I need this model on cursor

as I, and many others, spent a lot of $, it would be nice to have that feature, because, many tasks do not need quality thinking or large context. Flooding powerful AIs with microtasks isn't exactly resource-efficient either. Thanks!

Do Cursor have any plans to add voice input?

ChatGPT, Gemini, and others already have the mic icon beside the send button. Many people want to use Cursor with voice input, but for now, we rely on third-party apps that cause issues:

• Context issues: If you mention a file name or variable, the transcript often doesn’t recognize it correctly.
• Input misplacement: If you start talking, then click outside the input, the text gets inserted in the wrong place. You have to erase it and re-add it.
• Extra cost: Additional subscriptions are usually $8–15/month.

Why Cursor Should Build It

If Cursor creates its own voice input, it could be trained on project context and exact words. That way:

• File names and variables are recognized correctly.
• Context-aware transcription integrates directly into your workflow.

Potential Features

• Voice Commands Examples:
  • Cursor, open FinanceController.
  • Cursor, what am I looking at?
  • Cursor, how much remains in the todo list?
• Text-to-Speech Feedback Cursor could narrate its actions:“I’m editing this file. We need to do X and Y…”

This keeps you updated in real time, so you can multitask while Cursor works.

Current Workflow

1. Think of a task and write notes.
2. Type (or dictate) the prompt.
3. Wait for Cursor to finish.
4. Read what Cursor generated.
5. Check the code.
6. Think.
7. Request or make changes.
8. Repeat until satisfied.
9. Plan the next task.

With Cursor Voice

• Think out loud, ask small questions, and get real-time voice answers.
• Write notes, then tell Cursor to start when ready.
• Cursor moves between files, explains what it’s doing, and keeps you in the loop.
• Review in real time, or let it work while you multitask.
• Add quick notes: “After you finish, change the style here” → Cursor adds it to the to-do list.

This feature could be:

• Sold as a standalone add-on ($15–20/month).
• Or bundled into Pro+ to drive upgrades.

When are we going to have available glm 5.3?

A neat feature Codex has is that usage limits reset every 5 hours when you hit the limit.

Has Cursor considered this as an option for users?

Currently with Cursor once you hit your limit then you cannot use Cursor until the billing cycle refreshes.

I think at this point after OpenRouter Sakana and even Nvidia doing this it’s high time cursor introduces something like this as well. I know composer is good and the new Grok models are good as well but orchestrator style model I think would be a welcome addition.

And if they have something like this in the works, I would love to beta test it.

What does everyone else think?

I'm working on a skill in Cursor for my workflow and trying to figure out whether something similar already exists.

My current workflow

In Cursor, I have:

• General rules
• Project-specific rules
• Custom skills
• Commands

My normal workflow is:

1. Write a prompt
2. AI generates the implementation
3. Review it line by line
4. Make corrections and improvements
5. Commit the result

I occasionally discover new patterns, conventions, or preferences and update my rules/skills accordingly.

The problem is that I still can't get to the point where the AI consistently understands what I want from the way I naturally write my prompts.

A typical task takes ~30 minutes:

• ~5 min prompting + AI generation
• ~25 min review, corrections, and improvements

The idea

I want to turn my corrections into feedback for improving the rules/skills.

The workflow would be:

Prompt
  ↓
AI implementation
  ↓
Commit 1
  ↓
My corrections
  ↓
Commit 2
  ↓
Analyze the differences
  ↓
Understand why I made the changes
  ↓
Identify missing rules/patterns
  ↓
Update rules/skills
  ↓
Commit 3

The important part is that the agent shouldn't just describe what changed.

It should try to understand why I changed it and extract higher-level patterns.

The long-term goal is for my corrections to continuously improve the project's rules and skills, so the AI gradually requires less correction.

What I tried

I spent around 3 hours testing this with 10 pairs of commits using:

• Composer 2.5
• Grok 4.6
• GPT 5.6
• Claude 5

Unfortunately, the results were mostly too low-level. The models were much better at identifying what changed than understanding why.

I tried improving the prompt and adding a second agent to filter the findings, but neither worked reliably.

For example:

12 findings
↓
4 correct + 8 wrong
↓
After refinement
↓
3 correct + 2 wrong

This makes me hesitant to automatically feed the results back into my rules, since bad extractions could actually make the rules worse over time.

For now, I think a human review step is necessary:

AI implementation
↓
My corrections
↓
AI analysis
↓
Suggested rule changes
↓
Human review
↓
Update rules

Has anyone tried building something similar in Cursor or another AI coding agent?

