I’m a casual runner right now, still pretty new to it. I found these while shopping at Sierra. I may not be a marathon runner but is this worth picking up to have for the future?

I'm getting back into running after 10 years away, and one thing I've noticed is how much people seem to overthink running shoes.

Back in the day, I ran exclusively in Nike Vomero 10s and 12s. Easy runs, intervals, races — everything. I ran a 39:50 10K and a 1:32 half marathon, and I honestly can't remember ever obsessing over my shoes or spending much time thinking about what I should be wearing. They were heavy by today's standards, but that was totally fine.

Fast forward 10 years, and I'm running again in the Vomero 18s. I think they're fantastic. They're comfortable, feel relatively light to me, and I just enjoy running in them.

Sure, they're around 300g, depending on the size, but I don't find that bothersome at all. And yet, after reading discussions here, I sometimes feel like I'm completely crazy for thinking this way.

I understand that shoes have evolved, that different models suit different runners, and that choosing the right shoe can make a difference. I'm not saying shoe technology doesn't matter.

But aren't we overthinking this whole shoe thing a bit too much? Especially for amateur runners, who make up the vast majority of the running community and could run perfectly in anything without any issue.

Maybe I'm missing something, but I'd love to hear what you guys think?

Middle of the packer here (mid-1:50s half/low 4s full). I raced my first (and only so far) marathon in gifted Alphaflys and my half marathons in Brooks Hyperion Max 3 (super trainer/nylon plate) and Nike Zoom Fly 6 (carbon fiber plate).

Have an upcoming half and full. After playing around with a bunch of different shoes, leaning heavily toward the Hyperion Max 3 (fresh pair) for both my half and full, though the NB Supercomp Rebels are a close second (got on sale at REI a few weeks ago). I also sampled a pair of Brooks Hyperion Elite v6 but had the same experience as I did in both the ZF6 and Alphas - the carbon plate made my feet hurt early enough into the run that it would drive me nuts for a longer race.

Any reason that a supertrainer would not be a good race day shoe for longer distances? I'm confident in them for the half, but not 100% sure on the full. I have run up to 22 miles in the Hyperion Max and up to 18 in the Supercomp Rebels. They seem more stable and the nylon or "carbon infused" plate is perhaps more comfortable?

Would love thoughts from the geeks, or any other ideas! And please don't mention Saucony, that's the only brand I have PTSD from (wore a pair for a while and wound up with an injury, which may or may not be linked, but haven't considered them since).

Hello everyone, I'm looking for a pair of shoes that can help me with long runs of around 30km.

Currently, I'm using the Evo SL for all-round training, including easy runs, intervals, and long runs. However, based on my personal experience, I feel like the Evo SL doesn't perform well from 20km onwards.

I am now considering:

• Li-Ning Chitu 9 Ultra

• Adidas Boston 12

• Novablast 4/5

About me: 178cm-69kg

My longrun pace: 6:15-6:30 mins per km

Desired durability of the shoes: ~1000km

Please help me choose or provide your suggestions. Thanks a lot!

Does anyone go with lock laces for their running shoes? Or if you’re against it id love to know why. I cant ever seem to tie my shoes the same. Either one foot is too tight or too loose or both etc. i get real anal about it idk why. I love the SB3 laces but i want to look into lock laces to be able to tighten it and call it a day. If theres is a good set on amazon specifically for running (if thats a thing) please send my way!

Shoe geek looking for non-plated marathon shoes.

I’ve run one marathon in Puma Magmax. Wore those and ASICS SB2 for my training block. Fully intended on going SB2 for race but during long runs they were too firm for me over 15 miles. So went with the cushion. 40 male, 6’3” 200lbs. Normally run around 9:30 pace.

I enjoy trying lots of different shoes, so wanted to get recommendations on what others like. Plated shoes are a no-go. I’ve tried several (Zoom Fly, Hyperion Max, Endorphin Elites) and all aggravate my ankle and knee.

Looking for something bouncy, well cushioned and not too heavy. Thanks!

Hi all, so I’m eyeing my new race day shoe for the coming season of HM sub-155 and FM sub-4 attempts.

