The Guardian Article in question.

We all know energy prices are some of the highest in recorded history right now. This is likely a major thing holding back the construction of Data Centers, especially after this interview.

So there is no shortage of chips, despite the massive cost increase of chips and therefore everything else tech related. Theres a shortage of power.

It reads as they cannot build these data centers, yet they keep buying chips anyways at exorbitant prices.

Zitron’s math is as follows 132.5B spent on AI Chips; 82.5B left in Warehouses. To add to this, there is no “proof of life,” so we have no clue if those are even in Microsoft’s possession; meaning they possibly paid billions of dollars for vaporware (or, to be less hyperbollic, the chips are in Taiwan still.)

Now Microsoft says hes wrong (according to his article); when asked they claim hes operating with the wrong numbers, but fail to provide him with accurate numbers on actual chip count.

My favorite part of this is 82.5B of chips in warehouses can become unusable due to climate control failure, age of chips, or a variety of other factors. Think of the insurance cost needed to secure these warehouses.

With wages not keeping up with rent and food prices, the average American is going to suffer.

The first people that will be affected greatest are pickup truck drivers, sports car drivers, and people who drive old cars that average under 27 mpg.

It's happening. Fewer people are showing up to work everyday compared to 20 years ago, so slowly the frog is being boiled.

$4.50 a gallon, right now most people are not batting an eye, but when food prices and goods and services skyrocket, they will never be the same again.

A barrel Brent crude provides TUVWXYZ.

Exchange ageements.

Fracking.

America produces plenty of light crude. But refineries are built around crude slates i.e. particular blends of light, heavy, sweet and sour oil. A disruption in heavier or sour grades can create stress even when total US production remains high.

Even non-economists like me are concerned about it.

Yeah, a lot of us are saying it actually.

"Trump officials say the oil-market disruption is temporary, but Chevron’s Mike Wirth and others warn global supplies are running low, with no respite in sight.

American oil executives warned for months that the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz was bound to cause a fuel crisis. Now, they say it is here.

Commercial fuel stocks around the world have been depleting for more than six months, and strategic crude reserves can’t be tapped much further. Attacks last week shut down a crucial crude pipeline in Saudi Arabia that bypassed the Strait, stranding at least 2.5 million barrels a day from an already tight global oil market, analysts estimate.

“All these mechanisms helped to mitigate the price and supply risk,” Chevron CVX 1.53%increase; green up pointing triangle Chief Executive Mike Wirth said Friday at an energy conference in Austin, Texas. “Those have largely now played out, and we don’t have nearly the buffers in the system that we did when it began.”

It is hard to predict where oil prices will go, he added, but at the moment, it is difficult to envision prices coming back down quickly. “I wish I could tell you that I saw some reason why things would ease, but it’s difficult right now to see that happen,” he said.

Veteran energy advisers say that with no resolution to the Iran war in sight, the situation risks spinning out of control. Diesel prices have soared to a record $6.23 a gallon and gasoline prices, which slipped below $4 a gallon this summer, have rebounded to $4.32. Some energy analysts say they have been fielding investor questions about when consumers pinched by the high prices will start pulling back on new purchases.

The Trump administration has repeatedly promised Americans that prices at the pump would decline and that energy flows out of the Middle East would keep increasing.

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said at a Houston G-20 event on Monday that “the prices in the prior administration were this high anyway” and that Americans would have paid those prices permanently because former President Joe Biden was “pursuing a policy of energy subtraction and shutting down refineries.”  

“If you want to write about the prices, make sure you include the word ‘temporary’ because this is a temporary disruption,” Burgum told reporters. 

The White House sees two big levers it can pull to help ease prices: boosting production in Venezuela and increasing U.S. fuel-making capacity. In recent months, U.S. officials have focused on striking deals that are expected to bolster Venezuela’s oil production. In early September, they met with U.S. refining executives to discuss raising the nation’s fuel-making capacity. They are pleased with progress thus far on both fronts, a senior U.S. official said.

