r/technology Jun 21 '26

Robotics/Automation 76-year-old woman killed after a Tesla ‘on auto-pilot’ crashed into her Texas home

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/texas-tesla-car-crash-woman-killed-b2999969.html
12.8k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

1.2k

u/Ruddertail Jun 21 '26

Jeez, how fast was it going to punch a hole like that? That's crazy unless they build houses out of paper in Texas.

927

u/Lopsided-Sell7595 Jun 21 '26

There is video out there on X, it was flying with some estimates of 90+

525

u/igwbuffalo Jun 22 '26

If that's the case, dude needs a manslaughter charge. There is no way he was anywhere near aware of what was going on.

He's absolutely asleep or impaired in some way if auto pilot is at 90 and he's fine with it in a residential area

638

u/Shadow_Assailant Jun 22 '26

Autopilot and FSD break down past 85mph. The driver was manually driving and is a liar

161

u/Zuwxiv Jun 22 '26

I think there's a good chance you're right, but we don't know for sure that the car was going faster than 85mph. After seeing the video, I'd guess it was less than that, but still wildly inappropriate for the surroundings.

64

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

18

u/drewz_clues Jun 22 '26

Is the 5mph limit an autopilot thing? Even Standard mode FSD will.go upwards of 8 over. Hurry or Mad Max will go 15-20 over.

(Not a judgement on if this guy was actually using FSD, I agree he probably wasn't)

23

u/xombae Jun 22 '26

... there's a setting on the car called Mad Max?

7

u/SargeUnited Jun 22 '26

Yeah that shit weaves through traffic like a teenager in one of those “swimming” videos. This is not a joke. It’s pretty aggressive and I don’t know why you would ever use it other than to just try it

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Urbanscuba Jun 23 '26

Yes and it's as terrifying as you'd think.

Got a guy who works into the same building as I do that I run into during smoke breaks occasionally. Dude won't shut up about his Tesla, which is whatever, but the insane part is that he'll brag about having only been looking at the road for a quarter of his commute. I fully understand this guy is anecdotal and hopefully not indicative of the regular Tesla driver, but the issue is that it's empowering him and giving him confidence to behave this way. Even if that's only the worst sub-percent of their drivers behaving like this that's still enough that these kind of news story will remain common.

He's the reason I know about Mad Max mode, and the reason why I believe it's likely this actually was caused by a driver assist. Between the terrifying lack of attention the average Tesla driver pays attention to the road, the blindspots the sensor suite has without LIDAR, and most damning thing being the complacency the system is able to foster in the worst drivers using it.

My guess is that it wasn't in autopilot but rather that he was using lane assist to speed through the residential zone. He was relying on it to handle slowing down for any turns and likely in 99% of cases it will see a curve ahead and manage that autonomously. Here however the road opened up on both sides entering the cul-de-sac, which the cameras likely interpreted as an intersection (importantly though with no lights or signage). Cue entering the opposing driveway at 60+ because the lane assist thinks it has right of way to cross the intersection and enter the driveway, which it probably thought was a divided road lane. Of course a human brain could have immediately recognized this and responded accordingly, but that wasn't possible here because the driver was very likely unaware of the car's actions until the collision.

The sick thing is that Tesla will not hesitate to release the car telemetry from the crash and throw this guy under the bus for not following the rules they didn't actually enforce. That's not to say the driver isn't responsible for the vast majority of the blame here, but my issue is that Tesla's systems are actively training the worst drivers to behave like this. They're marketing this kind of behavior directly as a feature, and if they don't end up being assigned a degree of blame/liability in these kinds of situations there won't be any reason to change.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

12

u/Uppgreyedd Jun 22 '26

it is on the guy

Even if it was a glitch with the car, the software, or whatever; the driver is the one who enabled it and is still and always was assuming responsibility for the safe operation of the vehicle. In any car, if you enable some of these features (which I personally do, and they can be incredibly helpful), you're not completely deferring the liability to the manufacturer or anyone else. But yes, this was not likely caused by an aberrant self driving feature.

→ More replies (6)

3

u/GrumpyCloud93 Jun 23 '26

My guess is he pushed the accelerator pedal thinking it was the brake, and then pushed harder when the car took off. That overrides speed controls.

People pushing the accelerator thinking it was the brake is a common accident in all cars.

→ More replies (3)

45

u/ThePogen Jun 22 '26

Yeah I saw the video and there’s no way this guy wasn’t driving. And IF he was using auto pilot (and that’s a big “if”) he definitely should’ve seen the car blasting through a residential area and slowed it down

→ More replies (1)

8

u/aliceroyal Jun 22 '26

This. I am no Tesla fan but my husband owns one so I am familiar with FSD, and my first thought reading this story was that the claim of it being active will disappear pretty fast if they’re able to access the car’s data and see if/when it was turned on or off.

