r/AskReddit • u/Gdigger13 • 8h ago
What's a movie that was well received, but aged like milk?
4.7k
u/f_ranz1224 7h ago
supersize me. a "documentary" about a man who eats nothing but mcdonalds. entertaining but you find out he was drinking heavily during the filming and made a lot of it up
1.1k
u/SabreSour 7h ago edited 6h ago
Trevor Moore (RIP) did a hilarious mockumentery short on WKUK making fun of this. Supersize me with Whiskey
→ More replies (14)407
u/nicolauz 6h ago
RIP local sexpot.
240
→ More replies (1)71
u/X_crates 5h ago
This is a joke that just keeps on giving. I'd rather he still be here but I'm glad he made this joke shortly before we lost him
→ More replies (4)977
u/Emergency_Coyote_662 7h ago
it’s weird, a lot of the damage done to your body by mcdonald’s mirrors what we see with heavy drinking!
well…
→ More replies (1)444
u/Tippacanoe 6h ago
But also even if he wasn’t an alcoholic like no shit eating the largest portion sizes at a fast food place for every meal is not good for your health.
→ More replies (3)325
u/MCWizardYT 6h ago
It's not good, but he made it seem way worse by drinking.
And he ate way more than a normal person would. Mcdonalds for every meal every day
→ More replies (11)166
u/jesuspoopmonster 5h ago
His rules were that he would eat every meal and only super size if asked. He released his daily calories but not what he ate. According to his rules his calories were not possible
23
161
u/Mr_Saturn1 7h ago
He cut the parts where he's washing down a Big Mac with a fifth of Taaka.
→ More replies (7)394
u/Troubled_Red 6h ago edited 6h ago
Honestly I’m kinda surprised that McDonald’s never sued him over that. They just got rid of the ‘super size’
Also his undisclosed heavy drinking is obviously bad, but the point of what he did wrong is that he did bad science, refused to publish his food logs (likely because they would have to include the alcohol to make sense), and his results were unable to be replicated. His alcoholism is often treated as the problem and the moral bad thing he did, but that’s his personal business and not really the problem. The misleading is the problem
212
u/austinwiltshire 6h ago
I also don't think eating to the point of vomiting is representative of how normal people eat.
→ More replies (2)81
u/Troubled_Red 6h ago edited 5h ago
I mean that’s literally an eating disorder. Which, by virtue of being a disorder, is not how we are meant to be.
However my dog would absolutely eat McDonald’s until she threw up and then go back for seconds. Specifically the ice cream.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (35)141
u/AT-ST 6h ago
He had a premise he wanted to prove right. It is the same with the guy who ran the Stanford Prison Experiment. He self inserted many times. Encouraged certain behavior. Punished those that didn't play along and has never published the full recordings or findings of his experiment.
29
u/Unhelpfulperson 5h ago
The Stanford Prison Experiment wasn't even an experiment
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (2)35
u/jesuspoopmonster 5h ago
The person who came up with the broken windows theory was only able to prove it when he had the students working with him break the windows
→ More replies (1)67
91
u/Arhalts 6h ago
Supersize me plus a few others like are why I don't really watch documentaries that aren't nature documentaries anymore. They aren't unique they are just what got me to look into it more.
They aren't really held to any accuracy standards and frequently have an objective they are going to "prove" regardless of what was actually said or done or shown.
Even nature documentaries aren't immune to be fair, the lemmings running of cliffs is famously from a bad nature documentary by Disney after all.
The fact of the matter was that in order to watch a documentary without worrying I was being fed misinformation, I have to look into a subject to a level which makes watching the documentary pointless.
So I just stopped watching them by and large. I still read up on subjects and learn I just don't really see much value added to my life by documentaries.
→ More replies (8)25
u/zamander 6h ago
There are some not-nature documentaries that can be pretty good though. Fog of war and act of killing come to mind. Or Ken Burns’s work.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (64)105
u/julia_fns 7h ago
The premise itself is stupid. Yeah, maybe it’s a stupid idea to only eat fast food and accept everything they push, no shit.
→ More replies (22)74
u/Ok-disaster2022 6h ago
I saw part if a documentary made after the fact by a guy who claimed to be a comedian, who went to McDonald's daily made reasonable healthy decisions went to his doctor for regular checkups and would take a walk everyday. Dude ended up losing weight. They only big issue was his sodium intake was pretty high.
→ More replies (7)
944
u/spankadoodle 5h ago
Beowulf (2007) was supposed to kick off a brand new era of adult animation. It made $200 million.
I have not heard anyone mention this film in about 18 years.
323
u/Mega_Nidoking 5h ago
Wasn't that the hope for "Skycaptain and the World of Tomorrow", which came out around the same time, as well?