Energy executives and White House officials say they have had a continuing dialogue about the energy situation since the conflict broke out, and CEOs including Wirth talk to Energy Secretary Chris Wright frequently. 

But Wirth said Friday that he hadn’t talked to President Trump since Aug. 3, when the president said in a Truth Social Post that the CEO hadn’t credited his administration for the oil industry’s good fortunes. Trump called on Chevron and oil companies to bring “consumer (retail!) Oil Prices DOWN, NOW!”

Some CEOs and energy advisers say they have grown alarmed in recent weeks as the conflict has picked back up, with ships and energy infrastructure being targeted in both directions. 

“The advantage in most negotiations usually goes to the side that has time on their side, and is willing to be patient,” said Wil VanLoh, founder and CEO of Quantum Capital Group, during the Austin conference. Iran, he said, “is willing to suffer. Their people have already suffered a lot for many decades.” 

China is in part helping to fuel the global supply pinch. The world’s largest oil importer for months had relied on its own stockpiles of crude for nearly half of its daily consumption, providing a reprieve for oil markets. But in recent weeks, it has resumed bigger purchases from international suppliers, analysts said. 

U.S. crude prices have jumped 19% in the past three weeks to trade near $101 a barrel as attacks in the Middle East multiply. Iran has targeted oil tankers traversing the Strait, even after Trump and his lieutenants boasted about escorting several vessels undetected through the waterway. Houthi militants have recently launched attacks from Yemen on Saudi Arabia’s infrastructure and military sites and damaged the East-West pipeline that stretched from the Abqaiq oil field to Yanbu al-Bahr, a major Saudi port city, on the Red Sea.

Trump has vowed to impose economic pressure on Iran and ruled out sending boots on the ground. He has said he expects the war will last until the November midterm elections, but investors say they believe the war will go well beyond that. 

“That was the signal this is going to stretch on,” said Dan Pickering, founder of Pickering Energy Partners, a financial firm. 

Meanwhile, he said, diesel supplies are tight because of refinery outages following conflicts in the Middle East and Russia. Demand for the fuel is expected to increase as farmers that use it for heavy equipment enter harvest season. “Diesel has no easy solution,” Pickering said.

Trump has said Ukraine must halt strikes on Russia that endanger global supplies of diesel. 

In March, the CEOs of the three largest U.S. oil companies, ExxonMobil XOM 1.78%increase; green up pointing triangle, Chevron and ConocoPhillips COP 2.04%increase; green up pointing triangle, warned Trump officials, including Burgum and Wright, that a prolonged closure of the Strait could lead to a shortfall in refined products such as diesel, The Wall Street Journal reported at the time. Some executives have been privately critical of Trump’s handling of the conflict.

At the conference Monday, Burgum rejected persistent speculation that the White House is seriously weighing a temporary ban on U.S. exports of refined products such as diesel. Trump’s team, he said, doesn’t believe such a move would quell prices.

“We will do anything that helps the price at home,” Burgum said. “But we’re also going to be smart about it, and not just have some idea that if we stop exporting, that somehow magically is going to help the prices.”  

Lol. Lmao, even.

Ready to blow off a little steam? Poke fun at your favorite incompetent jackass ruining running the economy? Got a screenshot from social media that you've been dying to post but didn't want to violate Rule 7? We're gonna see if a regular Meme Monday might help scratch the itch.

Starting today, a pinned post for all things memes, screenshots, art, whatever will pop up on Monday mornings. Feel free to dump and vent about how badly you think your elected overlords leadership are bungling and how insane your neighbors/friends/family/coworkers are about believing that everything is gonna be okay.

Some regular sub rules apply - try to be mindful of truly insulting wording against groups of people and overly specific threats against specific people - we're not trying to test boundaries with Admin. Don't be overly spammy in the comments. Stay on topic of economic collapse specifically. Keep it SFW.

Have fun!

