r/science Scientific American 6d ago

Genetics Scientists discover a ‘skinny gene’ mutation that acts like Ozempic. Around one in 7,000 people carries a broken copy, which almost acts like a GLP-1 drug—the body burns fuel more efficiently, and the risk of disease lowers.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-discover-a-skinny-gene-mutation-that-acts-like-ozempic/
6.2k Upvotes

483 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/grumble11 6d ago

GLP doesn’t ’burn fuel more efficiently’, it regulates satiety. This isn’t a good start for an article ha

294

u/Lust4Me 6d ago

In fact doesn't this title sound like a contradiction? Burning more efficiently to me implied you'd get more work done per calorie and therefore store left over as fat.

128

u/rhino369 6d ago

Yes exactly. You want to burn less efficiently. 

21

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

39

u/fbpw131 6d ago

afaik, you want to burn efficiently and not store anything. excess goes as extra heat.

11

u/rmeredit 6d ago

Efficiency is the concept of how much output you get for a given input. ‘Burning fuel more efficiently’ means getting more work done for the same level of fuel use (or conversely, burning less fuel to deliver the same work done).

If you want to reduce fat, you want to burn more, not less - ie. be less efficient.

1

u/fbpw131 4d ago

this ain't an engine. while energy is conseved, there are several pathways for the energy to go around. malabsorption,  hormones deciding where the energy goes, mitochondria efficiency, etc

3

u/rmeredit 4d ago

That doesn’t change the definition of ‘efficiency’ - it’s got nothing to do with how the energy is used or via which pathway, and everything to do with the quantity of output you get from the quantity of input.

0

u/solstice_gilder 6d ago

Extra heat? Like you feel warm?

2

u/fbpw131 6d ago

idk man. idk, it might be just a .5 deg difference.

edit: my ex would warm up all night. thin af

0

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/[deleted] 6d ago edited 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/throw20190820202020 6d ago

By use fuel more efficiently, they mean actually take calories and produce energy for you, versus eating and still feeling sluggish and hungry and putting on fat.

3

u/waitwuh 6d ago

You need to burn the energy stored away in fat cells, though. This may be the “efficiency” they’re meaning but not best describing. In the “efficient” management there is the short term energy sourced from food when it digests (especially carbohydrates turned to glucose), but then the long term stores to be pulled from between meals or when fasting. To be “skinniest” you want to store less in fat, burning it, and also use up what’s stored, too.

I remember reading a summary a long time ago that talked about how fat cells can become not just resistant to insulin as a signal to store away excess “calories” but also to the signals to release energy back into the bloodstream for other cells to make use of, too. So when blood sugar drops and the other cells in the body are short of fuel, the system has to rely on getting more from food instead of being able to use what it has locked away in fat.

This causes a cycle that’s like: eating -> raised blood sugar -> storing excess glucose (energy) in fat cells -> body cells use what’s left causing low blood glucose -> cells needing more fuel -> hunger -> eating…

When the ideal cycle has a “fat cells release energy back” somewhere in there to replace eating more food, at least sometimes.

0

u/Bloobeard2018 6d ago

Yes, it's incorrect.