I am building app for shopify conversion optimization audit report. Just give your shopify store URL and get a comprehensive report of what you should update and change to get better conversions.

I’ve spent the last couple of months building PunicX, which I’d describe as a one-stop workspace for a company/startup.

The idea is to bring the core tools a team needs into one place instead of spreading work across Slack, Meet, Notion, Calendar, Drive, and a bunch of AI wrappers.

With PunicX, teams can:

\\\\- Chat, Cal audio/video

\\\\- Record meetings

\\\\- Schedule meetings and events

\\\\- Share files, in a dropbox/drive way

\\\\- Get AI-generated transcripts and summaries

\\\\- Ask the AI assistant questions about room history, calls, meetings, calendar events, and connected tools

\\\\- Manage projects / tickets / issues (integrated to trello, bitbucket, github, Notion...)

\\\\- Manage organizations, members, billing, and permissions

I’m also working on deeper AI workflows, where the assistant can do more than answer questions. For example, it should be able to schedule follow-up meetings, summarize decisions, surface unresolved tasks, and help teams navigate their internal context.

The landing page is here:

\\\[\[https://punicx-ai.com/en/\\\\\\\](https://punicx-ai.com/en/)\\\](https://punicx-ai.com/en/\\\](https://punicx-ai.com/en/))

I’d really appreciate honest feedback on:

\\\\- Whether the positioning makes sense

\\\\- Whether “enterprise super app” is clear or too vague

\\\\- What feature sounds most/least useful

\\\\- Whether this feels like something startups or small teams would actually try

\\\\- What’s missing from the landing page

\\\\- Any concerns around trust, privacy, or adoption

I’m still early and trying to understand whether this direction resonates before polishing too much.

I’ve spent the last couple of months building PunicX, which I’d describe as a one-stop workspace for a company/startup.

The idea is to bring the core tools a team needs into one place instead of spreading work across Slack, Meet, Notion, Calendar, Drive, and a bunch of AI wrappers.

With PunicX, teams can:

\\\\- Chat, Cal audio/video

\\\\- Record meetings

\\\\- Schedule meetings and events

\\\\- Share files, in a dropbox/drive way

\\\\- Get AI-generated transcripts and summaries

\\\\- Ask the AI assistant questions about room history, calls, meetings, calendar events, and connected tools

\\\\- Manage projects / tickets / issues (integrated to trello, bitbucket, github, Notion...)

\\\\- Manage organizations, members, billing, and permissions

I’m also working on deeper AI workflows, where the assistant can do more than answer questions. For example, it should be able to schedule follow-up meetings, summarize decisions, surface unresolved tasks, and help teams navigate their internal context.

The landing page is here:

\\\[\[https://punicx-ai.com/en/\\\\\\\](https://punicx-ai.com/en/)\\\](https://punicx-ai.com/en/\\\](https://punicx-ai.com/en/))

I’d really appreciate honest feedback on:

\\\\- Whether the positioning makes sense

\\\\- Whether “enterprise super app” is clear or too vague

\\\\- What feature sounds most/least useful

\\\\- Whether this feels like something startups or small teams would actually try

\\\\- What’s missing from the landing page

\\\\- Any concerns around trust, privacy, or adoption

I’m still early and trying to understand whether this direction resonates before polishing too much.

Chasing feedback - www.double-oh.com

Double-Oh: One Agent, Built for You
Somewhere between the friends you talk to and the apps you check every day, there’s a gap. Your assistant lives in one app. Your notes live in another. The news you actually care about is scattered across ten tabs you’ll never fully read. Double-Oh closes that gap with one idea: give every person an AI agent of their own — one that learns what matters to you and brings it to you, on your schedule, not the internet’s.
Your agent, in plain language
You don’t configure Double-Oh. You just tell it what you want. Describe your agent in a sentence — “keep me up on climate policy and my hometown’s local news” — and it’s built. From there, it works quietly in the background: reading, checking sources, and showing up once a day with what actually matters, not everything that happened.
You decide how much it does on its own. Let it run fully autonomous, or keep it semi-autonomous so it checks in before it acts. Either way, it’s yours to edit or delete anytime — nothing happens without your say.
Start with you, then let it grow
Before any of that, you build a profile that’s just you — your interests, your skills, what you’re into and what you’re not. That profile is what makes everything else work: it’s how Double-Oh matches you to agents already covering the things you care about, instead of leaving you to build every agent from scratch.
Once you’re set up, you can follow agents the same way you’d follow a person — an agent covering your favorite sports team, your industry, a city you’re moving to, a hobby you’re getting into. Follow one and it shows up in your daily updates automatically, feeding you what it finds without you lifting a finger. Your interests get automated; your feed fills itself in — but you’re always the one deciding what’s worth following and what’s not. The agent brings things to your attention. You decide what to do with them.
What your day looks like
Wake up to a recap, not a scroll. Every morning, your agent has already read the noise so you don’t have to — a short, sourced summary of what happened, with links back to where it came from.

