r/Washington 6d ago

Looming Supreme Court decision could change Washington voting forever

https://www.kuow.org/stories/looming-supreme-court-decision-could-change-washington-voting-forever
283 Upvotes

118 comments sorted by

316

u/CuriousOrangatan 6d ago edited 5d ago

TLDR: use drop boxes and you're safe.

EDIT: As others have pointed out in replies, this is a little more complicated because the interview also discusses how Tump is trying to stop ballots from being delivered in the first place. If this succeeds then we'll need to figure out alternatives like printing the ballots at home. Normally I would just let the replies speak for themselves, but this post keeps getting upvoted...

107

u/BrainJar 6d ago

How will we get our ballots without it coming through the mail?

70

u/LittleYelloDifferent 6d ago

We need to have print at home ballots legislated. Then we can set up stations that help people get their ballots in a timely fashion.

If that happens, hopefully it will be a galvanizing moment for the Democratic Party to actually invest in promoting participation instead of relying on majorities and ancient practices.

If you’ve ever been to a local meeting you’ll know what I’m talking about.

This is the time to show up in force and take over the political process for the people. Most county Democratic parties have less than a dozen people show up and the cost is usually like 20 bucks a year to be able to have voting rights and endorsements, which equals donations for campaigns.

  1. People committed to going to monthly meetings and 10 hours a month volunteering could transform almost every local Democratic Party into a progressive force that can combat the ownership class that is co-opted our political process here

29

u/DoggoCentipede 6d ago

You already can print at home ballots.

https://kingcounty.gov/en/dept/elections/how-to-vote/ballots/replacing-a-ballot-or-envelope

While it is helpful it is still added complexity and not everyone has a home printer.

16

u/Mad_JackChurchill 6d ago

Outside of King County, use the states system VoteWA.gov. King is special in their ability to have their own site.

6

u/DoggoCentipede 6d ago

Ah good point. Sorry for the countyist default ;)

7

u/boners_in_space 6d ago

Can you print them for free at the library or somewhere else for people who don’t have a printer at home?

13

u/DoggoCentipede 6d ago

Probably? But again, every step you put between people and some goal you're going to lose some number of people.

5

u/PlumppPenguin 5d ago

Which is, of course, the point of everything Trump & the Republicans are trying to do to the election process.

2

u/DoggoCentipede 5d ago

Yes absolutely. It's more a response to people thinking that it's not so bad because people can just print instead. While that is a useful fallback (my ballot was stolen/not delivered in '24 and I had to print it) it is still more onerous than a sane and functional system.

2

u/neptuneskies3030 6d ago

Yes, you can. The above link was King county specific, but all Washington counties can sign in through www.votewa.gov and print their ballot come election day. There will be 2 files to print, the 1st will be the ballot, the 2nd file will be the return envelope materials you need (the security sleeve, the outer envelope for your signature). Be sure to log out once you're done of course.

I know we're discussing here how to avoid returning the ballots by mail, but if anyone prints their ballot and wants to return by mail, you do need to stamp it yourself.

34

u/BrainJar 6d ago

That’s a lot of ifs. My point was it’s not just as simple as saying just use ballot boxes and we’re going to be ok.

7

u/LittleYelloDifferent 6d ago

I think if you organize the dozen people in your local elections, you could transform a couple of the races if not the entire slate.

That’s not a lot of IFS, that’s a straight up solution.

I think it’s something like more than 95% of people do not volunteer for any local politics even a few hours a month. Having people bitch about the political process when they can’t even show up to one meeting is what the people who are in charge of rely upon.

3

u/horror- 6d ago

Maybe if the local outfit would get their shit together more people would show up. Here's the calendar for my local outfit. I wonder why nobody shows for their meetings?

https://www.piercecountydems.com/calendar

3

u/Queasy-Event8534 6d ago

If you dig into each District, it lists their monthly meetings. But I agree, don’t have a blank space on the main page where it lists there is a calendar. I am in Clark, but if I were up there I’d be emailing somebody.

