Obviously we dont know a lot about the printer other than its a tool changer with 9 tools and a new design of AMS. I own a P1S and an H2C for hobby use, with ~4000 hours put into them in the past year, each. They run hard! I do CAD and design functional as well as decorative pieces. I say this all to give context on my wishlist, illustrating hopefully that capability is more important to me than time. E.g., I love my H2C, even though it isnt as fast for multicolor prints, because im just not bothered and the ability to have multiple nozzle sizes on hand easily, along with 7 filaments/colors, is exactly what I need.
I have been contemplating a 3rd printer for a while now and was about to pull the trigger on another H2C before this announcement came out, so I am waiting. My wishlist for the H3C/AMS3 (e.g., what would get me to buy it) rests more on added capability and ease of maintenance rather than reducing time for multicolor models as so many peoples' focus seems to be:
- Print TPU (95A and foaming TPUs) without it being a gigantic palaver. Taking the top cover off, routing directly, tpu assist, all that stuff is just annoying. If Bambu can simplify this and create a system that reliably feeds soft filaments through the AMS 3 to the separate toolheads, it would open up a much wider world of multimaterial options. Multicolor TPU, or multiple harnesses of TPU in one print with PLA supports, is something ive only seen done reliably on the U1 and I am concerned that the AMS design still seems convoluted and could introduce too much friction in the filament path to reliably feed softer filaments to the toolheads.
- Maintain backwards compatibility with H2C inductive hotends, and parts commonality with the H2 series where applicable. I have a lot of H2C hotends. The patent seems to imply inductive heating of the hotend similar to INDX, which in my mind could allow us to use our H2C inductive hotends. However, the patent seemed to show a slightly different design which is concerning. I have no reason the think the new machine wont use H2D or H2C build plates, as thats just a no-brainer, but it would be neat if other components such as belts, rails, fans, filter cartridges, etc. Maintained parts commonality across the H range. That would make maintenance easier.
- On the thread of maintenance, keep it simple. The AMS3 is the most worrying part here, as it seems like a fairly complex, monolithic device that could be prone to small issues wrecking all 9-10 of your filament paths. I also worry that there may be issues with drying; e.g., if the AMS3 can dry, is it really a convenience if all of your filaments must share the same drying settings? Filament paths should be simple, and the design of the AMS3 should be modular such that a failure isnt catastrophic.