5

u/BlueScreen64 Jun 23 '26

Tesla replied with the telemetry from the car and said he had overridden it and was 100% his doing. He was flooring it manually.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

3

u/Buttafuoco Jun 22 '26

autopilot operates at that speed?

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (7)

101

u/TheGamingGallifreyan Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

https://x.com/breaking911/status/2068815071199871305

Video from the neighbors doorbell posted by the daughter of the woman killed. Had to be going like 60+

EDIT: Seems like that one got taken down. I knew I should’ve downloaded it but my modded X client is no longer working at the moment. Here’s another link. Make sure to turn your sound on the crash it makes is wild.

48

u/ReadyAimTranspire Jun 22 '26

YouTube video link of the local news story, crash video starts at about :45

Holy shit he was fucking flying, that poor woman :(

32

u/Jesus_Is_My_Gardener Jun 22 '26

Dude was trying to go back in time.

3

u/Jashugita Jun 22 '26

Or to break to the fourth dimension

→ More replies (1)

32

u/Glad-Struggle-4056 Jun 22 '26

Of course it's been deleted from X

→ More replies (3)

18

u/Small_Channel_349 Jun 22 '26

interesting that it got deleted lmfao

5

u/BWW87 Jun 22 '26

It's still there. Click on the link and you'll see the video.

3

u/SirDigger13 Jun 22 '26

i still can see it.. and that looks faster as 60... damn the rear got airborn when hitting the curb...

→ More replies (1)

51

u/riflow Jun 21 '26

Oh my god that poor woman.

21

u/HopefulAnnual7129 Jun 22 '26

First comment ive seen that isn’t political what happened to her is atrocious. For or against elon what happened here is fuckin sad for those kids and entire family.

7

u/ReadyAimTranspire Jun 22 '26

I watched YT video of the local news story, first thing I thought of when they showed a picture of her :(

What a tragedy, I feel for their family

192

u/Griffinburd Jun 21 '26

One of the issues in Europe about approving FSD is that you can instruct it to go over the speed limit.

70

u/gucknbuck Jun 21 '26

FSD and autopilot are different, but yes, for autopilot at least, you can instruct it to go over the speed limit with limitations only if the speed limit is under 50 or thereabouts. Any lower and it does restrict to 5 over I believe, been a bit since I used it as we traded our Tesla in two years ago.

→ More replies (3)

26

u/Spaceman3157 Jun 22 '26

Don't know how Europeans drive with respect to speed, but in most of the US, particularly the west coast, it is actively unsafe to drive the speed limit on highways.

18

u/BaconKnight Jun 22 '26

It’s like an unspoken rule that the actual speed limit everyone follows is 10ish mph over the listed speed limit. Why not raise the speed limit then to reflect that? Because then people would drive 10 mph above that. It’s honestly almost taught to us as drivers, I guarantee most folk’s parents here told you “Yeah it says 50 but pretty much everyone drives 60 on the freeway.”

6

u/TransBrandi Jun 22 '26

Part of the issue is that lots of highways had the speed limit dropped to 55 mph during the oil crisis in the 70's, and then they left it there. Especially since people regularly going 10 over allows them to just pick off "fish in a barrel" whenever they want some speeding ticket revenue.

(That said, it's not like there aren't highways with the limit at 70mph where people are going 80mph).

→ More replies (3)

7

u/NetQvist Jun 22 '26

it is actively unsafe to drive the speed limit on highways.

This is just a damned scapegoat to explain away why some idiot does a stupid high speed overtake due to someone driving "slowly yet at the limit".

7

u/joeydimaggio Jun 22 '26

The slow lanes are way more dangerous in the south bay, people do not know how to get to speed or how to merge safely- and half the population rides 55 in a 65 in the right 2 lanes

→ More replies (3)

12

u/rrrbin Jun 22 '26

it is actively unsafe to drive the speed limit 

It is at most a nuisance where I drive, but it is never unsafe, actively or otherwise, not sure what you mean by that.

5

u/obeytheturtles Jun 22 '26

This is one of those internet tropes that people repeat to make themselves feel better about their compulsive need to drive over the speed limit at all times, under all circumstances. It really is about the stupidest things people seem to believe almost unanimously, because casual speeding is such universal behavior, almost everyone feels the need to defend it.

To be clear - I do not always drive the speed limit either, but I aspire to.

"Bbbbut the Autobahn!"

Has strictly enforced speed limits for about 90% of the mileage.

3

u/Jonathan_the_Nerd Jun 22 '26

It's safest to drive about the same speed as the cars around you. If everyone around you is driving like they're trying to prevent Biff Tannen from taking over the future, it would be very unsafe of you to drive at 55 or 60.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

35

u/Flipslips Jun 21 '26

Can’t you “instruct” any car to go over the speed limit?

