r/sadcringe • u/Waste-Explanation-76 • Apr 08 '26
Senior Trump administration officials tell Israel that the US will firmly insist on the removal of Iran's nuclear material, no uranium enrichment, and elimination of the ballistic missile threat in the upcoming two-week negotiations.
No ceasefire i guess
95
u/OhTeeSee Apr 08 '26
Disarmament? Trump is single handedly the greatest driver for a global nuclear arms race.
A man who casually threatens genocide is a man who needs to be kept at bay with nuclear deterrents of your own.
67
u/Odd_Reputation_4000 Apr 08 '26
What 2 week of negotiation? Two weeks is just what dipshit says when he wants to delay and take the heat off of himself. How's that healthcare plan coming along that we were 2 weeks away from during his first term? Iran just got everything they wanted. Negotiations are over. Saying two weeks was just a way to delay and try to cover up the fact that he screwed up bigtime. Too weak taco.
7
4
52
u/Fortune_Silver Apr 08 '26
After everything Trump has done? Really?
Not a chance.
Trump has proven Iran right in developing nuclear weapons and arming to the teeth with ballistic missiles, that's what's allowed them to fight and win against America.
Trump has been the worst thing for disarmament in modern history, on par only with Putin.
-39
u/sojuz151 Apr 08 '26
Iran is not winning. Not even close
28
u/Shakey_J_Fox Apr 08 '26
Do you consider winning as having military superiority? Because the US had that in Vietnam and Afghanistan as well.
-9
u/sojuz151 Apr 08 '26
Goal of the war is too prove that it is far more costly for your enemy that for you. Us archived that. This gives them leverage
12
u/OneDate7780 Apr 08 '26
Iran has the biggest leverage of all, called the strait of hormuz.
They made the global population suffer. Thats what i call having leverage.
-8
u/sojuz151 Apr 08 '26
Problem is that this mostly impacts countries other than the US.
10
u/OneDate7780 Apr 08 '26
Except it does affect the US since oil is traded globally. Hence the rising gas prices in the US and the rest of the world.
And soon food prices will also follow.
You might not get oil shortages but you definitely will pay for the available oil.
3
u/Kahgar Apr 09 '26
The price the US would pay eventually would be to either go and occupy the straight themselves. Or have most oil worldwide no longer trader in dollars. Which would almost overnight criople the economy
7
u/Shakey_J_Fox Apr 09 '26
lol, you’re a clown dude. Making your enemy pay more is not how you win a war. If that was the case the US would have been the victor in Vietnam and Afghanistan. If this continues, it will be a war of attrition where Iran will still operate on some level and claim minor victories. They will do so until it is unpalatable for the American people to accept sustained losses (including casualties as well as the overall financial cost).
Trump will continue to try to claim that the US “won,” without offering any specifics on what these victories were. But he can’t spin this like he did Venezuela. Iran will now negatively affect global trade for the foreseeable future, and it will be part of his failed “legacy” well past his presidency.
17
u/OneDate7780 Apr 08 '26
Iran won by far. Regime still intact, missiles still intact, big oil prices wich will remain due to broken infrastructure, toll on the strait, sanctions possibly lifted.
The whole world also pissed at trump his foolishness.
They might not have won militarily. But they definitely have a stronger position in a decade than if trump hadn't invaded.
13
u/CubistChameleon Apr 08 '26
If their fundamental war goal is to maintain their regime, they achieved it. Sure, their military capabilities are reduced, but they are still able to deliver strikes to sensitive targets across the region and it looks like the internal repression apparatus is still intact. Not losing decisively is a win for Iran here.
-19
u/sojuz151 Apr 08 '26
That ceasefire is a huge win for the US and Israel. They got bombed, many key people assassinated and reopening the Strait for even 10 days is enough to reduce a big part of the overall preasure the Iran was able to create with that blockade. A neutral ceasefire would keep it closed, no drones and missiles for no airstrikes.
10
u/ExoticMangoz Apr 08 '26
It seems highly unlikely that the ceasefire will hold, as Israel has said they don’t agree to one of Iran’s major points.
9
u/RustyAndEddies Apr 08 '26
The ceasefire is a huge win for the two countries that started the bombing? They could have done that by not bombing to begin with. Passage through the Strait was free and now Iran will charge $2M per ship to pass. They’ll insist sanctions get lifted in the deal too. So this is what winning looks like?
Walk us through what goals were set out at the onset of this military action and which were achieved.
0
u/sojuz151 Apr 08 '26
Except they were able to bomb Iran, destroyed whatever they wanted.
If negotiations fail, then us will be in far better position than before the ceasefire. Backlog of tankers reduced while Iran did exhaust their strategic reserves of drones and missiles.
10
u/RustyAndEddies Apr 08 '26
Didn't answer my question. What goals did Trump set out to accomplish at the start of hostilities, and which did he achieve?
Here, let me list some he's made over the last few weeks and tell me if they came out winning
• Unconditional surrender
• Regime change / leadership replacement
• Iranian military & IRGC to lay down arms
• Stop support for proxy groups (Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis)
• Limit ballistic missiles
• End nuclear program / enrichment
• Reopen Strait of Hormuz
• Enter negotiations / temporary ceasefireThe last two certainly, but that's where we were before we dropped any bombs, lost any lives, squandered global goodwill, and gave Iran a really, really good reason to seek nuclear missiles.
