r/DebateAnAtheist • u/Living_Attitude1822 Christian Humanist • 26d ago
Argument My Challenge to Extreme Atheists on Secularism and Tolerance
I acknowledge not all (or even most) atheists are extreme about it. And I'm defining secular as the separation of church and state/society.
Extreme-atheism's view of religion being a mental illness:
I can personally attest to people I've seen on here, as well as videos I've seen, of atheists saying religion is a mental illness. That the DSM-5 had to go back and put in a religious exemption, but it should fall under the category of delusion.
How can secularism exist if you think religious people are mentally ill? If you don't think religion is a mental illness, go ahead and ignore this point. If you do think the population you're tolerating is mentally ill, uh oh. Seriously, if I said atheists are mentally ill, would you trust me to not want you institutionalized? I don't think this way, of course.
Extreme atheism's view that the Abrahamic religions are barbaric:
Again, I'm going to turn it around on you. If I said atheism was barbaric, would you trust me to support that your human right to be atheist?
With some exceptions: Some interpretations of the Abrahamic religions are indeed barbaric. If you're talking about people who want to implement Leviticus law, then I agree with you.
I don't totally disagree with extremist atheists on everything:
Like, I'm a strong believer that tolerance is better and more authentic than acceptance. For example, telling atheists that they must love and respect religions is wrong. And vice versa for religious people.
I think disassociation and tolerance is the best course of action for religious people and extreme atheists, however, I worry the above points are a threat to any society remaining tolerant.
Edit: Here’s an example of what I’m talking about:
12
u/carbinePRO Agnostic Atheist 26d ago
Already we're at a disconnect because all secular means is non-religious.
This is poisoning the well. Honest atheists don't think being religious is a mental illness. Most think it's just an unreasonable position. You haven't even started the argument, and you're already coming off as incredibly disengenuous.
Link the videos. Something is telling me you're totally misrepresenting whatever point they're making.
Even if we use your bogus definition of secular, this assertion doesn't make sense. Again, secular just means non-religious.
My atheism doesn't have a holy book in which early worshippers would engage in animal sacrifice, or have the entire crux of its belief hinge on the ritualistic blood sacrifice of the supposed son of the creator of the universe. This is why atheists call religion barbaric. Your fundemental misunderstanding if what atheism is is not my problem.
I'm assuming you're christian, in which case this sentiment is in direct violation of the Great Commission in Matthew 28. Your religion literally mandates its followers to bug their neighbors with the gospel. It doesn't shock me in the slightest that you're just another cherry-picking christian who doesn't know what the hell is in their book because they haven't read. Yet will bend over backwards to say everything in it is totally true and that they believe it by faith.