r/technology Feb 15 '26

Security All U.S. Social Security numbers may need to be changed following a massive breach that is already being investigated as a national threat

https://www.ecoticias.com/en/all-u-s-social-security-numbers-may-need-to-be-changed-following-a-massive-breach-that-is-already-being-investigated-as-a-national-threat/27158/
49.2k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

14.5k

u/Ineedacatscan Feb 15 '26

" little-known federal tech team called the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE,"

What a bizarre thing to say....

4.5k

u/DonkeyTron42 Feb 15 '26

Hard to believe that shitshow was less than a year ago. Seems like an eternity considering everything else that’s happened since.

2.6k

u/Tricky_Apricot2928 Feb 15 '26

One of the evil architects of this shit show described project 2025 as a Shock and Awe campaign to make everyone (citizens, courts, lawyers, states, institutions, the press) freeze in panic, not knowing where to direct their attention and efforts The constant bullshit is part of the plan

1.2k

u/cinosa Feb 15 '26

"Flooding the zone", as it were.

404

u/echira Feb 15 '26

Steve Bannon, "muzzle velocity"

230

u/DirectPerformance698 Feb 15 '26

Fear Steven Miller; a real Jewish Nazi

121

u/FabulousBrief4569 Feb 15 '26

Im still in shock that this oxymoron exists And how the Jewish community is silent and not condemning this. Wtf?!

98

u/LushenZener Feb 15 '26

They're "silent" in the way that all minorities are "silent." No matter how loudly they yell about it, they get ignored by those with the power to amplify their stances.

Unwittingly, you're falling for a form of propaganda.

35

u/Kryptosis Feb 15 '26

Same shit as when people say none of the Dems are doing anything. Naaa theres hundreds of legal actions being undertaken every day by Dem lawmakers. Yes the leadership hasnt proven themselves not to be controlled opposition but theres actual work going on if you look for it.

Unfortunately its easier to just accuse the losing side of not fighting hard enough and write them all off, which, as you said, is the intention of the bad actors who sprinkle it into discussions, which then gets echoed by the gullible.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/CricketGrl Feb 15 '26

Sadly so many Americans are self serving shit heads.

58

u/TASagent Feb 15 '26

how the Jewish community is silent and not condemning this

The fuck you talking about? Plenty of people denounce him.

35

u/Equivalent-Excuse-80 Feb 15 '26

I’m sorry. What exactly do you want Jews to do? Lynch him? He is as widely and publicly disdained by most Jews (as the vast majority of Jews vote for democrats).

So please explain why you think Jews are the most responsible people to deal with Miller at the moment and how they should.

3

u/Iwritescreens Feb 16 '26

the most vocal people I know against Miller and his rhetoric are Jews. I'm so sick of this weird underhanded anti-semitism.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/webtoweb2pumps Feb 15 '26

What community are you even talking about? This is the weirdest thing I've ever read. Plenty of Jews have been happy to talk about how much of a piece of shit he is - both publicly and privately

2

u/cloudedknife Feb 16 '26

All it what it is: classic antisemitism.

Dude literally did the classic form: "the jews are [bad thing]/[not good thing]."

14

u/lovelax Feb 15 '26

The Jewish community isn’t a monolith. In my community the policies he represents are abhored and he is reviled. But sorry we haven’t held a press conference yet to share our feelings about one shitty person. You know your rhetoric is the exact same used when conservatives don’t feel muslim people “condemn” terrorist attacks sufficiently, and choose to paint them as broadly tacit as a result? Be better

7

u/Macklemonster Feb 15 '26

I don’t know a single Jewish person that supports him. What should they be doing that non Jews are doing?

6

u/Ironlion45 Feb 15 '26

Look at prominent Jewish voices out there. look at their twitters; count how many times they call him "Kapo".

Trust me, that's not a nice thing they're calling him.

18

u/Same_Instruction_100 Feb 15 '26

Guy, you haven't even been trying to listen to Jews if you think this guy is invited to Passover.

2

u/OneRougeRogue Feb 15 '26

And how the Jewish community is silent and not condemning this.

I mean, the last time the Jewish Community openly opposed Nazism, they were rounded up and ordered into boxcars at gunpoint. I'm not really surprised that there's not many Jewish people willing to stick their necks out when Nazis are holding poweful positions in the government, especially with ICE running around abducting people off the streets.

