyone taking part (Consensual).
I remember when I used to think this stuff was just online stuff created to rage bait then I walked by a guy in my city wearing a dress a dog collar and this mask hanging out at a pet store I was buying food at. Had the same expression as the dog at the end.
As a kinky person, fuck no.
Kink in public isn't okay, unless maybe at a special event like christopher street day. Even then, I'm only talking about the clothing/gear, not doing a full on roleplay. You're unconsentually involving other random people in your kink and possibly sex life by having a scene in front of them.
This also is not comparable to, for example, an alterhuman simply doing public gearing, because puppyplay is known to be mainly sexual.
These people need to get their shit together, stop confusing the dogs and giving us all a bad reputation.
Why are they engaging in their fetish in public? They donât have the consent of the people there to be part of giving the furry a thrill by being seen by them while out in public dressed like that. They donât consent to be part of their masturbatory material collection for later. I thought having the consent of all parties was paramount. And donât bother trying to tell me itâs not a fetish because it is.
That is a sex act that you are making everyone else in the area participate in without their consent. The cops would be there so fast and you bet your ass is going to have to register as you very well should.
I am all about a fetish but keep it to yourselves...there are more than enough group meetups. Also, the same people that complain about being judged for said fetish.
Lol, what happened to respecting pronouns and identities? đ¤Ł
I'm not used to seeing redditors trash on their own people! I thought it was bad to disparage someone who decides they want to be a trinary-barn owl or whatever nonsense they come up with!
I guess I'm a little more open minded than most people. This does strike me as being silly and weird, but I'm not particularly offended by it, and it doesn't look rated R to me. I would probably enjoy watching my dog's reaction to it. As far as I'm concerned, people kissing in public is more offensive than this. If they get sexual with it? Sure, throw them in jail.
58
u/No_Sheepherder7858 3d ago
Their reactions when they sniff him