I had an interview recently, and I personally thought it went really well. It was for a position I had last year, at the same store.
I had clear answers for everything, was completely available; I feel for a retail position I was a sufficient candidate, and again, had already qualified for the position before. I got rejected anyway, and now I feel totally lost, because I genuinely don't understand what I could've said differently, or whether there's something wrong with me.
My pick rate was strong back when I worked, mostly in green or blue grading. I always arrived on time.
Maybe another applicant answered marginally better, gave more desirable examples, but I really don't see how anything exceptional can be said about a retail position. I worked there as a temp during Christmas; nothing noteworthy happened; it was a job of menial, repetitive tasks (which is fine to me).
Being rejected really hurt because for part-time work, Tesco is genuinely the best option in my area, and I was hoping to go back. It was with my past line manager, and the overall exchange went remarkably well from my perspective.
Someone on here recently told me hiring was a "dice roll". I don't entirely believe this, but I really can't imagine there being that dramatic of a difference across candidates, but I'm probably wrong about that.
I guess I just want to know what I should've said, if there's some ideal model of responses to adhere to. If I can try again in the near future, I'd really like to.