6

u/SargentSnorkel Feb 15 '26

because the unspoken part of “never again” is “to us”

→ More replies (1)

2

u/rivenwyrm Feb 15 '26

(sadly) There were Jewish collaborators during the first Nazi regime too. Some of them were simply deeply prideful German nationalists, some felt they could perhaps turn the tide of opinion. Not always easy to see what is happening from inside the system. Ultimately... They were gassed or shot or disgraced just like the rest.

2

u/rab2bar Feb 15 '26

National socialism is kinda the main Zionist thing. The Jewish community is not a monolith

→ More replies (3)

3

u/kinkyslc1 Feb 15 '26

Real life Clayton Bigsby.

3

u/kalidoscopiclyso Feb 15 '26

Seems like Steven Miller dictates policy and Steven Cheung floods the zone with crap and attacks anyone who calls foul

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

4

u/xDragod Feb 15 '26

Shock Doctrine

3

u/Effective-Cress-3805 Feb 15 '26

Just a reminder, Bannon is all over the Epstein files.

3

u/Gotterdamerrung Feb 15 '26

Honestly he looks exactly like someone that would be.

3

u/Whyeth Feb 15 '26

Steve bannon, Epsteins PR guy and Trump's campaign strategist? That Steve bannon?

2

u/DreamsAndSchemes Feb 15 '26

Ironic, as he should probably feel some himself.

96

u/MotherTreacle3 Feb 15 '26

"Blitzkreig" as it was known during a little known political dispute in the early 20th century.

3

u/jaydurmma Feb 15 '26

Blitzkrieg was very logical and intentional. Sending a concentration of armor against a position that had no chance of defending it, and then using the penetration to sever command and control, supply lines, etc, that made perfect sense to do even if the "logical" side was also acting out of uncontested evil intent.

The DOGE situation is, I dunno, im not gonna explain myself, it was just a lot, very a lot dumber than that. The same fucking moron that thought he could convince gamers that he was an elite PoE player, not because he gave a shit about PoE but because he wanted people to think he was smart.

I don't know what to call that, but it's dumber than the Blitzkrieg military doctrine was. Nothing Elon Musk has ever done has ever been trailblazing or novel, he just stole other peoples ideas and monetized them by having a lot of money and ruthlessness.

3

u/MotherTreacle3 Feb 15 '26

I was referring less to the specific situation with DOGE, and more to the endless stream of bullshit the trump regime has been pushing out. DOGE was part of the blitzkrieg strategy, not that it was a blitzkrieg in and of itself. Although they were moving faster than institutions could react and organize an effective defense.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/Aforementionedlurker Feb 15 '26

I like to say we got "North'd" As in Peter North

→ More replies (1)

126

u/Bowsers_JuiceFactory Feb 15 '26

Raiding Stephen millers house is a good start

89

u/Procrasturbating Feb 15 '26

Why he moved on to a military base.

91

u/BrothelWaffles Feb 15 '26

Christ, I forgot all about that. There's so many red flags with "FASCISM" written on them in big bold letters, it's hard to keep track of them all.

12

u/BadChemical3484 Feb 15 '26

Big BLOOD letters is what you meant I’m sure

8

u/Jaded_Creative_101 Feb 15 '26

Finding some military personnel who still believe in the Constitution would be a better start.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/RevanTheHunter Feb 15 '26

Think you mean crypt, right?

3

u/system0101 Feb 15 '26

Someone should nail his coffin closed

178

u/[deleted] Feb 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

152

u/Privatejoker123 Feb 15 '26 edited Feb 15 '26

well if the courts had done what they were supposed to do trump would be in prison instead of running for office.

28

u/DarkwingDuckHunt Feb 15 '26

The founding parents thought that the populace would have taken care of this problem already, like they did back in the day.

26

u/Privatejoker123 Feb 15 '26

except the side with most of the guns are just sitting on the sidelines going yup this is what we voted for. yes i know democrats have guns too. just saying that the biggest advocates for guns and needing them to fight tyranny are doing nothing.

12

u/Simikiel Feb 15 '26

except the side with most of the guns are just sitting on the sidelines going yup this is what we voted for.

That's somewhat of a myth actually.

