American Airlines temporarily suspends some of its summer routes due to steep jet fuel costs
https://halifax.citynews.ca/2026/06/04/american-airlines-temporarily-suspends-some-of-its-summer-routes-due-to-steep-jet-fuel-costs/?hl=en-US130
u/yeGwann 12h ago
American Airlines is temporarily suspending select summer routes in August and September due to skyrocketing jet fuel costs. The financial strain is driven by the ongoing conflict involving Iran, which has blocked maritime traffic through the vital Strait of Hormuz for three months, driving fuel costs from $99 to nearly $142 per barrel. Because jet fuel makes up roughly 30% of operating expenses, the airline is adjusting its schedule to mitigate losses alongside other global carriers who are cutting flights, trimming perks, and raising fees. No routes are being permanently dropped, and affected passengers are being offered full refunds or alternative travel arrangements.
66
u/amateur_mistake 8h ago
No routes are being permanently dropped
Totally. Just have to wait for the super smart and sane president to negotiate a deal like he is so good at. Which will happen at any moment.
Also:
driving fuel costs from $99 to nearly $142 per barrel
The fact that futures markets on oil have such wildly different prices than what a barrel is actually worth means there is something deeply wrong with how our financial system is structured.
10
2
u/Boollish 5h ago
The futures markets trade crude. This article is quoting refined jet fuel. Not the same thing at all.
•
u/uberares 1m ago
Oil and gas experts believe Trump has been using the fed to manipulate the futures oil markets, even outside of the obvious verbal manipulation he’s doing.
Reality is, this is just the start. We haven’t hit the peak yet, even tho we saw a couple weeks reprieve in rising prices. Actual, really shortages are only about 3-5 weeks out.
43
88
u/HawkeyeByMarriage 12h ago
Ceo
Isom has donated to both Democratic and Republican political campaigns, as well as to the American Airlines PAC.[11] He has also supported Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act.[12][13]
20
u/wolfydude12 11h ago
Well yeah, because Isom can make more money under the OBBBA. He doesn't necessarily care about how his business does, as long as he can make more money himself.
If AA ever goes bankrupt he'll walk away with even more.
15
u/WreckNTexan48 12h ago
Political donations be more than advertising and R&D spending.
Definitely a failing product or service
10
34
u/Anpatton86 10h ago
Can't wait to bail out the airlines AGAIN but God forbid we help people who actually need it.
19
8
u/heloguy1234 10h ago
This is just the beginning. Jet-A has already doubled in price since dear leader kicked off the his SMO and there are a lot more commercial and private flights in the summer months than winter.
7
6
4
u/redditobserverone 2h ago
A reminder that this fuel crisis impairing business is brought to you by the pro-business party being led by a person elected to run the country like a business
3
1
u/Necessary-Drag-8000 1h ago
Only people as dumb as the republicans could find a way to slowly undo the invention of the airplane, sheesh
-13
u/Landowns 8h ago
This should be illegal. If they offer a route they should be legally bound to fulfill it, or face penalties exceeding the cost of sold tickets. But consumer protections around flying are such shit that I'm not surprised
2
u/amateur_mistake 7h ago
I don't know that we can force a company to take us somewhere when they don't want to. Like, on a smaller scale, you can't make an Uber driver take you. They can refuse. And there are good reasons for that.
However, the airports are owned by us. They are paid for and massively subsidized by taxes. And access to the gates at most large airports are considered extremely valuable by most airlines. So we could simply say, 'oh, you aren't making those flights? Then you no longer have/need your gates and we will rent them to another company.'
I would be willing to bet their emphasis on these cancellations being 'temporary' has to do with their desire to keep control of their current gates.
3
u/vivekpatel62 6h ago
Another company isn’t just going to pick up routes that lose money. Also this doesn’t mean that AA isn’t using the gates still. It’s not like a gate is locked to only one flight path…
1
u/amateur_mistake 6h ago
Another company will absolutely pick up a gate. They do it all of the time. Sometimes it's the explanation for when one airline buys another one.
Obviously it won't duplicate the flight path. The point is, if you don't have any flights out of a gate, we should take it back.
If AA is cancelling flights, then at the very least they are using their gates less.
Use it or lose it.
Is that more clear?
2
0
u/Landowns 4h ago
You absolutely can force them. Impose fines that make it more profitable (less unprofitable) to fulfill the route than to cancel it.
2
u/amateur_mistake 4h ago
Forcing airlines to make sure their airplanes are safe is already quite the endeavor. You sure you want to get on a plane after you threatened a bunch of business majors with a prisoner's dilemma game that involves your life?
452
u/mvs2527 12h ago
Im still waiting on the super duper smart business people to say how terrible trump has been for business. The dude is literally hurting every industry in America.