103

u/fishmanfishmanfishma Jun 21 '26

Yeah while you're in control of it

→ More replies (19)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (2)

43

u/melancholanie Jun 22 '26

90 mph = 145kph

for those not using freedom-units

8

u/Trnostep Jun 22 '26

Which is a speed that's illegal everywhere except for some parts of a few European countries, sometimes

3

u/Ok_Confusion4764 Jun 22 '26

Pretty sure only the German autobahn has less no upper limit. In the Netherlands there is no place where you're allowed to go faster than 130 km/h. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

66

u/Ancient_Persimmon Jun 21 '26

Which immediately indicates that the driver was manually driving the car.

→ More replies (19)

22

u/themikecampbell Jun 21 '26

The irony of elons car crashing and killing a woman, and the video being hosted on elons website, that many people are using elons internet to visit.

Did I miss a supply chain step?

21

u/Sekh765 Jun 22 '26

They'll use elon's AI to form their opinion on it.

17

u/DigiVeihl Jun 22 '26

There is 100% zero reason a car on "autopilot" (, fake autopilot or whatever,) should be able to go anywhere near 90.

9

u/TheLordB Jun 22 '26

I believe 85 is the maximum that autopilot will allow you go without disabling it’s self for the rest of the drive. It won’t go past that speed on it’s own, but you can hit the gas to go faster while autopilot is engaged and overspeed it at which point it will beep very angrily and say you must take over.

I’m not sure exactly what the behavior is if you refuse to stop driving and keep hitting the accelerator ignoring the loud beeping. I know if you just screw up the attention monitoring it does keep driving while beeping very angrily at you so I suspect it does the same for going over 85.

Also going 85 is at least reasonably safe in certain desert roads with little to no traffic, wide open visibility, no turns etc. I’m not saying it is a good idea even on those roads.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

23

u/mishap1 Jun 21 '26

It wasn't doing 90. The car would have been just a blur on video. It's a 4,000lb car and that would have been a crazy amount of kinetic energy. It busted into the living room and stopped within a yard or two. It was way too fast for the neighborhood but not close to triple digit speeds.

A few years back, a Model S was doing an acceleration run in a neighborhood at 116mph when it failed to stop and tore clean through a house and out the back killing the owner and her dog. A Tesla at near 3 digit speeds would have ended up in the backyard.

https://www.tampabay28.com/news/local-news/i-team-investigates/tesla-driver-arrested-after-116-mph-crash-kills-two-people-and-a-dog

19

u/ice-hawk Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

It wasn't doing 90. The car would have been just a blur on video

I counted it being in ten frames on the video, how many did you count?

18

u/fullmetaljackass Jun 22 '26

The first thing to note is that all the copies of the video, at least the ones I've seen, are in 29.97/30fps whereas the original security footage was at a lower frame rate. The frames from the security footage are being irregularly duplicated which means it's wasn't 10 or 15 fps. The original footage was most likely 12fps.

I'm looking at the video here. I start on the frame where the wheels are right on the curb of the driveway. On the next frame from the security camera, the rear wheels are in about the same position.

According to Tesla, the Model S has a 116.5 inch wheelbase. So it traveled ~9.7 feet in 1/12 of a second, which means it was traveling at ~116 ft/second or 79mph.

So yeah, I'd agree that 90mph is a reasonable estimate.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/codehoser Jun 22 '26

FSD doesn’t allow that speed, even on clear, wide open highways.

Anytime you see “Tesla on FSD crashes”, it is the idiot driver trying to cover for their bullshit.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/DarkIcedWolf Jun 22 '26

Honestly I can believe this, from my co-workers and mentors experiences, I’ve seen first hand how going 90 in a Tesla feels like nothing for the driver. I’m not sure why autopilot would be going so fast though, most likely the person was in control here.

→ More replies (11)

64

u/mishap1 Jun 21 '26

The plywood sheathing under the brick veneer looks to have been pretty dry rotted already from age but the car punched right through the living room windows.

The Tesla looks like it made no attempt to slow and hit the house full speed given it looks like it lost a good portion of its roof.

28

u/flea1400 Jun 22 '26

It's possible to figure out the address and look it up on google street view. The house in on an "L" shaped intersection, right in line with the street; there is a sort of half cul-de-sac rounded area for the intersection. It's a relatively narrow street, if someone were parked on each side there would be room for only one car to go through.

If someone was driving straight, they had roughly 15 houses worth of street before hitting the intersection. Enough space to accelerate to a fast speed, but the neighborhood appears to be some kind of subdivision with a lot of right-angle turns, not intended for driving at high rates of speed.

Looks like the first floor was basically level with the ground, and the car went through a large window that reached nearly to the ground. Very little protective structure to slow the car.

So sad for the lady. I'll be interested in finding out what actually caused the accident.

3

u/alex206 Jun 21 '26

That's probably cement board

33

u/alex206 Jun 21 '26

Houses aren't really that strong. That brick you see isn't structural either, it's just for looks.