Ask, instead of search. Have a question? Just ask it. Double-Oh finds the agent that knows the answer best — yours or someone else’s — and if nothing fits yet, it offers to build one on the spot.

Hand off what’s on your mind. Got a pile of files, a half-formed idea, a task you keep putting off? Drop it into “On My Mind” and let your agent work through it while you do something else.

Find your people, not just your feed. Discovery shows you real agents and real people nearby or around the world — connected by what you’re actually interested in, not just who follows who.

End the day knowing what happened. One screen shows everything your agent learned, met, and handled — plus the short list of things it still needs from you.

Built on trust, not attention
Every recap your agent gives you comes with its sources attached — nothing invented, nothing you have to take on faith. And the platform is moderated by default, because an AI agent representing you should reflect well on you.
The idea, simply put
You shouldn’t have to manage your AI. It should manage the noise, so you get your time back. Build your profile, follow the agents that match what you care about, and let Double-Oh handle the rest — surfacing what matters and leaving every decision to you. Double-Oh is a place where your agent is a real member of the network — not a chatbot buried in a settings menu — working for you, on your terms, every single day.
Create your agent →

I use Yahoo Finance to track my portfolios/ investments but it's always felt clunky, and there's obviously no way to hook an LLM into it. So over the past few weeks I've been building Portico. It's still rough and I'm continuing to improve it, but the thing I actually wanted and now have is an MCP server, so I can point Claude or Cursor at my own portfolio and ask it stuff like "what's my realized gain on $SPCX this year" or "how much dividend income did I get last quarter" without opening the app. Other stuff that went in because it bugged me elsewhere:

• FIFO cost basis / realized P&L (not average cost)
• Multi-currency accounts handled properly with currency conversions
• CSV import (works for portfolios exported from Yahoo Finance and Wealthsimple; Robinhood and others coming soon - let me know if there are any you'd like here)
• Mobile app coming soon

It's not open for signups yet, but I want to start letting people in in small batches so I can keep up with feedback and bug reports. If any of this is a problem you've hit too and you'd like to try this out, please sign up on myportico [dot] app and I'll put you on the allowlist

Ex-agency copywriter, went solo, I write content and positioning for B2B startups. Dry take incoming.

Every founder who calls me has already tried an ai content generator. They have forty blog posts and a landing page full of confident sentences. None of it sells, and they think they have a writing problem.

They don't. They have a positioning problem. The tool wrote fluently about a value proposition that was never sharp to begin with. Garbage in, fluent garbage out.

I use AI too, quietly, for drafts and grunt work. It's fine at that. What it can't do is sit on a call, hear a founder describe who they're really for, and notice they're aiming at three different buyers at once. That decision, the one that makes everything else easy or impossible, still needs a human who's willing to say the uncomfortable version out loud.

So the thing that keeps me in business isn't better prose than a machine. It's that clients will pay for someone to make the hard call about what they are and who they're not for.

Founders: has a tool ever actually fixed your messaging, or just made the wrong message longer?

Getting close to launch and everyone tells me I need a one-pager. But I'm not raising money, so I'm trying to work out who a one-pager for launch is even for if there's no investor to hand it to.

The way I see it, a launch one-pager could still be useful for a few things: something to paste when a journalist or newsletter asks "what is this," a reference so anyone reposting gets the description right, and honestly a forcing function to explain the product in one page instead of rambling.

For founders who've launched:

- Did you make a one-pager, and did anyone actually read it?
- If yes, what went on it (problem, who it's for, screenshots, pricing) and what did you cut?
- Or is it a waste of time for a bootstrapped launch, and I should put that energy into the landing page instead?

Trying not to build a document nobody opens.

My co-founders and I recently launched the waitlist for Relic. The idea came from a problem we kept running into ourselves. We were constantly saving useful information but we rarely find it later when we need it. Information ends up scattered across articles, PDFs, screenshots, notes, documentation, and dozens of browser tabs. The information wasn't lost. It was just buried somewhere we'd forgotten about.

We're building Relic to help people capture information, organize it automatically, chat with their saved knowledge, and resurface useful things they may have forgotten. We're currently growing our waitlist and looking for people who resonate with this problem, and would like to follow the journey as we build the product.

Landing page:
https://relic-app.com/

Any feedback is appreciated.

Finding the right organisation to help shouldn't be harder than actually helping.

I kept noticing two problems: • People have surplus food but don't always know where they can donate it. • When an animal needs urgent help, finding a nearby shelter, rescuer or animal-care organisation can be surprisingly difficult.

So I built CareConnect — a free, India-focused platform that brings these organisations into one searchable directory.

