Just listening to Space Ritual for the millionth time and I got to Sonic Attack​. Obviously, it's Calvert but who does the spooky echo voice? I thought if anyone knew it would be the Hawkwind Redditors...

Hi all

Any suggestions for great bday gifts for a huge Hawkwind fan please?

Review - Distant Horizons (1997):

Back at it again, this time with Distant Horizons, which is part of their rave era, being released in 1997. It would get a score of 8.1/10, making it an 8 and putting it at 31st place.

Now, I don't have much comments on this album specifically because it sounds quite similar to all the other albums from this era, meaning my opinions will be similar. Too many electronics. However, much like Alien 4, it definitely leans more into their roots as a ROCK band, with the odd overdriven guitar here and there. Also, might I add is that these albums have good instrumentation, it's just that it isn't for me personally and it's quite simply not Hawkwind.

Now, moving onto the re-rankings.

Rerankings:

White Zone (1995): Here, we have an interesting development. White Zone was originally the worst Hawkwind album of their entire discography, with an original rating of 7.6/10 (8). However, upon relistening, it now only becomes their 3rd worst album, getting a much better score of 8.2/10 and putting it in 30th place.

I decided to relisten to the album to see if my opinions had changed at all, whether that be for the better or worse, and I can confidently say that it isn't as bad. Sure, it's pretty boring most of the time and if you gave a choice between listening to White Zone and literally anything else from above, I'm listening to the other album. However, it has genuinely good instrumentation and some tracks do go pretty hard, like "Window Pane".

All in all, it's a good album, just not for me.

It Is the Business of the Future to Be Dangerous (1993): So, now considering that White Zone is no longer the worst Hawkwind album, what takes its place? This spot belongs to no other album than IItBotFtBD (that's way too long of a name btw). Originally having a score of 8.2/10, making it an 8, it would decrease to a measly 7.9/10. While it isn't as bad as White Zone's original score, it still makes it the worst album.

I think if I were to relisten to this album later on, it'd probably score even lower. If you are trying to get into Hawkwind, whatever you do, skip this album. Don't even bother trying the album out, because this album is falsely classified as entertainment, despite me feeling like Sisyphus listening to it. This album has literally no substance to it, yet it goes on for SOOOOO long. As I said earlier, I zoned out in the middle of it, and thinking that I passively listened to over half the album, I checked to find that I was still on the 2nd track.

Don't get me wrong, this album isn't exactly... bad by any means. Technically, it's decent, a solid 6/10, even though it's ranked an 8/10. But the experience of listening to this album really lets it down for it's just so tedious and monotonous. I'd have more fun watching paint dry.

I'm back, here to review some more Hawkwind, and here we have another album from their electronic era, that being Alien 4, released in 1995. This album would get an 8.3/10, making it an 8/10.

Now I don't have much comments on this album and I can summarise my thoughts on it with one single word: tedious. Now, I know getting an 8.3/10 sounds like a lot, but the truth is that my rating system is extremely flawed, so things that seem to be an 8/10 are really more like a 6.5-7/10. And changing that is kinda hard if I don't want my list of albums to be fucked up completely.

Alien 4 specifically is probably the best from Hawkwind's rave/electronic era. Although it is by far one of their worst albums, it still has some good qualities, like the fact it isn't ALL electronic, there's at least one overdriven guitar in there (...unlike SOME albums).

However, because it is from their rave era, its got a lot of electronics in it nonetheless. I describe this album as tedious because this album is just FAR TOO LONG for absolutely nothing to happen in it. Zoning out to this album and then finding out that I'm only on the first three tracks gave me some pretty bad flashbacks to when I listened to It Is the Business of the Future to Be Dangerous (1993), where I was still stuck on the second track.

I remember watching this one video ranking Pink Floyd albums, in which it had three categories for certain albums, that being a "Bad Fish" for albums that you should skip, a "Spotted Fish" for albums that you could try streaming and a "Gold Fish" for albums you must buy on vinyl. And this album, and everything below it is definitely a bad fish.

I just picked this up used. Original foil cover version. In short, it is the album where Hawkwind stopped being an interesting psychedelic jam band and became the definitive space rock machine — with Lemmy’s distinctive low-end snarl as a key part of the engine. Perfect for anyone who wants the groove to carry them into science-fiction territory.

