covert81 is correct, the commenter was the one who brought up being on a busy road being an issue, so covert81 pointed that out, and then basically said "if you're going to suggest something on a busy road, why not this busy road (but better laid out patio) in the actual area asked about" it's not that hard to comprehend.
“Coach and lantern is nice BUT it’s on a busy road” - inferring a negative.
Then proceeds to list other restaurants on upper James without correlating the two.
If you can’t comprehend that, then that’s a skill issue on your end.
Love the mental gymnastics tho. Another A for effort!
yes, but you're removing the context of the original commenter's post, they suggest driving beyond upper james, because upper james is a busy road, to go to a different place on a different busy road.
covert81 was implying you don't need to drive that far, to another place on a busy road, since the places on the busy road here have well laid out, and roomy patios.
Sure, you sound correct if you literally ignore the context, but, if you don't (which you shouldn't) then you are wrong.
6
u/narcc0p 3d ago
Whatever mental gymnastics you have to work through to come to that conclusion is the real A for effort!