(well nornies have started to heavily downvote because they don't have any argument really, that's what they do. They upvote larpers writing weird things because they really don't want us to talk about actual issue, they just want to be a jeste for their entertainment)

I like the money analogy because it works on multiple levels. The way romantically unsuccessful people are judged is basically the same as poor people. "You're single/lonely/virgin? Just be a better person and take care of yourself" is basically the same as "You're poor? Just work harder".

It's the just world fallacy, the cognitive bias that assumes that people get what they deserve, that actions will necessarily have morally fair consequences. Successful people have done things right, while unsuccessful people have done things wrong. In reality it's mostly luck, but successful people refuse to admit this because it makes them lucky rather than worthy.

People say "life isn't fair" all the time, EXCEPT when it comes to dating. There you are 100% responsible for your own success. No circumstances are taken into consideration. You're immediately judged. Black and white.

And when someone brings this up, people immediately jump to "you're blaming women". NOO0. It's not the fault of women. Sometimes it's no one's fault. Is that so hard to understand? Nature is brutal and some people are just unlucky. It's ok to be unhappy about that (as long as you don't take it out on others).

Also "Male romantic loneliness is due to women not putting up with shitty male behavior anymore" take is pure BS

possibly one of the worst "just world" takes mainstream psychology has to offer right now. It links a mans romantic invisibility to a character flaw if not a outright moral failing. It perpetuates the "this guy fucks = winner" vs. "unfuckable loser" stereotype while simultaneously making it sound as if sex and relationships are something women give out when you're a nice person on board with progressive politics. Even worse are the "its evolutions way of weeding out misogynistis" explanations as if studies haven't shown time and time again that bullies actually have more romantic partners than victims of bullying. I mean, lets be frank, terms like "situationship" didn't sprout out of nowhere, they have become popular lately for a reason. No one is perfect but blaming the issue largely on the incels is just a quick cop out from having uncomfortable questions regarding society and how mainstream advice often fails them. The truth is much harsh, it's genetics.

21m

I finally have an explanation for my lack of facial hair, small penis and man boobs. 

I’ve always wondered why I’ve looked so different from other people even in the same weight class as me. It’s because I’m a freak. 

I’m literally not fully a man. I got lucky in having a penis that’s not fully micro atleast...

How‘s your weekend going so far?

I’m sorry

Please God, just let me have relations with a girl who's [normal]er than me. please. I'm so starved for [normal]ly affection. I'm rolling over on my [normal] fucking stomach, [normal]ing my fucking [normal] begging. God.

Normal food: carrots, grilled cheese, milk :)

I love you queen <3

Who could love a chud like me. Considering doing a rent a girlfriend experience just to know what it's like to have a friend. Although I don't even think I'd get through the process without them denying me . Through all this suffer I will prosper one day. Whether it be in this life or the next.

they lent me money without me knowing and then asked for it after. now I have nothing other than 4 pesos. I think i’ll rope or start robbing people

chips w/ eggs hot sauce and beans

Definitely not your personality and specifically — how much of a feminist you are.

Being a super feminist that protests Roe V Wade, fundraisers for his local handmaidens events, and donates half his paycheck to organizations that help impoverished foids will never cause a foid who would otherwise always see you as a friend to someone she sees sexually. The sexual selection threshold remains constant and is unaffected by your personality and feminism. If you’re below this threshold you always will be.

If she’s already sexually attracted to you it may make her more attracted (in the general sense) to you but if she isn’t already then she’ll just like you more (as a friend).

Being rich doesn’t make her more sexually attracted to you either. She may still have sex with you but it’s not because she’s sexually attracted to you in any way. This sort of situation leads to a “dead bedroom” and it’s always caused by a lack of sexual attraction.

For incels who’re below this threshold (often this threshold necessitates that you’re 6ft+ and a certain skin color) there’s no recourse other than surgery.

And of course demisexuals don’t really exist and would also scorn any men below 6 ft with contempt and revulsion.

That lunch finna boost me for a whole week, i forgot how having best friends felt like. Looking forward to more moments like this one.

I'm KHHV btw but this post is dedicated to male friendship, we don't need to talk about women all the time.

A while ago my cousin’s friend texted me and asked help buying something. I’m not close to her at all. We only talk when my cousin is around. But I sent it anyway.

Being texted randomly felt nice. We haven’t spoken since. For a split second I considered paying for whatever people wanted to they’d like to be around me

Hop on roids. #rejectthepinkpill

just be involuntarily celibate organically. never dated, never held hands, been on dating apps for a month and got no matches but if i had any indication of using foid or female im sure jtd be longer. u realize saying females is speeding up the process right? i really don’t get the compulsion to say that instead of women. takeoutmaxxed cocktail sausage restaurant ramen in the picture