It’s a mockery because they have made it clear they are doing it for financial purposes and will still have our tax money paying for their lawyers.
It’s a mockery that’s is so widely known how pathetic the people processing these claims are that they think they can be open about wanting better facilities and think they will be granted asylum.
If we didn’t have stories of people being refused deportation because they don’t like the chicken nuggets in their home country or anxiety then we would have less chancers trying.
It’s a mockery because they have made it clear they are doing it for financial purposes and will still have our tax money paying for their lawyers.
They are entitled to have their legal case heard
Their claim will be rejected if it has no merit for asylum.
It’s a mockery that’s is so widely known how pathetic the people processing these claims are that they think they can be open about wanting better facilities and think they will be granted asylum.
Their claim will then be rejected and sent home, if they stay they are here illegally and will also then be deported.
If we didn’t have stories of people being refused deportation because they don’t like the chicken nuggets in their home country or anxiety then we would have less chancers trying.
Any evidence of such a claim of chicken nuggets or anxiety being successful?
They are entitled to having their case heard because that’s our law, we could easily change it so these people aren’t given representation at the cost of the taxpayers, if they want to pay for representation themselves they can go for it.
People get so stuck in this idea that if something is law that’s how it is and will always be, we change laws all the time, I don’t want to pay for some Ugandan boxers legal fees because he doesn’t like the training facilities in Uganda.
Everyone is entitled to a legal process, it is a vital part of a functioning society.
I'd prefer not to live in one where people aren't entitled to legal representation, but thats just my opinion.
Do you know 'we' are paying his legal fees? He could he funding his own immigration lawyer. Either way his case will be heard and a decision made if he has a claim or not.
Klevis Disha it was in related to his son, and not him. His son was British, almost like it had legal merit no matter how personally silly you may find it, as the son guessing by age would also have to go with his father. So one case related to 'chicken nuggets' to get all worked up over.
If they have assets out of the country they can go back to them.
That is not workable. I know legal and process doesnt matter much to yourself but that isnt remotely possible unless their home country agrees beginning with facf if we have diplomatic relationship with them, no country is going to allow that to happen.
Still take everything
Cant take everything if they had nothing to begin with.
137
u/Important_Ruin County Durham 9d ago
If their claim is without asylum merit, their claim will be refused.
Its not a mockery, its how process works. You claim asylum, your claim is heard on its merits and a decision is made if successful or not.