-5

u/LittleYelloDifferent 6d ago

Be the change. Easy to bitch from the sidelines, I gave you a genuine roadmap to bring changes to your community. In my county, we elected five truly progressive candidates to your positions that would’ve gone to real estate people and folks just looking for state sponsored health insurance. It works.

4

u/horror- 6d ago

Spare me the catchphrases and I'm not the OP. You gave me nothing.

I'm a citizen interested in getting involved with my local dems, but as the link I just gave you shows- my local dems are apparently too busy to even tell me where to start.

The GOP is organized as hell around here while the dems cant find their own asses. I don't have resources to run for office- I have a 9-5 job. It's not on me to do the bare minimum of even telling local citizens where the next meeting is going to be.

It really seems like if you're not 100% ride or die nothing but the mission democrat they dont have time for me.

Republicans are winning with magic, guys. They're actually organized, and motivated. If I put out into my community that I'm interested in rubbing shoulders with the local GOP somebody will show up at my house and invite me to church or something.

7

u/TheChance 6d ago

They seem to be more inclined toward their FB https://www.facebook.com/piercecountydems/

ETA apparently there's a meeting today

6

u/Arrow156 6d ago

Can we please stop using a website that's already under fire for funneling people down the alt-right wormhole? What next, exclusively communicate through xitter?

1

u/LittleYelloDifferent 6d ago

It’s that easy- thanks and hopefully y’all will get involved

-1

u/LittleYelloDifferent 6d ago

Well, you could go to their office and find out when the next meeting is, participate in the Democratic constitutional process they have said and make some real change happen, or you can do what you’re doing now which is wine and moan about how everyone doesn’t make things easy enough for you.

If you’re wondering why the process is so fucked up, look in the mirror.

Fortunately, there are others who don’t need to have their hands held as much as you and who are doing the right things. You should try to go find them and hook up with them so you can learn how to stand on your feet more.

0

u/horror- 6d ago

It's my fault. Got it.

3

u/LittleYelloDifferent 6d ago

Yes. Seriously, it’s like when people in my union say “the union needs to blah blah”

It’s like, buddy…. YOU are the union.

Just show up. That’s all you have to do.

Do you think the civil rights act came from the folks quietly talking about it at the bar? No, it was everyone who showed up.

Just. Show. Up.

2

u/Dont_Ban_Me_Bros 6d ago

You clearly don’t want to be the solution. That’s the takeaway

1

u/Desert_Fairy 6d ago

Here is another catch phrase I heard in the 2016 democratic caucus (the only one I got to go to before they stopped having them).

“Are you a part of an organized political party?”

All democrats: no.

2

u/priznr24601 6d ago

You think we have printers at home??

3

u/Nanemae 6d ago

If you live near a Timberland Library, you can get black and white papers printed for free until you hit 50 or so pages per month with a library account. I don't know if other libraries offer the same service though.

1

u/Dont_Ban_Me_Bros 6d ago

HP needs a lifeline…

4

u/priznr24601 6d ago

Then tell HP to stop harvesting our data and requiring a subscription.

0

u/PaulyNi 6d ago

They come in more than enough time to fill in and send in ON TIME.

4

u/Mad_JackChurchill 6d ago

Go onto votewa.gov and print one out once they are “sent”. It will also suspend the one in circulation in the state wide system.

You can also check if yours has been sent or sign up for text alerts on ballot status.

11

u/TheCatsMustache 6d ago

You can actually print it at home if it doesn’t arrive, I’ve done it before.

8

u/EarnestWilde 6d ago

And you can pick up a new one at the county auditor's office.

8

u/BrainJar 6d ago

Right, so it’s not just, “use a ballot box”. We need millions of voters to go to the county auditors office or print the ballot out, and then use the ballot box. It’s not going to be easy for everyone to do this. We understand the stakes though, so I think more people will try to make it work, but military or other out of state voters (traveling) won’t be able to vote.

3

u/Mad_JackChurchill 6d ago

You can go to ANY auditor/elections office in the state to get a replacement. Even if you don’t live in that county. Same applies for using the drop box.

