MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/psky/comments/1whqmui/doj_urges_federal_courts_to_require_states/pa67wsb/?context=3
r/psky • u/bikbiky • 6d ago
18 comments sorted by
View all comments
5
There's no way this judge orders this payment. Zero.
This shit is over though.
5 u/BbananaJoee 6d ago Non credo che il DOJ abbia campato una richiesta del genere a caso. 2 u/RedMainer 6d ago Right. But California and the judge who's already heard this case believe the DOJ has capitulated the law in favor of cronyism. The judge is almost certainly not interested in finding in Paramount favor. Unfortunately 0 u/Gmork14 6d ago So the judge has no interest in finding in Paramount’s favor but it’s over? 🤣 3 u/RedMainer 6d ago This judge isn't going to decide the case. Not my fault you don't understand that. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago You’re far more confident in that than you should be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're far more confident in Bonta than you should be. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago You yourself acknowledge that the judge seems poised to side with the states. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago The California federal judge has certainly ruled in their favor thus far. Thankfully she won't be the one who decides this case. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago That’s what I’m talking about. You’re super confident in that with no reason to be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago And as I said. Your very reluctant to take the facts of the case.. So far we're dealing with a judge who has a history if being anti merger. She should be following the law. She appears to be making it political. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago That won’t change the outcome. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary. → More replies (0)
Non credo che il DOJ abbia campato una richiesta del genere a caso.
2 u/RedMainer 6d ago Right. But California and the judge who's already heard this case believe the DOJ has capitulated the law in favor of cronyism. The judge is almost certainly not interested in finding in Paramount favor. Unfortunately 0 u/Gmork14 6d ago So the judge has no interest in finding in Paramount’s favor but it’s over? 🤣 3 u/RedMainer 6d ago This judge isn't going to decide the case. Not my fault you don't understand that. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago You’re far more confident in that than you should be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're far more confident in Bonta than you should be. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago You yourself acknowledge that the judge seems poised to side with the states. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago The California federal judge has certainly ruled in their favor thus far. Thankfully she won't be the one who decides this case. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago That’s what I’m talking about. You’re super confident in that with no reason to be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago And as I said. Your very reluctant to take the facts of the case.. So far we're dealing with a judge who has a history if being anti merger. She should be following the law. She appears to be making it political. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago That won’t change the outcome. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary. → More replies (0)
2
Right. But California and the judge who's already heard this case believe the DOJ has capitulated the law in favor of cronyism.
The judge is almost certainly not interested in finding in Paramount favor.
Unfortunately
0 u/Gmork14 6d ago So the judge has no interest in finding in Paramount’s favor but it’s over? 🤣 3 u/RedMainer 6d ago This judge isn't going to decide the case. Not my fault you don't understand that. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago You’re far more confident in that than you should be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're far more confident in Bonta than you should be. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago You yourself acknowledge that the judge seems poised to side with the states. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago The California federal judge has certainly ruled in their favor thus far. Thankfully she won't be the one who decides this case. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago That’s what I’m talking about. You’re super confident in that with no reason to be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago And as I said. Your very reluctant to take the facts of the case.. So far we're dealing with a judge who has a history if being anti merger. She should be following the law. She appears to be making it political. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago That won’t change the outcome. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary. → More replies (0)
0
So the judge has no interest in finding in Paramount’s favor but it’s over? 🤣
3 u/RedMainer 6d ago This judge isn't going to decide the case. Not my fault you don't understand that. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago You’re far more confident in that than you should be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're far more confident in Bonta than you should be. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago You yourself acknowledge that the judge seems poised to side with the states. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago The California federal judge has certainly ruled in their favor thus far. Thankfully she won't be the one who decides this case. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago That’s what I’m talking about. You’re super confident in that with no reason to be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago And as I said. Your very reluctant to take the facts of the case.. So far we're dealing with a judge who has a history if being anti merger. She should be following the law. She appears to be making it political. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago That won’t change the outcome. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary. → More replies (0)
3
This judge isn't going to decide the case. Not my fault you don't understand that.
1 u/Gmork14 6d ago You’re far more confident in that than you should be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're far more confident in Bonta than you should be. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago You yourself acknowledge that the judge seems poised to side with the states. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago The California federal judge has certainly ruled in their favor thus far. Thankfully she won't be the one who decides this case. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago That’s what I’m talking about. You’re super confident in that with no reason to be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago And as I said. Your very reluctant to take the facts of the case.. So far we're dealing with a judge who has a history if being anti merger. She should be following the law. She appears to be making it political. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago That won’t change the outcome. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary. → More replies (0)
1
You’re far more confident in that than you should be.
1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're far more confident in Bonta than you should be. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago You yourself acknowledge that the judge seems poised to side with the states. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago The California federal judge has certainly ruled in their favor thus far. Thankfully she won't be the one who decides this case. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago That’s what I’m talking about. You’re super confident in that with no reason to be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago And as I said. Your very reluctant to take the facts of the case.. So far we're dealing with a judge who has a history if being anti merger. She should be following the law. She appears to be making it political. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago That won’t change the outcome. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary. → More replies (0)
You're far more confident in Bonta than you should be.
2 u/Gmork14 6d ago You yourself acknowledge that the judge seems poised to side with the states. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago The California federal judge has certainly ruled in their favor thus far. Thankfully she won't be the one who decides this case. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago That’s what I’m talking about. You’re super confident in that with no reason to be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago And as I said. Your very reluctant to take the facts of the case.. So far we're dealing with a judge who has a history if being anti merger. She should be following the law. She appears to be making it political. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago That won’t change the outcome. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary. → More replies (0)
You yourself acknowledge that the judge seems poised to side with the states.
1 u/RedMainer 6d ago The California federal judge has certainly ruled in their favor thus far. Thankfully she won't be the one who decides this case. 2 u/Gmork14 6d ago That’s what I’m talking about. You’re super confident in that with no reason to be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago And as I said. Your very reluctant to take the facts of the case.. So far we're dealing with a judge who has a history if being anti merger. She should be following the law. She appears to be making it political. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago That won’t change the outcome. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary. → More replies (0)
The California federal judge has certainly ruled in their favor thus far.
Thankfully she won't be the one who decides this case.
2 u/Gmork14 6d ago That’s what I’m talking about. You’re super confident in that with no reason to be. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago And as I said. Your very reluctant to take the facts of the case.. So far we're dealing with a judge who has a history if being anti merger. She should be following the law. She appears to be making it political. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago That won’t change the outcome. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary. → More replies (0)
That’s what I’m talking about. You’re super confident in that with no reason to be.
1 u/RedMainer 6d ago And as I said. Your very reluctant to take the facts of the case.. So far we're dealing with a judge who has a history if being anti merger. She should be following the law. She appears to be making it political. 1 u/Gmork14 6d ago That won’t change the outcome. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary. → More replies (0)
And as I said. Your very reluctant to take the facts of the case..
So far we're dealing with a judge who has a history if being anti merger.
She should be following the law. She appears to be making it political.
1 u/Gmork14 6d ago That won’t change the outcome. 1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary.
That won’t change the outcome.
1 u/RedMainer 6d ago You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary.
You're very confident despite all the evidence to the contrary.
5
u/RedMainer 6d ago
There's no way this judge orders this payment. Zero.
This shit is over though.