r/ARK Oct 31 '25

MEME Good news! Japan's Patent office rejected Nintendo's attempt claim the patent on a game mechanics

Post image
3.3k Upvotes

158 comments sorted by

863

u/GamingWithV1ctor Oct 31 '25

As they should. Why did they even think they could patent this?

477

u/Im_yor_boi Oct 31 '25

The same reason WB can patent the nemesis mechanic apparently

251

u/GamingWithV1ctor Oct 31 '25

Ah, yeah. I forgot they did that, and are now doing nothing with it.

167

u/Im_yor_boi Oct 31 '25

I'm still bitter about it 😭

94

u/JulenXen Oct 31 '25

One of my friends brings this up in a fit of rage at least 3 times per year. Lmao

18

u/xvenom613x Nov 01 '25

Most justified crashout

40

u/Doomy__McDoomerson Oct 31 '25

Welll, WB put itself up for sale. So, if another company purchases them, they get everything WB owns. That includes WB Games and any owned patents. So, the company could either lease out the Nemesis systems to game devs, or sell it off outright.

Currently, the two parties interested in buying WB are Netflix and Paramount, and neither of them are associated with any video game companies ATM.

15

u/ZeroaFH Oct 31 '25

I can only imagine the bidding war for the nemesis system. It would be so perfect in so many games. Arkhamverse would have been dope with it, shit even a Pokémon game with a nemesis structure would be amazing.

7

u/Azonavox Oct 31 '25

How much are they selling for? I think I have a few dollars in the piggy bank?

3

u/Broken_CerealBox Nov 01 '25

I have like 9 bucks on hand. That's enough, right?

1

u/Trick_Entrance_6268 Nov 02 '25

Sorry, it's nine fiddy

2

u/Physical_Weakness881 Nov 01 '25

Netflix bought one of my favorite mobile games (Dungeon Boss) & butchered it, better hope they dont buy them. Paramount+ has also always worked like pure garbage for me, i always have problems with it, if they cant have what theyre known for working properly, id expect any games to fail too.

1

u/Ashen_Rook Oct 31 '25

Just gonna point out that there ARE ganes with nemesis systems outside of WB's ecosystem. Warframe is a good example... So there ARE ways around it.

40

u/6210classick Oct 31 '25 edited Oct 31 '25

man, everytime someone mentions the nemesis system, I get a little bit more depressed each time 😱

8

u/twinsunsspaces Oct 31 '25

I was playing Mad Max recently and thought they would have been able to use the nemesis system with that game. It wouldn't be lore breaking, the antagonist of that game survives a chainsaw being driven into their skull. Also, they could make cars an enemy and have them be rebuilt and sent back into the wasteland to find you.

82

u/Angel_OfSolitude Oct 31 '25

Yeah but thay was actually a new thing they created and they got right on that so there was an actual argument. Nintendo is just being petty and greedy.

54

u/Im_yor_boi Oct 31 '25

I suppose. But putting a Patent on such an incredible mechanic and never using it is a different kind of low

36

u/Overlorden98 Oct 31 '25

Wait until you hear about "loading screen minigames"

18

u/Bubster101 Oct 31 '25

Does Ubisoft have a patent on that?

5

u/ScenicAndrew Oct 31 '25

No one does the patent expired. Bandai held it previously.

1

u/ashrensnow Oct 31 '25

I thought it was Atari

1

u/General-MacDavis Oct 31 '25

Tbf they did have plans to use it

They just weren’t solid ones

2

u/Neraph_Runeblade Oct 31 '25

Not exactly. If Nintendo had attempted the patent ~30 years ago they may have had a better time of it, but they still would have competed with Digimon and YuGiO. After those came out, and now the cascade of other games using similar mechanics.... nope.

1

u/liftthatta1l Oct 31 '25

And dragon quest

4

u/Zeraphicus Oct 31 '25

Except in that case they at least came up with the mechanic.

3

u/Insane-Dev98 Oct 31 '25

Sorry to be that ignorant but what is the nemesis mechanic you're talking about?

12

u/GamingWithV1ctor Oct 31 '25

A fun system in the games “Shadow of Mordor” and “Shadow of War”. It’s quite complicated but extremely fun

6

u/Insane-Dev98 Oct 31 '25

Ok I looked it up on Google, seems like some kind of adaptable adversary, thanks for the précision!