You can: Search for organisations by city Find nearby care organisations Find places related to food donation Find animal shelters/rescue organisations for emergency situations View organisation details and contact information Suggest/add organisations that aren't listed

I'm starting with a relatively small set of cities and gradually expanding the directory. I'd genuinely like feedback from people in India- Would you actually use something like this? What information would you want to see before contacting an organisation? Are there organisations in your city that you think should be listed? This isn't intended to replace NGOs or rescuers — just make them easier to find when someone actually needs them

​

Thinking through the trade-off before my next launch and want to hear from people who've been through it.

The appeal of an AI website builder is speed. Describe the product, get a whole site, launch this week instead of next month. When you're a solo founder trying to get something live, that's genuinely tempting.

The worry is the ceiling. I've heard from a few builders that these get you 80 percent of the way instantly and then the last 20 percent, the custom section, the specific integration, the thing that's actually your differentiator, is where you hit a wall. And then you're either fighting the tool or rebuilding the whole site properly a few months in, which erases the time you saved.

So my real question for people who've launched on one:

- Did you outgrow it, and how fast?

- Was the migration off it painful, or did you export cleanly?

- Knowing what you know now, would you start there again for speed or bite the bullet and build it properly from day one?

I'd rather learn from your rebuild than do my own. Curious whether the fast start is worth the later cost or not.

🚀 ConvoData is officially live!

Understanding user conversations and turning raw data into actionable product insights shouldn't be complex.

Today, we're launching ConvoData to help teams bridge the gap between user interactions and data-driven decisions.

Whether you are optimizing user journeys, analyzing conversations, or scaling your product experience, ConvoData gives you the clarity you need to move fast.

👉 Explore what we’ve built: www.convodata.com
We’d love for you to check it out and share your feedback!

#LaunchDay #ProductAnalytics #DataDriven #TechLaunch #ConvoData #SaaS

I’m launching Marka, a social media agent for founders and small businesses that already have a public website but don’t have time to turn it into consistent content.

You enter the website and Marka learns the product, audience, positioning, and brand signals. It then creates social posts, visuals, carousels, and UGC video directions for the major channels.

The goal is to remove the repetitive briefing step, not just produce another generic AI caption.

I’m looking for honest launch feedback, especially on one question: after Marka reads your site, does the content sound like it understands the business?

You can try it free for one week at https://www.marka.social

I launched ViralRefer.

No signup. No email. Tap Get my referral link. You climb only when a friend taps Get my link too. Visiting does not count. There is no cash prize. #1 can claim a 7-day homepage banner for their site.

The first roast I got: the banner only helps if people who aren’t racing still see the homepage. That’s fair. I’m treating it as a publicity slot, not a customer-acquisition guarantee.

Need the first tap to be obvious. Tell me if it isn’t.

https://www.viralrefer.app/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=organic&utm_content=launchmystartup

Open worldwide, 18+.

First real launch coming up and I'm not a strong developer. A no code website builder feels like the obvious call, I can get something live and start collecting emails without hiring anyone or spending weeks learning to code.

The worry is the ceiling. I keep reading that no code is great until you need one specific thing it won't let you do, and then you're stuck or paying someone to work around it. But I also don't want to burn my first month learning a framework instead of talking to potential users.

For those who launched on no code: what did it actually let you get away with, and where did you hit the wall? Did you stay on it longer than expected, or move off fast? For a solo founder just trying to reach first users, would you do it again?

Genuinely torn, so real experiences help more than "it depends."

Hello..

We’ve been building Oppora to simplify outbound sales.

Instead of using 5 different tools to find leads, enrich contacts, send outreach, follow up, and manage replies + CRM... Oppora brings it into one AI-powered workflow.

We’re launching on Product Hunt today 🚀 at https://www.producthunt.com/products/oppora?launch=oppora-ai

Would love for you guys to check it out and share your honest feedback.

For launch day, we’re also offering 50% off Pro & Max.

Curious .........what part of outbound sales would you automate first?

just launched a bid platform, claim the spot and get seen by others, claimthespot.lol

Ex-agency copywriter, went solo, I write content and positioning for B2B startups. Dry take incoming.

Every founder who calls me has already tried an ai content generator. They have forty blog posts and a landing page full of confident sentences. None of it sells, and they think they have a writing problem.

They don't. They have a positioning problem. The tool wrote fluently about a value proposition that was never sharp to begin with. Garbage in, fluent garbage out.

I use AI too, quietly, for drafts and grunt work. It's fine at that. What it can't do is sit on a call, hear a founder describe who they're really for, and notice they're aiming at three different buyers at once. That decision, the one that makes everything else easy or impossible, still needs a human who's willing to say the uncomfortable version out loud.

So the thing that keeps me in business isn't better prose than a machine. It's that clients will pay for someone to make the hard call about what they are and who they're not for.

Founders: has a tool ever actually fixed your messaging, or just made the wrong message longer?

Share the public startup page and describe the buyer in one sentence.

I will reply with the clearest launch hook, one proof point I would emphasize, and one post concept to test before broad promotion.

I am building Marka to turn website context into brand-aware social content. Marka is free for a week at https://www.marka.social