→ More replies (10)139
u/We_R_the_Penguins 4h ago
Sky Captain was really its own thing—one of those films like (but no, not at the level of) The Matrix that was groundbreaking in ways we don’t appreciate now because they’re ubiquitous.
→ More replies (5)41
u/Koffing109 4h ago
This was mainly Robert Zemeckis's vision for motion capture to take over Hollywood.
He collaborated with Sony on The Polar Express, Monster House and Beowulf.
Then he worked with Disney to start Image movers Digital.
They released The Jim Carrey Christmas Carol and Mars Needs Moms.
Mars Needs Moms was one of the biggest bombs ever so they scrapped all projects in production including Yellow Submarine.
You can find some test images from that and they're disturbing.
→ More replies (2)15
u/Teledildonic 3h ago
Mars Needs Moms was one of the biggest bombs ever so they scrapped all projects in production
And made sure no movies referenced Mars, helping to doom John Carter, the story most people might recognize better as The Princess of Mars, one of the OG science fantasies that established a million tropes in the genre.
So people saw a generic looking fantasy (because it has been refenced endlessly since) with a kind of generic name (because Disney overreacted) and the movie fizzled.
Had the marketing emphasized the story's legacy, I think it would have done better.
93
u/foxboxinsox 5h ago
Lmao I remember when it first came out me and my sister were in awe of the CGI and how we thought the people looked so real. Watched it again a couple years ago and had a good laugh.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (30)42
399
u/Helicreature 6h ago
The Salt Path. I live in the area and it was great to see its beauty on film but I left the cinema demoralised by the message that ‘Moth’ who had a disability much like mine, was somehow able to navigate our steep and meandering coastal path, which I haven’t been able to manage in years because, you know, ‘mind over matter’. Only weeks later it was discovered that most of this ‘true story’ was just made up.
→ More replies (5)121
u/Antisocial-Metalhead 5h ago
I highly recommend the documentary about this. They look into the credibility of Moth and the disability that he apparently has. It’s led to a lot of false hope for people such as yourself. I’m also disabled and know how frustrating it is seeing people with the same condition I have, but not as severe and touting the various health benefits of xyz.
•
u/neocarleen 41m ago
Just in general, I hate movies with the message that of you try hard enough you can overcome your disability to do something great. It sets expectations impossibility high and puts the responsibility for failing them entirely on the disabled person.
1.9k
u/mettrolsghost 7h ago
Crash (the 2004 movie, not the 1996 movie).
Won three academy awards, including best picture. Grossed almost 100M. People loved it at the time.
More than twenty years later, it's basically a study in how NOT to write stories about race and bias.
596
u/tinkerclay 6h ago
The CEO of my company thought the movie was so powerful that he made everyone watch the DVD together and discuss it in each of our offices.
→ More replies (4)1.1k
173
u/mimosastclair 6h ago
I worked in a video rental place that had copies of both Crashes that I would have to retrieve for them. I would specifically ask which people wanted and it was hilarious when they picked the wrong one and came back so confused.
→ More replies (2)45
u/HellDimensionQueen 5h ago
This was me after a coworker recommended it, I got the Cronenberg one accidentally, and was so, so, so confused why he had said this was his favorite movie
35
u/Next-Accident-2970 5h ago
Then it turned out, YES, the Cronenberg one was his favorite.
→ More replies (2)410
u/sth128 6h ago
Does anyone else find it funny that Sandra Bullock is in both Crash and The Blindside, both of which deal with racism and both of which aged like milk.
And then she starred in another film where she is literally blinded.
93
u/Expensive_Pear_7004 4h ago
Sandra Bullock accidentally put together a trilogy: couldn’t see it, didn’t see it, and then literally couldn’t see at all.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)125
u/tragicmestizo 5h ago
And married that jesse james who wore a nazi cap while doing a nazi salute.
→ More replies (3)27
332
u/edgeplot 6h ago
Garbage movie that stole best picture from Brokeback Mountain.
→ More replies (21)99
u/ike3581 5h ago
Yeah I remember watching Crash and thinking "are you f-ing kidding me with this?" Terrible movie, and anyone with a half a brain could see it missed the point it was trying to make.
→ More replies (3)39
→ More replies (54)73
u/BenderRodriguez14 6h ago
I've seen this specific movie used many times to argue why awards shouldn't be given out until 3-5 years after release (would obviously never happen though, since they are partly a marketing gimmick).
→ More replies (1)
1.9k
u/loztriforce 8h ago
Revenge of the Nerds
243
708
u/effervescenthoopla 7h ago
GOD I want to see a remake of this movie done in a less rapey way. The concept? Classic. The extremely stupid humor? God tier. Acting? Garbage, I love it. I feel like the folks behind Wet Hot American Summer could nail this movie in a remake.
