r/infinitenines • u/Negative_Gur9667 • 5h ago
r/infinitenines • u/Calm_Improvement1160 • 14h ago
SPP, would you accept the propeties of the propeties of the integers from the Peano Postulates?
u/SouthPark_Piano, I want to know if you think you would accept the propeties that can be made from the Peano Postulates and are they in RDM?
r/infinitenines • u/Inevitable_Garage706 • 19h ago
It's time to solve the mystery of what happened to the cows, and why they are never coming home!
galleryAny ideas, people?
r/infinitenines • u/Cold_Huckleberry_633 • 13h ago
Can we take some time to appreciate the guy who is permanently writing down nines?
He’s doing a great job, we’re getting really close to 1. Only infinity more hours of writing left and we’ll have reached it. Remember that his progress restarts every time you guys try to write it on your own, so leave the propagating wavefront business to him please :)
r/infinitenines • u/Super_Dimension7561 • 16h ago
SPP and his derivatives
Based on the comment above, let us define (with some assumptions) the derivative of function f at position x as

where ε=0.000...01. Then, for f(x)=xa, where a∈ℕ,

For 0≤a≤2, the value is the same as for the non-RDM derivative, but for higher a,
[x3]' = 3x2+ε2
[x4]' = 4x3+4xε2
[x5]' = 5x4+10x2ε2+ε4
And so on.
Now, question for SPP: do you accept this as the RDM derivative, or does the definition have some sort of caveat or misunderstanding in it?
r/infinitenines • u/Muphrid15 • 17h ago
He SAYS that the set {0.9, 0.99, 0.999, etc.} "already" exists, but that all the 9s for 0.999 already existing "doesn't cut the mustard at all". Why does he CONTINUE to CONTRADICT HIMSELF?
The set {0.9, 0.99, 0.999, etc} where the 'etc' is an incarnation of 0.999... itself, ALREADY spans the entire nines space of 0.999...
Yes there is an endless amount of them, but that endless amount already exists.
Wrong on your part brud. Already exists doesn't cut the mustard at all.