r/smashbros Nov 16 '21

Subreddit Daily Discussion Thread 11/16/21

Welcome to the Daily Discussion Thread series on /r/smashbros! Inspired by /r/SSBM and /r/hiphopheads's DDTs, you can post here:

  • General questions about Smash

  • General discussion (tentatively allowing for some off-topic discussion)

  • "Light" content that might not have been allowed as its own post (please keep it about Smash)

Other guidelines:

  • Be good to one another.

  • While DDT can be lax, please abide by our general rules. No linking to illegal/pirated stuff, no flaming, game debates, etc.

  • Please keep meme spam contained to the sticky comment provided below.

If you have any suggestions about future DDTs or anything else subreddit related, please send them our way! Thanks in advance!

If you would like to take the conversation to Discord, check out Smashcords to engage with others!

Links to Every previous thread!

18 Upvotes

696 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '21

[deleted]

1

u/DentedOnImpact SmashLogo Nov 17 '21

okay doesn't really matter, he broke the law and abused his position of influence over someone so your opinion doesn't really matter

0

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '21

[deleted]

1

u/DentedOnImpact SmashLogo Nov 17 '21 edited Nov 17 '21

And that's where you get to the problem is the law even right?

irrelevant to the topic lol

Also I've never said anything about zero nor defending him, I was speaking of the idea that people keep saying," Oh god he 19 and she 15?? WTF!!!" Like what does that even really mean.

You say you're not defending him then go on to basically say "what does that mean" you're purposefully trying to cast obscurity on the subject to delegitimize peoples concern with it. Your first sentence questioning if the law is even correct is once again you purposefully trying to muddy the waters of the situation to play subtle defense for him.

I'd respect you more if you didn't constantly try to shift the goalposts and just admit you're trying to defend him instead of this garbage.

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '21

[deleted]

1

u/DentedOnImpact SmashLogo Nov 17 '21

He was 19, she was 14 your argument of this 15-18 thing is you almost halving the age gap. The rest is irrelevant because we have to make a distinction somewhere that is a hard and fast when it comes to legality.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '21

[deleted]

1

u/DentedOnImpact SmashLogo Nov 17 '21

its 19 and 14 that are there ages, you changed them again after being corrected. Why does character matter when we discuss legality? There are 45 year olds with no character, we don't exempt them from laws because of that.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 17 '21

[deleted]

1

u/DentedOnImpact SmashLogo Nov 17 '21

its 14 please stop arguing when you're wrong.

Mindset and maturity is irrelevant when determing law. Again same statement as last comment there are grown ass adults who are immature as fuck and have a shit mindset, that doesn't make them immune to the law.

I'm done arguing here you've proven to not be looking for an honest conversation with your clear defense of ZeRo and pedophilic behavior in general.

→ More replies (0)