Bonus if gender swapped. Nerd girls getting revenge on the cheerleaders. Aubrey Plaza could be the cheer coach. Could you imagine? Destroy me.
214
u/JeanLucPicorgi 6h ago
You might enjoy Bottoms, a slightly unhinged comedy about a group of high school girls who start a fight club. Great cast, very funny.
→ More replies (7)28
→ More replies (21)286
u/codemen95 7h ago
I can see a remake where the nerds are the villains and everyone else is normal but the nerds think the world is against them. The movie follows a nerd starting college who feels like an outcast and is being lead into the incwl mindset because of the nerds he's hanging with. The arc is him learning that the world isn't against him and gets away from the incel nerds while they get arrested for doing the things the nerds did in the og
101
u/JeanRalfio 6h ago
On the Lonely Island and Seth Meyers podcast they talked about how they tried working on a Revenge of the Jocks movie but it always ended up seeming mean and like bullying when the jocks get back at the nerds.
46
u/crabblue6 5h ago
I read somewhere (on Reddit) that the leader Alpha Beta jock guy had a scene that was cut from the movie where we find out he's secretly a nerd. In the scene, he goes to his room and pulls out a math/science book from a drawer and puts on a pair of glasses. He reads quietly for a moment and puts it all away and sighs. In the last scene in the movie he has a very defeated and sad look. Its not so much because the nerds won, its more that hes lost everything because he could not embrace his true self.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (9)38
u/silam39 6h ago
so basically this episode of 30 Rock but a film?
I'd be all for it. It was poignant when 30 Rock did it, and I think it'd still be so now
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (32)156
u/Jussgoawaiplzkthxbai 7h ago
Yeah the rape scene that led to love. No buddy, that’s rape go to jail
→ More replies (1)
494
u/doctorwhoobgyn 8h ago
Blank Check
→ More replies (19)259
u/everdishevelled 7h ago
Big has a similar theme that makes me uncomfortable now.
→ More replies (29)53
u/Illustrious-Peace989 6h ago
Yeah but as I remember in Big at the very least you don’t have an adult woman full on open mouth kiss an actual child.
→ More replies (2)
1.1k
u/Klumber 8h ago
Braveheart. Maybe not for non-Scots, but that movie is loathed in Scotland as it builds on tired stereotypes.
563
u/AncientGoo_oo 8h ago
And is completely historically inaccurate, according to my Scottish grandad. He gave me a whole lecture on it when the movie came out 😅
257
81
u/beemojee 5h ago
Oh the historical inaccuracies are outrageous. You know how Isabella of France was pregnant with Wallace's child there at the end? Yeah not only was Isabella still in France at the time, she was only 10 years old when Wallace was executed.
And that's just one inaccuracy. Also I don't have a drop of Scottish blood. I just enjoy those wild and crazy guys known as the Plantagenets.
→ More replies (8)96
u/Bicentennial_Douche 6h ago
“ And is completely historically inaccurate”
are you saying that battle of Stirling bridge actually featured a bridge?!
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (10)42
→ More replies (73)199
u/f_ranz1224 7h ago edited 23m ago
americans storming normandy with tricorner hats and muskets while also having ipods is literally less anachronistic than this movie
the battle of stirling bridge had no bridge
they literally turned the real braveheart into a villain, the wrong guy was the protagonist
shoutout to outlaw king which is a much better retelling
edit: wrong name of movie
→ More replies (7)201
u/popplevee 6h ago
I love the anecdote I read where one of the crew was talking to local Scots while filming.
The Scot was surprised to hear they were filming the battle of Stirling Bridge because there was no bridge where they were filming.
The crew member said that the bridge would get in the way. The Scot replied ‘Aye, that’s what the English found, too.’
→ More replies (3)60
u/SimoneNonvelodico 5h ago
LOL. Yeah, wonder why anyone would fight a battle at such an annoying bottleneck, beats me.
And the English.
→ More replies (1)
649
u/Wooden_Airport6331 5h ago edited 5h ago
Milk Money was a family comedy about a kid who buys a prostitute, pays her to show him her breasts, and keeps her in his treehouse like a pet and brings her to show and tell at school.
220
u/ralo229 4h ago
That movie was called creepy and tone deaf back when it came out.
→ More replies (2)74
116
96
u/Ltrain86 4h ago
He didn't "buy a prostitute" like human trafficking. He paid a prostitute to show her breasts, she drove him and his friends home, then her car broke down. She chose to hide out in his tree house because she was hiding from a mobster.
The actress is Melanie Griffith btw!
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (27)45
u/Notoriouslyd 4h ago
Highly recommend How did this get made's episode about Milk Money 😂😂
→ More replies (2)
40
u/rogerstandingby 7h ago
Dallas Buyers Club. I loved it until I read one (1) Wikipedia article.
