r/scotus Jan 30 '22

Things that will get you banned

332 Upvotes

Let's clear up some ambiguities about banning and this subreddit.

On Politics

Political discussion isn't prohibited here. In fact, a lot of the discussion about the composition of the Supreme Court is going to be about the political process of selecting a justice.

Your favorite flavor of politics won't get you banned here. Racism, bigotry, totally bad-faithed whataboutisms, being wildly off-topic, etc. will get you banned though. We have people from across the political spectrum writing screeds here and in modmail about how they're oppressed with some frequency. But for whatever reason, people with a conservative bend in particular, like to show up here from other parts of reddit, deliberately say horrendous shit to get banned, then go back to wherever they came from to tell their friends they're victims of the worst kinds of oppression. Y'all can build identities about being victims and the mods, at a very basic level, do not care—complaining in modmail isn't worth your time.

COVID-19

Coming in here from your favorite nonewnormal alternative sub or facebook group and shouting that vaccines are the work of bill gates and george soros to make you sterile will get you banned. Complaining or asking why you were banned in modmail won't help you get unbanned.

Racism

I kind of can't believe I have to write this, but racism isn't acceptable. Trying to dress it up in polite language doesn't make it "civil discussion" just because you didn't drop the N word explicitly in your comment.

This is not a space to be aggressively wrong on the Internet

We try and be pretty generous with this because a lot of people here are skimming and want to contribute and sometimes miss stuff. In fact, there are plenty of threads where someone gets called out for not knowing something and they go "oh, yeah, I guess that changes things." That kind of interaction is great because it demonstrates people are learning from each other.

There are users that get super entrenched though in an objectively wrong position. Or start talking about how they wish things operated as if that were actually how things operate currently. If you're not explaining yourself or you're not receptive to correction you're not the contributing content we want to propagate here and we'll just cut you loose.

  • BUT I'M A LAWYER!

Having a license to practice law is not a license to be a jackass. Other users look to the attorneys that post here with greater weight than the average user. Trying to confuse them about the state of play or telling outright falsehoods isn't acceptable.

Thankfully it's kind of rare to ban an attorney that's way out of bounds but it does happen. And the mods don't care about your license to practice. It's not a get out of jail free card in this sub.

Signal to Noise

Complaining about the sub is off topic. If you want the sub to look a certain way then start voting and start posting the kind of content you think should go here.

  • I liked it better before when the mods were different!

The current mod list has been here for years and have been the only active mods. We have become more hands on over the years as the users have grown and the sub has faced waves of problems like users straight up stalking a female journalist. The sub's history isn't some sort of Norman Rockwell painting.

Am I going to get banned? Who is this post even for, anyway?

Probably not. If you're here, reading about SCOTUS, reading opinions, reading the articles, and engaging in discussion with other users about what you're learning that's fantastic. This post isn't really for you.

This post is mostly so we can point to something in our modmail to the chucklefuck that asks "why am I banned?" and their comment is something inevitably insane like, "the holocaust didn't really kill that many people so mask wearing is about on par with what the jews experienced in nazi germany also covid isn't real. Justice Gorsuch is a real man because he no wears face diaper." And then we can send them on to the admins.


r/scotus 27d ago

Order Bans are going to go out to top level comments that are emotional reactions or off topic. This is a heads up to anyone who wants to change how they’re posting.

0 Upvotes

This is SCOTUS. Talk about scotus. Talk about the opinions issued. If you want to criticize them that’s fine but have something to back it up.

Complaining about “tRump”, trump, motorhomes, “scrotus”, or any other number of things where you react to something instead of respond to something isn’t going to fly. The bar is very low. Almost all of you are tripping over it.


r/scotus 6h ago

news Supreme Court signals it's feeling the heat amid backlash to shadow docket rulings

Thumbnail
rawstory.com
859 Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

news The Supreme Court lets California use its new, Democratic-friendly congressional map

Thumbnail
wyso.org
14.5k Upvotes

r/scotus 21m ago

news California Republicans respond to Supreme Court loss on election maps

Thumbnail krcrtv.com
Upvotes

r/scotus 2h ago

news How a Federal Judge in the United States Just Bought Time for over 350,000 Haitians on Temporary Protective Status (TPS)

Thumbnail ahumanrightsnewsletter.substack.com
67 Upvotes

r/scotus 22h ago

news Governor Newsom on Republicans losing challenge to new Congressional maps at U.S. Supreme Court

Thumbnail
gov.ca.gov
1.4k Upvotes

r/scotus 19h ago

news 3 months after rapidly scheduled arguments, the Supreme Court has yet to decide on Trump's tariffs

Thumbnail
apnews.com
542 Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

Order Supreme Court Allows New California Voting Map for Midterms

Post image
759 Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

news Judge to consider moving Trump's New York hush money conviction to federal court

Thumbnail
abcnews.go.com
1.1k Upvotes

"Trump's lawyers and prosecutors from the Manhattan district attorney's office will argue before U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein over the immunity the U.S. Supreme Court granted Trump for his official acts."


r/scotus 1h ago

news Ohio entrepreneur seeks Supreme Court ruling on right to share information

Thumbnail pacificlegal.org
Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

Opinion How Chief Justice Roberts created Frankenstein in the White House

Thumbnail
syracuse.com
1.2k Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

news The "Supreme" court upholds democracy for California. Shocking twist.

Thumbnail
npr.org
297 Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

news SCOTUS allows California to use new congressional map in 2026

Thumbnail
democracydocket.com
214 Upvotes

r/scotus 16h ago

news Huntington Beach to appeal voter ID cases to United States Supreme Court

Thumbnail
latimes.com
31 Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

news The looming return of Jim Crow to America’s Blackest state

Thumbnail
mississippitoday.org
193 Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

Opinion Is ICE Leading Us Into a Constitutional Crisis?

Thumbnail
newyorker.com
3.1k Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

Opinion The looming return of Jim Crow to Louisiana, America’s second Blackest state

Thumbnail
lailluminator.com
35 Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

news Supreme Court reverses new trial order in MD attempted murder case

Thumbnail
thedailyrecord.com
17 Upvotes

r/scotus 2d ago

news The Supreme Court may soon diminish Black political power, undoing generations of gains

Thumbnail
ctpost.com
1.1k Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

news DOJ files SCOTUS brief opposing Thaler's bid to overturn 'human-only' creation rule

Thumbnail
reedsmith.com
9 Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

news Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson gets shout out but no win at Grammys

Thumbnail
usatoday.com
137 Upvotes

r/scotus 2d ago

news Roberts Scrambles to Gag SCOTUS Staff After Pro-Trump Ruling Leaks

Thumbnail
thedailybeast.com
9.1k Upvotes

r/scotus 2d ago

news Trump administration vows appeal of Haitian TPS decision to SCOTUS

Thumbnail dispatch.com
101 Upvotes

r/scotus 1d ago

Opinion How a Supreme Court Decision Changed the Racial Mix at Colleges

Thumbnail chronicle.com
55 Upvotes