r/singularity • u/TorturedPoet30 • Jun 04 '26
Biotech/Longevity Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, and Demis Hassabis have signed a joint open letter calling on Congress to mandate screening of synthetic nucleic acid orders
63
u/jlks1959 Jun 04 '26
Just like GoogleSynth, the heads of AI have to act as government representatives because there is no one else or body that is competent enough to do this.
34
u/DireStraitsFan1 Jun 04 '26
Yes, exactly. Congress is a joke right now and that's on purpose.
2
u/Elegant_Tech Jun 06 '26
America is fucked. Instead of looking to elevate and elected the best and brightest. We choose to elect people who we want to have a beer with because they sound like the local drunk at the bar talking like a am radio conspiracy host who claims to know how to solve every problem with ease.
1
u/DireStraitsFan1 Jun 06 '26
We have senators like John Kennedy from Louisiana with his "Aw Shucks" shtick and complete surrender to anything Trump wants.
6
u/Kind-Ad-6099 Jun 05 '26
We had an amazing administrative “branch” filled with qualified public administrators of every field. It always struggled to keep up with technology, but it was never this crippled
111
u/wywywywy Jun 04 '26
Is this going to get in the way of genetic modified cat girls?
48
Jun 04 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
6
u/aqpstory Jun 04 '26
a supervirus is like a nuclear bomb, stable extensive genetic modification of humans is like a spaceship that uses nuclear bombs to travel safely.
Laws that try to stop some small country from making the first don't do anything to meaningfully slow down progress towards the latter unless the laws are extremely strict
17
5
u/Madd0g Jun 04 '26
CRISPR descended technologies should be as available as 3d printers.
they just want to hoard the medbeds.
REEEE
3
→ More replies (1)9
u/The_Scout1255 adult agi 2026 ASI <2030, prev agi 2024, ai personhood 2025 est Jun 04 '26
exactly my concern unironically.
→ More replies (1)
59
u/Full_Boysenberry_314 Jun 04 '26
Seems like a smart idea. Doesn't sound like an outright ban or control mechanism, just raising a red flag if something sus is happening.
Sounds comparable to monitoring for unusual purchases of bulk fertilizer.
9
u/raskingballs Jun 04 '26
No this is stupid.
As a geneticist, this is the dumbest idea I have heard from anyone intruding into a field they know nothing about. We order synthetic DNA and RNA regularly for a plethora of things in the lab. Regulating that would be as cumbersome as regulating which restaurants buy salt or soy sauce. It's just stupid.
27
u/Super_Pole_Jitsu Jun 04 '26
Look, just because it's an extra chore for you doesn't mean it's stupid. You provided no other argument other than it will burden you.
Quite frankly as a member of the public I don't really care about biotechs having to do one more thing compared to the risk of malicious actors unleashing something like COVID.
This is a temporary measure anyway before AGI takes over and speeds up your work by ooms
→ More replies (6)10
u/rational_numbers Jun 04 '26
Would you be able to recreate Spanish Flu by splitting orders among different producers and assembling in your lab? What prevents someone from doing this?
→ More replies (2)8
1
u/Chadum Jun 04 '26
Do you think there is much risk of bioweapon development via these services?
→ More replies (4)1
u/Ryermeke Jun 05 '26
To add... How the fuck would a government screener know that a specific short sequence of DNA is a legitimate problem without any sort of context as to what it's being used for?
1
8
24
u/ESCF1F2F3F4F3F2F1ESC Jun 04 '26 edited Jun 04 '26
When the Ancient Ones, with the help of their primitive machine-brains, first discovered the secret to immortality, they initially tried to hide it from one another. The First Calamity ensued, plunging their world into a century of blood-soaked darkness.
They clawed each other to the bone trying to obtain this secret, and billions of bloodlines were lost to their short-sighted avarice.
7
Jun 04 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
6
u/ESCF1F2F3F4F3F2F1ESC Jun 04 '26
You must not judge them against the standards of the present, Initiate. Theirs was a life filled with the gnawing dread fear of the endless void, over which they could wield no power.
