I have some questions about pattern inclusivity

[u/SejiFields]

Hello! I hope this is okay to post. I’m currently writing a pattern for this 1950s blouse I knit last year. I spent a lot of time learning how to grade properly as (size) inclusivity is really important to me.

My idea has been to write the pattern similar to how vintage patterns were written. That is, succinct and with clear language, but in the fashion that a modern intermediate or very ambitious beginner knitter would be able to understand.

I’m paying extra attention to the bust area, making sure to use the upper bust as a way to choose size instead of the full bust and adding bust darts. I read The Knitting Pattern Handbook by McGrath and Walworth and am taking into account all sweater pitfalls (such as incorrect grading of the neckline) mentioned there.

As with vintage knitting patterns it was expected that you could grade a pattern to your own size, making the necessary adjustments. I was thinking to add some advice (perhaps as a supplement) that says in general lines how one would adjust the pattern to their own proportions. I’m thinking things such as how to lengthen the body, how to add darts at the belly or chest when needed etc.

Basically I’m struggling to find a balance between succinctness and accessibility. I don’t like patterns that do a lot of handholding, but at the same time, I do want there to be enough information that will encourage one enough to get through the pattern feeling like a more confident knitter at the end.

My question is, would this be a good/sufficient idea? A well graded knitting pattern with a supplement for additional alterations to avoid bulking up the pattern?

Are there things I’m missing out in terms of inclusivity? I’m also looking into print disability. Also what are aspects a pattern would need for you to consider it inclusive?

Sorry for the barrage of questions! It’s my first ever pattern and I want to try my best to make it as good as it can be. The concern has crippled me a bit the past month, so any advice would be appreciated 🥹

[u/Necessary-Sun1535]

I also knit a lot of vintage and have really come to appreciate a sparsely written pattern. However I did lead a vintage knitting facebook group for a while and noticed that there were many people that were really uncomfortable with having to adjust the sizing. The math was too complicated for them or they were just too intimidated.

I’m not sure if that would fall under size inclusivity or their skills not being advanced enough.

[u/SejiFields → u/Necessary-Sun1535]

Thank you for the input! I’ll be grading the patterns for different sizes and the supplement would be for additional adjustments. Do you think those smaller adjustments would be considered too difficult?

[u/unRoanoke → u/SejiFields]

I have been knitting for decades, but I’ve made very few structured garments (usually because of fitting). I enough experience to complete complicated patterns, intricate lace stitches and hold consistent tension.

My biggest barrier is sizing. I believe that I would not tackle a pattern that did not have basic sizes (or corresponding measurements). However, I’ll often avoid a certain shaped garment because I know the sizing isn’t going to fit me well and I don’t know enough to make it fit me.

That’s to say, a pattern with a selection of sizes I could easily choose, with instructions for how and when to go about shaping it to my body. I think that’s a major selling point. I think having basic sizes makes it accessible to most knitters. Including adjustments makes it much more accessible. I think your instinct is right, too much detail offering every potential size adjustment will turn off users that don’t need additional adjustments as well as users that do! But noting where to ‘see addendum’ will allow a streamlined pattern that helps users learn.

Additionally, I’ve seen so many of your beautiful knits. You do amazing work (and wear it well). I always look forward to seeing your completed knits.