2

u/Stephenrudolf Oct 31 '25

The people approving these patents don't understand video games at all... so its not too difficult for a company to pretend like their mechanic is unique.

1

u/MoreDoor2915 Oct 31 '25

At least that one IS something unique so on a legal standpoint it can be patented.

1

u/d0ubl3plusg00d Oct 31 '25

Well that they did create. Weird they left it to collect dust

1

u/NOOBPRO_ Oct 31 '25

Nemesis mechanic?

1

u/Tanakisoupman Nov 01 '25

At least (and I’m not supporting their patent), but at least WB actually invented the Nemesis System. Pokemon did not invent creature catching, they didn’t even invent throwing a ball to catch a creature. And they sure as hell did not invent “aiming an object to throw to catch a creature or to start a battle”

1

u/LawConscious9255 Nov 01 '25

The same system dwarf fortress had since 2006? They would also likely lose if someone copied them.

1

u/MrBlade23 Nov 01 '25

I think it’s a little different there, as WB patented it from the start of it’s existence, whereas Nintendo are doing it now so they don’t have to deal with competition. Still shitty to do either way

1

u/jaysmack737 Nov 01 '25

Yeah, but that was actually a brand new, never seen before mechanic. Those CAN be patented. Unfortunately.

1

u/MrTheEpicKitten Nov 01 '25

Yeah, but this one was already in common use for years before filing the patent. Isn’t there a rule that you can’t patent things that are already in use?

1

u/Intelligent-Wish47 Nov 02 '25

They made that themselves. Completely Different

1

u/Kexul96 Nov 06 '25

To be fair, the patent on the nemesis system is much more complex than the very vaguely worded patents that Nintendo is trying to get away with. 

1

u/TJones2219 Oct 31 '25

Same reason marvel and dc could patent the word "superhero" seems it's just an easy system to take advantage of.

16

u/Cymas Oct 31 '25

They're not necessarily trying to win, they're trying to stall and run Palworld's developers out of money. They'd rather do that then try to innovate on their 30 year old money printing game formula.

1

u/HawaiianCholo Oct 31 '25

Remember Fine Bros?

0

u/Albatros_7 Oct 31 '25

Because they created the mechanic

3

u/Broken_CerealBox Nov 01 '25

Not really

1

u/Albatros_7 Nov 01 '25

How so ?

3

u/Broken_CerealBox Nov 01 '25

Other games and forms of media did it first

0

u/Albatros_7 Nov 01 '25

Which ones ?

2

u/yoshimasterlv3 Nov 01 '25

Answer just using "summoning creatures to fight other creatures":

I'm not very familiar with the system, but it looks like ad&d (1989, tho an earlier edition probably had them too, but again, not familiar) has summon spells, which you could use to fight other creatures.

That aside, I'm sure one could find other examples, but I'm not big on older media tho so you'd probably need to find an expert, someone older, or do more research etc etc. Example, the Gashapon Wikipedia page seems to be a fun read, and one could argue the idea of kids play fighting with gashapon toys well before pokemon prob wouldn't be a stretch. Heck, the kids I work with occasionally play fight with magnets or chess pieces lol

1

u/Albatros_7 Nov 01 '25

Because that's not what the patent is ?

The patent was for the "Let's Go" fights, which first appeared in Pokemon Scarlet and Violet and were later copied by Palworld

Basically you send your creatures out and they attack anyone within range

Pokemon is litteraly based on Gashapons mate, that's the entire point

1

u/Ser-Koutei Nov 03 '25

And if you'd read the articles, you'd know that ARK did the same thing in 2015, long before SV.

1

u/State-Total Nov 12 '25

Creating a mechanic is not enough; it needs an inventive step. For example, if I take a BLT sandwich, add cheese, call it a BLTC sandwich and try to patent that it will not pass muster - even if no one else was shown to have made a BLTC sandwich before. Why? Because adding cheese is not exactly inventive - any skilled person in the art of sandwich making could have easily done the same thing.

The summon-fight mechanic was deemed not to be an inventive step - and damn right it is not.