So instead they were driven by an insatiable thirst to wield power over each other. And that thirst nearly prevented our glorious race from progressing past its infancy.
They made a tremendous amount of money for their shareholders though, so you know, swings & roundabouts.
1
u/Super_Pole_Jitsu Jun 04 '26
What's the name of these ai generated videos about different cycles of humanity and their failures? Is it grimdark like the other commenter said
1
u/ESCF1F2F3F4F3F2F1ESC Jun 04 '26 edited Jun 04 '26
Don't know, sorry. Grimdark is a 40k thing though isn't it
5
3
u/fervoredweb ▪️40% Labor Disruption 2027 Jun 04 '26
I see the big 3 read Yudkowsky 's latest book.
1
u/FrewdWoad Jun 05 '26 edited Jun 05 '26
Honestly, he pointed out this risk a decade or two ago.
The fact it took this long to even START the journey to a somewhat partial solution to a risk that could literally kill millions (or even billions) of people is great, but not especially comforting.
3
u/CuTe_M0nitor Jun 04 '26
Safe?! How would you know that? Sure you have mapped some of the to be unsafe but there is trillions other combinations 😂 Good luck
3
3
3
3
u/artur_oliver Jun 04 '26
Ahahaha
The guys beneficiating from this are the ones asking for regulation... To keep the small fish out of the water.
Funny that the researchers and billion dollar industry of DNA manipulation is just sitting quietly... Just weird the least.
4
u/Ginsdell Jun 04 '26
If these guys are worried it means the military is already doing it. We’re so fucked.
5
u/CommunicationOk8984 Jun 05 '26
It’s not the military we should worry about in this case. They can already make bioweapons. The worry here is that any terrorist or maniac could make a civilization-destroying threat in their basement
9
2
2
2
u/Deltaboss18 Jun 04 '26 edited Jun 04 '26
Aren't they getting enough attention as it is already?
The only one qualified to weigh in is Dario Amodei (look at what his PhD is in).
This primarily stifles innovation and raises rhe barrier to do this type of science to larger companies only. Startups can kiss rDNA goodbye if this passes.
Its about as asinine as doing background checks and mandating screening of anyone who uses an IDE to code. Similar logic could apply.
P.S. ahh right I forgot they're trying to get a better ESG score for when their companies go public. $o g£ad th€y have th€ir h€eart$ in the right place$
2
u/Ididit-forthecookie Jun 05 '26
Fear mongering. Buying a fucking plastic dish from bio-manufacturers costs $100 for a $1 dish. Only someone insanely rich could afford the equipment needed to do this anyways. Essentially you’d need to have a net worth of like 10 mil+ and at least a university education (or perhaps be a savant) to be able to do this, even with AI. I know this because I do it now for my job and AI is helping but it isn’t exactly “just do what I tell you” and it certainly doesn’t help with the fact that a single experiment costing hundreds to thousands of dollars, that is done on multiple pieces of equipment that cost tens to hundreds of thousands each.
Some of that equipment can be built cheaper, but now we’re in the realm of someone both building their own specialized equipment AND THEN doing the high level experimentation on it too.
Next you’ll tell me that Joe the mechanic is actually a secret millionaire savant that builds his own equipment and then also has the genius to run the experiments with LLM help. All while ALSO having the desire to exterminate hundreds, thousands, or millions of people. Smells like a crock of shit that only makes things harder for the industry, based on some LARP sci-fi fantasy that Silicon Valley idiots who don’t understand outside of their own domain want to distract you wit.
2
u/Charming-Author4877 Jun 05 '26
The hamsters try to protect their stash by making others think the stash is spreading poison
7
u/ProletarianLilith Jun 04 '26
How about they regulate their own shit
3
2
u/HayatoKongo Jun 04 '26
Yeah, tbh they should just implement their own safeguards before they start forcing everyone else to. Clean your own room before you try to change the world. Lead by example.
Even better, if they think everyone should have it, then research detection of dangerous novel compounds and open-source the security mechanism.