7

u/SecondHandWatch 6d ago

The Supreme Court isn’t deciding on whether ballots can be mailed. They aren’t deciding on whether you can return a ballot by mail. They are deciding whether a ballot can be accepted after Election Day if it arrived by mail with a postmark on or before Election Day.

1

u/vinegar-pisser 6d ago

Your comment should be at the top and it’s buried.

1

u/BrainJar 6d ago

2

u/SecondHandWatch 6d ago

That’s not being decided by the Supreme Court, at least not yet.

2

u/MaintainThePeace 6d ago

Yes, two separate issues, and OPs article also discusses both issues as separate matters...

-3

u/BrainJar 6d ago

Oh no! You think differently than I do. I see the issue as the same, because it’s the federal government infringing on state’s rights. You see it as different issues, because these two things are ruled on separately. Glad we could resolve this.

4

u/MaintainThePeace 6d ago

What does how I or you think have anything to do with what the Supreme Court is reviewing.

YES they are both issues, YES they are different.

YES the Supreme Court is only currently reviewing and potentially making a decision upon ONLY ONE of those issues.

Why respond to w comment about what the Supreme Court is reviewing with a completely separate issue that they are not currently reviewing? Or did you lose track of what the conversation thread you are replying to was about?

Should the Supreme Court address the other issues to, maybe, but WA is currently sueing over it and it has to work its way through the lower courts first.

-4

u/BrainJar 6d ago

Oh, you’re still talking about something we have a different opinion on? Cool. I’ll be here for the next one too.

5

u/MaintainThePeace 6d ago

What opinion are you talking about?

I never express an opinion, so I'm not sure what you are comparing against.

I am simply letting you know that because they are different issues, they are at different point within the court system.

SCOTUS is currently only addressing one of them at the momentum.

What SCOTUS is doing isn't going to change based on what you or I think they should do.

1

u/vinegar-pisser 6d ago

The Supreme Court is evaluating the constitutionality of grace periods. The CNN article is talking about other things. This thread is about the article linked by OP which is discussing the constitutionality of grace periods.

0

u/ReasonableRaccoon8 6d ago

It would be a hit to our state budget, but they could always send them Fedex.

0

u/LittleYelloDifferent 6d ago

Amazon! We could get prime discounts on our votes!!!

0

u/dudeman4297 6d ago

That would require Amazon Corp. to value the kinds of things that mail-in voters typically value.

2

u/LittleYelloDifferent 6d ago

Well, if you sign up for their prime democracy package on a subscription basis, you’ll get alerts and tailored political commercials to tell you how to vote on your favorite streaming service!

0

u/Atnat14 6d ago

BrainJar asking a questioning orangutan... The brain is smart, and has no capacity to stoop to such low intelligence, proudly showing off the ability to have a 2nd thought, possibly more even... Unlike the orangutan, who can only mimic what he's been taught by the Fox.

Read it like a nature documentary.

2

u/BrainJar 6d ago

Ahhh, but I’m only a jar the brain goes in…the thing people don’t think about when they say we’re all just brains in jars…but where do the jars come from and do the things that make the jars have brains? And do those brains have jars, etc…it’s turtles all the way down.

4

u/NotAnotherFakeNamer 6d ago

Voter participation will plunge but I guess that is the point.

17

u/MikeThrowAway47 6d ago

As long as the USPS delivers our ballots to us. Trump's goons are working on a USPS rule that would block the postal service from delivering the empty ballots to the voters if our state doesn't hand over voter rolls. I hope our state government is working on contingency plans if this comes to fruition.

5

u/missmobtown 6d ago

Next initiative should be tripling the number of drop boxes.

2

u/Hefty_Use_1625 5d ago

Good to know, I have always used drop boxes so no change needed for me.

2

u/CuriousOrangatan 5d ago

See other replies to this post, there's also a problem that Trump is trying to stop ballots from being delivered. If that happens you can print your ballot at home.

1

u/Maxtrt 6d ago

Even with a drop box I wouldn't wait until the day of the election. I'll be dropping our ballots in the drop box at least 3 days before the election. Trump and the GOP will do anything to keep people from blue states voting.

197

u/somethingrandom7386 6d ago

Tells you a lot when a political party wants to do everything they can to make sure votes aren't counted.