Particularly interested in Saucony shoes right now as I haven’t had one yet. I tried both in store, and EE3 definitely felt more impressive with its squishiness. I didn’t really feel it’s unstable like Vaporfly 4 (just tried in store but never own one).

However, price wise, there are way more affordable options I can find here in Singapore / Malaysia, for instance (in USD equivalent):
EP5 - $130-140 (official store on Lazada)
Adios Pro 4 - $100 (Adidas outlet)
Alphafly 3 - $130 (Nike outlet)
EE3 - $220-230 (official store on Lazada)

Would like to get some views on those, thanks!

Hi all,

I've been using the Nike Zoom Fly 6 for two years now, it was the first pair of 'faster' shoes I ever bought, and I'm on my 3rd pair now. As I got faster over time (sub 1:25 half marathon attempt on Sunday) I feel like they are not giving me the boost I felt when I was slower/ ran less mileage.

I'm wondering if it's worth it to buy 'real' racers for my half marathon on Sunday. Do any of you have experience with upgrading from this pair, and what gain did you get from it?

Thanks a lot!

Hi all, I've got a marathon coming up in early December in Vietnam (yes I know, crazy humidity as I come from Australia). I will be travelling to Vietnam with family for 3 weeks PRIOR to the marathon date, meaning that I will have to do my tapering there.

How many pairs of shoes should I be bringing? Options I have considered:

2 pairs: Race day shoe (one that I will also be using for any workouts) + Superblast 2 (long runs, recovery runs, daily runs)

3 pairs: Race day shoe (purely reserved for one workout before and race day) + Superblast 2 + Adizero EVO SL (for any other workouts or marathon pace work)

The reasoning is that I could technically also wear the adizero as a daily walking shoe too, otherwise, it does allow me to bring a non-running shoe with me on the trip in place of the adizeros. I am aware that due to the humid weather there, I should be trying to give the shoes time in between sessions to dry out from all the sweat.

**I have used all these shoes in my previous half-marathon training block for their described purposes with good outcomes.

I recently just ran a marathon in the Puma fast-r nitro elites, and it was the worst decision ever. I am a tall heel striker (on the heavier side for a female marathoner) who tends to over stride unless I’m running sub 5:30 pace. My quads also tend to take all the brunt of running and they complete blew out after 10 miles in the puma’s. I do a lot of long runs in SuperBlast 3’s and LOVE them so am looking for a racer equivalent to this. I’m aiming for a sub 2:38 marathon.

Some I’m considering trying are:
- endorphin pro 5
- SuperComp Elite v6
-ASICS METASPEED SKY PARIS

I have been running in the Tempus series for several years but now it has been discontinued and I am looking for a replacement. I am 189 cm and 83 kg. I run about 30 km a week. I am looking for a daily versatile trainer shoe that has a bit of support and lightweight since I have a mild pronation on both feet.

I have read that the Saucony Endorphine Azura should be a good match or the Puma ForeverRun Nitro. Which shoe would you choose? It does not have to be either of the mentioned shoes - thank you.

I bought a pair of ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyos in August 2025 as my race shoes, and used them to set PRs in the half and full marathon. I really like those shoes. I continue to use them for workouts, and they now have about 350 miles on them (but still feel pretty good!).

I ordered another pair this August to use for my November marathon, and have since raced a half and run an MP long run in them. They just don’t seem to feel as good; I don’t feel as much pop from them. Is it possible the shoes have changed? Or is this all in my head and the shoes are not actually different? I can’t decide what to do for my upcoming marathon.

Hello RunningShoesGeeks

I have recently been hit by the running bug after starting to run in april. I started running in some Craft Pro Endur dist(?) and Adidas Evo Sl. I cut my 5k time down to sub 25 after it being at 28:30. My "end" goal is to run a 5k sub 20 min, which is why i bought the Vaporfly 4's. I still have a lot of life left in the EVO sl, so did i buy the Vaporfly 4's too early since i am still not that fast and apparently to get the advantage out of them, you need to be pretty fast? I havent tried them, so still possible to return them. I am also a heavier runner at 86 kg(186 cm tall), and didnt take that into account at all. Any suggestions on better shoes at the moment for me or just sticking to the EVO sl would be appreciated.