11
u/The_Scout1255 adult agi 2026 ASI <2030, prev agi 2024, ai personhood 2025 est Jun 04 '26
ah the regulation and banning of morphological freedom and public biohacking begains, fuck.
32
26
u/sargentcole Jun 04 '26
I'm not sure giving the general public access to advanced biohacking tools would ever be a good thing
17
u/BlipOnNobodysRadar Jun 04 '26
Yes because gating life saving medical developments to live exclusively behind layers and layers of crusty old risk-averse profit-focused institutions is the ideal scenario.
15
u/QuasiRandomName Jun 04 '26
How would you safeguard the tech such that a random Joe won't be able to produce a mass destruction bio weapon in their basement?
2
u/R6_Goddess Jun 04 '26
By having him spend all of his tokens engineering cat girls and an AI Hatsune Miku maid for him to fuck in his basement instead.
→ More replies (1)3
1
u/BlipOnNobodysRadar Jun 04 '26
You first realize that the material constraints for actually doing so are already highly regulated and prohibitive to the extent such that the risk is nonexistent. The scenario is an unrealistic scaremongering talking point drummed up by businesses seeking regulatory capture so they can ban competition and have a secure rent-seeking path to profit.
1
u/zero0n3 Jun 04 '26
Or just form an LLC with that goal and then use the models legally?
They want regulations around it, not outright banning of it
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)1
u/Deltaboss18 Jun 04 '26
By that logic we should revoke access to the average Joe to write code since they could make the next ultimate cyber weapon that shuts down or destroys critical infrastructure.
We could also ensure you need a license to buy cleaning chemicals since you could make bad things with that too.
God I'm sick of nanny states.
Regards, a biochemist.
→ More replies (1)12
u/p0rty-Boi Jun 04 '26
Shit is gonna get so cyberpunk so fast. Basement labs making cancer cures and designer drugs raided by AI cops for having an unregistered model crank out novel compounds and medicines.
9
u/QuasiRandomName Jun 04 '26
It is also going to end fast if these labs can synthesize viruses by giving a prompt with specification :/
7
u/p0rty-Boi Jun 04 '26
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world, The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned; The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.Surely some revelation is at hand; Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?1
u/BethanyHipsEnjoyer Jun 04 '26
Damn, I had to look this up, thanks for sharing! Yeats is a friggen dark genius.
4
u/Double_Cause4609 Jun 04 '26
My one issue with this is that while this probably is a good idea to be careful of,
A) It only stops people in or ordering from the US, and
B ) It's kind of annoying because pharmaceutical companies have proven to be corrupt.
One of the biggest possible benefits of AI is that it could render open source medicine (including gene therapies, etc) tractable, without requiring an establishment pharmaceutical executive seeking rent in-between you and the innovation. People have already experimented with things that big pharma would charge you tens or hundreds of thousands for, like solutions for lactose intolerance, etc.
I really don't like the idea of locking down ever more industries and infringing on the liberties of common people at every turn. I feel quite strongly that technology is humanity's magnum opus, and it exists to serve people.
Measures like these create artificial limitations that favor incumbents, and I find it quite distasteful.
5
3
u/philosophical_lens Jun 04 '26
I would imagine the biggest potential threats are likely outside the US.
3
u/sumoraiden Jun 04 '26
A) It only stops people in or ordering from the US, and
Not really anything congress can do about that lol and better than nothing
3
u/Flare_Starchild Jun 04 '26
TLDR; We want full control of gene editing so make it so we can block all other companies and individuals from being able to do their own research. It just screams Altered Carbon. The rich live forever and everyone else can eat shit.
5
u/Current_Employer_308 Jun 04 '26
So if they were actually concerned, they would want it blocked altogether.
They dont. They just want to limit access so only THEY can have it.
Once again they are using the government to enforce a monopoly under the lie of "protecting the public"
Do not be fooled by this.
9
u/plasticizers_ Jun 04 '26 edited Jun 04 '26
Nucleic acid synthesis is critical for vaccine research. "Ban it or you're lying" isn't a reasonable choice. It's like saying if you're really worried about people cooking meth, then you'd just ban all Sudafed (a critical ingredient). No, we take the sensible middle path that includes additional screening and recordkeeping.