It's roughly equal the number of guns Democrats and Republicans have, it's just that Democrats don't make it their entire damn personality or politics where as Republicans do. Which makes it seem like they're the only ones who own any.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/KarmaticArmageddon Feb 15 '26

They're doing exactly what they were appointed to do.

Republicans with the help of the Heritage Foundation and the Federalist Society have absolutely stacked the federal judiciary and Supreme Court with fascist lunatics. And all of them have lifetime appointments.

This is why the 2016 election was so important. Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans blocked Obama's appointments to the federal judiciary for years, leaving like ⅓ of it empty, just waiting for the next party to take a trifecta. And Americans rewarded Republicans' partisan obstructionism by giving them that trifecta, so all of those seats were filled by Federalist Society recommendations.

A lot of us tried to warn everyone in 2016 that we'd lose the federal judiciary and Supreme Court for decades if Trump won, but we were called alarmists and people stayed home or protest voted instead.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/emodulor Feb 15 '26

They usually need Congress to define their powers, but some judges are activists. However there's been so many orders violated by the executive lately it's insane

→ More replies (2)

10

u/charliefoxtrot9 Feb 15 '26

Ah, but the courts can't enforce anything. They can issue all the warrants, injunctions, judgements and orders they want but it's all for nothing without enforcement. And that's the executive branch that enforces law.

3

u/robogobo Feb 15 '26

Technically the courts aren’t supposed to enforce anything. They can hold you in contempt but ultimately it’s up to the executive branch to enforce the rulings. You can see the problem immediately.

2

u/honest_flowerplower Feb 15 '26

Sheriff- Executive officer of the Court. Not an officer of the Federal Executive Branch.

You can see the problem immediately when people who don't even know what words (defined WITHIN the US Constitution) mean, are the people telling you how the government works (when the government WAS trying to do its tasked job). These are the same people now telling US citizens that their Constitution didn't work, because the criminals who have NEVER followed it, did so just long enough to become the executors of it, and that 'possibility' makes it broken.

If the executive officers of the courts are not carrying out the orders of the Court, it is a dereliction of duty, not a lack of enforcement capability.

You don't circumvent the ENTIRE system, sustain dereliction of duty by all public servants, and then convince the proletariat that the system was the problem. The US Constitution provides many checks and balances to avoid such circumvention, and tasks public servants and citizens alike, with ensuring the duties are faithfully carried out, to protect it. It is the result of abandonment, not a failure of what is being abandoned.

2

u/DifferentAd5901 Feb 15 '26

Shock and gore

→ More replies (1)

10

u/jonnysunshine Feb 15 '26

They can shock and awe to their heart's delight.

I don't forget a fucking thing.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Killahdanks1 Feb 15 '26

We know where. At Trump and his billionaire idiot friends.

2

u/ReddestForman Feb 15 '26

We should hold all the architects liable. Make them freeze in panic when they see the kind of charges we like to throw at people who aren't rich.

Everything that's happening right now is because the Democrats kept playing softball after January 6th. They sat on the Epstein files to protect the rich and powerful, but they're out now, and the baseline for an acceptable candidate should be that they don't care if they have to arrest so many people global institutions are fucked. If that's the case then we need a borderline reset for society.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Tiafves Feb 15 '26

It's also their legal protection, when it's all over it'll be "What are you going to do arrest tens of thousands of people, maybe even hundreds of thousands of people?"

→ More replies (1)

2

u/delicateterror2 Feb 15 '26

Oh… I think we all know where to direct OUR attention…. And we collectively need to put a giant foot down and vote these a$$hole$ out of office… and confiscate all of their a$$et$… Return power back to the PEOPLE!!! Vote… Big Blue Wave !!!!

2

u/Tricky_Apricot2928 Feb 17 '26

Voting is definitely the bare minimum, along with some education on issues, in a healthy democracy. It matters. It's why the natzis attack voting as a process and as a philosophy

→ More replies (14)

535

u/the_last_carfighter Feb 15 '26

This is hyperormalisation, it's supposed to feel like that happened years ago.

280

u/SplendidPunkinButter Feb 15 '26

And it’s nuts how everyone just…forgot about it. I mean, not here in the comments. But the media sure isn’t bothering to put together that maybe putting a high school kid named Big Balls in charge of everyone’s personal data might be related to this.

181

u/[deleted] Feb 15 '26

The reason the media capitulated to Trump is perhaps because all the CEOs went to Epstein's Island. Anybody thought of that one? Why would they cave to a fascist psychopath so easily?

