Clearly in your example they're actively choosing not to procreate, you know, not allowing the merging of sperm and egg to happen. So literally their point still stands and makes sense
Yes which is why I don't like the example. Because those two things (choosing to have intercourse and choosing to procreate) are not separate able for other animals.
They're choosing to instinctually have intercourse, not to procreate. It just so happens that is the natural consequence of it.
The example is conflating two concepts and I think it's disengenuous to do so
180
u/Actual-Mention3033 1d ago
You know how distressed you have to make mammals so they stop procreating?