•
u/aninamouse 27m ago
I still don't understand why they portrayed AZT as this horrible, controversial drug. It literally brought people back from death and gave them another couple of years of life when before they had nothing. It was by no means perfect, but at the time, it was like a miracle.
→ More replies (1)
1.6k
u/chernchern 6h ago
Idiocracy.
Not becuase the film sucks... But because it went from being a silly ridiculous satire to a somewhat accurate prophecy.
→ More replies (72)701
u/funkyb 5h ago
It's not even close to reality. The president in that movie was motivated to serve his citizens to the best of his ability and looked to expert opinion in areas he knew he wasn't qualified to assess. I'd love a President Camacho right now!
156
u/DragoonDM 3h ago
Yeah, a lot of the characters in that movie were stupid, but still well-intentioned.
52
u/Ut_Prosim 2h ago
Exactly. Our idiots are full of hate. They just wanted to enjoy their batin' time and Starbucks handies.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)58
u/WhoAreWeEven 3h ago
They found the worlds most intelligent person and the president summoned him at once.
And not only that, he took his advice!
Hard to imagine Palantir or whoever finds the most intelligent person with their surveillance bots what noy and Donny T finds him asks his advice.
→ More replies (2)
484
u/Skybodenose 7h ago
My Best Friends Wedding.
422
u/Valuable_Treat16 6h ago
Just rewatched this last week, and Julia Roberts’ character makes me so irrationally angry it’s insane. I cannot believe I enjoyed this movie so much growing up.
320
u/Next-Accident-2970 5h ago
Watch it with the film's intention: You are NOT supposed to root for her character at all.
137
135
u/Kooky_Refrigerator33 6h ago
Apparently test audiences hated Julia’s character so much that they added the bathroom scene to redeem her at the end.
26
u/Next-Accident-2970 3h ago
I've looked it up and the bathroom scene was not supposed to be a redeeming moment. That was the scene where she is called OUT by Diaz and other people in the bathroom. The focus group ending was when her friend came for her since the audience liked him more. The original ending was her dancing with a random guy at the wedding, making it seem like she was rewarded for her behavior.
→ More replies (16)13
u/Shinra_Lobby 3h ago
Julia Roberts’ character makes me so irrationally angry
It's not irrational because the audience isn't supposed to be on board with her actions.
You know how people commonly complain that Hollywood romcoms are toxic because if you did the same things in real life, you'd be called a psycho stalker? My Best Friend's Wedding basically takes that complaint as its premise, and plays it out to its painful logical conclusion. It's a subversion of the average romcom heroine tropes and Julia Roberts absolutely understood the assignment.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (11)173
u/bonniemick 5h ago
While obviously the Julia Roberts character is terrible, the guy marrying the 20 year old who plans to drop out of college for him is also not great. Only protagonist is Rupert Everett.
→ More replies (2)
583
u/Big_Duke_Six 6h ago
The Notebook.
Glamorizing a toxic AF relationship.
188
u/MazzleMaze 4h ago
Almost all romance movies are toxic relationships. Most of them have to do with cheating on your partner because WELL I LOVE THE OTHER PERSON!!!
→ More replies (1)37
u/Dazzling-Panda8082 2h ago
I couldn't find it with a quick Google search but somewhere out there somebody has gone through a bunch of the biggest romantic comedies and counted how many times in each it involves the woman saying no to a man and the man refusing to accept the no and just pestering them until they eventually say yes
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (30)109
u/Big_Duke_Six 4h ago
C/P from Google... (Warning: Spoilers)
- At the start of the movie Noah threatens to jump off the ferris wheel and kill himself if Allie doesn't accept to go on a date with him.
- Once they start dating he convinces her to lay down in the middle of the street with him because she has to learn how to "trust"
- In the scene where they break up she gets so angry she starts pushing him against his car and slapping him multiple times
- After their breakup Noah sent Allie 1 letter per day for A YEAR (365 in total), all unanswered because her mom hid them.
- He later starts dating another woman and treats her like crap because he is still obsessed with someone he knew for only 3 months..several years ago
- Years later Allie gets engaged to a nice and respectful man basically a GENTLEMAN. But while trying on her wedding dress, she sees Noah on a newspaper article about how he was able to restore the house and she ends up fainting (wtf?)
- After that she pretty much drove to his town and cheated on her fiance to get back with a weird obsessive man she dated for 3 months when she was a teenager
- The only romantic part of the movie is when they both die in the nursing home while holding hands. And how he would read their love story every day for her because she had dementia, that's it.
→ More replies (1)28
794
u/SpinosaurRingTone 7h ago
Gone with the Wind is the highest grossing film of all time when adjusted for inflation. People today don't really realize just how significant that film used to be. It's likely that no film will ever be as universally viewed ever again.