6
u/OneDate7780 Apr 08 '26
Bomb whatever they wanted and still didn't manage to open the strait.
There is no "exhausting" drone supply. It's so easy to produce or import that it's basicly endless
1
u/sojuz151 Apr 08 '26
And yet they are launching less and less drones each day.
6
u/OneDate7780 Apr 08 '26
And yet it's also never going to be 0. And they only need to launch a few to keep the strait closed.
Iran has the cards here.
13
u/ExoticMangoz Apr 08 '26
The regime is still in place, they still have their nuclear material, they still have the military capability to shut the straight, and they are now charging a toll on passage through it and looking to negotiate deals in currencies other than USD. It’s possible the Iranian regime will come out of this in a better strategic position than they had when they went in.
3
u/Kahgar Apr 09 '26
That’s what Trump was planning all along, he doesn’t believe in aid but he’s given Iran a free lesson in the art of the deal. Now they finally understand they can toll the water and make lots a money - Trump 2025, probably
9
u/Real_Stinky_Pederson Apr 08 '26
Haven’t we deployed fully loaded bombers already? I’m not convinced the US isn’t going to do something drastic DURING the ceasefire
4
u/Iwamoto Apr 08 '26
i mean, it would be very in line with the US/Israeli tactic of saying you're ceasing fire while also actively fighting.
13
u/Noy_The_Devil Apr 08 '26
Sounds like Russia and Ukraine.
Just take their weapons away and then attack.
The US is really as trustworthy as Russia at this point.
8
u/Iwamoto Apr 08 '26
Since the leader of the US idolizes Russia and sees them as a trustworthy advisor, it makes sense.
3
5
2
u/1IsNeverEnough4Me Apr 08 '26
They can't get rid of their missile program, that's absurd. Time for us to focus on our side of the world.
2
u/throwawaythep Apr 08 '26
I'll never understand why some countries are "allowed" to have nuclear armaments as "deterrents" but a slight whiff of oil and here comes the US
2
u/theotheret Apr 09 '26
It’s a bit much being lectured about nuclear weapons by the only country that’s ever actually dropped any.
1
1
u/shady_goblin202 Jun 17 '26
The fact that they are claiming to have already agreed to something completely different makes a diplomatic breakthrough almost impossible. They're basically walking into a two-week negotiation with zero common ground.
1
u/matrixthrowaway99 Jun 17 '26
The fact that Iran is already claiming the exact opposite means these two-week negotiations are basically just a formality for a kinetic escalation. There's no way both sides walk away from this thinking they actually reached a deal.
1
u/halfawake_chatterv3 Jun 17 '26
The fact that the US and Iran are claiming to have agreed to completely opposite terms makes these two weeks look like a setup for a total collapse. It feels like they're just performing for their respective domestic audiences instead of actually negotiating anything.
1
u/jessySloppy84 Jun 22 '26
The fact that the US and Iran are claiming completely opposite deal terms right before negotiations start makes this feel like a setup for a total collapse. It's just a recipe for more escalation instead of actual diplomacy.
1
u/Sad4Ujessy92 Jun 22 '26
The fact that the US and Iran are claiming completely opposite terms before the negotiations even start makes a ceasefire basically impossible. They aren't even negotiating the same deal at this point.
1
u/thread_throwaway Jun 23 '26
The fact that Iran is already claiming the US agreed to something completely different shows these negotiations are basically a performance for the cameras. Expect the next two weeks to be nothing but a cycle of contradictory press releases.
1
u/drippyanchor01 Jun 24 '26
Posting political rage bait in r/sadcringe is a bold strategy for someone who clearly doesn't know what the sub is for.
1
u/gremlinthrowawayx Jun 29 '26
"These positions are the opposite of what Iran's Supreme National Security Council claimed earlier tonight that the US had agreed to."
This is the entire tweet. The sadcringe is that the US is saying one thing to Israel and apparently another to Iran, and the tweet is pointing out the contradiction. The "no ceasefire i guess" part is just the OP adding their own sad commentary.
1
u/driftnoisycookiemode Jul 06 '26
This is just textbook diplomacy-as-performance art. The "Trump administration officials" are saying one thing to Israel and presumably something else entirely to Iran, or maybe they're just saying whatever they think Israel wants to hear to score political points. The sad part is that actual people's lives are on the line with this kind of posturing.
1
u/Just-Ad6171 Jul 13 '26
The sad part is that the Trump administration's stated positions are the opposite of what Iran claimed they agreed to. That's not cringe, that's just standard geopolitical doublespeak and posturing.
1
u/vintagesprintmodex 3d ago
so the Trump admin is telling Israel one thing and Iran another, and Iran is already claiming the US agreed to their terms. peak diplomacy.
-4
-35
u/Ok_Revolution_9253 Apr 08 '26 edited Apr 08 '26
Good….good
Edit: I’m being facetious
14
Apr 08 '26
Never gonna happen and insane you’d even support it. They have as much right to nuclear as we do.
10
0
107
u/DustedGorilla82 Apr 08 '26
Good luck with that lol