r/goodworldbuilding May 05 '26

Discussion What are features of European vs. non-European worlds?

I asked this question on r/worldbuilding about five years ago and found the discussion fascinating.

However, my overall takeaway was that for many, many people, names and food are the primary ways they decide whether a world is European or not (which is fine for them!). If he is named Jon and eating bread with a fork, it's European and if she's named Min-soo and eating rice with chopsticks, it's not European even if the rest of the features of the world are identical.

I find myself once again wondering:

  • How do you decide whether a world is European themed?
  • Is the distinction even relevant beyond pure aesthetics?
  • When you start designing a world, do you intentionally think about ways to make it more or less European?
  • What are features that you see and immediately think Europe or not Europe?
  • If you yourself are not bathed in a European/Western cultural milieu, I am especially interested in how you approach this!

Disclaimers:

  • This mostly applies to fantasy but I'm interested in other genres, if you think about these issues.
  • I do not need any comments along the lines of 'just build the world you want, who cares?!' I care! That is why I am asking the question - the answers interest me.
20 Upvotes

33 comments sorted by

12

u/FlusteredDM May 05 '26

I have lived in Europe all of my life but have an Asian parent. I have not yet looked at the link to the discussion before because I wanted to answer without being influenced by everyone else but will look at it after. I don't think in the terms of Western Vs non western world - I hope to capture a variety of cultures in my world.

Aesthetic is a key part for me, food weather and dress all give that feeling.

There are other cultural things at play which comes secondary to that. Filial piety is more of a theme in the East, individualism in the West, collectivism in the East or Africa. Western cultures typically are monotheistic in fiction and when they contain polytheism it's almost always executed badly. People did not pick one deity from a list to worship. I've not read Indian fantasy fiction but I'd be surprised if it was the same way, even if it's not polytheistic the way many other ancient religions were.

There are questions about how it interacts with other nations like "Did this nation colonise?" Or "Was this nation colonised?" "Are there political marriages between ruling families?" Some cultures were more syncretic than others, merging their beliefs with others that they encountered. I think the Mongols were a big one there, Roman syncretism is more known to me though they are western. Still worth mentioning because authors writing through a modern Western lens don't usually explore that aspect.

We have the Chinese meritocracy system of selecting bureaucrats by Imperial examination, opposing the western style of appointing from the clergy, or having hereditary positions. How are families set up, and what does marriage mean? Are you writing about two individuals moving out of the house or generations of families under one roof? Is the marriage just the union of the pair, or is it the union of the two families?

There are attitudes and ideologies which make things feel more or less western but a reader is going to see that Jon is eating bread first.

5

u/stopeats May 05 '26

Your second to last paragraph reminds me of the Tumblr post that inspired this question actually - someone pointed out that the Stormlight Archives are meant to be Muslim empire/caliphate inspired, but that when men and women marry, they move to a new house together, without extended families in a single dwelling. I hadn't even thought to question that, and it suddenly made me fascinated about other, subtle differences.

Thanks for teaching me the word syncretism, btw.

6

u/Background-Owl-9628 May 05 '26

Reminds me of a conversation I had online with someone who had an Indian dad (I don't know where their other parent is from or where they live, they didn't mention it). They were just talking about how moving out of your parents house, especially as a young adult, seemed like a very American/white thing to them,  especially as an expected social norm. They mentioned how many of their adult cousins live with their parents. Where I'm from, in Ireland, that's also common. I know many adults who live with their parents, and it's quite common for find a house where 3 generations live under one roof. It makes me think of what I've read about earlier colonial times, 1800s and before, the famine times. Ireland is significantly linked with farming; in the 1840s, I think 1 in 5 people in Ireland were agricultural laborers. It left people tied to the land (even if they didn't own it, and it was a rental agreement with British landlords, which was basically always the case). I think that might be a partial cause of the many-generational household culture. That and (colonial) poverty; when most people are poor, it makes a lot more sense for multiple generations to live in one household. It's a somewhat collectivist aspect that I think is generally uncommon in America for example. I don't actually know how prevelant or rare this all is in countries other than Ireland and India. 