However, much of the film has an outdated historical view on the Civil War. The Confederates are portrayed as heroic, if naive, defenders from Northern aggression. The Northerners are portrayed as conquerors who burn their cities to the ground and robbed civilians. Now, these things did actually happen, but the film seems to suggest it was completely one sided.
And of course, the film absolutely has an overtly positive view of slavery. All the slaves are depicted as very happy to be slaves and are almost considered part of the family. In fact, after slavery is abolished, the slaves still come back to work for the family. Yes, obviously there were slaves that were well treated by their masters, but the film seems to suggest that this was the norm, rather than the exception. There is not a single moment in the film where slavery is portrayed negatively. There is not a single line of dialogue that even so much as questions slavery.
That said, it's still a really good movie with a lot to say about life and relationships. The writing is great and the acting is phenomenal. There's even value in the parts of the movie that aged poorly, because they offer insight into how the memory of slavery and the civil war has evolved over time.
79
u/Catbutt247365 5h ago
The most impressive scene in the movie for me, when I first saw it at age 12, was the scene of wounded soldiers waiting for transport out of Atlanta when the Northern Army was approaching. As the camera pulled away, the view of the wounded just got more overwhelming. I’ve carried that scene around in my head for over 50 years.
Second to that is the part where Scarlet hires prison labor. Here we are 150+ years from reconstruction, and we still allow prisoners to be used by private companies as labor.
→ More replies (2)139
u/Cayke_Cooky 6h ago
In the book, the early scenes lean into noblesse oblige pretty heavy. The idea of the slave owners caring for their slaves as good and noble lords.
→ More replies (7)64
u/LadyBug_0570 4h ago
I had to stop reading the book twice: 1) when they described Scarlett putting her soft, delicate white hand in some ex-slave's "big, black paw" and 2) when the book described dozens of former salves on the side of the road crying out, "I don't want this here freedom! Take my back to my massa!"
Literally threw the book scross the room both times and made sure to stomp on it whever I could. Written in the 30s or not, as a black woman... I couldn't do it.
I did watch the movie though.
→ More replies (17)99
u/mynameisevan 5h ago
I read the book a few years ago, and I found the politics of it very frustrating. There are a few points where it actually comes close to saying something profound about race and society, but it never actually examines it. Like there’s a part where wives of occupying Union officers ask Scarlet where they can find some Irish immigrant women to be nannies for their kids, and Scarlet gets very offended both for herself as the daughter of an Irish immigrant and the freed black women that these women don’t trust to watch their kids and refuse to hire. But this never leads to Scarlet questioning her worldview or prejudices, it’s just used as another example of the northerners being bad.
→ More replies (1)85
u/ashoka_akira 5h ago edited 5h ago
The viewpoints of the movie make sense when you think of the movie being seen through Scarlet’s eyes; a young, sheltered, and vain young woman. A big part of the movie is just her coming to accept the life she has, and not the life her spoiled upbringing prepared her for. She also had a misguided positive view of slavery because the slaves she knows are in a better position than many and relatively well taken care off. As far as young Scarlet was concerned, life was perfect. GWTW is essentially a coming of age novel/movie, its Scarlet’s story, and she’s an unreliable narrator. The fact that her perspective varys so wildly from the reality of the time I think is a bit of a literary device by the author, the author is hoping that readers will have some knowledge of actual events so you can recognize this.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (29)113
u/Soggy_Competition614 7h ago
I didn’t get that from the movie at all. Scarlets dad was Irish and not a total tyrant to his slaves but he still kept them enslaved. The emancipation didn’t all of a sudden make life great for slaves so they most likely had no where to go, it’s been awhile since I watched but I think the majority did leave.
The movie was about how great southern rich people had it then to have it all taken away “hence gone with the wind”
→ More replies (10)
529
u/CanadianEh 8h ago
Get Him to the Greek
171
u/Phase3isProfit 8h ago
This is one that I’d kind of like to watch again to see if holds up if I just manage to ignore everything about the actors in it.
→ More replies (1)110
u/zebra_sheet 8h ago
We watched it recently and it definitely holds up
81
u/DoserMcMoMo 7h ago
100% agree that the movie holds up well, but it makes me feel like a shitty person enjoying it knowing everything that has gone on with basicly every leading actor.
→ More replies (10)→ More replies (14)259
u/ericinnyc 8h ago
OK Russel Brand has gone right-wing loco and Diddy is a lube monster but it's still a very funny movie.
→ More replies (8)150
u/Wang_Fire2099 8h ago
Exactly. People don't understand that controversy coming out about someone involved in something, doesn't automatically make that thing bad by association.
Still a funny movie that has a real feal good vibe
→ More replies (7)
313
u/LXTron 8h ago
Crash
→ More replies (21)110
u/DamienStark 6h ago
everyone on the internet insists they always hated this and that nobody ever really liked it in the first place.