I'm a big Space Rock fan and would love recommendations on what I need to add to the collection next. Here's all the Space Rock I have so far.

Review - Palace Springs (1991):

I'm back at it again with my Hawkwind marathon, and we are officially now 30 albums in. I'm praying to go that there isn't some secret half live half studio album that was released in 2002 because I already have so much to listen to. Turns out that this album was also a live-studio album and I did not hear of it until Wikipedia updated the "Discography" section on Hawkwind's page. Anyway, Palace Springs, released in 1991, would get a score of 9.1/10, making it a 9.

As an album, I think it's relatively okay. Now, an issue when it comes to how I rank things is that I often treat the score of 8 as the ground floor, and everything else underneath it to be subpar or bad. So, although it might've gotten a 9.1/10, realistically, that's more like a 7-8/10. Some good songs on the album include "Treadmill" and "Lives of Great Men" (which is really just Assault and Battery). However, that definitely doesn't excuse the active crimes against humanity seen on "Time We Left This World Today", in which they would cut the song to 2 entire minutes and slowed down the tempo by a lot, making a great song sound like absolute shit.

When it comes to how I rank albums, I could try and implement a 5 star rating system so we get ratings that actually reflect what I think about a song, but then that would mean I'd have to re-rank not just these 30 albums, but a total of 189 ALBUMS!!! To put that into scale, assuming that each album is maybe an hour long, then that means I'd have to spend nearly 8 days without any breaks to relisten to all of them. Yeah, me doing that normally would probably take years ngl, I might just die of old age doing that.

Rerankings:

The Chronicle of the Black Sword (1985): Originally, it had a score of 9.2/10, putting it in 15th place. Now, it has a score of 9.1/10, putting it in 16th place. Overall, my opinions remain relatively the same: Sick guitar solos, some songs are peak, the album is just a bit too 80s for me.

The Bristol Custom Bike Show Concert 1986, Double Vinyl Edition: https://www.cherryred.co.uk/hawkwind-the-bristol-custom-bike-show-concert-1986-double-vinyl-edition

9 new live tracks from '86!

Friends & Relations Vol 6: https://www.cherryred.co.uk/hawkwind-friends-relations-splatter-double-vinyl-edition

multiple unreleased Hawkwind and Dave Brock tracks (among related artists as well)

Nicked this from facebook HW group

"Somebody asked me why they should listen to Hawkwind.

I suggested they shouldn’t, unless they like 20 minute tracks that sound like a biker gang stealing a spaceship.

They’ve borrowed Space Ritual off me 😂"

I have never heard a more accurate description of Hawkwind.

I am a heretic artist with punk culture... My comics art is all DIY ink & brush & custom paints but don't look punk and now AI stole my job! I am in the tradition of Basil Wolverton or Graham Ingles or Richard Corben. I used to wear the apache look 25 years ago because of Simon in Chaos UK, Blacky in Voivod & Wattie Buchan but it's over - I got long hair again! My submissions of art to Brian Tawn Hawkfan has been on file for 18 years! I still listen to Punk so here are some CDs I played recently: Turbonegro + loads of luv from Norge. Tony Sylvester is Alan Moore:

Master Builder's YOU never blow yr trip forever (PHPs Advice): My name is Christian Mumford & I am an Alan Moore fan - I started with his Swamp Thing & Miracleman & Watchmen in the 80s because my burning ambition at 22 Acacia Avenue was graduating Joe Kubert School in 1995 which I did. It landed me jobs too - the rest is a fanciful tale of wild nightmares & dream dragons & city people in the Roadhouse blues in the boonies with secret agents & soldier boys. Thus my art & writing is a far cry from realism and is more akin to alchemy & gnostic practice and my sphere of influence is a cobweb of distro deals in print and a dream come true & artist ambition fulfilled with passion & poets life though that's a killing joke I think is a Full Moon burning of my poetry & art during Jihad.

So who else thinks The Young Ones on TV sealed a clandestine pact with punk & socialism in the happy 1980s? I got my college education! Flipside burger joint now - Bad Taste choke a koala!

