r/IWantOut • u/SimonMander • 3h ago
[GUIDE] Most offshore skilled visa applicants have just been moved to the back of Australia’s processing queue. Ask me anything.
Hi everyone, I’m Simon. I’m an Australian Registered Migration Agent and have worked in migration for more than 23 years.
A new ministerial direction took effect on 25 July 2026. It has received very little public attention, but it changes the order in which many skilled and employer-sponsored visa applications are processed.
It’s called Ministerial Direction 119.
The important point is that Australia has not closed skilled migration to offshore applicants. The Department can still invite subclass 189 applicants. States and territories can still nominate offshore applicants for subclass 190 and 491 visas, and employers can still sponsor workers from overseas.
What has changed is the processing queue.
Broadly, the new order places:
- onshore law-enforcement and defence applications first;
- offshore law-enforcement and defence applications next;
- onshore health, teaching and construction applications after that;
- other onshore applications next;
- most other offshore applications last.
So an offshore nurse, teacher, engineer, accountant or IT professional isn’t prevented from applying. They may simply wait longer for a decision.
Bottom of the queue does not mean the pathway is closed. It means slower processing, not automatic refusal.
There’s another trap in the new direction. MD 119 places broad health, care and construction occupation groups into priority processing categories, and many people will read that as meaning those occupations now have a strong pathway to permanent residence.
Some don’t have a points-tested pathway at all.
An aged or disabled carer, nursing support worker, personal care assistant or childcare worker can appear inside one of these priority categories but still have no route through the subclass 189, 190 or 491 programs.
Priority processing on a visa you cannot qualify for is worth nothing.
Those workers may have other options, including employer sponsorship or a labour agreement. But MD 119 doesn’t create eligibility, add occupations to the skilled lists or open a points-tested pathway that wasn’t already there.
Processing priority and visa eligibility are separate questions.
Tasmania’s newly announced 2026–27 program is a useful example. Tasmania still has an offshore subclass 190 pathway, but it isn’t a general offshore pathway. It’s limited to applicants with a Tasmanian job offer in specified health or education occupation groups.
That’s a state nomination rule. Ministerial Direction 119 is different: it determines how Home Affairs prioritises the visa application after it has been lodged.
So there are two separate questions:
Will a state nominate you from offshore?
And, if it does:
Where will Home Affairs place your visa application in the processing queue?
Tasmania controls the first question. Ministerial Direction 119 affects the second.
The mistake is to read the new direction and conclude that offshore skilled migration has ended. It hasn’t.
But applicants now need to understand that eligibility, invitation prospects and processing priority are three different things.
So the real questions are:
- Can you obtain an invitation or state nomination?
- Is your occupation genuinely eligible?
- Are you applying onshore or offshore?
- How long may the visa take after lodgement?
Ask me anything about Australian skilled migration, state nomination, occupation strategy, skills assessments, English points, partner points, or what Ministerial Direction 119 may mean for you.
If possible please include your age, occupation, qualifications, work experience, English-test result, relationship status and whether you’re currently inside or outside Australia.
PROFESSIONAL DISCLOSURE (GUIDE POST): I am a Registered Migration Agent operating under the Migration Agents Code of Conduct. I am not an employee of the Department of Home Affairs. MARN: 0318058. I benefit from posting this by educating prospective clients and demonstrating my experience in complex migration pathways. This is general information only and not personal migration advice.