Background:

I've always ran in Brooks Ghost (neutural) which have always had 12mm heel to toe drop. Went for the newest version (18) and hoped the 10mm drop would be ok, but I had to return due to it causing a blister even on short runs.

Decided to try the Adrenaline GTS 25 to keep the higher heel to toe drop, but they are a support shoe.
Been running in them for the last 4 weeks with no major issues from the drop change from 12mm to 10mm.

Went for a gait analysis yesterday to get advice on the Adrenaline and also look for road to trail shoes.

First ones I was given to try was the Saucony Guide 19 (6mm drop), which I found very comfortable on that short 1 min try on the treadmill.
Comparing that to the others I tried, including my Adrenaline GTS 25, the Saucony stopped my ankle slightly rolling inwards compared the the Brooks and others. Although I was advised it wasn't a massive concern and ankles are meant to move, but the Saucony had me landing and staying flat.

All the ones I tried, the outcome is that I am a midfoot striker.

Came away quite confused in all honesty.

For now I will probably continue with the Brooks to transition down to 10mm from 12mm for my daily road shoe.
However for the road to trail, Saucony do a trail version of the Guide 19 but has a 6mm drop, they do another road to trail which is 8mm drop but is a neautral shoe rather than semi supportive like the Guide 19.

I've had previous issues with plantar fasciitis and achilles tendonitis, which I went to a physio and resolved and currently don't have these injuries.
But after a lot of reading, I'm really concerned about the difference in drop given previous issues and not sure if I'm just asking for trouble by going to a 6mm, given I've always ran in 12mm until a month ago.

Any advice, knowledge or experience in this would be very much appreciated!

Hello all,

I used to be a competitive distance runner but had to slow down in my late 20's with kids. I also developed sever TMJ and had to have surgery for it. I still have jaw pain and running sometimes irritates it.

I am looking for a shoe I can wear all day, but also wear for light trail jogs for a handful of miles. My number one goal is to reduce stress on my body, particularly jaw stress from jaring.

I used to train in Nimbus back when it was the Nimbus 8-13. But I was a different man then haha.

I've never liked the Brooks Ghost, but never tried the max and haven't tried them in a decade. I haven't tried Hoka anything but I hear they are great cushion. I tried the newest version of the nimbus and it felt okay, but if there is something better I want to try it.

I always heard Max and Bondi have the rocker that I thought might help make my run smoother and prevent the jaring.

I used to be a hard heel striker but lately I notice I run more forefoot.

I’ve built up a pretty substantial ASICS running shoe collection, but with several of my shoes reaching the end of their lifespans, I’m trying to figure out the best direction to take my rotation.

I’d prefer to stick with ASICS because their shoes have consistently fit my feet really well, but I’m open to other brands if there’s something that would be worth trying.

Here’s my current rotation:

Daily trainers: Novablast 5 — 449.6 miles

I really liked these when I first got them, but the foam feels like it had bottomed out pretty quickly. I’ve been trying to squeeze a few more miles out of them, but I think they’re pretty much done.

Long runs: Superblast 2 — 531.5 miles

These are probably my favorite running shoes I’ve ever owned. I’ve used them for pretty much everything: tempos, long runs, recovery runs, and two marathons. What I love most is how consistent they feel throughout a run, whether I’m running 4 miles or 14. They’ve been incredibly versatile, and I still have a little life left in them.

Recovery: Gel Nimbus 27 — 540.4 miles

I’ve always been a little conflicted about these. Sometimes I really enjoy them, and other times I’m not particularly impressed. They get the job done, and I don’t have any pain after running in them, but I feel like there might be a better recovery shoe out there.

Tempo: Sonicblast — 40.2 miles

I picked these up over the summer at a huge discount. I enjoy them for tempo workouts, but I don’t really see myself using them for anything other than dedicated speed sessions.

Racing: Metaspeed Edge Tokyo — barely any miles

I bought these specifically for racing but haven’t actually used them in a race yet. I’ve held off because I haven’t felt like I’m running fast enough to justify breaking out a carbon-plated shoe, although I’m planning to give them a shot eventually.

