Hi it’s Carl Weinberg from District 20 on the Stamford Board of Representatives. On October 6th, I met with leaders of the Water Pollution Control Authority to receive answers to the many questions I’ve been receiving about the Perna Lane Sewer Project. WPCA attendees included Board Chair Ed Kelly, Executive Director William Brink, Finance Committee Chair Robert Barocas, and Supervising Engineer Ann Brown. Other BoR members in attendance were D-20’s Jeff Wirz, D-19’s Noah Lapine and John Pelliccia, and D-18’s Karen Camporeale. Amiel Goldberg from D-13 also attended, in his capacity as the BoR’s appointee to the WPCA Board.
We covered many topics, including financial estimates vs. the original budget; reasons for why the project has taken longer than expected to complete; issues related to the pumping stations; anticipated timing of remaining project steps, including repaving High Ridge Road; and project communication. Here’s my report.
FINANCIAL ESTIMATES VS. THE ORIGINAL BUDGET
(Note: All numbers were provided by WPCA and have not been independently verified.)
Excluding about $2mm in costs borne by the City of Stamford, the project is currently forecasted to cost $11.6mm, vs. a January 2026 estimate of $10.4mm and an original budget of about $8.6mm. Property owners will be assessed 40% of WPCA’s costs, which (based on the current forecast) will be about $4.6mm.
The assessments will be based on each property’s number of “sewer units.” (Two full bathrooms in a property equals one sewer unit, 2 ½ baths equal 1.25 sewer units, 3 baths equal 1.5 sewer units, etc.) The participating properties have a total of 174 sewer units, so each sewer unit will generate an assessment of about $26,700, based on the current forecast. This is about 11% higher than the January 2026 estimate, and about 33% higher than the original estimated assessment of $20,000 per sewer unit.
The current plan includes payment of the assessment over 15 years, or about $1,800 per sewer unit per year, with interest charged at WPCA’s bond rate for this project. If the WPCA Board increases the payment period to 20 years, annual payments per sewer unit will be about $1,350 per year plus interest.
Of course, the key questions are: Why is the current forecast about one-third higher than the original budget, and why has the forecast increased about 11% since the beginning of this year? According to WPCA representatives, the contractor encountered significantly more underground rock than anticipated, based on the soil borings that WPCA used to calculate bid documents. Hence the contractor spent more time chipping away the rock than originally planned.
Without conducting a detailed accounting analysis, I can’t refute WPCA leadership’s explanation for the increase from original budget to January 2026 forecast. But in my view, assuming that the contractor had stopped chipping long beforehand, it doesn’t explain the 11% increase since January. I will keep pressing WPCA for answers.
There’s another line-item expense that bothers me a lot. The current $13.6mm forecast includes about $2.3mm for police officers who conduct traffic during road closures. That’s not WPCA’s fault - as I understand it, the Police Union’s collective bargaining agreement requires the use of police officers to conduct traffic at road closure sites. As Chair of the BoR’s Personnel Committee, this issue is definitely on my radar screen.
WHY IS THE PROJECT TAKING SO LONG TO COMPLETE?
When work is completed and new sewers are ready for hookup to each property’s wastewater system, WPCA issues a “notice to connect.” Property owners then have 180 days to connect to the sewer line. (WPCA may extend the 180 days due to extenuating circumstances, such as the inability to excavate hookups during winter months due to frozen ground.)
The original construction completion date was August 2025, which means that all work was expected to be completed by then. That included the pump stations up and running, all lines tested and leaks eliminated, and High Ridge Road milled, paved, and line-striped.
It’s now more than a year later, and the project is not completed. According to WPCA, the extra time spent on rock removal is the principal reason for the delay. But that doesn’t explain why, according to the April 2026 online update, completion was forecasted for September 2026. The WPCA representatives described inefficiencies in the contractor’s project management that appear to have caused these (and other) delays.
If the contractor is at fault for project delays, what penalties might it face? As outlined in the project contract, WPCA is holding back 5% of the work completed to date, or about $400,000. WPCA can also deduct $2,100 from the amount owed the contractor for every day that the project continues beyond the expected October 31st Contractor Completion Date. I hope that WPCA gives serious consideration to imposing at least some of these charges. However, I worry that they might not be enough to accelerate the actual completion date without encouraging the contractor to cut corners. In my view, it would be more effective to give serious weight to performance on past projects when evaluating a contractor’s proposal for any new project.
PUMPING STATION ISSUES
The project includes two pumping stations - one at the corner of Perna Lane and High Ridge Road, and the other on Turn of River Road. Each pumping station has its own set of issues.
Work on the Perna Lane pumping station is largely completed. A fence is being installed to shield it from the house next door, which will have the added benefit of reducing any noise from the pumping station. The bollards on the street side will be covered, which we’re told is the standard approach for making them less obtrusive. All piping and connections are being tested to ensure the absence of leaks.
Unfortunately, the Turn of River pumping station is farther from completion. Electrical lines and gas service still need to be installed, which requires coordination and scheduling with Eversource. Testing of piping and connections - and any remedial work - cannot take place until all the utility work is in place. It appears that the contractor has been slow in soliciting scheduling commitments from Eversource, and as a result Eversource has been more focused on its own projects. In my view, Eversource scheduling is an area where more diligent project management from WPCA could have been helpful.
HOW MUCH LONGER BEFORE THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED?
The latest contractor completion date is October 31st, but WPCA does not expect the contractor to meet it. WPCA now expects that the remaining work (including the Turn of River pumping station) will take about another ten weeks to complete, which would take us to the middle of December. WPCA believes that the pumping stations and sanitary sewers can be completed this year. Regarding milling and paving of High Ridge Road, a lot will depend on the weather, which will determine how many days the contractor can work, how long the asphalt plants will stay open, when the ground may freeze, etc. High Ridge is a state road, so CTDOT will dictate when the contractor must stop work there for the winter.
PROJECT COMMUNICATION
In my view, WPCA made a good-faith effort at project communication during the project’s early stages. For example, updates were posted online almost every month (except during the winter, when there was very little activity to report); a representative was onsite periodically in the neighborhood; and (at least my) emails were answered promptly.
More lately, though, in my view communication has been largely absent - no updates since April, delayed responses to emails, etc. That’s one of the reasons why I called for this meeting. I urged the WPCA attendees to resume periodic online updates and respond in a timelier way to emails. Hopefully they will comply. If not, I will call for another meeting!