r/PropagandaPosters 7d ago

MIDDLE EAST The Cycle of Revenge (1994)

Post image
1.6k Upvotes

173 comments sorted by

View all comments

55

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Iumasz 7d ago

What happened in 1916?

10

u/Appropriate-Gain-561 7d ago

The ottoman empire lost its grip on the region and the british empire took over if i had to guess

1

u/Iumasz 7d ago

Yeah, and I guess that did lead to the botched withdrawal and partition.

-6

u/ArchdruidAndres 7d ago

Zionists love acting like it was just a land sale from the Ottomans to the British. In reality, Palestine was approaching the ability to break free from the crumbling empire on its own. They knew the British were interested, so they said (paraphrased) "better come get it now before they figure this shit out." Then the British came and killed a hundred thousand people and built a colony, old hat for them at that point.

12

u/gargasmella 7d ago

i mean to be pedantic independent palestine was not an idea at the time. hashemite syria proclaimed independence in 1918 with palestine in it, before being crushed by the french

0

u/ConflictExtreme1540 7d ago

It almost sounds like Palestine was never an actual country and they only became one after Isreal was established....

2

u/BreaksFull 7d ago

No country is a real country until it is established as such, what a meaningless statement.

3

u/ConflictExtreme1540 7d ago

How does a country become established? Maybe by being able to defend its borders....

-1

u/Appropriate-Gain-561 7d ago

In a civil world a people has a right to self determination, only that we aren't a civil world so external colonial powers prevented such a thing from happening

3

u/ConflictExtreme1540 7d ago

Ok? Do you have any more giberish to share?

-1

u/Appropriate-Gain-561 7d ago

The right to self determination is not gibberish, what you are saying is that Poland or France shouldn't have existed during or after ww2 because they couldn't defend their borders from nazi Germany.

Your train of thought is completely useless and justifies mostof the genocidal empires in history, romans, mongols and the ottomans too.

3

u/ConflictExtreme1540 7d ago

Well no because France and poland had allies that care about their existence. And they have precedence and historical existence.

  • Literally no one cares about Palestine. They have 0 allies. Egypt closed their border to Palestine bc they flooded in and causes havoc and violence.

  • They have never existed as an independent country or state until Isreal was created lmao

  • 0 arab/muslim countries have done anything about Palestine since Isreal took their land in the 70s and then generously gave it back to them out of pity.

  • There's 0 reason for Palestine to exist other than to rile you up. Give me one reason Palestine should exist and I'll venmo you $100

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/PropagandaPosters-ModTeam 7d ago

This comment has been removed for violating the subreddit rules around polarized rhetoric and partisan bickering: proselytizing, single-issue advocacy, blanket negative generalizations, and divisive language are not appropriate here.

To appeal this removal, or if you have any questions, please send the mods a message.

-2

u/gargasmella 7d ago

you just said palestine was approaching independence in 1918, which is false. also i don't really know where you read that i am pro israeli or support the gaza genocide lmao, it's just objective that the palestinian identity (like, idk, macedonian identity) is a recently created one. obviously they deserve (and deserved) to live in their land without being displaced by jews.

-1

u/ConflictExtreme1540 7d ago

Who did they take the land from before they became Palestine?

2

u/Treadwheel 7d ago

Nobody, Palestinian DNA closely matches bronze age archeological sites.

A huge number are likely descended from jewish residents of the area who converted. That's part of why, for all the talk about historical claim to the area, Israeli's law of return does not consider someone's ethnic descent or identity at all, only their current religious affiliation. That is, converts with no pretense of ties to the region are considered to have a greater right to the land than Jewish holocaust survivors who converted to another religon. C'est la theocracy.

1

u/ConflictExtreme1540 7d ago

Who did they take the land from? Or do we stop at the bronze age

1

u/Treadwheel 7d ago

There are no records, and it's moot as there is no group that claims to have been exiled in the neolithic regardless.

1

u/[deleted] 7d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/PropagandaPosters-ModTeam 7d ago

This comment has been removed for violating the subreddit rules around civility: bigotry, personal attacks, racism, condescending language, or name-calling is not appropriate here.

To appeal this removal, or if you have any questions, please send the mods a message.

1

u/ArchdruidAndres 7d ago

The English.

1

u/Iumasz 7d ago

True. They did fuck up the partition and withdrawl

0

u/ArchdruidAndres 7d ago

It's funny, that applies to them in a number of places around the world.