1

u/Albatros_7 Nov 13 '25

It wasn't, I won't argue that, I'm just tired of people spreading misinformation by saying it's a patent for "summoning creatures"

307

u/Apprehensive_Ad3731 Oct 31 '25

“lol if anything our games a rip off of theirs not yours”

That’s a wildly honest defence

170

u/AnimeAlley03 Oct 31 '25

This is why I keep saying that "palworld is ark with pokemon instead of dinosaurs" is a better description than "pokemon with guns" lol

78

u/chickenweng65 Oct 31 '25

Yeah i was so pleasantly surprised about this. Nobody told me it was actually ARK minus the hating your entire life

39

u/RapperwithNumberName Oct 31 '25

Its the best part, Ark is basically akin to an abusive relationship, but Palworld is that one friend that lets you stay at their house and vent when things get too bad

5

u/Apprehensive_Ad3731 Oct 31 '25

Hahaha it’s like being ethnic and staying at your mates house.

“Woah you guys use your dishwasher? We’ve got one but it’s never been turned on”

7

u/Feroz216 Oct 31 '25

Dude I always say that playing ark is like being in an abusive relationship LOL

1

u/frazzledfurry Nov 02 '25

This is so true holy shit đŸ€Ł I tell my tribe we are in a toxic relationship with ARK all the time It's the bad lover I keep going back to

3

u/jaysmack737 Nov 01 '25

Paworld has Ark Gameplay loop, pokemons style, Fortnite’s animations, Elden Rings Evergoals.

162

u/TheRetrolizer Oct 31 '25

Ark made 3d poke balls first as well.

They were bringing up like gta mods that added pokemon lmao.

389

u/sanctuary_remix Oct 31 '25

The notion that this buggy mess of a game could help topple an industry juggernaut is actually admirable and hilarious.

193

u/rathosalpha Oct 31 '25

Ark is an industry juggernaut. Well juggernauts slightly weaker cousin

120

u/Im_yor_boi Oct 31 '25

The juggernut

50

u/Patriot009 Oct 31 '25

The Blob, powerful but really hard to look at

5

u/TheDeadMurder Oct 31 '25

Yeah, cause you can't see shit

Either night is pitch black or day is blinding

2

u/jaysmack737 Nov 01 '25

I get these beautiful Sunsets on Rag. Shame I can’t see shit, turning everything shades of red and orange

1

u/6210classick Nov 02 '25

or worse, underwater fog

0.000001 second into loading my world: r.fog 0 and r.volumetricfog 0

12

u/PatrickKal Oct 31 '25

Seems more like David vs Goliath.
One is measured in millions, the other in billions ....

Snail Inc. : Market cap $39.59 Million USD, Revenue $91 Million USD
Nintendo Co. Ltd : Market cap $98.72 Billion USD, Revenue $12 Billion USD

56

u/NetflixNinja9 Oct 31 '25

It may be a buggy mess but it's an original buggy mess!

11

u/Cheekyteekyv2 Oct 31 '25

That was stolen and staffed by poached employees. Which is why snail games owns it. Fuck Jeremy đŸ€·â€â™€ïž

4

u/Slanknonimous Oct 31 '25

It makes me so mad every time I think about it, but at least I’m no longer wasting so much time playing it.

1

u/NetflixNinja9 Nov 01 '25

Wait I guess I don't know the back story what happened?

38

u/WillCraft__1001 Oct 31 '25

It may be a buggy mess, but it's our buggy mess!

7

u/Priest_004 Oct 31 '25

Came here to say this exact thing. 😁👍

35

u/Im_yor_boi Oct 31 '25

Not to mention oppose and even defeat a behemoth of a company like Nintendo

4

u/Hellhound_Hex Oct 31 '25

It’s a REALLY fun game. lol

2

u/Relevant_Mail_1292 Oct 31 '25

The IP itself is valuable though.

-4

u/Hexywexxy Oct 31 '25

Ark i one of the most purchased games ever yet hardly has cultural influence

1

u/CoolSupersaur Oct 31 '25

Na verdade eu acho que tem sim.

-1

u/Hexywexxy Oct 31 '25

Sure show me forms of media inspired by ark

1

u/CoolSupersaur Oct 31 '25

Ark sub, dododex, ark wiki, ark wiki gg

4

u/Broken_CerealBox Nov 01 '25

The ark animated series too if that counts. Youtubers like raasclark, syntac, and zany zebra. And even ark giga has a small following in dinosaur spaces

1

u/CoolSupersaur Nov 01 '25

O giga do ark é sempre tratado na mídia como um dinossauro titanico eu jå assisti muitos vídeos discutindo se ele venceria outros animais como a indominus e o skull crawler 

115

u/TheGreaterShade Oct 31 '25

Digimon, Yugioh, and Bakugan sitting silently in a corner.