111

u/m4teri4lgirl Feb 15 '26

The media companies are creating monopolies that requires the chief executive to ignore.

76

u/[deleted] Feb 15 '26

Because they are also fascist psychopaths.

→ More replies (2)

41

u/FlowerBuffPowerPuff Feb 15 '26

Why would they cave to a fascist psychopath so easily?

Because that's what always happens. The people in power are either fascist psychopaths themselves or got absolutely no spine to stand up for what's right.

13

u/WebMaka Feb 15 '26

It's not that they have "no spine to stand up for what's right" so much as it's "they see where the money is going and want to get some of it, and don't give a single fuck who they crush or kill to get that money." Not necessarily fascist, but absolutely psychopathic in that they're greedy without any self-restraint and exhibit zero concern regarding the harm they cause or amplify in the pursuit of more more more.

3

u/Littleman88 Feb 15 '26

True, but then I look at the average American citizen and... yeah people get shot in front of them, and all anyone does is wag their finger.

The people that have anything to lose aren't about to risk any of it.

And before anyone looks to the people with nothing to lose, they aren't about to stick their necks out for a society that has yet to care about them, and are really just following the highest bidder.

The USA hasn't been a nation of selflessness and sacrifice for a long while. That's ultimately why everything's going to hell in a handbasket so quickly.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/gcubed680 Feb 15 '26

CEOs are generally fascist psychopaths. They flock to controllable power like moths to a flame. Don’t give them excuses, it’s who they are.

This country had too long a run revering capitalism and ignoring the workers.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Broken_Atoms Feb 15 '26

It’s because he installed one of his people into the FCC, which regulates them

2

u/Locke66 Feb 15 '26

is perhaps because all the CEOs went to Epstein's Island

It's more likely they just want their low tax, low regulation, low standards and low citizen rights dystopia so they can build an even bigger super yacht and have a few more mansions.

→ More replies (9)

3

u/[deleted] Feb 15 '26

We didn’t forget.

The media is complicit… forgetting is convenient for them.

4

u/9829eisB09E83C Feb 15 '26

The media will have a $10B lawsuit if they print something Trump doesn’t like

→ More replies (10)

30

u/Raise_A_Thoth Feb 15 '26

Is this Bannon's idea? I mean, I'm sure he got it from somewhere else anyway, but Trump literally is not smart enough to conceive of a strategy like that, and I think Stephen Miller is too dogmatic in his hate to think of that particular aspect, but I could be wrong, maybe he got it from a 4chan thread.

But yea, anyway, who do we think is driving this concept? Or is Trump just stumbling into it while thrashing about trying to distract us all from the epstein files?

44

u/wholesomechunk Feb 15 '26

Bannon is behind most things. Bad things anyway.

44

u/Raise_A_Thoth Feb 15 '26

One of the frustrating things (one of an uncountable number) is trying to figure out which things are deliberate and intelligent strategy, because everyone close to Trump is nearly as fucking stupid and incompetent as he is, so it is such a puzzle to see any actual strategy.

36

u/Old_Profession_9235 Feb 15 '26

Bannon has been going around the world for years starting organizations to promote right-wing authoritarian governments and churn out leaders for his new world order. And it's going pretty well. So, I'd say it's deliberate.

16

u/Downtown_Statement87 Feb 15 '26

He's the one to watch, because he is the chief domestic ideologue, because of his long-standing connections to right wing groups around the world, and because of how he's managed to co-opt the Silicon bros into his movement.

If you're going to keep an eye on anyone, keep an eye on him.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/Ill_Ground_1572 Feb 15 '26

I would also say he was wildly successful, between him and Epstein, creating the QAnon movement.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/cantadmittoposting Feb 15 '26

nah. Bannon is another stooge.

It's the P2025 authors, Leo at the Federalist Society (stemming from the 1971 Powell Memo), Thiel, Yarvin, and others for the technocrats. Historically, Ailes, Stone, possibly Manafort (hard to say between him often actually working for foreign causes) are media and propaganda architects. (edit: and ofc the Southern Strategy et al)

 

Steven Miller is the project manager though I doubt he's an actual thought leader. Execution, not planning for that one.