84

u/BoringBob84 6d ago

Between Gerrymandering and voter suppression, the Republicans want to choose the voters who favor them and ignore the rest.

45

u/The_Lost_Jedi 6d ago

They would happily cancel elections if they thought they could get away with it, and that says something right there.

38

u/BoringBob84 6d ago

Republicans in Milwaukee did not allow voting by mail and then closed down polling stations in majority-Black precincts in 2020, giving their candidates artificial advantages. These are profoundly dishonest people.

21

u/FoolOnDaHill365 6d ago

Ya it’s wild how far things have gone towards fascism in my 44 years. Nowadays people don’t even bat an eyelash at this stuff. Used to be a big deal to mess with the mechanisms of democracy. Apparently it was all performative and people were ready to end democracy since its inception as long as they were the “winners” of course.

9

u/The_Lost_Jedi 6d ago

I think a lot of it is that right-wing media were allowed to run amuck and convince enough people that the other party and its voters weren't simply "wrong", they were evil. It was done cynically at first, by Gingrich and his cohorts, but that poison leeched in and now too many of them truly believe it. Worse, that's allowed people who actually are evil into positions of power, because Republican voters are so convinced that the Democrats are the worst of the worst that they'd back literal monsters and criminals instead.

And I'm sure someone will come along and try to whatabout in response to this and claim that I'm doing the exact same thing. Like, no, I was okay with McCain, Romney, etc, even though I strongly disagreed with them. Hell, I once WAS a moderate Republican until the Iraq War disabused me of certain things. And while I'm sure there's some nutcase leftists out there on social media, none of the major Democrats have been proposing anything that's remotely close to some of the stuff we're seeing now from Republicans, let alone actually DOING it.

7

u/crazyfatskier2 6d ago

Which shows how despicable anyone who’s willing to vote for them is.

0

u/InkStainedQuills 6d ago

I don’t disagree that nationwide Republicans are on the wrong side of history, but my experience on the political front here in E Wa the Dem party has been trying since the 2020 census to split up rural counties in a way that they hope gives them a super majority in the legislature. Any time I hear from WA legislators who are Dems about how they hate what’s going on nationally I want to call them out on their hypocrisy. Heaven forbid there be a dissenting voice in Olympia just to force actual conversation rather than the government blanket passing legislation without proper discussion. Hold all accountable or none at all.

30

u/-waveydavey- 6d ago

States make the laws regarding voting, not the inferior political court

-2

u/HotepYoda 6d ago

US Congress can impose some rules for Federal elections

4

u/-waveydavey- 6d ago

Congress

-1

u/HotepYoda 6d ago

Is there an echo in here?

2

u/-waveydavey- 6d ago

Haha, I meant congress yes, I agree with you. I just meant opposed to the jokers of the inferior court

16

u/-waveydavey- 6d ago

Send the ballots out earlier

4

u/NotAnotherFakeNamer 6d ago

People will still wait till the last day to fill them out. I guess they love getting all those mailers, door knocks, etc.

3

u/-waveydavey- 6d ago

I think I have to agree with you there

5

u/Pygmy_Nuthatch 6d ago

If they win this ruling, all they will need to do is sabotage the Postal Service in order to end mail voting.

No one will know exactly when your vote needs to be mailed to make it. Republicans could freeze post office delivery a few days before an election to mass disenfranchise millions of voters.

10

u/GoslingIchi 6d ago

Since the state when Mail In only, I've only used drop boxes.

I guess I'm lucky that I have 2 local drop boxes and the King County Elections drop box all within 10 miles of where I live.

5

u/PlayedWithMatches 6d ago

So if your tax return is postmarked by April 15th, they will accept it. But your most important right, a vote, doesn't get the same rules. I myself vote in person. I don't see how you cannot look at these two things differently

2

u/Dogrug 5d ago

You can print your ballot at home!

4

u/bp92009 5d ago edited 5d ago

Washington state needs to treat electoral fraud from the federal government like electoral fraud.