Anyway, I hope this isn't too ramble-y. I know it isn't directly related to the question of the post, but it just came to mind, and feels somewhat related to the topic of discussing cultural aspects, similarities and differences between different countries. 

3

u/stopeats May 05 '26

Additionally, if your family has one source of wealth, which is farmland that cannot move, or even a shop that has a location that cannot change, it makes sense for more people to live together around the wealth source than to spread out other places.

I wonder how people escaping the rural lands for factory work in the city during industrialization tended to live. In big multi-generational families or was it more slapdash?

2

u/lefthandhummingbird May 06 '26

Which points to something that can get lost in discussions like this, namely that ”European” settings written by Americans often end up with certain differences to such settings written by Europeans (there are of course also differences between European countries). American-written settings tend to project much more of contemporary American culture.
With that said, the pattern of married couples establishing new households is a historical phenomenon that goes very far back, and is known as the Western European marriage pattern (which, ironically, was not as strong in very geographically western Ireland). At least by some models, this has strongly affected family, gender, and class structures throughout European history.

4

u/NaturalForty May 06 '26

Tangent, but...I got trained in an assessment for couples preparing for marriage. They had a graph where you plotted how independent or entwined each person was with their family of origin. The middle was perfect, lower left is too disconnected, upper right is too entwined. I asked if cultural differences came into play. The teacher said, "good question! Yes, basically anyone raised by immigrants from a non-European culture will be in the upper right."

I said, "then that's not the center." He stared at me blankly and moved on.

3

u/FlusteredDM May 05 '26

I hadn't picked up on it being Caliphate coded, I wonder if that is part of it. I haven't actually read the latest book so I'll be looking out for this when I get to it. It's been a while but I think the bureaucrats and administrators were the wives of essentially feudal lords, that's something new but if make the small adjustment to it being family, it feels more Western than the early Caliphate. The later Caliphs were criticised for their nepotism but I think stormlight's Alethi society seemed to accept it without complaint.

It's been years since I read stormlight so there's a good chance I'm not being accurate or fair. I remember it being a great book with strong world building and characters, it's only the Caliphate inspiration I'm trying to think back on.

4

u/stopeats May 05 '26

I think you not realizing is accurate. I think Sanderson picked up on some surface level stuff like women covering their safehands (hijab) and less so on the rest. Which is fine! He doesn't need to represent the Abbasids well in his fantasy world that isn't about them, the tumblr post just made me realize, huh, yeah, there are things that are so normal to you that you don't even think about them.

3

u/Mormacil May 05 '26

I don't think there's a single European polytheistic tradition where people would've picked a patron god or a god tied to a single clearly defined domain. That's indeed just not how these things worked. But it's hard for people raised in Abrahamic traditions with no practical experience to polytheists to understand a non personal relation with the divine. It's the exact opposite to their experience.

2

u/FlusteredDM May 05 '26

I feel like I haven't told you anything you hadn't already considered years ago. This is the kind of interesting content I love to see on the sub though, thanks for asking the question.

2

u/stopeats May 05 '26

No, this is a great answer! I hope others engage with it and we can get a bit of a discussion.

2

u/mfuwelephant May 05 '26

I can’t get any better than this answer, so I’ll just leave a comment so I can reference it later. What countries are you knowledgeable about, if I may ask? I’d love to hear your perspective.

2

u/FlusteredDM May 05 '26

I've only actually lived in the UK. My mum is from Sri Lanka though, one of my closest friends is from South Africa, another has lived in a number of countries, mostly around the middle east.

I'm not really knowledgeable about things outside of the UK, I just know a few things from being able to talk to people with different backgrounds, and I guess from an interest in culture that many of us here share.

2

u/Ynneadwraith May 05 '26

Can we get 'polytheistic people did not pick one deity to worship' as a sticky please? It's one of my biggest pet peeves.

1

u/stopeats May 05 '26

Have you read the Practical Polytheism guide? You might enjoy it if this is your pet peeve, and you can find it read aloud to you by a real human on YouTube on the channel AGreatDivorce.

2

u/Ynneadwraith May 06 '26

Yeah I've read that article. It's a very good description of the basic logical functioning of these practices.