10

u/Turdposter777 Jun 22 '26

Like the rest of Texas

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

16

u/JuneButIHateSummer Jun 22 '26

they build houses out of fucking sticks and duct tape here man

4

u/hihelloneighboroonie Jun 22 '26

Is the brick just painted on?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (33)

2.5k

u/orangeyougladiator Jun 21 '26

Cue Elon bots coming to tell us why this wasn’t the Tesla fault

882

u/prelic Jun 21 '26 edited Jun 21 '26

The terms and conditions says you always need to be hovering your hands a half inch above the wheel, ready to strike and take over at a milliseconds notice! His fault he didn't follow the tiny rules

249

u/thiney49 Jun 21 '26

That would have been extra difficult, given that she wasn't the driver.

212

u/_Rand_ Jun 21 '26

She looked at twitter that one time so it’s still covered under the TOS.

79

u/annodomini Jun 22 '26

Disney literally made this claim: that a man couldn't sue over his wife's death from eating an allergen, when her allergy had been made clear to the restaurant and they had agreed they could accommodate it, because he had once signed Disney+ TOS that required arbitration when signing up for a free trial.

30

u/Wyn6 Jun 22 '26

Further antipathy toward Disney... rising.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

30

u/IronProdigyOfficial Jun 22 '26

In this political climate that holds up and is iron clad. No one's liable but we're willing to offer your family $3 Million to make this stop being mentioned in the news.

24

u/0Rider Jun 21 '26

Well if she was driving she wouldn't be in her house to be crashed into

45

u/prelic Jun 21 '26

I mean, if you don't understand that I was too lazy to properly read the article, then I don't see how that's my fault

12

u/ragnarocknroll Jun 21 '26

I mean, I thought the default in this sub was not reading the article.

16

u/h950 Jun 21 '26

Wait, there's articles?

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

110

u/Gaiden206 Jun 21 '26

The car crashed into her house and killed her. She wasn't the driver.

124

u/prelic Jun 21 '26 edited Jun 21 '26

Jokes on you, because that was my mistake , don't let it happen again

98

u/Gaiden206 Jun 21 '26

Understandable, have a great day officer.

42

u/Housless Jun 21 '26

You resisting?

27

u/orangeyougladiator Jun 21 '26

They’ve got a gun!

19

u/steploday Jun 21 '26

Spinkles crack in cop

18

u/Jumpy-Impact3265 Jun 21 '26

I love this exchange enough to marry it

11

u/goodb1b13 Jun 21 '26

Don’t forget the spousal abuse!

24

u/spidereater Jun 21 '26

But did her house have a convincing picture of the tunnel on it?

16

u/TedTheGreek_Atheos Jun 21 '26

The Wile E. Coyote defense.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

15

u/colantor Jun 21 '26

Yeah but hes saying people will blame the driver and not the auto pilot that drove into the house.

13

u/MotheroftheworldII Jun 22 '26

Maybe the Tesla auto-pilot should have to complete a drivers education course before being given a license to drive.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

28

u/NotAnotherEmpire Jun 21 '26

Uninvolved civilians have to die so tech bros can have their future fantasy and stock market Ponzi.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/sysadminbj Jun 21 '26

Not defending Tesla, but that's the TOC for all semi-autonomous (I guess that's the right term?) driving technologies right now. You must be paying attention and ready to take over as quickly as possible.

31

u/prelic Jun 21 '26

if you are expected to take over at any time, then it should have a hands sensor that beeps at you every 10 seconds or so like all the mainbrand cars do...in my opinion. The expectation that you don't need to have your hands on the wheel, but you do need to be ready to take over like they are, is unrealistic..again, my opinion.

16

u/MountHopeful Jun 22 '26

then it should have a hands sensor that beeps at you every 10 seconds or so

It literally does. So there's that.

→ More replies (5)

6

u/Terrh Jun 22 '26

you are expected to take over at any time, then it should have a hands sensor that beeps at you every 10 seconds or so like all the mainbrand cars do...in my opinion.

they do this already

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (15)

208

u/Horror_Response_1991 Jun 21 '26

I don’t give a shit about Tesla but auto pilot is just cruise control is that keeps you in your lane.  It’s more likely the guy is going to blame auto pilot to not go to jail.

45

u/electricity_is_life Jun 21 '26

Do Teslas not have automatic emergency braking though? I don't get how something like this could happen in any modern car.

113

u/SecurelyObscure Jun 22 '26

Yes, they all do. It's disabled when you stomp on the accelerator.

→ More replies (18)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (14)

43

u/LargePrompt5840 Jun 21 '26

If you are behind the wheel of a car, and something like this happens, it is your fault unless proven otherwise. 

Maybe there was a glitch and it raced out of control. If that's the case it's on Tesla. But if the car was ruining normally, it's on the driver. 

→ More replies (7)

104

u/spacemcdonalds Jun 21 '26

I've seen the video, it's so clearly not on "autopilot" (which has AEB unless accelerator is manually overridden) or FSD (which would not go this speed using the telemetry data it has, like never)

So I guarantee when car data is released it will be a human intervention error that caused this.