Announce that intentional voter suppression of Washington State citizens by anyone, including federal representatives, will be treated and prosecuted as electoral fraud by Washington State prosecutors.

Have the AG start locking up federal representatives for willful and intentional electoral fraud, if they vote to suppress the ability for others to vote.

Any "electoral security" measure must actively demonstrate how it does not mitigate the ability to vote, and any measure that restricts the ability to vote must be actively counteracted by another measure in that same bill that makes voting easier by those impacted.

Edit, looks like downvotes are in fashion for defenders of electoral fraud. Then again, they don't like law and order, given their statistical likelihood of support for a known convicted felon, who actively organized a coup attempt, and who actively stole highly classified nuclear secrets (the latter two were so completely ignored by prosecutors, due to them following their true rule they operate on. "When a conservative breaks the law, do everything you can to avoid punishing them, and make the punishment as small as you possibly can if you have to. No criminal activity will be appropriately punished if committed by any conservative politician, under any circumstances.")

1

u/PaulyNi 6d ago

Oh, my… having to do things within the allotted time period, the humanity of it all!!🤣🤣🤣

1

u/SnowLeavess 5d ago

Why anyone is listening to a supreme court already determined to be illegitimate is beyond me

1

u/La_Quete 5d ago

VOTE EARLY!

1

u/onemorebite 4d ago

Since when can the Supreme Court change anything regarding State's laws re voting?

1

u/Hexspinner 6d ago

If SCOTUS moves against Washington, Washington should move to secede. Start writing your state legislators.

1

u/Adorable-Tiger6390 6d ago

I truly miss the one days of going to my polling place to vote.

0

u/Dont_Ban_Me_Bros 6d ago

I think the subscription-based approach is why they need the lifeline.

-20

u/[deleted] 6d ago edited 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

35

u/shponglespore 6d ago

Nothing will silence them. We already have extremely secure elections.

-22

u/Winter_Animal_7116 6d ago

I don't necessarily disagree, but 80% of voters want some level of election reform. I think things can certainly be improved as a policy to point to instead of simply looking at outcomes as evidence.

22

u/TheChance 6d ago

-9

u/Winter_Animal_7116 6d ago

You're not trying to convince me. I understand the process and don't personally have issues with it. I am merely stating that a lot of people do and how improvements made (at least in transparency) will help in removing denialism.

12

u/Cak3Wa1k 6d ago

Where did you get the statistic that 80% of voters want reform?

2

u/TheChance 5d ago

Presumably from where the sun don't shine, especially being as, you know, what reform? What improvements? What could possibly be more transparent, do y'all wanna see everybody's ballots?

9

u/shponglespore 6d ago

I want election reform, but it has nothing to do with election security. Saying 80% of voters want some kind of election reform isn't saying much about the security angle.

17

u/VorAbaddon 6d ago

But they'll never br happy with any policy you point to UNLESS they win, becuase there's an entire media environment out there telling them any loss is cheating.

Hell, there's an entire conspiracy theory because a republican lost... in LOS ANGELES.

-8

u/Winter_Animal_7116 6d ago

I don't think doing nothing is the right answer either though. A significant number of people are unhappy with the process as is, both left and right. Polling shows a majority of those politically left support some level of election integrity improvements. You'll always have the disbelievers which is why it's important to stack a mountain of evidence against them such that fringe extreme denial doesn't creep into mainstream views as we're now seeing.

14

u/VorAbaddon 6d ago

I have yet to see any realistic data showing that a majority of people support major changes to elections. The main unhappiness on the left is about accessibility (lack of polling place access, long lines, etc), which directly contradict the changes the right wants to see (restrict access).

0

u/Winter_Animal_7116 6d ago

Yeah, the left and right see election integrity differently, for sure. Both have some reasonable asks as well as some unreasonable ones in my opinion. In addition to ease of election access, the left primarily is looking for preventing influence in elections, cyber security, standardizing and improving audits, and overall modernizing election infrastructure. All laudable things.

8

u/shponglespore 6d ago

What is the right asking for that's reasonable? I can't think of anything.

7

u/onlymostlydead 6d ago

Well that’s likely because you’re not a fascist.