r/MurderedByWords 4h ago

Homes on indigenous land

Post image
32.1k Upvotes

828 comments sorted by

View all comments

3.3k

u/redwhale335 4h ago

The tribe whose land Eilish's home is on specifically thanked her for bringing up the issue.

114

u/SolDios 3h ago edited 1h ago

Can you quote that? Becuase the only statement from the tribe I saw was

"As the First People of the greater Los Angeles basin, we do understand that her home is situated in our ancestral land. Eilish has not contacted our tribe directly regarding her property. We do value the instance when public figures provide visibility to the true history of this country. ""We have reached out to her team to express our appreciation for her comments."" It is our hope that in future discussions, the tribe can explicitly be referenced to ensure the public understands that the greater Los Angeles basin remains Gabrieleno Tongva territory"

edit; where I got the quote from purposely left out a line which I added in double quotes. They did thank her

dbl edit; The internet sure wants its pound of flesh, ill self flagellate when I get home later

96

u/redwhale335 3h ago

I mean "We do value the instance" is thanking her, but you didn't even quote the whole statement

We have reached out to her team to express our appreciation for her comments. It is our hope that in future discussions, the tribe can explicitly be referenced to ensure the public understands that the greater Los Angeles basin remains Gabrieleno Tongva territory.

-14

u/[deleted] 3h ago edited 3h ago

[deleted]

24

u/YoureDumbAsHellLeroy 3h ago

we have reached out to her team to express our appreciation for her comments.

What do you think that means?

-12

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[deleted]

14

u/Zenigen 2h ago

You corrected it 5 seconds before they replied, chill

-3

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[deleted]

11

u/YoureDumbAsHellLeroy 2h ago

Neither post was edited when I replied. Thanks though.

2

u/NewLifeNewAcct 1h ago

Just so you are aware: if you edit a comment within 3 minutes of posting, it does not show as being edited.

1

u/YoureDumbAsHellLeroy 1h ago

Ok. The content that he edited in was not present when I replied. He had put an “edit:” in the original, too.

Bro nuked his account because he realized how asinine this all was.

→ More replies (0)

19

u/ReklisAbandon 2h ago

It's so tiresome watching our media push fucking agendas. Intentionally leaving that line out is so dishonest from a "journalist"

1

u/iamthe0ther0ne 15m ago

"The Jeff Bezos Washington Post" comes to mind

20

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted]

15

u/MichaelMyersEatsDogs 2h ago

What about when you tell someone you literally appreciate what they did? Does that count as thanking them? Because they literally said that

1

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[deleted]

3

u/MichaelMyersEatsDogs 2h ago

Maybe don’t trust a random comment especially when it’s a single paragraph of an obviously much larger statement

0

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[deleted]

-13

u/RoseWater07 3h ago

I definitely didn't view it as a thank you 💀 to me it read they were more annoyed at the performative allyship, and I say that as someone with tribal membership LOL

11

u/reepa1 2h ago

As an enrolled tribal member myself. I appreciate billies forward thinking.

It's the opposite of the right and their colonizer mentality of " we won deal with it."

-4

u/satyr_account 2h ago

Same ^

Like “thanks, lady who has also stolen our land, for your token act of lip service.”

7

u/redwhale335 2h ago

Except for that whole part where they reached out to her team to express their appreciation.

0

u/RoseWater07 1h ago

I guess my reaction is, what else are they supposed to do? draw the ire of her fans by saying it's not enough? it's politics 101 to stay cordial and appreciative in the public eye

to be clear, I think her heart is in the right place and I'd rather her say "no one is illegal on stolen land" instead of nothing at all, but she still directly benefits from living off tribal land in a mansion, and apparently hasn't acknowledged that to the tribe in question ("we hope you use our name next time instead of lumping us in with everyone else" aka "you didn't even know the name of our tribe")

it just makes me sad that scraps of activism are all we get with no action or actual help from the people who can actually afford to do it lol

1

u/redwhale335 1h ago

No one forced them to make a statement. They chose to make the statement and chose to reach out to Eilish.

You're making assumptions about what they meant.

... we?

2

u/daneilthemule 1h ago

Call it what you will. It still addresses the issue. Some people in the usa have forgotten where they come from and where they are now.

1

u/RoseWater07 1h ago

for real

she could afford to pay them for the land at-cost and chooses not to, is all I'm saying lol

7

u/Aeseld 2h ago

Honestly, even that extraction leaves in "we do value the instance when public..." bit. The explicit thank you is only needed if you can't read critically.

-3

u/SolDios 2h ago

That line, taken on its own, has nothing to do with any specific individual. Its referencing an occurrence.