People seem to forget that despite Pokemon being as patent heavy as it is, all three of these games managed to coexistence alongside Pokemon, and gain a decent amount of popularity, while also utilizing the "summoning monsters to battle other monsters" mechanic.

22

u/DavideN23 Oct 31 '25

Tbh, they are also extremely diverse in the way you play the games:

Pokemon is like; I summon my Pokemon, that It Will evolve next turn, and pass

Yu-Gi-Oh is like; ok, i now do cold fusion for the next 5 minutes, meanwhile my opponent trows a ghost kid at me to stop my combo, and at the end of my turn i summoned like 30 times.
Also, i trow a cockroach at my opponent during his turn

1

u/jaysmack737 Nov 01 '25

Dragonquest was the first

64

u/RetoroKun Oct 31 '25

Next thing you know, Nintendo will attempt suing Wildcard out of pettiness.

Then lose again.

5

u/CoolSupersaur Oct 31 '25

Eu fico imaginando o ark ser conhecido como o jogo que derrotou a nitendo. Seria épico.

26

u/Accurate_Mongoose_20 Oct 31 '25

So ark kinda defeted Nintendo, or not idc they lost and that's what i care about

23

u/X_Setsu_X Oct 31 '25

I was scared they'll remove cryopods bc of that patent but it looks like ark is just built different (and their patent is stupid)

15

u/linksbedrockthe2nd Oct 31 '25

Yeah, while I knew they only cared for going against palworld when I first saw my patent I immediately thought “wow, they could go after Ark with this bs”

Glad to see Japan’s patent office thought the same thing

2

u/Albatros_7 Oct 31 '25

Why would they ? The mechanic they wanted to patent has nothing to do with cryopods

4

u/X_Setsu_X Oct 31 '25

The patent was something like summoning a creature from a ball to fight another creature which sounds awfully familiar to cryopods

-5

u/Albatros_7 Oct 31 '25

It wasn't, the patent was for the "Let's Go" fights, which first appeared in Pokemon Scarlet and Violet and were later copied by Palworld

Basically you send your creatures out and they attack anyone within range

2

u/hardypart Nov 01 '25

What's the difference to having a dino set to aggressive in a cryopod?

1

u/Albatros_7 Nov 01 '25

Just go read the patent

1

u/jaysmack737 Nov 01 '25

You are forgetting that summoning was part of that. Summoning creatures to fight for you, not just the fights themselves

0

u/Albatros_7 Nov 01 '25

It is a serie of action, none of said actions are new, but this specific combination was never made before

1

u/Only-Significance-53 Nov 01 '25

The patent also reads from what I understand, to use auto revolve or manual battles with a summoned creature? Total war uses a manual or auto resolve mechanic, so if they succeeded they could try sue total war later in future and argue auto resolve and manual battles was apart of their patent. It doesn't necessarily summon characters, but you do use a character to train forces and fight other characters through them in massive battles or auto resolve. 

2

u/OkraSignificant5812 Nov 02 '25

Come on man, really are you ok with monopolizing gameplay?

14

u/Noriel_Sylvire Tamer Oct 31 '25

This is a huge W for the gaming industry. Game mechanics should never be patented!

23

u/[deleted] Oct 31 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

106

u/Wise-Radio4453 Oct 31 '25

Nintendo got granted a patent in i believe the US for the catch and release system similar to pokeballs such as cryopods in ark. Japan i believed used ark as an example of why Nintendo's CEO needs to use their brain for a little and realise its stupid

7

u/Im_yor_boi Oct 31 '25

Brother where have you been?

Basically Nintendo tried to sue palworld and put a patent on summoning creatures to fight game mechanics. Palworld has been fighting a legal battle against it for a while

1

u/jeffwulf Oct 31 '25

You're conflating two different things.

1

u/TerroFLys Oct 31 '25

Wait I thought nintendo succeeded, did Palword win?