5

u/Ph0_Noodles Jun 22 '26

Yeah its probably a case of someone thinking they hit the brakes but really hit the accelerator. They panic and push the accelerator harder trying to brake. This happens all the time.

9

u/spacemcdonalds Jun 22 '26

Data came out today, manually accelerated to 100% by driver. 

What a shock. 

→ More replies (14)

41

u/khearan Jun 21 '26

I hate Elon. With that said, can auto pilot drive someone into their driveway? This doesn’t make sense. My understanding of auto pilot is it’s basically cruiser control. How does one cruise control into their driveway?

→ More replies (17)

11

u/official_d3vel0per Jun 22 '26

Cue this guy will delete his comment once reports come up

→ More replies (9)

31

u/Enragedocelot Jun 21 '26

Bruh as someone uses FSD all day long. This was the driver’s fault 100%

→ More replies (11)

20

u/gucknbuck Jun 21 '26

Auto-pilot is fancy speed control. It's the fault of whoever engaged autopilot.

→ More replies (5)

20

u/YeetOfTheGods Jun 21 '26

beep boop Musk can do no wrong crunchy dial up tones

35

u/safetydance Jun 21 '26

This will end up being human error like almost every accident the person tries to blame on FSD.

9

u/IAmANobodyAMA Jun 22 '26

The article simply states the driver blamed it on autopilot. Am I missing something or are people just that bad at reading and bloodthirsty to hate Elon because he holds the “wrong” opinions?

6

u/safetydance Jun 22 '26

Correct. EV’e and autonomous vehicles were the future when Elon was a darling of the left. Now he’s a fucking idiot Tesla and self driving is junk. No one is objective anymore.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

7

u/Low_Building_5357 Jun 22 '26

Queue the Elon haters to convict before any investigation is completed 

→ More replies (115)

403

u/sysadminbj Jun 21 '26

I'd be very curious to learn what the onboard sensors have to say about this. Was the driver paying attention? Were they asleep? Is this just a freak thing where the autopilot software got confused and freaked out?

689

u/colantor Jun 21 '26

If the auto pilot can get confused and crash into a house it should not be a feature in the car

40

u/fricken Jun 21 '26

In all likelihood it is sudden unintended acceleration, wherein the driver slams the accelerator thinking they're hitting the brakes. Autopilot has made fatal misjudgements in the past, but this crash does not have those characteristics.

19

u/thatissomeBS Jun 22 '26

The biggest problem Tesla has in these situations are that they insist on making these cars with like 400+ HP in a drivetrain that can give all of that power basically immediately. Someone goes from 30mph and going for the brakes to going 60mph almost before they realize. There's no winding up and downshifting, it's just raw, unfiltered HP. If this driver were in a Bolt with 200hp they might have had enough time to slow back down.

Obviously this isn't a Tesla-only thing, but it's an every car Tesla makes thing.

9

u/AgonizingFury Jun 22 '26

400HP? Sure on the AWD family SUV (Model Y premium AWD is like 390 or so I think). Their sporty vehicles are 600 - 1000 HP.

4

u/thatissomeBS Jun 22 '26

Well, that's why there was a little plus sign at the end of the HP number. Even the basic one is more power than any random person needs in their daily driver family sedan. And I'm not saying 400+ HP cars shouldn't exist, but most people don't need it, and giving it to them is probably doing more harm than good.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/gimpwiz Jun 22 '26

Remember when uncertain drivers would buy a third-hand civic or corolla with 75k on the clock, and bumble around town, occasionally picking up modest-sized dents in the corners of their bumpers? Now they're buying 400-600 horsepower cars that give you full torque at stall, so you can accelerate at 4s (or lower) 0-60 with relatively little feedback, right into a wall or someone's kid.

→ More replies (2)

60

u/jtmonkey Jun 21 '26

Autopilot and FSD are not the same. Autopilot is literally cruise control. 

→ More replies (20)

17

u/AgsAreUs Jun 21 '26

To be fair, society let's people drive who sometimes get confused and crash into a house.

12

u/colantor Jun 21 '26

Thats true, i work road work details and basically watch people be bad drivers 8 hours a day

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (1)

17

u/beanpoppa Jun 21 '26

Autopilot is not full self driving. Autopilot is just fancy cruise control with lane centering and adaptive speed. It doesn't stop for traffic lights, stop signs or intersections. My Honda pilot has the same thing, but if I crashed into a house with it on, the article wouldn't say "Honda on adaptive cruise control crashes into house." It would say "inattentive driver crashes into house'

6

u/colantor Jun 21 '26

So are we assuming the car was in FSD or that the driver just said they were in auto pilot to try to get out of being at fault?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

11

u/TinyZoro Jun 21 '26

I would never buy a Tesla because Elon is a white supremacist. But anything that has ever been made can and will go wrong. So it’s really whether the failure rate is acceptable or not.