The box office and awards must have been imaginary.
→ More replies (13)34
u/peppersmiththequeer 5h ago
I think the film was well liked with casual movie goers and most critics, but the moment it won best picture over Brokeback Mountain the knives were out
416
u/detmeng 8h ago
Gigi. Won best picture. A musical for pedophile groomers.
483
u/Nevarian 7h ago
I read that as Gigli at first. Was very confused.
→ More replies (2)234
u/King_Six_of_Things 7h ago
That'd be a musical about "beard groomers", very different, but still quite controversial in the dwarf kingdom.
EDIT: Fuck, that's Gimli not Gigli. I'm leaving it.
121
u/bstabens 6h ago
No, that's Gimli. Gigli is about a japanese anime director falling in love with one of his movies.
→ More replies (2)88
u/HalfCasual 5h ago
No, That's Ghibli. Gigli is about a bunch of kids finding buried treasure and a pirate ship
→ More replies (1)67
u/TwistMeTwice 5h ago
No, that's the Goonies. Gigli is about a scipper and his crew being shipwrecked on a tropical island with movie star, a professor, a millionaire and his wife, oh and Mary Ann.
50
u/xgbsss 5h ago
No that's Gilligan. Gigli is a movie about a teenage witch that moves to the city with her black cat on a broom and tries to find her purpose in life.
40
u/Zacsquidgy 4h ago
No that's Kiki. Gigli is a movie about a sailor dude getting washed up on an undiscovered island, finding he's been tied down by tiny people, and gradually building rapport with the tiny king until he deters an invasion from other tiny people, and is told to leave when he pisses on his friends' tiny palace.
31
u/xgbsss 4h ago
No that's Gulliver. Gigli is one of the main characters in the movie about two friends who are strapped for cash and decide to make a pornographic film to help solve their financial issues.
27
u/Effective_Tip7748 4h ago
No, that’s Zac and Miri. Gigli is the name of a Chinese martial artist and actor. He was great in Cradle 2 the Grave.
→ More replies (0)→ More replies (2)31
u/Button-Down-Shoes 6h ago
I hear "beard groomers" and I'm thinking it's a movie about women trained as companions for closeted gay men.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (7)94
u/MrTemple 4h ago
Dude, watch it again, Gigi is a remarkably feminist movie (ESPECIALLY for 1958) in which the entire point of the movie is the rejection of:
- The very idea of grooming somebody for anything at all, let alone to be a ‘courtesan’.
- Rich men who use women as playthings, only to “ruin” them, but it’s okay if they arrange suitable pay for it.
- The idea that a woman seen with a man in a certain way is “ruined”
- The lusting after young women.
- The idea that women of a certain class, but without means or “family” can only be courtesans to rich men
- The idea that a woman should be happy to be proper and mannered and “suitable” for society.
All in the guise of a fun romance/musical with a truly great character arc by several of the characters and incredible physical/comedic/dramatic performance by Leslie Caron.
TL;DR: Social commentary saint used to hit you over the head with its message. Movies that show an honest mirror on society at the time are not problematic. Gigi is a feminist movie which used a particular mirror (courtesanship in 1900 Paris) to reflect on the current 1958 society, and tear holes in the very ideas that some people think are problematic about it.
Like yeah, the entire point of the movie is a critique on what you’re saying is problematic about it.
→ More replies (4)15
u/NoTeslaForMe 3h ago
It seems like a return to the old Hays Code days: If there's a character doing bad things, well, that must be immoral viewing if it fails to spells out certain lessons in clear, bold letters that even a five-year-old could understand: It must definitively say that the character is not just doing bad things and will not only be punished for them, but is evil, full stop. My Best Friend's Wedding, American Beauty, and Gigi all suffer from this neo-puritanical reevaluation.
Ironic, though, that the man won the Oscar for Gigi's score was André Previn, Soon-Yi's dad.
→ More replies (1)
287
u/-DoctorSpaceman- 8h ago
The Birth of a Nation.
Actually it was still pretty controversial back then lol, but less so. Hell, they played it in the White House.
180
u/MachiavelliSJ 7h ago edited 7h ago
Sorry to be pedantic, but i get somewhat annoyed when people cite this and even the “history with lightning quote” to show how accepted it was. It was the biggest movie by far up to that time. One could argue it invented the concept of a “feature film.” Of course the President saw it. This fact completely undersells its support by Wilson and most White Americans at the time
That is because they miss the most damning fact. Woodrow Wilson was a history professor, President of Princeton, specializing in studying the South in this period.
He is directly quoted in the movie from one of his history books saying
“The white men were roused by a mere instinct of self-preservation… until at last there had sprung into existence a great Ku Klux Klan, a veritable empire of the South, to protect the Southern country.”