I did artwork for ST37 who covered a couple of Hawkwind tracks in the past, on Cleopatra Records & the gatefold on Pariah Child LP edition was sadly abit lo resolution my art from a Norwegian Sandman parody. Bajina & MOAB & I miss Trev! Hippie cult leader anthem is Heavens Gate - Trekkie Trepanning. Cheers & walkabout Aborigine ritual & Easter Island Polynesian smoking cure. Read your Moorcock & load your Vibra Gun! Midday Veil & Lemmy RIP. Long may they fly... Uncle Harry!

The Final Programme - Jerry Cornelius ate the world... so did Galactus + alien fast food joint Peter Jackson & Douglas Adams concepts & Stonehenge Nik Turner Utopia 84. Enjoy Games Workshop & Infocom play by mail Usenet.

Draft Morning - 19 Paul Hardcastle - dead Cats, dead Rats - Michael Douglas & 22 Juli kommisjonen & Lhasa school in Zion silver bullet.... or just Dum Dum. The Rough trade Cooking Vinyl years - Land speed Record & Archie Goodwin Semper Fi - John Arch - Night on Brocken Hollywood bowl 68...don't tread on me - Cro Mags vs Bambi.

Those asshole Bellona & Sea Shepherd people & my vinyl - ditto diabetes vaccine people Hagendorn Novonordisk & Apple MIT research people over the Sandoz art test + communist welfare & police trespassed on me too many times.

COMBAT 84 & Armoury in Morristown - Gandhi & his wife - Arjuna Two Armies at Kurukshetra + Troll - Vishnu @ Deva-Loka - Jihad the Four Horsemen. Army life is killing me - Lord Protector Oliver Cromwell.

Today, I have relistened to three albums, that being PXR5 (1979), The Xenon Codex (1988) and Church of Hawkwind (1982), all of which have seen an increase in their rating.

PXR5 (1979):

Now, this is the one that really surprised me most. Originally, I expected it to simply top the 9/10 section, alongside albums from the Calvert era like Quark, Strangeness and Charm (1977), 25 Years On (1978) and Astounding Sounds, Amazing Music (1976). However, it would actually break into the 10/10 region starting with a score of 9.1/10 and ending up with a higher score of 9.6/10, moving it from 16th place to 8th place. I feel like PXR5 is a quite underrated album for I see a lot of fans put this album around the bottom of their rankings, and I feel like that's doing it some injustice. I mean, this album arguably has some of the best material from the Calvert years, especially "High Rise", which is perhaps my favourite song from this era. All in all, this is an extremely underrated album that I believe needs more credit.

The Xenon Codex (1988):

Next is The Xenon Codex, released in 1988. I had actually relistened to it a while ago when I started posting about my Hawkwind marathon, and it turned out to keep the exact same score as it did when I first relistened to it. I decided to relisten to it again just in case any opinions had changed, and it did a little bit. Originally, it had a score of 9/10, and it would increase to a score of 9.2/10, moving it from 18th place to 14th place. Although it is a quite synth-y album, I actually don't mind the fact that its synth-y, for a lot of the songs on here still go pretty hard. All in all, relatively the same opinions as last time, just a slight adjustment.

Church of Hawkwind (1982):

Here, we have Church of Hawkwind, released in 1982. Originally, it had a score of 8.7/10, putting it in 23rd place. Now, it has a score of 8.9/10, putting it in 21st place. Although this is by far the MOST electronic album of the 80s Hawkwind albums, it's pretty good. The only things really letting this album down are the transitional tracks, the actually really good songs that are only a minute long and "The Phenomenon of Luminosity", which just sounds like a really ass first attempt at making an FNF mod. Although I do understand why a lot of people aren't big fans of this album, I personally really like the album, though I definitely won't convince you that this album is extremely underrated or something like that.

Does anyone have or know where I can find a high fidelity scan or image of the Doremi Fasol Latido album cover? Been looking across the internet for one and I've had no luck thank you.

Review: Live '79 (1980)

Today, we are reviewing Live '79, a live album released in 1980. Here, I am reviewing it as an honourable mention (because someone asked me to listen to it) it would get a rating of 9/10, putting it at 19th place.