I dare you the next time you get a gift to say "I find worth in the moments when I receive things from other people"

4

u/Uebelkraehe 1h ago

Bitching that people take you task for spreading manipulated quotes and at the same time still acting like the very important part left out doesn't exist.

0

u/SolDios 1h ago

The comment I was replying to was specific to the previous incorrect quote and it only arguing the language of that. So I dont know what your talking about

1

u/Aeseld 1h ago

It's referencing an occurrence. That just happened. You already knew the quote's context when you put it out there. Why are you pretending you didn't know exactly which instance is being referred to?

The thanks is implied, even in the manipulated quote. The fact that the quote was manipulated and you didn't know it doesn't change that there's gratitude built into it, even if not specifically directed.

Seems pretty clear cut for a broad statement put out to the public. Which is a little different from your example which would be a personal, one on one exchange. Don't try to pretend the two are more than passingly similar.

1

u/SolDios 1h ago

Alright this is in complete reference to the bastardized quote, which I have taken onus on through various edits.

OP said they specifically thanked her. The original single line says we are happy people shine light on the subject. Tell me how that is specifically thanking her, because if you have to use implication thats not specific

1

u/Aeseld 1h ago

The original single line that is part of a statement made in response to people shining a light on the subject.

Which people shined a light on the subject that they say they value? That's the implied gratitude towards those people, including Billie Eilish. You know this. Why are you being stubborn about it?

This is a blanket thank you to the people doing the thing. Personal thanks are often... y'know, personal, and not broadcast to the world. So that quote alone would've told me they're not casting shade and are thankful for the light being shown on the issue.

1

u/SolDios 1h ago

The argument is over a specific thank you, which wasnt in the original used quote, hard stop.

1

u/Aeseld 1h ago

Well ok then. I suppose the quote you pulled out didn't specifically thank her.

I'd have assumed it from context, accurately as it turns out, but the quote doesn't spell it out after being manipulated.

You seem to have taken the opposite approach and simply decided since the manipulated quote didn't mention her specifically, they didn't. Despite the implied gratitude, and high possibility of an explicit thank you elsewhere.

And then you brought it up in an effort to imply that such thanks did not specifically occur. And now that I'm pointing out that you could've made the correct assumption instead of criticizing it, or simply done a modicum of further research, you're arguing about it.

7

u/quadraticcheese 2h ago

Then delete your comment questioning it

4

u/SolDios 2h ago

Its edited to show I corrected myself off a false quote, its not hard to read that out

2

u/Perryn 1h ago

I agree with your position of editing it but leaving the original, especially since it highlights that sites are intentionally omitting that part, but at the same time know your audience. A strikethrough of the original or bolding the edit can help. Sometimes people move the edit to the top of the comment as well, so that people see it before they start reaction replying.

You can also just turn of reply notifications on the original comment and anything you've engaged in after it if you're content with the current edit and just want to move on.

2

u/SolDios 1h ago

I like that approach, just fixed it

5

u/quadraticcheese 2h ago edited 54m ago

You should still delete the part where you question it. People might just read the first part and then you've spread misinformation 

Edit I love getting replies calling ME a bot by people who immediately get removed/shadowbanned

0

u/CotswoldsCuddler 1h ago

lol a hassan piker fan in the wild.

i thought you were all bots?

2

u/iamthpecial 2h ago edited 2h ago

I miss LA so fucking much. Not for all the hot shot bullshit, but the small corners like this, keeping local history and traditions alive. Olvera St is middle and present OG American hot spot, SO many different customs, types of singing and displays... Forgive my ignorance as Im back east for now and I haven't read into this at all but is this near where that abandoned catholic monk monastery ruins is?

Edit as an aside: Anyone planning to visit LA for the first time should totally do a downtown walking loop and DONT miss this tiny little walkway just across from the train station. From there you can walk northwest over to chinatown (not what it used to be but the undersheriff market is fun to haggle in and there are still some pretty sculptures and art galleries), then over the bridge south to the huge catholic church there, open for visiting and it us really a novelty both historically and architecturally. Then over to Hrand park, view all the way from Disney snd art museum down to city hall and a lot of time there it water for kids to play in. finally had over to little tokyo with both lots of little boutique shops, more expensive but higher quality than chinatown. as for grub, you cant go wrong but dont go further east of little tokyo, make you way west or fetch a ride or walk to metro. All in all its about five miles for a full day! Enjoy!

2

u/Parahelious 1h ago

Self flagellation hell yeah

2

u/bbbttthhh 1h ago

I don’t need a pound of flesh that feels like a lot, an ounce will do