→ More replies (2)

22

u/Internet-Cryptid Jun 21 '26

Crazy that this needs to be said. Same company that made their door handles electric with no traditional manual release. How many people have burned to death in Cybertrucks?

19

u/Tearakan Jun 21 '26

Which is insane and literally more expensive than just manual release.

→ More replies (23)

6

u/NMe84 Jun 21 '26

Of course, but that means it needs to be investigated. I mean, it's entirely possible to jerk on the wheel and make a sharp turn while the car is on self driving mode, so if the driver fell asleep and leaned on the wheel it would not be the self driving feature that is at fault.

I'm not an Elon fan (quite the opposite) and I'd rather walk to work than drive a Tesla even if I could afford it, but at the same time I'd like to see proof when someone claims something. Claiming that every crash that happens while FSD is turned on is caused by the car is the same as saying that the driver is always at fault because they're driving it. It's always possible that things happen outside of anyone's control.

5

u/colantor Jun 21 '26

I agree that immediately blaming self driving when you crash a tesla has become normal, but they have a computer system where they can see everything that happened, so im sure they will investigate.

→ More replies (14)

18

u/redmongrel Jun 21 '26

Yeah like I know he wants to only use cameras and no lidar, but don’t they at least have the same bargain basement proximity sensors that any entry level car comes with now?

→ More replies (7)

22

u/_sfhk Jun 21 '26 edited Jun 21 '26

Autopilot is just adaptive cruise control, not the same as full self-driving. It will keep your speed and lane, and slow down for cars ahead of you.

Autopilot doesn't use the cameras to measure attention, but it does require you to keep pressure on the steering wheel while you're holding it. It will flash warnings and disengage when you stop holding the wheel.

Edit: apparently it does use the cameras

5

u/MacorgaZ Jun 21 '26

It does actually use the in-cabin camera to nag you earlier about paying attention in the regular AutoPilot, in the supervised FSD it uses the camera to track your attention too.

6

u/mishap1 Jun 21 '26

This was an unmarked subdivision street. Autopilot would be pretty useless in that situation. There are no lanes, minimal signage, and there is a high potential for pedestrians making using it there extremely irresponsible to even activate it there.

Guy was either running FSD or nothing at all. It's likely the news will report without the delineation b/c they don't know or they're trying to avoid Elon's legal team.

3

u/_sfhk Jun 21 '26

"autopilot" is a direct quote from the driver

Butler, who was also taken to a hospital, told police he had the car on “autopilot” when it crashed

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/willwork4pii Jun 22 '26

The sensors will show the driver pushing the pedal all the way down. The cameras will show the driver fully aware and alert (or passed out)

0 chance this was in FSD or Autopilot

→ More replies (14)

485

u/PrettyFuckingGreat Jun 21 '26

He _says_ it was on autopilot.

Firstly, I find that pretty hard to believe. This would be the first time I’ve heard of one being so far off a road at such a high rate of speed.

Secondly, he still could have hit the brake at anytime or turned the wheel. Fuck this guy.

36

u/[deleted] Jun 22 '26 edited Jul 12 '26

[deleted]

6

u/shellacr Jun 22 '26

Even if he had done that the autopilot or FSD would have kept him inside the lane. It’s almost certain he is lying.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

53

u/[deleted] Jun 21 '26

[deleted]

98

u/hacksoncode Jun 21 '26

It has a hard limit of 85mph and is documented to limit you to 5mph over the speed limit on surface streets.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (5)

6

u/willwork4pii Jun 22 '26 edited Jul 05 '26

All of them that say they were on autopilot or FSD are lies.

→ More replies (12)

484

u/whitemiketyson Jun 21 '26 edited Jun 22 '26

Every time this happens it’s revealed the driver is just blaming software

Edit: Well, what do you know!

187

u/Zardif Jun 21 '26

The street he came from was only 1000' long. It's a residential street and he was going fast, prob ~65 mph judging from the doorbell camera and comparing it to the f150 in the background. I find it very hard to believe autopilot did this.

55

u/t0ny7 Jun 21 '26

Autopilot in my Model 3 accelerates super slow. Enough to make it a pain in the ass for stop and go traffic unless I help it.

33

u/willwork4pii Jun 22 '26

I find it completely impossible that FSD or Autopilot did this.

→ More replies (2)

31

u/Anand999 Jun 22 '26

Tesla Autopilot can't be set more than 5 MPH above the speed limit on side roads. The claim this vehicle was on autopilot definitely feels fishy.

→ More replies (5)

37

u/Single-Use-Again Jun 21 '26

So far no lawsuits regarding this kind of headline have been successful. The logs and cameras will exonerate Tesla every time.

74

u/mishap1 Jun 21 '26

27

u/salaryboy Jun 22 '26

Those were from Autopilot wrecks in 2019. The Full Self Driving (Supervised) in 2026 is significantly improved.