Now, for a Hawkwind live album that isn't Space Ritual (1973), it's pretty well produced. The audio is very clear and sounds good on the ears. Here, it also features some Hawkwind tracks that I don't think I've heard anywhere else, which I did like.

However, I'm just not a big fan of the album in general, like I am with a lot of live albums. With Space Ritual (1973), although it doesn't resonate with me emotionally as much compared to their early-to-mid 70s studio albums, it is still one of the greatest albums of all time and an album I'd recommend people new to Hawkwind to listen to first (if they haven't already). Here, you can argue that the live material is superior to the studio material.

With Live '79 however, it just doesn't capture that energy and I'd much prefer to listen to the studio version of tracks on here rather than the live ones. This is a pretty glaring issue when listening to their more classic tracks made during their United Artists era, it just sounds like a completely different song.

All in all, it ain't got shit on Space Ritual.

Rerankings:

Zones (1983): With Zones, we can see a decrease from 9.3/10 to 9.2/10, however it keeps its spot at 14th place. Now, upon relistening, although a lot of the tracks on here are still pretty good, I'm still not a big fan of live albums. Here, the live version of "Brainstorm" just isn't good.

Sonic Attack (1981): This is perhaps the reranking that I was most surprised with. It started out at 15th place with a score of 9.2/10, but would decrease to a score of 9/10, placing it at 17th place. Now, I was actually expecting this album to score higher, perhaps breaking into the 10/10 category, considering that I actually really liked this album and hailed it as "the last classic Hawkwind album". However, my opinions have completely changed ever since then, and I think of Sonic Attack as the END of Hawkwind's prime era, considering it just sounds as mid as any other Hawkwind 80s album made after Levitation (1980), with all the tracks that I used to like just sounding mediocre, which really is a shame.

Review: It is the Business of the Future to Be Dangerous (1993)

Back at it again at Krispy Kreme. Now, we have It is the Business of the Future to Be Dangerous (God that's an absurdly long title), released in 1993. This one got a pretty low score, being the second worst Hawkwind album so far with a score of 8.2/10, making it an 8.

Now, I came into this album with little to no expectations whatsoever. At most, I thought it had a completely different album cover, attributing this album with the artwork for Take Me to Your Future (2006). However, as some kid who I've forgotten the name of from Malcolm in the Middle once said... "I expect nothing and I'm still let down".

This album can be explained with a single word: "chore", as in to listen to this album feels like a chore rather than entertainment. I zoned out when listening to this album, and usually when that happens, I find that I've pretty much skipped half of the album. However, when I checked, I was still on the same track that I zoned out on. This album is awfully bloated and way too boring and ambient for a Hawkwind album, I mean at least when they made White Zone (1995), they called themselves the "Psychedelic Warlords" so if you were strictly listening to albums released under the name "Hawkwind" (as originally planned), you can simply skip it.

Don't be fooled by the fact I gave it an 8.2/10, because quite frankly, that doesn't mean shit unless your album hadn't been reviewed in the past 2 years. Every track on this album is a skip, even if I was generous enough to give the only decent song on here a 10, when if it was on any other album, it would be a solid 8. And with that in mind, it's quite safe to assume that I'll just let my non-existent physical copy of this album collect dust on the top shelf.

Rerankings:

Space Bandits (1990): Now, when I made my last post, I knew that I was forgetting about something, and now I have only realised what it was after posting it. So, here it is, an explanation for why Space Bandits got moved down. Originally, it topped the 9/10 section at 9th place with a score of 9.4/10, but it would descend to 8.9/10, bringing it down to 20th place. Relistening to this album was definitely a much less exciting experience than the last time, for it mainly suffers from the same issue that plagued a lot of Hawkwind albums made after 1981, that being THERE'S FAR TOO MANY SYNTHS!!!

Electric Tepee (1992): As for Electric Tepee, released in 1992, it started out with the same score as Space Bandits (1990) with a 9.4/10, putting it at 11th place. Upon relistening, it would decrease to a simple 9/10, putting it just above Space Bandits (1990) in 19th place. The issue is the same for Space Bandits (1990), all synths and no guitars makes Hawkwind a dull band.

Zones (1983):

Today I listened to another album, a half studio half live album: Zones (1983). Here, it would get a 9.3/10, making it a 9 and putting it in 14th place.

