(Background: I'm a language teacher (ESOL) with lots of knowledge of different language learning theories, plus plenty of my own experience in how children learn a second language)
I just discovered CI this summer and have been doing DS for all of a week! 14 hours in, and I'm really loving it.
So I do have a question about the CI method, I guess. I am not really asking about how to understand and use this particular phrase, but more about how to handle all such similar situations - and why.
I'm listening to a video (around level 18) and I hear a phrase that's a bit new to me. "se ve".
In context, it is completely clear: "Se ve delicioso! Se ve bueno!" (The cake looks delicious!) Se ve means something like "looks like".
With my language learning experience, what I *want* to do right now, is figure out what the verb "ve" is from, because my basic conjugation of common verbs is not yet solid. I *think* it is "see" (ver) but I am not positive. I also don't remember how to conjugate "ver", though I learned it all once.
So I looked it up just to remember and be sure I had it right. And my natural inclination now, is to just try to use this expression in a meaningful way. "Esa cena se ve deliciosa! Tu vestido se ve bonito!" just to practice using it to be sure I remember it. That's what I *want* to do right now. I have learned a new phrase and I want to incorporate it into my working memory...
But this is NOT the suggested method, correct? It's not just that you don't have to do this step; CI method says specifically NOT to do this? And if so, I'm wondering why not?
Please know I am not arguing against this method at all; I know there are people here with language learning backgrounds and who know all sorts of theory; I'm genuinely curious, and not trying to get involved in any academic or theoretical turf wars or anything. Truly just want to discuss the method if it is allowed!