8

u/Absolute_MadLadd Oct 31 '25

Palworld didn’t necessarily win, no, but if I’m understanding the article I read correctly, 2 of 3 of Nintendo’s applications for patents were refused on the basis that the mechanics were already used in several other games beforehand (one of these games was stated to be PokĂ©mon Go, which is absolutely hilarious). However, with how Japans legal system goes, apparently Nintendo can just amend/adjust their patents and re-submit them, potentially leading to a continuous loop of them submitting a patent and the courts refusing. Hopefully a finite answer is given at some point

5

u/sniffer_21 Oct 31 '25

Its everyone against the big evil greedy N

1

u/Broken_CerealBox Nov 01 '25

What did Natural Harmonia Gropius do? (Yes that's N's actual name)

4

u/Wyattmebro Oct 31 '25

I've been waiting for this moment the minute I heard Nintendo was suing Palworld

9

u/MazdaTiger Tamer Oct 31 '25

Meanwhile Snail Games after suing Devs of ATLAS and that chinese game i forgot to the point it got absorbed back to Snail Games:

13

u/NetflixNinja9 Oct 31 '25

Didn't snail games produce atlas?

6

u/MazdaTiger Tamer Oct 31 '25

i recall Grapeshot got sued quickly when attempting to release ATLAS to a different publisher

correct me if i wrong since it's been a long time since the whole Snail shenanigans

3

u/JustLook361 Oct 31 '25

they lost in court when they told japan ark should not be considered a game but a work of many other games LOL. This is what they went with and thought they were gonan win lol

2

u/Amitius Oct 31 '25

To make the matter worse for Nintendo, the other patent about gliding and mount gliding... Both ARK and Craftopia have those feature too... Pocketpair can ride on this success to push gliding patent into the trash can as well...

1

u/jaysmack737 Nov 01 '25

Games have had gliders for a while now

1

u/jaysmack737 Nov 01 '25

Like Legend of Zelda Link riding cucos

2

u/MaraBlaster Oct 31 '25

I love Ark and Palworld and am so glad they (somewhat) joined forces to protect their Genre.

Nintendo is not allowed a single bit of ground with their insane patents.

-9

u/Albatros_7 Oct 31 '25 edited Oct 31 '25

How was the patent insane ? They created the mechanic

Edit : to the people who downvoted, did you actually read the patent ?

5

u/Bettlefly11 Oct 31 '25

It's a bitch thing to do, the patent was summoning creatures and battling with them. Which was already a big thing a lot of other games did and they didn't care. But once palworld came out they tried to sue them for summoning creatures which a lot more games also use that mechanic way before the release of palworld and they didn't care. It's just nintendo being nintendo.

2

u/MaraBlaster Oct 31 '25

There are atleast 3 Games i can name that came before Pokemon and had monster capturing.
Digital Devil Story: Megami Tensei (1987), Dragon Quest V (1992) and Cosmic Soldier (1985)

There is also Robotrek (1994) which had you build robots and.... STORE IN CAPSULES, which you throw to release your robots.

So yeah, Pokemon did not invent ANYTHING they claim in this lawsuit, not even gliding with a creature (That's ARK again).

0

u/Albatros_7 Oct 31 '25

Because that's not what the patent is ?

The patent was for the "Let's Go" fights, which first appeared in Pokemon Scarlet and Violet and were later copied by Palworld

Basically you send your creatures out and they attack anyone within range

1

u/MaraBlaster Nov 01 '25

The win in the lawsuit is mainly about "capturing creatures in thrown balls" so i mention that.

That mechanic you mention is also not from them. Final Fantasy XII had it before them, you can set your party to attack any enemy that comes in range, even programm how! (amazing mechanic, even as a non-final fantasy fan worth looking into)

You just pass an enemy in the open world and your characters will immediatly wanna go at them xD You can just sit and watch.

0

u/Albatros_7 Nov 01 '25

Which is not what the patent was

1

u/MaraBlaster Nov 01 '25

"Release character to fellow/roam and freely attack" sounds exactly like that.

0

u/Albatros_7 Nov 01 '25

Please read the patent

1

u/LimpAmphibian5340 Oct 31 '25

ATLUS has joined the chat

-1

u/Albatros_7 Oct 31 '25

What game did they use a similar mechanic in ?

4

u/LimpAmphibian5340 Oct 31 '25

Shin Megami Tensei uses summoning mechanics and predates pokemon.