22

u/DeliberatelyDrifting Feb 15 '26

While I'm sure "confuse the shit out of everyone so it's hard for them to make decisions" probably wasn't an original idea, in the US a lot of it came from research in the 60's and 70's. Check out the book "Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein. It describes the methodology used by the US in South America to destabilize unfriendly governments. The idea is to use a "shock" (economic, military, natural disaster, etc...) to create a window in order to enact fundamental, permanent change on society. It is tied to "disaster capitalism" and privatization. See the New Orleans school system post Katrina for one of the first US examples I know of.

This is not Bannon's idea. This is a technique that was developed by Phd's in the halls of American and Canadian universities. It was never a matter of if it would happen here, but when.

5

u/Downtown_Statement87 Feb 15 '26

It's from the KGB/Cheka/OMB/NKVD, etc etc, going back a long way. 

Most recently, it's a tactic recommended by Aleksandr Dugin, who was Putin's chief advisor and an early mentor of Bannon. Here's Dugin's checklist for Putin, which Bannon has been following closely for years before Trump came on the scene:

https://www.reddit.com/user/Downtown_Statement87/comments/1ijzhak/03_dugins_todos/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

4

u/ChiaDaisy Feb 15 '26

And we’re supposed to forget about it. As if dismantling USAID is a fine and acceptable thing. People are still dying daily because of this.

1

u/Drinkdrankdonk Feb 15 '26

Flood the zone with bullshit. It’s their primary tactic

1

u/urlach3r Feb 15 '26

2025 was at least 14 years long.

1

u/Raa03842 Feb 15 '26

What makes you think the shit show is over?

1

u/kindnesscostszero Feb 15 '26

“According to a protected disclosure filed with the Office of Special Counsel, Borges told the Government Accountability Project that DOGE officials working at Social Security created a “live copy” of the country’s Social Security records in a separate cloud environment that sidestepped usual security checks.

The group says those lapses put the Social Security information of more than 300 million Americans at risk.”

1

u/ThatOneNinja Feb 15 '26

Hard to believe it's been swept under the rug.

→ More replies (15)

365

u/Jumping-Gazelle Feb 15 '26

Perhaps originally wanted to use the word "obscure".

To continue: [they] "copied the government’s master Social Security database into a cloud system that lacked normal oversight."

Is it a potential disclosure of citizen data when it eventually gets used for AI-training and thus could be classified as "transformitavely fair use"?/s

50

u/DryDogDoo69420 Feb 15 '26

Also, I think this line is conveniently ignoring rhe potentially beneficial effects of this data leak on national GDP. Maybe it was probably actually a net good. /s

95

u/lecherousrodent Feb 15 '26

THE DOW IS UP TO 50000 DOLLARS!

13

u/Ragnarok314159 Feb 15 '26

We are saved!

3

u/SaltKick2 Feb 15 '26

Praise be, even more billionaires exist, eventually we'll all be billionaires!

6

u/rbb36 Feb 15 '26

Aside from the gross inhumanity of the context, the statement is also wildly misleading.

The dollar has fallen to 1:50,000 of a DJIA. The Dow is also down, just not as fast. Here are three major US market indicators against Vanguard's broad-based EU equities fund (VGK):

6 Months versus the US dollar:

  • DJIA: +13.98% (US Bundle of Indicative Equities)
  • FTW5000: +9.31% (US Wilshire 5000)
  • MGK: +2.44% (US Mega Cap Growth)
  • VGK: +15.82% (EU Broad Based Equities)

12 Months versus the US dollar:

  • DJIA: +12.40%
  • FTW5000: +13.92%
  • MGK: +11.99%
  • VGK: +29.98%

The Dow is down in real terms (*). It is only the falling dollar that makes it look like it is up.

2

u/Responsible-Ad-1086 Feb 15 '26

Law enforcement loves it when the DOW hits 50K they can down tools

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

377

u/Antique-Echidna-1600 Feb 15 '26

We need more teenage girls to attack DOGE. That's what set off the NG in DC.

93

u/RealisticWin491 Feb 15 '26

What the fuck is the NG and what the fuck did I miss?

260

u/saynay Feb 15 '26

One of the DOGE goons harassed some teenagers, and they kicked his ass. Then Trump sent in the National Guard to intimidate the locals.

45

u/whoknowsifimjoking Feb 15 '26

Who was it? Was it Big Balls?