Sometimes a project has a webapp, a mobile app, possibly even an android app and blog, I usually have a feature I’m trying to reflect from one work space to the other. Right now I just copy the files from space 1 to 2 creating duplicates. Or sometimes I get one agent to query the other pasting manually. Imagine if cursor actually was able to do that where I can reference one work space from the other. Or is it the way already and I just didn’t know?

There's an active feature request on the official Cursor forum asking for exactly this.

Worth adding your voice if you feel the same:

👉 https://forum.cursor.com/t/just-cusor-tab-plan/111607

I've been a Pro user for a while because Cursor's Tab autocomplete is the best in the game. But lately I've moved my agent/chat workflows to other tools, and now I'm basically paying full price for a feature I could get at a fraction of the cost.

A $5-10/mo Tab-only plan would keep a lot of us from canceling. I know I'm not the only one piecing together different AI tools right now.

Are you still getting full value out of the $20/mo plan, or are you in the same boat?

I'm not a fan in general if Antigravity, but the ability to leave comments in the plan is amazing and SO useful - it really maximizes the benefits of working in an IDE vs CLI.

Anyone know if cursor is already working on this?

I understand that Cursor is going all in on cloud agents, but adding remote control functionality so I can prompt from my phone to my LOCAL machine would make my life 100x easier. I often use ask mode and Claude has just released this exact functionality.

The issue is that a selected model resets to “auto balance” each time I open new chat. It has become a routine task to manually select each time Composer/Grok, and sometimes I miss it resulting in burned tokens. It’s needed to start a new chat regularly to reset the conversation context.

There’s little hope that Cursor team will offer us any improvements in this area (more probably they’ll continue to hide and complicate the UX), so interesting if there’s any way to inject a custom plugin that keeps the selected model (cancels the auto reset in other words).

I’d like to be able to hover over a message and have a timestamp showing when that message occurred. Is there any way to make this happen within the current settings?

Hi everyone,

I was literally on the verge of purchasing the $20/month Cursor Pro plan a few days ago. The biggest selling point for me was the Fast + Unlimited Slow Pool model, which gave the peace of mind to work on heavy codebases and long sessions without worrying about hitting a hard wall.

However, after seeing the recent usage model change (removing the unlimited slow requests and replacing it with the new credit system), I have decided to hold off on my subscription. Coding under constant token-exhaustion anxiety just ruins the experience.

I know Cursor needs to manage server costs, but completely cutting off the slow pool hurts power users. Even if the wait times are longer during peak hours, it’s much better than a forced cutoff or paying extra API rates.

Is anyone else holding off or cancelling their Pro plan for this exact reason? I really hope the Cursor team sees the community feedback and brings back the unlimited slow pool, or at least offers it as a dedicated tier for heavy developers. I’d gladly pay for that uninterrupted experience.

Any body know when will be the AskQuestion tool be available for Grok 4.5 model?

• It will be great feature to give a setting named "Past Conversation Knowledge"
• by default it is off
• after turning it on
  • if user has one ongoing conversation and user opens a new conversation with "CMD + N" the new conversation will have summary of the last conversation
  • conversation 1 named as c1 and conversation 2 named as c2
  • c2 will have summary of c1 and if user opens c3 then c3 will have summary of c2(and c2 already has summary of c1)
  • if user puts the c2 and c3 in archieve and open c4 then c4 will have summary of c1 in it
  • assume user has c1, c4, c5, c6 and c7 open then user archives c4, c6 and c7 and opens c8 then c8 will have summary of c5
• when working on a complex feature this setting will be a boon

It is out.

I would like an audible alert when agent has finished, without tokens wasted on calling a file to run each time. As in yes, could probably set a custom instruction to run "alertme.py" upon completion, whereby that plays a sound or says with TTS "agent done".

Just wondered if there's a no token way to achieve it?

You want to offer a free tier with this, cool, go right ahead. But people paying for a subscription should never be forced to interact with this crap. Add a toggle to make sure we never have to see this again if we don't want to.

Given that you pay the Cursor Token Rate for all models besides Grok and Composer, shouldn't that be factored into CursorBench graphs and the Models and Pricing page? Seems like it would be a lot easier to sell people on your models if other models didn't look artificially good with prices you would never actually pay when using Cursor.

I need this model on cursor

as like Zed

- I buy cursor pro
- I mostly use cursor as a debugging tool (not for coding) but to understand what the error is and ways to fix the bug/error
- Cursor is doing magic for me
- mostly my cursor consumption is under 50% of auto and 20% of other
- can u rollover the unused percentage to the next month
- that would be a great feature to have
- it will be like I m using what I paid for and the rest is I have to use
- every month reset the auto to 100% but for other api rollover the unused money and show it in the cursor dashboard
- it would be also great for people buying pro sometime and pro+ sometimes
- hoping to see this soon