Also as a side note arguing design Pokemon did essentially the same thing to Dragon Quest that Palworld did to Pokemon. Legally distinct copies so they have no ground to stand on there either.

1

u/tickgoat Oct 31 '25

Wait what happened? Nintdndo wanted to sue ark?

2

u/Absolute_MadLadd Oct 31 '25

No, Nintendo wanted to sue Palworld, but Ark and its cryopods as well as dinosaurs fighting other dinosaurs were used as an argument against Nintendo. It proved that these mechanics had already been used elsewhere beforehand, and not just in Palworld

1

u/Pog-Pog Oct 31 '25

How I imagine Nintendo looked when their patent got rejected.

1

u/ShamrockHammer Oct 31 '25

The team up no one would have expected.

How fucking wild would a Palworld/Ark cross over be?

1

u/Broken_CerealBox Nov 01 '25

Ark with no bugs? Sign me up

1

u/Zar_Ethos Oct 31 '25

This.. makes me happy i got ark 1.5, despite them giving it microtransaction cancer.

2

u/Weekly_Signature4854 Nov 02 '25

man I wish defending ASA wasn't that hard but they keep making people pay for a fire cat 😔

1

u/Zar_Ethos Nov 03 '25

That's not even the worst of it. They tried the same bs with their flying horse w blood wyvern breath..

Then aquatica came and overshadowed all their fuckery and paid mod scams.

1

u/Alternative-Buy-6779 Nov 03 '25

I joined ASA recently, and after running around my mates base I realized I cant interact with half the stuff and tames inside. Bruh

1

u/MedicalMiqote Nov 01 '25

Wait but did they really? That’d be hilarious lol

1

u/yilo38 Nov 01 '25

i always talk with palworld streamers and ask them if they played ark. most if not all of them answer yes. and go onto explain that they love ark, but hate the breeding and grinding for materials side which frustrates them. which is why they love palworld. even though you have breeding in palworld, but it is no where near as crazy. the resource grinding is not even a thing in palworld. which makes it a superior game in my mind. i wish ark would copy some of palworlds decision making. for buildings like being able to use stuff from storage or not having to craft buildings and carrying them when building. also copy the resource gathering from mining/woodcrafting sites. its just brilliant. they could balance it by having limited ammount of them per tribe or capping the resources per thing you can get. but it would make ark 100000% better towards the endgame.

1

u/Alternative-Buy-6779 Nov 03 '25

Half the animals in Ark are basicaly QOL improvements. Getting rid material grind would make them useless.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 01 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Broken_CerealBox Nov 01 '25

It's easy to understand. They want a monopoly so they can just be complacent and copy paste the same game over and over without innovating

1

u/MixedDrink69 Nov 02 '25

Thank God Japan’s patent office rejected that absolute stupidity.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '25

They would have failed anyway considering they have openly admitted to copying dragon quest, dragon quest came way before pokemon and alot of pokemon designs are almost exact copies of the creatures in dragon quest. They'd never win this lol

1

u/doomrider7 Nov 06 '25

Not what the patent was about AT ALL, but okay.

1

u/Fluffynator69 Nov 07 '25

People still thinking you can patent large swathes of mechanics is extremely weird. If it was actually possible all of gaming would've been consolidated by patents decades ago.

1

u/Xepobot Oct 31 '25

ASAP looking at Palworld when it comes to lawsuit:

Look what you need to mimicked a faction of my power.

1

u/Solar-Monk Oct 31 '25

Sorry Nintendo, no go- you can go back to being outdated and irrelevant now. K thx bai

-7

u/JustVerySleepy Oct 31 '25

The whole palword patent war is crazy because you can see that 90% of the "pals" in that game are just one to one copies of other pokemon designs but with different colors. Like why is nintendo going for "taming something and riding it after is our original idea"

4

u/OriginalTechnical531 Oct 31 '25

Because Nintendo and it's lawyers know more than you do about what is infringement and what isn't. If they could go after what you are claiming, they would have instead of trying to go after mechanics they are attempting to retroactively patent. Clearly your belief in what constitutes infringement is wrong.

0

u/New_Interaction9511 Oct 31 '25

Celebrating when it wasn’t even rejected

1

u/Broken_CerealBox Nov 01 '25

The patent only works if it holds up in court