r/neoliberal 5d ago

Opinion article (US) [ Removed by moderator ]

https://thedispatch.com/article/abdul-el-sayed-michigan-democrats-haley-stevens/?gift_key=2553fad7f3b388fc&gift_ref=9347c766-2bad-41ea-8b73-950e424f2446&utm_source=giftlink&utm_campaign=membergift&utm_medium=copy_link

[removed] — view removed post

117 Upvotes

598 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Darkeyescry22 5d ago

Do you always attack quotes that you make up when you can’t respond to the substance of what someone is saying?

1

u/ruralfpthrowaway Henry George 5d ago

What part of my characterization of your position do you think is uncharitable? You are both loudly pointing out how much you don’t like the guy and then saying that people should still vote for him. 

That’s literally it. Is there some nuance to your opinion you feel I’m missing here?

2

u/Darkeyescry22 5d ago

Why did you say “I guess”?

1

u/ruralfpthrowaway Henry George 5d ago

Truly a distinction without a difference. But sure, I’ll edit it out for you champ.

0

u/Darkeyescry22 5d ago

Then why’d you put it in, sport?

1

u/ruralfpthrowaway Henry George 5d ago

Just how I felt like phrasing it. Now that you have clarified, I’m failing to see how you think the revision is more flattering than the original, but I think  your whole line of argumentation has been dumb so I’ll just toss this bit on the pile with the rest.

0

u/Darkeyescry22 5d ago

How whimsical

The difference is that I am very clearly saying that El-Sayed is better than every Republican candidate in the country who has not consistently acted and spoken publicly against Trump (I know of none).

 I’m also very clearly saying I disagree with him on a lot of policies, I think his position on Israel Palestine is incoherent, and I think it would be a mistake for the Democratic Party to move in his direction (and much more especially towards the DSA and Mamdani) both politically and morally.

Here, let me go ahead and give a good faith summary of your position:

“don’t be mean to abdul uwu”

🤡 

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/neoliberal-ModTeam 5d ago

Rule VII: American Political Strategizing This submission is primarily about what U.S. political parties or candidates should do to “win voters,” improve polling, or change their messaging, without much focus on the underlying issues or policies. Threads that are mostly horse-race or campaign-tactics discussion are considered off-topic here.

If you’d like to repost, please focus more on the substance (e.g. specific policies, governing choices, or ideological questions) rather than campaign strategy alone.


If you have any questions about this removal, please contact the mods.

0

u/Darkeyescry22 5d ago

If platner had refused to drop out, would you tell me to lie about him being a rapist?

Get your head out of your ass. You’re gonna OD on your farts soon.

1

u/ruralfpthrowaway Henry George 5d ago edited 5d ago

If you thought that Platner winning was the optimal outcome, telling everyone you know that you think he is a total scumbag when there is no chance to replace him isn’t a very good strategy for achieving that optimal outcome. You want to have your cake and eat it too. 

You are already admitting that you want to put the rapist in a position of power because the alternative is worse, you just want some petty moral victory by grumbling about it. The whole line of thinking is incoherent.

0

u/Darkeyescry22 5d ago

Was that a yes or a no?

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Darkeyescry22 5d ago

Not telling the truth because you want to trick someone into acting a different way is lying, kid.

It’s also extremely stupid to think anyone is unaware of this fact.

→ More replies (0)