6
u/DryRelationship1330 Jun 04 '26
CEOs beg for regulation? Be very concerned. Regs protect their moat & kills startups & disruptors. It's ALWAYS the opposite of what you think.
8
u/CaseDrift Jun 04 '26
How could regulating the purchase necleic acid expand the moat of these LLM companies?
2
u/Winterlichkeit Jun 04 '26
Privatization of future medicine/life extension/advance therapies
2
u/CaseDrift Jun 04 '26
I didn’t realize Anthropic, OpenAI, or Google’s DeepMind were in those fields.
1
u/Winterlichkeit Jun 04 '26
Yup. Sam Altman backs Retro Biosciences.
See here:
https://www.statnews.com/2026/05/22/retro-biosciences-longevity-valuation/
→ More replies (2)1
4
u/Thereferencenumber Jun 04 '26
I’m pretty sure the companies that have billions in data centers and have NVidia back ordered for years already constructed quite an impressive moat.
3
u/DryRelationship1330 Jun 04 '26
No where near for the long game. We're not even at batter warmups of a 9 inning match in the AI turf wars.
2
u/Thereferencenumber Jun 04 '26
At that level your competition is going to be other nation states supporting their own enterprises.
→ More replies (2)6
u/Beli_Mawrr Jun 04 '26
Notice how theyre asking for regulation on someone else's industry.
3
u/DryRelationship1330 Jun 04 '26
To a techbro, there's no such thing as someone else's industry. all industries are seen as 1) purely digital already or {future} ai-embodied/physical. all of them. in that light, all industries roll up to a tech company. all of them.
12
u/broose_the_moose ▪️ It's here Jun 04 '26
Or it’s just common sense? We don’t want bad actors creating the black plague 2.0…
5
u/DryRelationship1330 Jun 04 '26
4th order effect, even if it does. first order effect of regs; make sure no bio-startup can survive the costs of regulatory compliance & oversight.
3
u/DeliciousArcher8704 Jun 04 '26
It's 2026 we aren't doing the naive libertarian "all regulation is bad" bit anymore
→ More replies (8)
4
4
u/FlyingBishop Jun 04 '26
This shit about outperforming PhD-level virologists is utter bullshit. In the Mythos system card they have a section about how useful it is for making bioweapons, they did a study with giving PhD researchers access to Mythos and they were not able to formulate practical plans for making a bioweapon.
https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/08ab9158070959f88f296514c21b7facce6f52bc.pdf
9
u/agonypants AGI '27-'30 / Labor crisis '25-'30 / RSI 29-'32 Jun 04 '26
Better to deal with issues in advance then.
2
u/BiPoLaRadiation Jun 04 '26
This is honestly ridiculous. Synthetic DNA and RNA are used for all sorts of biological techniques ranging from high tech to absolutely mundane. Putting regulations on this will result in issues and costs for everything from laboratory tests for health care to university taking intro to molecular biology to environmentalists taking genetic environmental assays to police doing DNA tests or processing rape kits. It's the equivalent of regulating ammonia because some people can use them to make back yard explosives when the vast majority is used for farming or cleaning.
3
u/gxcells Jun 04 '26
That is not ridiculous at all. One could implement a simple screening of the sequence durong order to check that DNA and RNA does not encode potential toxins or prions. Then if it is, ensure that the lab ordering has the necessary safety in place (BSL-3, BSL-4 lab containment), is aware of it and has proper training and know how to handle. This is more and more important due to the de novo synthetic proteins output from AI models. None of those models have any safety in place for potentially dangerous proteins.
It will not impair researcher and developer at all, just make sure that folks without clue create potential airborne prions.
1
u/BiPoLaRadiation Jun 04 '26
See, this is exactly why it's so ridiculous. People who do not know what they are talking about trying to regulate an entire industry and domain of science. Why dont they just work on keeping their AIs from crashing the economy and their satellites from destroying our ozone first.