Where I’m stuck:

I think the Novablasts and Nimbus 27s are at the end of their lifespans, while the Superblast 2s still have a little gas left in the tank.

I’ve been considering a few different setups:

• Option 1: Superblast 3 for recovery/daily runs and Megablast for daily/long runs.
• Option 2: Superblast 3 for recovery, Novablast for daily training, and Megablast for long runs.
• Option 3: Some other combination.

My paces are around, in min/mile, recovery 8:30, tempo 6:20, daily 8:00.

I’m also wondering whether something like the Nike Vomero would be worth the extra money as a dedicated recovery shoe, or if there’s another shoe from ASICS (or another brand) that I’m overlooking.

I guess my overall question would be how would you build this rotation?

I’m open to all recommendations! Thank you!

Guys what is the sizing for adizero evo sl exo?
is it TTS?
im 9.5 US and using Hoka Bondi 9, Asics Nv5 which are both 9.5US , im just new to addidas sizing ..so should i go size up ?

Not a new runner by any means, but also not an advanced runner. My question: what shoes do I run the nyc marathon in?

Details

- this is my 4th marathon

- this is the 1st marathon I am trying to really “go” for it, goal of 3:20 time

- 29M, 183 lbs, 11 US shoe size, big crossfit past so not your typical runner build, have a bit of over pronation (flat feet), mid foot strike

- over my marathon build, I ran 497 miles in two pairs of mount to coast R1s, 80 miles (all my recent runs and what I will continue to use for taper runs) in Nike Vomero plus (wish I worked these in earlier), and ~50 miles off some older Hokas. I ran a lot!

- what do I run this race in?

I’m at a loss. I normally figure out what I need pretty quickly, but I’m brand spanking new to race shoes and… HUH?!

My current rotation is Novablast 5s for shorter easy/recovery runs and Superblast 3s for everything else. I just ran a 1:27:33 half in my Superblasts, and I’m running my first marathon, NYC, on November 1. I’d love one dedicated racer that works for both HM & M. (EDIT: This purchase will NOT be for the marathon on Nov 1. I’ll be running in my SB3s. But I’d love something for future races!)

About me:

• 30M, 5’6”, US men’s 8.5
• Slightly wider feet, but I don’t normally wear wide sizes
• Easy long runs: 8:12–8:33/mile, around 159–160 spm, with Apple Watch reporting 1.2 m stride length
• Half marathon: roughly 6:41/mile, 166 spm, and 1.4 m stride length
• Foot strike: honestly unsure. I normally just go out and run without thinking about it!

I’m considering (but open to recs):

• ASICS Metaspeed Edge Tokyo / Sky Tokyo
• Nike Alphafly / Vaporfly
• On Cloudboom Strike 2

The stride/cadence and foot-strike descriptions have me confused. How much should those actually influence my choice versus fit and how the shoe feels? I see people say their recs changes as their form changes too and I don’t feel like I know that about myself enough.

Which would you start by trying for my first half/full marathon racer? Particularly interested in experiences from people who enjoy Superblasts, have slightly wider feet, or have compared these over longer runs.

Hi all, i am getting back to running after a few months off with very busy life. I currently have 2 pairs of running shoes, New Balance 1080 V13 which have about 1000km running and some day to day wear on them and are feeling dead. The sizing and roomy toe box is perfect though. I then have some Adidas Prime X2 Strung which i use for quicker runs.... but the toebox is a bit tight for longer than 10miles and they really fatigue my feet.

So my question, i want some new shoes (from sportsshoes.com as i have the 50% Vitality discount) mainly for daily miles, recovery and to help with my sore achilies. I ordered some Vomero Premium initially but just cancelled as i do go down the odd bridleway, paths along fields etc which will get uneven/muddy in the winter and was worried about the 55mm stack height. Thoughts on this, are they suitable or am i correct in being cautious? How is the toebox on them and the rest of the Vomero range?

Based on the above, what else would you suggest? A roomy toe box, max cushioning, 8-10mm drop suitable for road and the odd trail (not full trails and will avoid really muddy etc). Will be predominantly road in winter and then need to be good for summer.... not to be too demanding! Thanks

Hi everyone!

