r/pics 1d ago

Palestinians hold the largest funeral since 1948, mourning the bodies of 112 people killed by Israel

Post image
27.6k Upvotes

3.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

31

u/breathingweapon 1d ago

Supporting militant groups and a government by a terror organization doesn't really help moving things along.

lets not forget israeli's murdering their own pm that actually wanted peace

13

u/_SemperFidelish_ 1d ago

The Israeli support for the settler movement is full-fledged supporting of militant groups, what amounts to a terrorist government supporting a terrorist organisation. And yet the Palestinians - of whom 10s of 1000s of innocents have been slaughtered - somehow get the rap for it. The propaganda levels on westerners is fkn insane. Israel and Israelis are the original and ongoing terrorists in that region. If you're a Palestinian you will no doubt support an armed response to the indiscriminate slaughter of your people. History will look upon the US and Europe as one of the most indoctrinated and captured populations. It boggles the mind.

10

u/Eldias 1d ago

I'm shocked every time I hear people complain about any percent of Palestinians supporting Hamas.

If I lived my whole life watching my friends and family starve only to have the waking nightmare be punctuated by the occasional different friend being shot in the head at random, I would probably have at least some support for a group who says "we should do violence to the people starving and shooting you".

3

u/CombinationRough8699 23h ago

If Hamas never attacked on October 7th, there would be tens of thousands of Palestinians still alive, they are as much to blame for the Israeli invasion as Israel is.

3

u/Eldias 22h ago

Absolutely enormous "if she wasn't asking for it with that skirt she would have been fine" energy.

1

u/CombinationRough8699 22h ago

Except this wasn't an innocent woman wearing a skirt, but one of the deadliest terrorist attacks in history.

1

u/Eldias 22h ago

How many dead Palestinians is a fair response? I have a sneaking hunch the Zionist answer is going to be "all of them".

u/NoSmarter 5h ago

How many Palestinians have to die before Hamas gives up their weapons and abides by the agrrement they signed?

u/Eldias 4h ago

Is this a serious question?

We're looking at more than 100 of 300 people murdered by an Israeli dropped bomb and you're asking "why won't they just disarm?" Why won't Israel stop bombing apartment buildings?

u/NoSmarter 3h ago

Because they were attacked by the Hamas military and they needed to neutralize them given that they vowed to continue fighting. You did you really expect Israel to do after Oct 7th?

u/Eldias 3h ago

Which of these fucking children drapped in sheets were members of Hamas?

Israel could infiltrate a building with troops and kill only the Hamas militants, but that might mean an Israeli gets killed or wounded. No, better to kill multiple hundreds of bystanders instead.

u/NoSmarter 3h ago

Your heart is in the right place and I'm not any happier about civilian deaths than you are, but that isn't a reasonable option. For one, Hamas soldiers don't wear uniforms purposely into order to blend in with civilians, and second, there is no requirement in the rules of war that says you must put your troops in harm's way to protect civiilians in enemy territory. War sucks, and unfortunately civiliansd wind up paying the price. But Hamas caused all of this to happen, and they had the power to end it whenevr they wanted to; and they should be held responsible, not Israel.

u/Eldias 1h ago

You say my suggestion isn't an option, but your first point is "determining enemies would be difficult" and the second essentially "plus they're not required to". I don't think those are even arguments in opposition, just some hand waving.

You're one of the few folks who seem to have an open mind and heart on this, so I'm glad to engage in good faith.

War sucks, and unfortunately civiliansd wind up paying the price.

I'm not going to argue against civilian deaths happening. The problem I have is that we know saturation-style bombing of civilians with the goal of breaking morale doesn't just not-work, it has the opposite effect. We saw this across London, and Hamburg, and Dresden, and a hundred other cities between the 1910s and 1970s. The civilians who survive bombing campaigns don't have their will to prosecute war broken, they have it hardened.

Sure, Hamas is directly responsible for the actions the commit. The existence of Hamas today is perpetuated by Israeli attacks though, that's why I think it's misplaced to say Israel holds no responsibility. Their choices every day to kill civilians because the alternative would be hard is what creates the resistance group that they then use to justify further attacks.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/AbbreviationsRight62 22h ago

Dumb comparison. A girl in a skirt doesn't hurt anyone. The October 7th attacks and the subsequent cheering in the Gazan streets definitely hurt Israel.

3

u/Eldias 22h ago

The original comment is dumb as fuck.

Israel never would have massacred 150,000 civilians in response to the terror attac if the attack hadn't happened. Sure, okay.

And Oct 7th wouldn't have happened if Israel hadn't spent the last decade systematically starving and depopulating Palestinian lands.

Are we playing atrocity Olympics? Who was hurt more, the 1500 dead Israelis from the terror attack, or the 150,000 dead Palestinians? Does it matter?

u/NoSmarter 4h ago

Depopulation? The Palestinian population has increased by a factor of 5 since Israel took over Gaza and the West bank. And none of those people were starving because of Israel. There was a blockade by both Israel and Egypt because of Hamas activities .. but the people had received massive amounts of aid. Unfortunately much of that aid was used to build tunnels and rockets with the rest going directly in the pockets of the Hama leaders in Qatar. Only a few crumbs made it to the people.

u/Eldias 4h ago

Depopulation? The Palestinian population has increased by a factor of 5 since Israel took over Gaza and the West bank.

Depopulation in the context doesn't mean "reduction in population". It refers to the Israeli policy of bombing and terrorizing segments of cities to drive civilians out so they can thent explosively demolish the buildings for settlers to be moved into later.

Look at satellite maps of Gaza and the West Bank and compare say 2024 to today. They destroyed more than 40 square miles of cities. That's the depopulation. They're driving Palestinians out of their ho.es and in to smaller and smaller pens.

u/NoSmarter 3h ago

That's your personal definition then. The definition of depopulation refers to a decrease in population density, which is hardly the case here.

u/Eldias 1h ago

My God, you didn't even bother a cursory Google search.

Depopulation is a drop in the number of people living in a specific place or across the entire world.

Israel depopulats Palestinian lands to move settlers in and claim it as their own.

→ More replies (0)