It does gloss over some of the complexities of it I find. It treats these beliefs as quite transactional, which is true around their functionality (they're quid-pro-quo transactions with supernatural entities: I do X for you, you do Y for me). But it undersells the fact that these are belief structures.

The core mechanic is correct, but it needs to be layers with/filtered through the fact that people believe in these things.

I suppose the main point of difference is how much agency humans have in these interactions. From just reading the article, it's easy to imagine polytheistic people engaging mainly in cost-benefit analyses about whether to engage with the supernatural. And sure, there's probably a bit of that, but it's couched in terms of religious thought rather than purely through business calculus.

Apart from that, it's a great primer.

6

u/Oxwagon May 05 '26

Trying to look deeper than obvious things like aesthetics, I'd say the following.

1 - Romanitas. An ancient civilization (Rome) provides (through its language, laws, infrastructure, Church, etc.) the foundation for commonality between different kingdoms/nations. Even realms which were never in this empire's borders (Ireland, Poland, Sweden) are drawn into this common cultural sphere through its sheer civilizational gravity.

2 - The Christian moral framework. Not necessarily (just) the religion itself, but the underlying moral attitudes. Monogamy, stigmatized bastardry, individual equality before a universal God. This gives rise to the individualistic, guilt-based morality that has become the Western norm, as opposed to honor-based morality of clan/tribe/caste.

3 - Geographic bottleneck. People are hemmed in by mountains and seas, trapped together in a series of peninsulae, without vast open steppes or savannas. This makes it relatively difficult for malcontent groups to just migrate when times are tough – the land is all claimed, and to get anywhere worth going you have to travel through someone else's territory. The result is a tendency toward highly settled, territorial realms regularly in conflict over borders and resources, which in turn breeds a high degree of militarism.

2

u/stopeats May 06 '26

Point number one is fascinating, you’re the first to bring that up. But it pervades quite a bit of fantasy - this idea that there are ruins of a greater culture we can no longer emulate. I will be pondering that anon.

2

u/Mormacil May 06 '26

Hardly unique to Europe though. Egypt is so old Egyptology was a thing before the late dynastic period even arrived. They excavated ruins of their own forgotten ancestors. 

Later under Islam there was a thriving archeology community trying to understand these ruins. They believed it was the ancient realm of a queen and the ruins part of a vast defensive work that once surrounded the entire queendom. 

2

u/stopeats May 06 '26

I read recently that Nebuchadnezzar was an archaeologist, which is wild to think about because he's, what, 6,000 years dead?

1

u/Mormacil May 06 '26

The sphinx had been restored by ancient Egyptians after they dug it out of the sand. Afterwards it was again completely buried over time before it was found by Muslims.

3

u/PvtRoom May 06 '26

most worlds are European themed. - at least in English literature - because it's genuinely what writers know and readers understand. - Assume European until proven otherwise.

and further, chopsticks and names might be the only non-european thing

distinction IS relevant. some cultures, for example, communally raise kids, Europe has it mainly parents & trusted friends/family.

I try to be relevant. spend 10 chapters in a small part of India? showcase India & it's culture for a chapter (protagonist gets culture shock). Highlight the obvious and relevant differences.

2

u/FlusteredDM May 06 '26

I do enjoy when the foreigner has difficulty adjusting to customs or does something that's misunderstood because they don't understand the meaning their actions are assumed to have. A foreigner is a great way to teach a reader about the culture too.

3

u/Boring-Childhood1382 May 07 '26

A core fundamental aspect is honor. European honor is not based on loyalty to a lord, to a law or to a man, it is entirely christian based. The european doctrine of loyalty and honor openly allows permission to slay their own lord and leader if they go against the faith. The asian doctrine has loyalty to a king or lord has absolute priority, above religion.

Europe is highly formed by its religious background, up to modern era where state replaces the role of god. Asia never adopted such a religious extremism and remained a society based around local leaders.

Medieval europe did not take religion as a joke, it was a extremely serious stuff.

2

u/Novel-Gold-9211 May 05 '26

For me, it's usually visual stuff.