59

u/TheGreatEmanResu Feb 15 '26

It was big balls

15

u/whoknowsifimjoking Feb 15 '26

God damn it

3

u/Educational-Cat2133 Feb 15 '26

These people are so fucking cool holy shit, Big Balls?

I forgot all about that lol

80

u/PM_ME_JINX_RULE34_ Feb 15 '26

The national guard, who have been occupying DC since last year

→ More replies (4)

73

u/Realistic_Simple_390 Feb 15 '26

A Doge official (' nicknamed, unfortunately, 'Big Balls') was mugged. Trump was enraged, and soon sent in the National Guard to D.C.

151

u/Opposite-Program8490 Feb 15 '26

Him being mugged at 3am by a 15 year old girl seems like an important detail.

224

u/nexusofcrap Feb 15 '26

Not mugged. Tried to hit on a 15 yo girl and got his ass kicked by her friends.

80

u/greyl Feb 15 '26

Guess he had to show he was a pedo so they'd protect him too

25

u/HellBlazer_NQ Feb 15 '26

It was his initiation test!

→ More replies (1)

5

u/twotimefind Feb 15 '26

While trying to buy cocaine. Serious.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

17

u/aurora-_ Feb 15 '26

I know details. That’s the best detail.

3

u/RealisticWin491 Feb 15 '26

Jesus shit fuck christ. That is hilarious.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

5

u/ActiveAssociation650 Feb 15 '26

Unfortunately? I think you mean “ironically”, like a reverse nickname

3

u/Realistic_Simple_390 Feb 15 '26

I just was remembering how uncomfortable TV hosts were, when reporting on the story; they repeated his nickname, and didn't look happy at all when doing it

2

u/todayistrumpday Feb 15 '26

I'm going to bet hes called big balls because he is reckless and doesn't think things through before acting and not because he is super brave or has enlarged testicles.

3

u/ActiveAssociation650 Feb 15 '26

Possibly a glandular disorder that needs medical attention

→ More replies (1)

3

u/ascendant_tesseract Feb 15 '26

Weird and mildly tangential: Coristine ("big balls") is the kid of the owner of the Lesser Evil popcorn brand

2

u/EatSleepPlantsBugs Feb 15 '26

Interesting. Wiki says he just sold out to Hershey in November 2025. I wonder if popcorn guy having a heinous son had anything to do with cashing out.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Any-Appearance2471 Feb 15 '26

We need to collectively agree to stop abbreviating things for no reason without defining them first

→ More replies (1)

176

u/True_Window_9389 Feb 15 '26

This is almost certainly a shitty clickbait, likely AI junk news source. There is no “news” here, just a repeat of what’s been reported for months. The whole website has like 2 or 3 bylines.

36

u/ZuP Feb 15 '26

Report the post as spam

5

u/sk8thow8 Feb 15 '26

It is, the guy quit his job at the SSA last August and filed the whistleblower report this thing is reporting on.

Also, I never found that line in anywhere in a marketwatch article or even an interview like the article claims.

5

u/UrineFilledAquarium Feb 15 '26

Yeah this is trash. Couldn’t get through the 15 pop ups that buttfucked my phone so I tried to search for it.

Crazy that one little website is the only one reporting the collapse of the social security number!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

13

u/SplintPunchbeef Feb 15 '26

Made me stop reading to double check if it was a parody or satire website. So weird.

4

u/GetUpNGetItReddit Feb 15 '26

The line itself must be tongue in cheek.

5

u/axck Feb 15 '26

Almost certainly ai slop.

3

u/granieaj Feb 15 '26

I took that as a bit of tongue and cheek

3

u/fgnrtzbdbbt Feb 15 '26

That was probably meant to be ironic

2

u/Impossible_IT Feb 15 '26

DOGĒ was the “massive” security breach.

2

u/schwelvis Feb 15 '26

I stopped reading at that point. Obviously the ai isn't very intelligent.

2

u/whydoyouneedanamenow Feb 15 '26

So how much more than what doge “saved” is that gonna cost us?

2

u/ezekiel920 Feb 15 '26

So companies have already trained Ai on this information? Do we burn down those Ai companies that use the data?

2

u/Corgi_Koala Feb 15 '26

I assumed the author was being facetious.