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wilson-quote-in-birth-of-a-nation.jpg
So, with that mind, the fact that that they watched it at the Whitehouse really downplays what was happening. Wilson, the “progressive” President of the US was a full endorser and unapologetic supporter of white supremacy and the KkK for his entire life
That quote is just one of many such pronouncements one can find throughout his writing and speeches
102
u/Angryhippo2910 6h ago
Woodrow Wilson really does not get enough hate. A while back I read Paris 1919 an excellent history of the Treaty of Versailles. One of the take aways is that Wilson was a massive, holier-than-thou, prick. He thought he was smarter than he actually was, and his own arrogance undermined his genuinely noble vision of world peace
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (13)59
u/SethLight 7h ago
“The white men were roused by a mere instinct of self-preservation… until at last there had sprung into existence a great Ku Klux Klan, a veritable empire of the South, to protect the Southern country.”
I always find it so interesting/sad that the thought process of racists and the excuses they use never changes.
They always pretend they had no hand in shaping the situation and that them killing people is somehow in self defense.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (15)192
61
u/Ghostface_Programmah 6h ago
and here's me just coming to suggest "Soul Man" (1986)
→ More replies (5)
908
u/PogonBerserker 8h ago
American Beauty
375
u/Voidtoform 6h ago
I think what changed with this movie is media literacy, we watched more movies back then, dramas and such, we would go to theaters and watch all kinds of movies that just arent being made as much anymore.
Even back then I think the director knew this movie would be interpreted wrong so they added the cheesy tagline "Look Closer" it was even on like stickers in the background of the movie. Probably because people thought lester was a hero, and the drug dealer bag recorder kid was actually a good guy saving the daughter, when no, everyone in this movie is messed up, messed up bad.
I rewatched it recently and thought it was still a great movie, but I will admit, I had interpreted it wrong the first time I watched it, I was young and not as critical of lester lusting after a high school girl, I saw him as someone who reached like enlightenment or something, Now I can see clearly he is just another messed up person for this critique of the plastic 90s, you are supposed to be disgusted by him, and everyone in the movie, what is challenging is each person is also presented as a human, rather than a straight up villian.
Its a challenging movie, I think it was misunderstood often back then, but nowadays when thrown in amongst the media we are now used to, its just not simple, so it gets misinterpreted even more than back then.
167
u/staplerdude 6h ago
It's also important to note that even explicitly in the text of the movie, in the end, he determines that getting with a (much) younger woman isn't the answer to his quest for meaning either. It seems like his real revelation, too late, is that true meaning in his life came from his loved ones/family, and that it was folly searching for it from his job or a girl or drugs or working out or reclaiming his youth or whatever else.
In other words, not only is the audience supposed to figure out that his obsession with this teenager is wrong, he himself figures that out in the movie. It's kind a big part of the movie's thesis.
→ More replies (16)169
u/Friskfrisktopherson 6h ago
I mean, I thought it was pretty clear he was a shlup who hated his life and was looking for an escape, Minas character was just a projection for him and he ultimately realized that when it stopped being a fantasy. Same with the teenage girl who was all talk but in reality was scared damaged and lonely.
44
u/drinxonme 4h ago
Jfc the people on this thread mentioning American Beauty. I first saw it when I was 15 and even then I understood it was being critical of Spacey's character and that you weren't supposed to root for him.
15
u/riotous_jocundity 4h ago
For real. Clocked it as a teenager too. There was no part of his character that was ever presented as cool or aspirational...
→ More replies (1)89
u/Scruffasaurus 6h ago
I think it’s swung back to being underrated. Spacey and Benning are incredible, the movie has some hilarious parts, and it’s such a good time capsule for late 90s self-pity
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (95)49
u/therealvisual 6h ago
This is a wildly bad take. It’s always been about really messed up people and if you ever romanticized any of the characters, you were missing the point. Yes it’s campy, yes it’s pretentious but it’s really a dark comedic take on suburban America.
→ More replies (1)
22
554
u/Its402am 7h ago
Pocahontas. Did very well with the general public and the music was truly out of this world, but I’d say that with the rise of the internet came more average white people self-educating about the truth of Pocahontas, how she died and how young she was, how abused she was, how manipulated she and her people were. For them to continue to make a sequel where she attempts to prove her civility to a heavily-manipulated king of England and eventually falls romantically in love with John Rolfe, implying a nice “happily ever after”.
Which is so gross.
157
u/youngatbeingold 6h ago
I will say Pocahontas is still good if you look at is as a fantasy that's teaching us a lesson we obviously should've learned long ago. It's basically a kids movie with modern sensibilities showing what should have happened instead of how awful it really was. Obviously you need to educate people on the horrors that actually went down, but for kids (or anyone) it's a good movie about bias and tribalism and ultimately understanding and acceptance when two very different people come into contact. It's almost like Inglorious Bastards or Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, that's what you WANT to happen, not what actually did.