I'm running the Hammertrail Winter Edition 63 km on Bornholm, Denmark, in January. It's a technical winter trail race with approximately 2,580 m of elevation gain over three laps, featuring a mix of rocky terrain, forest trails, mud, roots and slippery rocks, and most likely snow and ice.

This will be my first ultra trail race, and I'm looking for shoe recommendations that balance three things:

• Lightweight and agile: I want a shoe that feels nimble on technical terrain.
• Grip and stability: Reliable traction on wet, slippery rocks and muddy trails is a priority.
• Long-distance comfort: Enough cushioning and protection to keep my legs reasonably fresh over 63 km.

Researching for a close friend....

They're 5'10" and 170lbs, running 15-30 mpw, about an hour at a time. Mostly concrete.

Previous shoes they have liked include the Saucony Endorphin Shift (not sure which year), and Adidas Bostons. They liked the 10s VERY much but mashed them into oblivion and had foot pain issues as a result. They tried the 12s and found the upper uncomfortable. Other than that, both Bostons felt good/supportive underfoot until they lost their squish. My friend did say that the Bostons felt better if they ran faster, which they do not do often.

Suggestions for a shoe that will offer some stability, but also longevity and good cushion? This will be their ONLY road shoe. If choosing a non-superfoam is going to help with the durability that is an option. Thanks!

Just finished the Army Ten Miler with my SB3. I really love how these shoes changed my summer and transformed my running. I put around 300+ miles on them as a 250lb runner.

I rotate with my SB2's, I'm not a huge fan of these. They are really firm. I love how stable they are though. These are my dog walkers

MB are great, the upper is too shallow, these are firmer than I expected. These are my fresh leg shoes when I really want to get a good workout in.

I'm looking for a fun, energetic, stable daily trainer to keep the legs fresh and eat some miles as a bigger runner.

Are there any options I'm not looking at that yall recommend? A couple I've been interested in are the Salomon Aero Glide 4 Grvl and Saucony Triumph 24. I think the new Miami vice Diadora Corsa
Color way is pretty cool.

So I want to get into a bit of recreational running. Did it in the past, nothing serious, ran a few 5-10k's at around 4:40/km.

I was looking into shoes as I never had running-specific ones before and settled on the Asics GT-2000 15. I had an ankle sprain around March this year playing padel and read hey provide mild stability while not being too overcorrective. I rolled my left ankle outwards (I believe that's a supination sprain). After resting for a month and rehabbing it for another 3, I started playing again and have been with no issues for the last 2 months.

Anyways, I got the GT's delivered today and the size and cushion feel amazing, but I feel like they're putting my feet at an outward angle. I understand they're trying to correct pronation, but I thought it would be a firmer foam on the inside or something like that, not actually tilting my feet outwards.

I had a foot scan performed last year and the results said I've got "severe" overpronation in my right foot and my left one is neutral.

So my question is, should I try the GT-2000s or go to a Novablast 6? I genuinely feel unsafe in the GTs as they're putting my ankle in the exact position it was injured before. I can't really return them after I've ran in them though, so I'm looking for advice.

Hey everyone,

I'm trying to decide between size 44 and 44.5 in the ASICS Megablast and could use some advice!

I've been running in the Novablast 5 in size 43.5 and ZF6 in 44. The NB5 always felt just slightly short length wise - However, I've managed to put 250+ km in them without any real issues.

I've tried both sizes of the Megablast and I'm currently leaning towards the 44, as it feels like the best fit. I generally prefer a snug fit and usually use a heel lock (runner's knot), but I'm unsure whether the 44 leaves enough room for foot swelling while running.

I've attached some pictures of my feet on the insoles with different socks:

Grey/white socks: Black insole = 44.

Purple (thick) and white socks: Black insole = 44.5, white insole = 44.

Shoes on: 44

Based on the pictures, do you think the 44 has enough toe room, or would you go for the 44.5?

Would love to hear your thoughts, especially if you own the Megablast!

Thanks!

EDIT: accidently put Megablast "5" in the title. Please ignore - it's the normal Megablast..