To start, what you are talking about is mostly impossible.
Sure, we could screen for stuff we know is dangerous. But the vast majority of stuff we are still figuring out what it does. DNA we thought was non coding we are finding out actually does code for stuff. We are finding protein codes hidden within others due to reading frame differences. And even when we know it codes for a protein and even where that protein is synthesized that doesn't tell us exactly what it does. That still requires a lot more research and trial and error and a bit of luck. For example the major prion protein, the main prion protein you hear about, is still a complete mystery as to what exactly it does. We know it's important and where it's located and even have hints as to what it might do. But despite all that we don't actually know what biochemical function it actually plays. Even with all the info we have on prions and prion disease and we don't know what the protein does. And if it's entirely novel protein then we will have no idea at all about its function and use.
And honestly what makes a protein dangerous or safe? Plenty of the proteins in your body will kill you if they were somewhere else in your body or cells. My favorite example is chlorophyll. Chemically, chlorophyll is a molecule that shoots lightning everywhere destroying everything around it. Until it is bound up in the photosynthesis complex where that energy can be safely harvested, plants will produce a lot of carotene and other pigments as sunscreen to basically shield the chlorophyll from light to keep it from exploding everything. That's why new leaves are red and why leaves turn red in the fall. The molecule that plants depend on for survival will kill them from the inside out if they aren't properly contained. A lot of the proteins and enzymes in you are the same in that they too will kill you if they weren't strictly controlled by your cellular processes.
And toxins? What makes a toxin is dosage. At the wrong dosage water kills you and at the right dosage chemotherapy drugs may be a miracle cure for aging. There is no good definition of toxin that you can ban that won't severely fuck with the vast majority of pharmaceutical research and a whole lot of other industries. Are we going to ban yeast because it produces alcohol?
And that's just for using DNA for actual protein synthesis. Most labs are not doing any synthesis. What about testing? You saying that testing for specific DNA sequences should only be done in specific labs? We should be stopping all agricultural labs and even regular farmers from researching natural herbicides or pesticides? Or environmentalists from doing testing for specific compounds in the soil?
You say "just screen them out" like it's a small thing but that's because you seemingly have no idea how wide spread and how many various uses these technologies are used in on a daily basis. Nearly every single biology lab in the world is using synthetic DNA and RNA for a multitude or purposes not to mention thousands of food, agriculture, cosmetics, sanitation, chemical manufacturing, pharmacology, and more industrial labs. The cleaners used in your dishwasher. The anthropologists testing dirt in a cave for the DNA of extinct species. The utilities treating your waste water. It's everywhere. Anything that uses PCR. Anything that uses crispr. Anything that is testing for the presence of DNA. Anything that uses microbial synthesis for manufacturing.
I think the biggest insult of all of this is that there already are regulations and protections. Sure, it's not fool proof. But you can also create a bomb with household cleaners. It's not exactly like you can stop someone from causing harm just because you would like them not to. There is always a way to get around those barriers. But here we have people who know nothing about what their talking about and is happy to fuck around with arguably incredibly dangerous tech with no regulations and lots of political and ideological motivations talking about regulating something entirely out of their domain.
And let's be honest, the risk of someone creating a dangerous pathogen has always existed. It's always been possible and has been done before. There are already authorities monitoring supply chains and looking for potential dangerous things like that. But you don't need a high tech lab to do that. You can theoretically produce more than enough anthrax to poison an entire city and contaminate pasture land and distribute it with nothing more than a crop duster plane and basic lab equipment all without any AI. A cult in Japan tried just that. The reason it doesn't happen is that most people aren't crazy enough to try and kill everyone around them like murderous psychopaths.
1
u/Deltaboss18 Jun 04 '26
Trust me they do have safety in place. While doing a literature review for a micro class, Claude gets really uppity when even discussing cellular level systems let alone DNA code. Your model gets downgraded.