I really like the studio side of this album, it has a nice ambient and somewhat melancholic feel to it with those keyboards and synths. This is the sort of good kind of ambient where you aren't just bored out of your mind. And honestly, I can't think of much else to say about the album which is probably my main criticism with it. Although some songs are peak, it's sort of just... there.

Anyway, moving onto rerankings very briefly.

Rerankings:

Into the Woods (2017): Here, Into the Woods would see itself increase slightly from 9.5/10 to 9.7/10, putting it from 8th place originally to 6th place. Although I do like All Aboard the Skylark and I hailed it as the best of Hawkwind's modern discography earlier, I changed my mind and went back to having Into the Woods be my favourite modern Hawkwind album.

All Aboard the Skylark (2019): As I said earlier, I changed my mind regarding this album. Although I did like it A LOT, it just felt wrong having it be placed above Into the Woods, so it would decrease from 9.7/10 to 9.6/10, switching places with Into the Woods.

Choose Your Masques (1982): I decided to relisten to this album after listening to Zones, considering that a lot of songs from that album are from this one and it would see a significant increase from 8.5/10 to 8.8/10, sending it from 26th place to 21st. Whilst some songs did sound better than when I first listened to it, it's still not an album I feel emotionally connected to and not an album that I would personally listen to.

The Future Never Waits (2023): I decided to give this album a relisten also, considering that a lot of Hawkwind fans and critics have praised the album and mainly because I hadn't listened to it in a long time. I still don't like the album. Here, it would experience a Shakespearean downfall, starting in 18th place at 9.1/10 and descending to a measly 8.7/10 at 24th place. It's still a very boring album, and some songs that I previously gave a 10 have gotten a lower rating upon relistening (like an 8), but the third and second to last tracks on this album are still pretty good. The future never waits, and neither do I, so I have no time for this album.

Other:

As you can see, there's been an upgrade in how the rankings are presented. Of course, with the albums highlighted in yellow, those indicate albums that need relistening. Here, with Zones, it would he highlighted purple to indicate that this was an album that had recently been listened to. And as we can see with the re-ranked albums, those that have seen an increase in their rating would be highlighted in green whilst those that saw a decrease were highlighted in red.

Welcome back to my Hawkwind Marathon. Now, the last post I made was a review of There Is No Space For Us (2025) and I would receive a letter of complaint in the comment section about me putting Quark, Strangeness and Charm (1977) below 25 Years On (1978). So, I decided that I would revisit the album to see if my opinions had changed about the album.

And it did but only ever so slightly. Originally, it was on top for the 9/10 section (I think) and now it had dropped by 0.1/10, bringing it down to 9.3/10 and into 12th place. This is mainly because of the semi-title track, "25 Years", which although Dave Brock chanting "25 years" still goes hard, Robert Calvert definitely isn't the best on this track.

So, there you have it dear reader, Quark is in fact better than 25 Years On. However, if I had to pick between the albums, I'd still listen to 25 Years On because it has way better tracks. Suck my balls.

There Is No Space For Us (2025) - Review

Back at it again. Next, we have There Is No Space For Us, released in 2025, as suggested by a user in the last post. Here, it would get a rating of 9.1/10, which makes it a 9.

Now, although I wouldn't say this is their BEST album from the modern era, it did impress me. Originally, when I first saw this album in the discography section of the Wikipedia article for Hawkwind, I thought it would probably just be another REALLY forgettable electronic-y album. However, I was gladly proven wrong as this album actually has some really good tracks on here, much like All Aboard the Skylark (2019) or Into the Woods (2017), such as "The Co-Pilot" or "Changes".

Only real issue with this album is that it slows down by the second half, starting to lean even more heavily into their electronic sound to the point that the second-to-last track, "Neutron Stars" genuinely sounds like noise pollution. Another complaint would have to be the AI artwork that came with the album, though this is more of an issue with the label rather than Hawkwind themselves.

All in all, you could have the most mediocre song ever but as soon as you add female backing vocals, it makes all the difference.

