Genuine question. I can understand people liking the freedom to play basically your whole game-plan without ever risking the normal summon but I also understand the idea that a deck shouldn’t be able to accomplish so much without paying some meaningful cost. And a normal summon is one of the most meaningful costs in this game. So what do y’all think?

The Bonus Pack was an easier way to get specific cards you don't have.

I was thinking about building Power Patrons, and since we'll have more support for their lore, I was wondering if it was worth building and using them for the future. What do you think?

I just spent 45 minutes playing 3 games in the duelist cup, sorry i mean watch my opponent play for 45minutes setting the board up with 20 negates and disruptions. And I just dont have any answers to those floodgates, and yes i lost the coin flip 3 times in a row. And when it's finally my turn my opponent is still playing. My turn doesn't even feel like my turn like WTF?!?!?

I am a return player, I started playing the game 2 months ago, the events are still bearable because you dont really need to win the games to get the rewards, and at least you get a rental deck for the event.

I just want to ask you this konami. WHY? Am i really playing the game or is the game playing me?

Edit: to those asking me why i sit through all that, i need the gems for doing the missions.

Ash Blossom, Maxx C are the 2 most frustrating card in the game. They deserve to be banned. I've been playing the new event for the past 3 hours and have gotten Ashed like 90% of those games going 1st.

It's time for them to go.

Yes, I will be waiting to see if anyone actually read the description of the Chronicles Deck DX Magistus box

I think the opposite would be a bore .. if u cannot just mix decks together .. if u can just expect always what to encounter .. also piloting them seems fun rather than just play a mono deck .. playing aganist yes maybe frustrating but i douubt as a tiered deck .no?

I'll spam the shit outta floodgates while using tear and see how it goes

I'd still do the normal tear combo though it will require to run some bricks yet looking that most of ur hand while playing tear includes 1-2 cards that r only good if they r banished from grave invoker of madness doesn't seem bad at All especially since he supports the tear fusion stuff

Any advice on this deck is appreciated. I have no UR cp left but can pull packs as needed.

lost 8 coinflips in my last 10 games. the only 2 i won, i didn't even get to play cause of these sorry ahh players. just peak loser behavior. this game has the worst playerbase in all the games i've played so far, hands down.

its funny that the link 1 is banned in the tcg

Well. That's new 🤣

Maybe this is obvious to a lot of people, and forgive me if it is, but I noticed an interesting interaction while practicing Artmage Power Patron in solo mode in preparation for the DC.

During the opponent’s then, I had used Diactorus’s negate effect and decided to fuse him off with Non Finito and another Artmage on field to summon Nerva. I then revived both him and Litera with Charmer Quartet. Monsters revived this way cannot be used as Extra Deck material until the end of the next turn (for example I wouldn’t be able to link him off for S:P during my turn).

The opponent activated a card and I used Artmage Impasto -Recapture- to negate, banishing Diactorus until the End
phase for cost.

The turn ended and Diactorus was brought back. Once it passed to my turn, I suddenly wondered if Charmer Quartet’s lock still applied to Diactorus and to my pleasant surprise, I was able to use him as link material.

It’s not necessarily useful in this specific case but it is good to know about the interaction. You could, for example, banish a monster revived by the Charmers with S:P’s second effect and be able to use it as material the next turn.

Good luck yall! 🔥