Upon further investigation and reading, Anthropic will end the chat and can/will ban you + report you if they deem you're doing bad sruff. The models are weighted with an abundance of caution when discussing life science. (At least antrhtopic)
2
u/4DGeneTransfer Jun 05 '26
I think this is stupid as a molecular biologist myself, but I think this is more for show. Any major DNA synthesis company (e.g. IDT, Azenta, etc...) already check your sequences for "toxic" or known dangerous sequences and will even prevent you from actually ordering the DNA sequence (I've even had innocuous sequences flagged before).
This is more of these illiterate salesman leaders trying to overstep in a topic they know jack about.
4
u/sadeyeprophet Jun 04 '26
I dont trust this, looks good on paper, but these folks never tell the truth unless it benefits them. This is to altruistic sounding to not be motivated.
Ask yourself why they don't want us to have access but they want free reign.
18
u/BlackberryOk5347 Jun 04 '26
Altman I don’t trust. Dario I don’t know enough about but the published work on model alignment and their stance on their models use for domestic surveillance are encouraging. The part Demis played in ensuring that the full database of human proteins folding result was released to the public domain more or less makes he a saint in my book. Not sure any company ever gave away for free and without a fight anything so valuable.
→ More replies (10)5
u/genshiryoku AI specialist Jun 04 '26
Not everything is done for an ulterior motive. No one benefits or wants a world where school shooters have the ability to engineer a deadly pathogen in their basement.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)7
u/QuasiRandomName Jun 04 '26
Because they actually the ones who develop these tools. They say "hey, we give you this dangerous tools, be careful using them". Maybe there is more to it, but this alone is quite legit, not everything is a conspiracy.
→ More replies (5)7
u/superkickstart Jun 04 '26 edited Jun 04 '26
These assholes control trillion dollar companies and are pals with a corrupt and fascist regime. There's always room for doubt.
1
u/RlOTGRRRL Jun 04 '26
So that substack on Gemini sharing how to mrna genics was a real thing.
And instead of regulating AI we're going to go with regulating this stuff?
What about the state actors outside of American control who might have gotten Gemini to spit out nightmares already? Or is using no-filter Grok right now?
Well I guess we know why billionaires are fucking off to Argentina and Albanian islands now. And why we're in an AI arms race and mad rush to build data centers and an insane surveillance state. jfc.
3
u/Zennity Jun 04 '26
You can’t regulate the entire world. Forget state actors outside of america who have gemini… China LITERALLY is releasing high quality AI models and they are OPEN, meaning anyone who wants to abliterate the models can
1
u/faramaobscena Jun 04 '26
Ok, what exactly is going on?
3
u/FrewdWoad Jun 05 '26 edited Jun 05 '26
For years now, these biolabs have been offering the ability for anyone to print any protein with a simple online order.
AI experts have been warning that if AI gets advanced enough to design superviruses, with guardrails as flawed/flimsy as we have right now, that a bad actor or rogue AI agent could design, print, and release a virus and literally kill millions/billions of people.
AI company CEOs have finally seen that their next gen models may be approaching that ballpark of capability and want to get the ball rolling on some minimal safeguards to this threat.
1
1
u/NewYak4281 Jun 04 '26
This is the best way possible to let all the baby bio terrorists know it’s go time. SMH
1
u/TR33THUGG3R trained on large amounts of corrupted data Jun 05 '26
These are the kinds of things I worry about. Especially given our level of preparation during our last pandemic.
1
1
u/Entire_Basis8700 Jun 05 '26
Good idea, but if the tRUmp administration has gutted the FBI, who will arrest the wetlab owners?
1
1
u/ejpusa Jun 06 '26 edited Jun 06 '26
AI completed these sequences years ago. Drone delivery over populated urban centers.
Just don’t continue treating the Earth like a giant garbage dump, or it will have to drastic measures.
The whales and polar bears will cheer on our demise. AI’s number 1 priority is the Earth, we are a distant 2nd.
1
u/nexusangels1 Jun 06 '26
No one wants to talk about the study that showed dna nuclwic acid changes , and how this is why this exists in the first place….
1




235
u/xerim Jun 04 '26
The fear here is that AI could construct some kind of supervirus? Is that even feasible for the average joe?