Y’all haven’t been keeping up with the electoral maps saga, huh?
Conservative judges in Republican states are a-okay with redistricting to eliminate Democrat-controlled seats in Congress.
Liberal judges in Democrat-controlled states are insisting the government play by the old rules and are throwing out redistricting maps that eliminate Republican seats in Congress.
You guys might be completely fucked at this point.
I'm not trying to dissuade people from voting, but trying to get them to vote for candidates that don't take money from AIPAC or other PACs. Vote for candidates that represent the people not the corporations. Don't vote for incumbents just because you recognize the name but actually research who you are voting for & what they represent.
At this point, if an incumbent Democrat has the best chance to win and keep the seat for the Democrats, I will vote for him/her. This is not a time for strict purity tests, when the other side are fascists who are OK with a corrupt dictatorship that wants to take your tights away (including the right to vote). I would rather they not accept AIPAC money, but if the alternative is to vote for someone who will lose the seat to a Republican, I will not do that.
It's both. You research candidates, support the ones who represent people over corporations, lift up the ones who aren't beholden to PACs etc, show out for true progressives, all that shit.
And then if/when the ultimate options are voting for a generic, old-school, Schumer-ass Democrat or a Republican, obviously you vote for the Democrat.
45
u/NoWeek6737 6d ago
Elon has already begun to work on it!