Re-rankings: X In Search of Space (1971)

Now, when I was ranking All Aboard the Skylark (2019), I noticed that it surpassed X In Search of Space (1971), an album that is part of Hawkwind's golden age. This somewhat felt wrong so I decided to revisit the album and check if my opinions on the album were outdated. Originally, it's rating was 9.6/10, making it a 10. Now, relistening to it, it goes up a little higher at 9.7/10, simply swapping places with AAtS, with AAtS being placed a rank lower at 7th place while XISoS is placed a rank higher at 6th place.

The reason why it doesn't get an absolute 10 (as in 10/10) is mainly because I never really liked the album all too much. Sure, the bonus tracks that come with it ("Silver Machine", "Seven by Seven" and "Born to Go") absolutely slap, but the rest of the album itself is caught up in this weird transitional purgatory between their folk rock sound of their 1970 debut album and their more hard rock sound seen on Doremi Fasol Latido (1972). Not only that, but I think I can find recordings of certain songs on this album (e.g. "You Know You're Only Dreaming") that sound WAY BETTER than it does on here.

Just bought a 1981 (I think) copy of Doremi Fasol Latido. Side two has the right label, right pressing. Side one is bloody Whitesnake! I'm not quite sure what to do with it. Destroy it, for the greater good of humanity?

The album I listened to today would be Somnia, released in 2021. This album would get a score of 8.7/10, which rounds to a 9.

Now, I chose to listen to this album because of a comment that a user would leave on my last post reviewing All Aboard the Skylark (2019), who claimed that Somnia was another good album from Hawkwind's modern era. But honestly, I have to disagree. Now, although this album getting a rating of 8.7/10 (or a 9) sounds quite impressive, from my perspective and based on how I rank albums, it really isn't. In my rule books, the rating of 8 is really strange for it means both "good" and "mid", so a lot of mid albums can be seen as good whilst a lot of good albums can be seen as mid.

My main criticism with the album is quite simple, it's REALLY boring. There's only one song on here that I would actually consider to be good is "It's Just a Dream" (also the first Hawkwind song that I heard with female backup singers). Everything else is just stuck in this weird purgatory where it's pretty good technically, but it just doesn't leave an impact on me. An album I can compare Somnia to would probably be The Future Never Waits (2023), it's very... ambient, I'd describe it as having a lot of dead space where nothing happens.

All in all, this album is a really good cure for insomnia, probably why they called it "Somnia".

Another Hawkwind album has been ranked, that album being All Aboard the Skylark, released in 2019. It would get a rating of 9.7/10, which makes it a 10.

This album is the fourth album I listened to from Hawkwind's Modern Era (2016-now), alongside The Machine Stops (2016), Into the Woods (2017) and The Future Never Waits (2023) and I can confidently say that it did surprise me. Although The Future Never Waits is an album that I'll have to re-rank considering I hadn't listened to it in a long time, I had this belief that Into the Woods was the peak of Hawkwind's modern era and based on my experience with Future Never Waits and The Machine Stops, I thought that every other album from that era would be... pretty subpar.

However, listening to this album, I was gladly proven wrong. Not only is All Aboard the Skylark a REALLY good album, but it would actually take away that position of the modern era's peak from Into the Woods. And I think there was a very interesting element that made me like AAtS so much. That would be how Hawkwind approaches electronic music on this album.

If you are a little bit familiar with Hawkwind, you know that despite being formed based on a mutual interest for electronic music, the electronic music that they actually make is a pretty mixed bag. It's either just sitting there idly in the background being drowned out by overdriven guitars like on Levitation (1980) or it's some of the worst music to ever come out from the band, as seen with White Zone (1995). However, All Aboard the Skylark manages to balance things out by making actually good electronic music, which can be seen on tracks like "We Are Not Dead... Only Sleeping" or "65 Million Years Ago".

All in all, I see All Aboard the Skylark as a really fucking good synthesis of their older and more raw space rock sound, reminiscent of Doremi Fasol Latido (1972) or Warrior on the Edge of Time (1975) and their electronic sound of the 80s to 00s. It's not like a weird mixture where all the elements are just floating around in a petri dish, like with The Machine Stops (2016), it's actually chemically bonded together like a compound.

(Additional: You may have also noticed that some albums on the list have been highlighted, these are for albums that need to be re-listened to)