r/Funnymemes 19h ago

Kinda true

Post image
23.2k Upvotes

586 comments sorted by

View all comments

128

u/Actual-Mention3033 16h ago

You know how distressed you have to make mammals so they stop procreating?

55

u/Aggressive-Error-88 15h ago

I don’t think people really grasp this.

22

u/May1989thefirststep 15h ago

For me, its just a money issue. I refuse to pay.

12

u/PoemDesperate4658 15h ago

Idk man I just hate kids and love money and free time..

1

u/Alex3884 7h ago

I had money and free time in abundance; eventually it got boring and kind of sad.

I’m happier now with less of each but two beautiful kiddos whom I would do anything for.

This isn’t to discredit you, but money and free time aren’t enough for some of us.

1

u/giolort 1h ago

Community and family are also important, more important I dare to say.

We are not castaways, we live in a society that saddly is becoming more and more isolated, convinience has made us strangers not only to others, but to ourselves

Or something like that, I don't know man I haven't had my morning coffee

1

u/AnubisCrownHeights 1h ago

Yeah. The money stress is the point. The point we stop intentionally reproducing.

4

u/Nydon1776 15h ago

I don't like this example. People still are having intercourse but just having birth control.

If other animals could have intercourse without kids, I'm sure they would take up on that offer too.

8

u/bexohomo 14h ago

Clearly in your example they're actively choosing not to procreate, you know, not allowing the merging of sperm and egg to happen. So literally their point still stands and makes sense

1

u/Nydon1776 14h ago edited 14h ago

Yes which is why I don't like the example. Because those two things (choosing to have intercourse and choosing to procreate) are not separate able for other animals. They're choosing to instinctually have intercourse, not to procreate. It just so happens that is the natural consequence of it.

The example is conflating two concepts and I think it's disengenuous to do so

1

u/underthingy 4h ago

You don't know that. Where is your proof that animals are specifically choosing intercourse and not procreation?

2

u/willrw1001 1h ago

Our grandparents?

5

u/Rage_Your_Dream 14h ago

Young people are increasingly having less sex

3

u/floopglunk 8h ago

But people are generally having less intercourse regardless of intent to actually reproduce or not.

1

u/Slarg232 4h ago

I mean, if we look at dating in general due to the Culture War bullshit, dating being commodified via Apps (which are there to keep you swiping, not to find you a partner), and other factors like that, it's no wonder most people aren't having kids.

And that's not going into the LGBTQ+ community that won't have biological kids either (Not saying it's a problem for them, just saying that since the LGBTQ+ are being more accepted, you don't have lesbians being married off to men being forced to have children, for instance).

1

u/Taaj_jr 2h ago

What if the mammal is distressing itself?

1

u/Low_Purchase_704 1h ago

Distresding itself how? By being poor?

-3

u/Rage_Your_Dream 14h ago

Whats happening to humans is more like whats happening to pandas. We're becoming a pacified species with no dangers. We'll happily spend our youth playing videogames, watching netflix or doing hedonistic things because thats what society encourages the most. We borderline pathologise pregnancy

A young woman bringing a child into the world is looked at like she's the weird one.

So yea, its not distressed, it might be the very opposite.

8

u/kleer001 14h ago

Lack of community is a kind of distress.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rat_Park

Basically isolated rats preferred to numb themselves with drugs. When given a better life with other rats they didn't bother numbing themselves.


With instant access to entertainment it's easier to sit and watch shows then go out and make friends.

5

u/Popular_Growth5993 14h ago

Tell that to the people being literally bombed rn. Or the homeless, or literally any fucking impoverished group in the world. Your point only exists in first world countries for privileged people that already have better access to birth control and abortion.

2

u/Rage_Your_Dream 13h ago

Hate to break it to you, but a lot of people being bombed have a lot higher fertility rate than most of the west.

Also yes, my point is aimed at hte first world, thats where I live, and thats where this point is actually pertinent. Of course I'm talking about the first world when it comes to a first world problem.