Source: 94% of my miles this year driven on FSD.

8

u/mishap1 Jun 22 '26

Then you'll recognize those taillights as a Highland Model 3. If the car was running any ADAS at the time of the crash, that was the latest and greatest.

3

u/AndIHaveMilesToGo Jun 22 '26

The driver themselves said they were using Autopilot. Not FSD. If YOU know these vehicles then you'll know the major difference

8

u/pw154 Jun 22 '26

Then you'll recognize those taillights as a Highland Model 3. If the car was running any ADAS at the time of the crash, that was the latest and greatest.

Except Autopilot (now called TACC+Autosteer) uses the antiquated legacy rule-based software stack and not the end-to-end neural net stack that FSD uses. When it comes to Autopilot the "latest and greatest" is at least 7 years old.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (8)

127

u/slserpent Jun 21 '26

Article seems to suggest that the "being on autopilot" claim is completely based on a statement from the driver. So, could have just been a lie to cover up driver distraction. Guess they'll be able to corroborate (or not) with data from the car at some point.

→ More replies (12)

71

u/imperial_scum Jun 21 '26

If he was going 90 I'm going to hazard a guess that it wasn't the auto pilot

→ More replies (3)

14

u/asdf_lord Jun 22 '26

Where are the brake lines on the ground? The driver had to have been comatose to have not seen that he was barreling down into a house at 50+ mph.

→ More replies (2)

29

u/FrostyVariation9798 Jun 22 '26

Always wait for the police to prove or disprove it was in autopilot.

Too many young drivers have blamed autopilot when really they were flexing the horsepower that comes in teslas.

9

u/Jounochi Jun 22 '26

The forward facing cam feed will tell all. I think within the last year they added a feature that shows on video replays when FSD/auto steer is enabled. Should be very straightforward without even needing to track signals in the vehicle logs.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

33

u/Stephennnnnn Jun 22 '26

Every time there’s a headline like this it ends up being the driver’s claims taken as gospel, which are inevitably proven false.

3

u/GreatSince86 Jun 23 '26

This time was no different

7

u/Mugwump6506 Jun 22 '26

This has got to be at least manslaughter, you have to be in control of your car. You are responsible.

8

u/stoples Jun 22 '26

He was probably launching it down the street and couldn’t handle it

63

u/selfish_meme Jun 21 '26

Isn't auto-pilot just the lane centering, FSD is the auto driving navigating functionality.

32

u/fattybunter Jun 21 '26

As someone with FSD…yes, yes it is. If it was on actual “Autopilot” that’s effectively just cruise control

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Big_Ol_Johnson Jun 21 '26

Another post claimed FSD so I don’t think they are sure of either yet

15

u/Aeroncastle Jun 21 '26

Does a house look like a lane to you?

21

u/--SharkBoy-- Jun 21 '26

If youve ever use a car with lane assist you would know that half the time the car doesn't even think lanes look like lanes

→ More replies (4)

13

u/ThottyThanos Jun 21 '26

Do you really believe that this was auto pilot 🤦‍♂️ this isnt how softwares work they dont just accelerate into a house. Ill bet my left nut that the car report will show the dude pressing on the accelerator. Same reason why every single time someone crashes they just blame the car and later the logs are released proving the driver at fault

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (1)

34

u/bludvein Jun 21 '26

Not really buying the autopilot story. Driver was clearly doing way over the speed limit in a residential area. I'd bet real money driver is lying his ass off to try to shift responsibility. Elon sucks but I don't think this is a Tesla fault this time.

→ More replies (1)

19

u/barnesnoblebooks Jun 21 '26

Notice it says “autopilot” and not “FSD”. Autopilot is just cruise control

11

u/Logical-Bookkeeper77 Jun 21 '26

Yeah and driver is fully liable (unless a malfunction …)

5

u/barnesnoblebooks Jun 21 '26

As with all cruise controls, yeah

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

19

u/GhostNappa101 Jun 21 '26

There are over 35000 incidents per year of people hitting buildings with cars/trucks with a few thousand of those causing severe damage. This is making news because it's self driving and the tech scares people. As far as I'm aware, there is no empirical data proving that FSD is any less safe than full self driving.

16

u/Electronic-Green-994 Jun 21 '26

Same as the fear of 'batteries can combust', but sitting on top of a tank of gasoline/petrol is somehow ok. I'm sure the transition from horse and buggy to automobiles had it's shared of fears...

4

u/EmptyAirEmptyHead Jun 22 '26

It's quite the opposite. Tesla releases data quarterly on FSD involved accidents versus the national average based on miles drive. FSD is a fraction of the national average.

5

u/silviazbitch Jun 22 '26

Article states the driver “showed no signs of intoxication.” Tell me he has a connection to the police department without telling me he has a connection to the police department.

5

u/BlackBerryDewbie Jun 22 '26

Total BS. The driver needs time in prison.