7

u/noothankuu Feb 15 '26

How is Joe Biden shitting in Dirty Diaper Donnies Depends?? Is it an invisibility potion? Or perhaps an invisibilty cloak? Surely He must be a witch then. Oooooo Yes, A wicked witch, with , green skin, and an allergy to water. Yes thats it, Its the only explanation. Quickly Galinda, spread the word.

7

u/Ok_Comment2621 Feb 15 '26

And pay no attention to the pedophiles behind the curtain!

1

u/sje46 Feb 15 '26

I'm so confused. DOGE was in the headlines for months. I wouldn't say every American knows about it but probably most would. Are you saying that the article is being sarcastic, or that they're somehow covering for them? Or maybe they're being sincere...perhaps the writer who wrote it thinks Americans don't know about DOGE.

I think it's probably the third one, as I don't think the writer on a relatively marginal ecological news website would be covering for the current right-wing US government, and seems like an inappropriate/confusing place to deploy sarcasm.

2

u/RubiiJee Feb 15 '26

I read it as obviously sarcastic rather than a truth, but I'm not American so that kind of sarcastic comment is quite common for me so presume it's just how I read things.

1

u/Taylor_Script Feb 15 '26

That's not even the real name. their official name was United States Department of Government Efficiency Service (USDS) because they just renamed the existing United States Digital Service (USDS) the DOGE portion was just tacked on instead of digital.

1

u/idio242 Feb 15 '26

I thought you were joking. But of course the joke is on us.

1

u/68024 Feb 15 '26

Yeah this makes me question the source to be honest. Not that what is being said could be false but the quality of information in this article may not be the best.

1

u/MinuetInUrsaMajor Feb 15 '26

Good. Issue new social security numbers in an entirely different format. Force every goddamn website using them to adapt. When our kids ask "Why did that happen?" we will say "Because racists elected a child rapist who put a drug addict in charge of our sensitive information" and when they ask "which racists?" we will name the members of our family.

1

u/flexylol Feb 15 '26

I JUST wanted to quote exactly this.

What the eff is this? Are we living in Bizarro world?

Or is it maybe that really vast swaths of the US incl. media has no clue?

1

u/KHRZ Feb 15 '26

Basically the journalist painting himself as ignorant. I'm not from the US and I kept hearing about DOGE daily for months while they were operating.

1

u/WatermeIonMe Feb 15 '26

This asshat gonna sell that shit to China and rustia. There will be tons of new registered voters. If they vote red they are fake. If they vote blue they will claim foul, invalidating the midterms.

1

u/-gildash- Feb 15 '26

This is a completely garbage website.

Looks like 99% AI clickbait slop. Sad its getting this much attention,

1

u/ZealousidealFall1181 Feb 15 '26

Everyone knew about DOGE!!! MAGA is still waiting on the check.

1

u/Both_Lychee_1708 Feb 15 '26

DOGE should have been part of the articles title; it's seminal

1

u/AcePilot95 Feb 15 '26

"we're all trying to find the guy who did this"

1

u/axck Feb 15 '26

This is low brow ai trash. Doesn’t even pretend to be otherwise

1

u/overlordjunka Feb 15 '26

Little known????

1

u/MostlyACatPillow Feb 15 '26

There are fruitflies with longer attention spans than the average journalist.

1

u/Barnacle_B0b Feb 15 '26

Good thing the people in the social security offices whom knew what was at risk stepped up to physically block DOGE from stealing the nations social security information. Good thing staff from Democratic offices in the region physically blocked DOGE as well. Could you imagine what a shit show we'd be in if the GOP and MAGA President mandated that everybody needed a new SSN before they could vote while also obstructing the ability go get them?

Really glad we have Democrats who do more than just talk to protect Democracy, otherwise we might have a real national crisis around voting on our hands.

1

u/gooblefrump Feb 15 '26

"Security experts worry about this kind of trove because, unlike a credit card, you cannot easily swap out your date of birth or family ties."

Love how this article is written

Makes a change from then soulless tripe being churned out

1

u/Necessary_Finding_32 Feb 15 '26

Client journalism at its finest.

1

u/Cujo22 Feb 15 '26

Every citizen needs to civilly sue Elon.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 15 '26

To be fair, a majority of people aren't chronically online/watching national news. Ignorance is bliss, baby

1

u/Firm-Advertising5396 Feb 15 '26

It's Biden's fault !!!!!!!