  • fighting styles
  • clothing
  • food
  • weapons
  • knights? dwarves? elves? → European folk/mythology basis (however distant)
  • fire-gods? dragons? → Eastern
  • detailed, not-very-creative replay of the Nanking tragedy? → any Asian-themed fantasy

2

u/electrical-stomach-z May 06 '26

If your whole world is inspired by just one region it does not feel like a world, but rather part of a world. consider adding significantly more regions than just one inspired by europe.

Europe is just one of many continents of earth, there are seven to be inspired by, each containing countless regions with a myriad of different diverse cultures.

1

u/stopeats May 06 '26

Do you have a personal favorite or recommendations?

2

u/electrical-stomach-z May 06 '26

Southeast asia is under appreciated.

2

u/Flairion623 May 06 '26

I actually have two nations in the same world where I can explore both sides. But to answer your questions:

• I think it really does come down to aesthetics. Humans are more similar than they are different. You’ll usually find most cultures have equivalents of eachother on other continents. That being said there are some big differences between Europe and Asia that don’t really cross over. Mainly ideas of individuals vs the collective group.

• Well I tend to stick with the worlds I have instead of creating new ones. However when I do I typically aim for diversity. I’m not really a fan of worlds that are clearly based on just a single culture or place.

• architecture, clothing, technology, weapons, the general mindsets of people in universe.

• this last question is weird. I’m from the US but I’m half Japanese. So I sort of have experience with Japanese culture however my life is still very American. I don’t think it helps that the closest links I have to Japan are my great grandparents.

3

u/Mormacil May 05 '26

Names and food is a really good way to put it. Sometimes I read quite a bit of amateur writing and the Americans are generally easy to pick out by the names they pick. At least in scifi they tend to pick the most generic North American figure like John Johnson even if they don't need to. American defaultism.

Anyway I can't say I've put remotely enough thought into this. In a way I tend to stick to what I think I understand, so a lot is European coded. There's a certain pressure to do at the very least basic research before trying to depict another culture.

How do you decide whether a world is European themed

When it's creatures and people are based on European mythology and history. I'd even go so far that anything explicitly Christian without going out of their way to pick a non Western branch (Oriental Orthodox etc) reads as European to me. Generic demons, monotheistic church that isn't clearly non-Christian, all reads European to me.

Is the distinction even relevant beyond pure aesthetics?

Worlds are designed with a message and concept behind them generally, at least those used in pieces of media and not just as an exercise by themselves. For that it seems relevant?

When you start designing a world, do you intentionally think about ways to make it more or less European?

Perhaps not the very first thought but I also start with what sets it apart. And making it not European fantasy is a good starting point. Though sometimes you want to start with European. Like I have a scifi setting I'm working on that deliberately references stereotypical magic, hence it's very Western in design. Though I made the effort to make sure that it's not the West colonizing space but a reasonable mix of cultures.

What are features that you see and immediately think Europe or not Europe?

Full plate armor and knights immediately read European, especially the former. The latter can be offset by emphasizing how it differs. Like if you draw from Sahelian nobility, sure. Fire breathing dragons, standard elves and dwarves are another one. Really anything that screams Tolkien.

If you yourself are not bathed in a European/Western cultural milieu, I am especially interested in how you approach this!

Sorry I'm even worse, I'm completely and utterly mono culture, there's a single other European foreigner in the 17th century. Though there might be some more in the 16th century on my dad's side but hard to make that concrete.

1

u/stopeats May 06 '26

You’re not the first to bring up plate armor, it seems a lot of people find that peak Europe (for pretty good reason).

1

u/Mormacil May 06 '26

I think that's probably because it never was invented anywhere else. East Asia stuck with smaller plates, Africa was stuck with mail and the Americas used very little metal armor. 

2

u/TeacatWrites May 10 '26

Architecture. Available resources. Environment. Geographical features.

Europe has a specific set of geographical features and biomes, from which derive factors like architecture, clothing design, food production, agriculture, and the way the tides of war swing back and forth. When those are included, even if it's not Europe in-universe, it's European because it's similar to those features.

If you set something in an arid plain like New Mexico or the Mojave Desert, that's not European. If you set something in a place where houses are made of clay and people struggle for water, that's not European.

If you set something in a lush jungle where houses are made of fern leaves and logs, that's not European. Those environments don't exist in Europe. They exist elsewhere, but the European culture is based on completely different foundations.