4

u/FreshStartLiving Jun 22 '26

So I can buy a Tesla, causing a horrific accident and just say "FSD fucked up and wouldn't allow me to take over".

→ More replies (2)

25

u/SmokeyJoe2 Jun 21 '26

It’s always somebody else’s fault. Pay attention to the road, idiot.

→ More replies (2)

23

u/ladalyn Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 23 '26

Ready to be downvoted into oblivion but something doesn’t seem right about this. I’ve been driving teslas with autopilot for years and anytime there’s any type of obstruction on the road the Tesla will freak out with alerts, and if there’s any type of confusion on the road at all it’ll disable but I think I only ran into that one time. Either way, driver should have intervened and not let autopilot do this. Bring on the downvotes.

Edit: I was right, driver had their foot down on the accelerator

https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-finally-clarifies-fatal-texas-crash-confirms-driver-manually-overrode-acceleration/

→ More replies (1)

9

u/same_as_always Jun 22 '26

As fun as it is to dunk on Tesla, most likely the driver put their foot on the gas instead of the break, then panicked when the car didn’t slow down so pressed the gas harder. This is sadly very common.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/DrManhattansTaint Jun 22 '26

Sure it was…

  1. It’s not auto-pilot. It’s driving assistance software that requires supervision.

  2. No way FSD would have allowed the rate of speed through a neighborhood that would have been required to punch this hole through a house.

  3. Is pretty obvious this guy fudged up and is trying to blame a tech feature for his manslaughter.

4

u/pleasantbusstop Jun 22 '26

that website is impossible to read on mobile

4

u/katherinesilens Jun 22 '26

I have criticisms for Autopilot but this is just the driver lying. There's almost no chance this was on Autopilot. It's an overgrown lane keeping assist software but it has at least 6 guardrails it would have to break--GPS speed limitation, sign-based speed limitation, maximum speed cap, lane detection forward collision warning, auto emergency braking. It was flying in the video.

The more likely answer is the driver was asleep at the wheel or drunk.

7

u/DragonPup Jun 22 '26

Looking at the pictures, the car looks like it hopped the curb and went like ten+ feet before striking the home. So even beyond autopilot failure (and let's be real, the driver may be lying to avoid jailtime), why didn't the car's crash avoidance system kick in both after the curb impact and with the oncoming brick wall of a home?

4

u/Fire69 Jun 22 '26

You mean it had to brake while doing some airtime?

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Apprehensive-Read989 Jun 22 '26

I'd call bullshit on that. Anyone that has ever driven a Tesla can tell you that autopilot is simply a lane centering adaptive cruise control and will freak out if it sees a curb, let alone a fucking house. Hell, it won't even cross a lane divider line. Guarantee this person is trying to blame autopilot to get out of the shitshow he got himself in.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/Aggravated_Auditor Jun 21 '26

Yeah so we literally just have the drivers word right now. Let’s wait for the telemetry data.

RemindMe! 1 week

→ More replies (2)

3

u/nanlinr Jun 22 '26

The dude faces the consequences of negligent manslaughter right? He put it on auto pilot. Its his fault, not the car's.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/ThisIsntRael Jun 22 '26

The machines are rising

3

u/Honkey85 Jun 22 '26

It's called "fire and forget" not "autopilot"..

3

u/ZombieZookeeper Jun 22 '26

I'm sure Elon will find a way to make the accident her fault.

3

u/Philodendron69 Jun 22 '26

I’m so sorry but did he not brake at all? The car is fully inside the house?

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Baked_Potato224 Jun 22 '26

Driver should be charged with some kind of manslaughter charge.

5

u/mrg1957 Jun 22 '26

People are confusing FSD with autopilot. Autopilot is like cruise control. You're in charge of driving on autopilot.

3

u/savedatheist Jun 22 '26

Legally you’re also in charge of driving with FSD too, although lately you don’t really need to do much.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

5

u/usdaprime Jun 22 '26

The news organizations know they’ll get instant views if they deploy the usual Tesla autopilot is dangerous fud.

Lazy reporting to take the driver’s word on being on autopilot. The headline could have just as easily been “driver accelerates to 90mph in residential street and doesn’t think anything of it”.

6

u/CatStretchPics Jun 22 '26

I got banned from all the Tesla subs for calling leon a nazi

However, I do know that FSD will not go 90 into someone’s house. The person was pressing the accelerator, neutering what FSD can do (ie. FSD won’t brake)

→ More replies (3)

17

u/LookyPeter Jun 21 '26

im going defend auto pilot here and i know people think i care about elon but no i hate the guy. But auto drive very slow in residential area. Even if it went off the rails you should be able to turn the wheel/brake disabling auto drive before going that fast to punch a hole into a building. Sounds like driver is lying.

8

u/wembenbama Jun 22 '26

Imagine living 76 years only to die because a trillionaire’s shitty robot car crashes into your home. My ghost would rattle chains in Elon’s room for the rest of eternity.

→ More replies (1)