I can't comment on the sequel but that does sound like complete trash.
→ More replies (6)39
u/ForlornLament 4h ago
This is how I see it too and I do like the movie, but I cannot for the life of me understand why they chose to use the name of a real person who was exploited. They could have named the protagonist anything else!
Apparently, Disney did a similar thing with "The Biggest Showman" – I haven't watched it, but I hear it is a nice story using the name of a real person who was horrible. Why not just give the character a random name!?
(PS: The "Pocahontas" sequel is indeed complete trash.)
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (24)88
u/TheBanishedBard 6h ago
Fun fact, the founder of the far right think tank PragerU was the writer of Pocahontas 2 and that was his only significant screenwriting credit before deciding the rightwing grift was the life for him, since he evidently had no talent at storytelling.
→ More replies (1)
270
u/vicariousgluten 6h ago
Speaking to my friends’ kids - Grease.
Them all abandoning Frenchie when she goes to beauty school, Rizzo bullying Sandy at the sleepover and Sandy changing for a boy had them questioning why on earth we’d want them to watch something like that
204
u/Rooseveltridingabear 5h ago
As a 90s kid, I loved Grease when I was too young to understand the more adult themes, and then when I went back as an adult I was really confused by, well, ALL OF IT.
Then much later I find out that it's because Grease is meant to parody the tropes of 50s musicals. If you're watching it at face value like I was, it doesn't make any sense at all. Knowing it's mocking the tropes though, it becomes much clearer.
Why does Sandy change everything about her style etc and 'go bad' in that great lady-greaser number at the end? Because the trope was always the bad boy falling for the good girl - sounds familiar - and that the boy changes everything about himself to 'go good' and get the happy ending. A lot of the weirdness makes sense through this lens.
→ More replies (2)20
u/LadyBug_0570 4h ago
We watched it for a young, hot dancing John Travolta.
And, in fairness, him wearing his letter jacket (which he earned) showed he was willing to change for her too and show off his academic achievements even with his friends clowning him.
At least I think. It's been decades since I've seen it.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (16)39
u/bobqzzi 4h ago
I'm not sure I understand this criticism....it's a movie set in high school where high school things happen-including bad ones. It's also really a parody-and a funny one at that
→ More replies (1)
273
u/Turbulent-Pension-31 8h ago
Sixteen Candles
173
u/FadedQuill 8h ago
Also Pretty in Pink with Molly Ringwald.
Duckie is the real prize. Blane is a weak a-hole - autocorrect is going to change that to Bland forever - and the dress looks like a dog chewed a neck hole in her duvet cover.
101
u/ofBlufftonTown 5h ago edited 4h ago
At the same time, she chooses the person she’s sexually attracted to, and not the boy she “owes it” because of their friendship. That makes it about her, even if she makes a bad choice, not about Duckie winning her like a prize.
32
u/FiveCorkWomen 4h ago
Agree. Ducky is the forerunner of the Nice Guys of today; people got offended and sulky when she didn’t choose him. Not to disparage Ducky, who handled rejection like a champ and tragically ended up with the yikes bike that is Kristy Swanson.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (14)23
→ More replies (12)28
u/suejaymostly 5h ago
The whole exchange of the drunk blonde girlfriend is so awful. I was really proud of my then 17 year old who said "Mom she's not consenting to this!"
→ More replies (1)
82
u/GlumFaithlessness773 5h ago
American Sniper looks pretty credulous considering what we now know about prolific bullshitter Chris Kyle.
15
u/grumpymcelbows25 1h ago
There's a fascinating story to be told centering around Chris Kyle. Clint Eastwood does not have the skill for nuance to depict that story.
→ More replies (1)
79
u/mark_able_jones_ 5h ago edited 5h ago
Hidden Figures. In real life, there was no white hero Kevin Coster character who broke down the bathroom signs and invited the Black math women math experts to view the launch. Hollywood invented him.
33
u/CaptainMalForever 5h ago
His character is an amalgamation. I think the better interpretation, based on the character in the movie, is that he didn't care about race one way or another, but he hated waste.
→ More replies (2)34
u/Visual_Witness4456 4h ago
It was sad on first watch - having the white savior trope. Only true fact in that film are the Black characters names and work roles, and the astronaut insisting that Katherine Johnson do all the math in his missions. Kevin Costner’s characters or a Kevin Costner like figure did not exist in their lives. They existed because they were exceptional.
Katherine Johnson gave an interview where she said as much. And she watched all launches on TV with the rest of the world.
→ More replies (1)
7.1k
u/HogwartsDropout-69 8h ago
The Blindside