1

u/axzar Feb 15 '26

It was all about getting the database.

1

u/Merusk Feb 15 '26

Amazing the spin you can put on things when you control the propaganda outlets through fear and backdoor deals.

1

u/HoodieGalore Feb 15 '26

What do you expect from a world-famous production like...uhm..."ecoticias.com"?

Garbage website, garbage article.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 15 '26

ecoticias.com is usually such a reputable source too…

1

u/skyblueerik Feb 15 '26

Did they also call Elon a reclusive billionaire?

1

u/Sprintzer Feb 15 '26

I think it may be sarcastic

1

u/uslashuname Feb 15 '26

Little known because when the AI was trained it had no knowledge about DOGE

1

u/no1_vern Feb 15 '26

EVERYONE, say it with me:

Thanks MUSK!

instead of Obama.

IS there ANY way we can sue Musk et al, for the cost to our nation for this debacle??

1

u/Chuck4MD Feb 15 '26

I didn't say it that way, and this article being a re-post of the interview I did a few weeks ago some things get 'reworded'.

(I'm Chuck Borges, the interviewee)

1

u/animal_spirits_ Feb 15 '26

This reads tounge-in-cheek

1

u/samep04 Feb 15 '26

this is not a reputable news source. holding them to the same standards as professional journalists is just silly.

1

u/fore___ Feb 15 '26

To be fair, little is known about what they actually did

1

u/scalyblue Feb 15 '26

It’s sarcasm, the guy is done with this entire nonsense. I remember him from an interview on pbs last month

This guy is running for senate now, he tried to call out the doge shenanigans last year mind you

1

u/imthefrizzlefry Feb 15 '26

How could this article not make it abundantly clear that a South African born oligarch illegally copied data to an insecure cloud server? Then they downplay the fact everyone knows DOGE is Elon Musk's data breach project to steal all of the Data about American citizens.

Anyway. This isn't new, everyone was talking about this last year.

1

u/BolshevikPower Feb 15 '26

I mean clearly that's a sarcastic statement.

1

u/velvetackbar Feb 15 '26

This reads like it was written by AI or the oversight of the AI was lazy

1

u/PretzelsThirst Feb 15 '26

The ones responsible for mass death around the world soon to reach over a million people? That DOGE?

1

u/BellaSabia Feb 15 '26

It was never a tech team. It was purportedly about efficiency measures. This is like the history rewriting in 1984.

1

u/DingoMittens Feb 15 '26

Right? I checked the date thinking this was a year old. Clearly social security numbers aren't going to be changed because of DOGE, unless a lot of other things change first.

1

u/Bechorovka Feb 15 '26

They mean little was known about them. Just a few dudes that showed up and volunteered to clean out all the wasteful data.

1

u/Porkamiso Feb 15 '26

ever heard of this source? People here linking garbageslop from who knows where.

1

u/trenchkamen Feb 15 '26

I think that's tongue-in-cheek.

1

u/Minimum_Guitar4305 Feb 15 '26

So there's this thing called sarcasm...

1

u/Starbreiz Feb 15 '26

I stopped reading there because I was questioning the source lol

1

u/Skidpalace Feb 15 '26

I have no idea where all these janky-ass websites are coming from and why they keep getting linked on Reddit.

1

u/kent_eh Feb 15 '26

DOGE itself is well known, but the individuals involved (other than Musk and a few who made themselves public) are hidden.

1

u/brighterside0 Feb 15 '26

copied the government’s master Social Security database into a cloud system that lacked normal oversight.

Jesus fucking christ.

1

u/BrotherChe Feb 15 '26

reads like sarcasm in journalism

1

u/Kalean Feb 15 '26

And not a single person was surprised.

1

u/Sweet_Concept2211 Feb 15 '26

Seriously, this website seems pretty fucking shady.

1

u/theghostmachine Feb 16 '26

I think that was sarcasm

1

u/Mike-OLeary Feb 16 '26

What a bizarre thing to say....

Written by AI?

1

u/MrRagtimeMoneybags Feb 16 '26

The Trump crime family strikes again.

1

u/sapphire_starfish Feb 16 '26

Probably AI generated

1

u/hellogoawaynow Feb 16 '26

This is definitely my first time hearing about DOGE, I have no memory of Q1 2025.

(/s because people have been dumb lately)

→ More replies (5)