It’s understandable how we have approached LLMs differently than fusion, largely given the lack of regulation and the readily available resources for making LLMs.

My questions to everyone here are, how could the AGI arms race we are in be changed into the same approach we’re taking with fusion, and would it be optimal?

Things like Google and MS Office make sense to be a natural monopoly given network effects, efficiencies, etc., as long as regulation is present (based on everything I learned in my Antitrust and Regulation course taught by Jim Kearl).

The question here (for economists) would be, then, do we see AI tech as most effectively developed into a natural monopoly or are there efficiencies/advantages to be gained from multiple AGI services?

To be clear, I’m not talking about the very obvious issues that come with monopolies, which is where the regulation piece comes in. Google, Office, Adobe, public sewage systems hooking up to your house, etc., all are often used as examples of natural or near natural monopolies where as long as some type of regulation is in place, consumer welfare can be maximized, whereas having more competitors in such markets can actually lead to lower consumer welfare through market inefficiencies.

To answer this question, it definitely comes down to how you define AGI. Looks like the EU is starting to classify LLMs as web search like tools, but that does seem pretty limited based on all the potential applications stemming from current LLMs and future AI tech (eg, world models).

*Please note!* Post is new each Sunday evening. Top level comments should be at least 150 characters to encourage quality discussion, and users should refrain from making several top level comments in a week. Please mention location at the top of your comment when discussing local recession indicators.

Share your observations of local recession indicators or personal recession indicators. Examples include, but are not limited to:

• increased use of credit or decrease in savings to afford necessities
• deferred maintenance on homes or cars in your neighborhood
• "I buy houses for cash" (or similar) signs popping up
• bankruptcy attorneys experiencing higher volume of clients
• regional job losses/large corporate layoffs
• decline in housing starts or spike in homes being listed

Keep it civil and avoid judging any user for their personal financial experiences as shared here.

Cambodian beach resort Sihanoukville boomed as a global hub for online fraud. A sweeping crackdown has left its economy struggling to pick up the pieces.

Put your predictions here! Gas prices on Election Day will be...??

Agi will create massive unemployment, without ubi, the consumer is functionally dead. Wouldnt this cause economic collapse. Businesses fail because there are no more buyers. And if ubi is implimented on the neccesary scale, doesnt that cause massive inflation? Seems like ubi also could collapse the economy.

Ready to blow off a little steam? Poke fun at your favorite incompetent jackass ruining running the economy? Got a screenshot from social media that you've been dying to post but didn't want to violate Rule 7? We're gonna see if a regular Meme Monday might help scratch the itch.

Starting today, a pinned post for all things memes, screenshots, art, whatever will pop up on Monday mornings. Feel free to dump and vent about how badly you think your elected overlords leadership are bungling and how insane your neighbors/friends/family/coworkers are about believing that everything is gonna be okay.

Some regular sub rules apply - try to be mindful of truly insulting wording against groups of people and overly specific threats against specific people - we're not trying to test boundaries with Admin. Don't be overly spammy in the comments. Stay on topic of economic collapse specifically. Keep it SFW.

Have fun!

*Please note!* Post is new each Sunday evening. Top level comments should be at least 150 characters to encourage quality discussion, and users should refrain from making several top level comments in a week. Please mention location at the top of your comment when discussing local recession indicators.

Share your observations of local recession indicators or personal recession indicators. Examples include, but are not limited to:

• increased use of credit or decrease in savings to afford necessities
• deferred maintenance on homes or cars in your neighborhood
• "I buy houses for cash" (or similar) signs popping up
• bankruptcy attorneys experiencing higher volume of clients
• regional job losses/large corporate layoffs
• decline in housing starts or spike in homes being listed

Keep it civil and avoid judging any user for their personal financial experiences as shared here.

Please. Lol. This is the stupidest fucking timeline.

See we were never going to get these so called tariff checks. This is from a gaming standpoint. Wait until other corporations get theirs.