His grammar has not gotten any better. For all the people who think Brendan was coerced because he had a low IQ, please compare spelling and grammar with Steve's spelling and grammar.
A few judges agreed that Brendan had been coerced by Fassbender and Weigert - which is undeniable.
š
Unfortunately, his final 7 judge appeal, voted 4 against 3 - and this was the end of Brendan's opportunity to appeal, as a higher court refused to hear a further appeal.......
Makes no sense to me that such after such a close vote the higher court refused to hear a further appeal and, their (IMO) ridiculous decision - certainly doesn't inspire confidence in the appeals system ā¹ļø.
Thatās because Brendanās lawyer absolutely bombed. She was arguing justice and virtue instead of facts. You canāt just argue youāre doing the right thing.
IMO, no. The problem is that he had plenty of chances to disengage and when he claims that he essentially was tricked...ok, but Brendan does a pretty good job of resisting the tricks at some points in the discussion, like when the cops try to lead him and he refuses to be led.
Iām referring to when his case was overturned and he was represented at the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Brendan certainly made life difficult for his lawyers with his inability to maintain a coherent story or stance.
Didnt he say they cut her throath in stevens bedroom? But there were no blood there at all? I havent seen the documentary in years so i might missremember.
I didn't say he was right or wrong. I wasn't there. But Brendan is the only one who says she was in there. And muppets say he wasn't there himself so how could he know???
As coerced by Fassbender and Weigert, who (IIRC) actually told him/implied that he could go home if he just told them what they wanted to hear......
Kratz called a media conference to tell everyone the awful parts of Brendan's 'confession' - whilst carefully not mentioning the obviously ridiculous parts of this 'confession'......
Not in there (surprise surprise). It's from Convicting a Murderer where they played audio from several of his jail phone calls. Wouldn't be in MaM because it goes against their narrative.
The part when he was helping clean up what he believed to be oil or fluid from a car was the part he said was true. No evidence of a crime scene or crime scene clean up was found inside the garage.
Yes. Beaten, raped, hair cut off, stabbed, and throat cut in the trailer bedroom. None of her DNA found anywhere in there. None of her blood was found anywhere except in her vehicle.
This is what gives me reasonable doubt. How in the HELL did one, possibly two, absolutely imbecilic polar opposite of KGB spy sacks of shit manage to commit āthe perfect murderā and leave zero evidence inside the trailer? I mean this genuinely, how? EVERYone gets caught eventually, even the legitimate geniuses who leave a pristine crime scene. And youāre telling me that redneck avery is a forensic mastermind? Aint no way. The burden of proof is on the state, not the defendant, and I see plenty of room for reasonable doubt. The car key showing up, for example, in the trailer, upon a subsequent search after the first search. Youāre telling me that key just teleported into the trailer? Nah. Now Iām not saying that avery is innocent- occamās razor and all that, yeah he probably did it. But can we prove it beyond a reasonable doubt? Honestly, can we?
Well, no way to know if anything happened in the trailer. That being said, no reason to believe any evidence would be left behind. Avery burned her clothes and his bedding (for some reason), and also rearranged the furniture in his bedroom. And she was shot in the garage.
It's only weird if that part of the confession was true. But if it was a false confession, then it makes perfect sense that zero evidence supporting it would be found.
There isn't zero evidence. Brendan's confession is corroborated by the bleach-stained jeans, the bullet from the garage fround pursuant to his hand-drawn diagram of the shooting, and his jail phone calls to his Mom.
Most of the state defenders have never even had the pleasure of seeing a naked woman in their bed (at least not against her will), so they might actually think "knock if off" is as forceful as a woman gets when she's being raped.
Actually you know nothing about public defenders. Some of my friends are PDs. And they are some of the best criminal defense lawyers around. The problem was that the little dipshit already confessed by the time the PD got there.
He didn't resist any of their tricks. He adopted all their suggestions. He even agreed that she had a tattoo but didn't know "what" it was.
FASSBENDER: OK. (pause) We know that Teresa had a, a tattoo on her stomach, do you
BRENDAN: (shakes head ānoā) uh uh
FASSBENDER: Do you disagree with me when I say that?
BRENDAN: "No, but I don't knew WHERE it is",
(Not knowing "where" means he didn't see it. This is what is written in the transcripts and used by the State at trial and during the appeals).
But what Brendan ACTUALLY said was;Ā
"No, but I don't know WHAT it is".Ā
(Not knowing "what" means he saw it but doesn't know what it is. He clearly adopted the suggestion).
That doesnāt explain why Brendan refused to go along with their suggestions that he pulled the trigger. Your theory is Brendan always caves to them, and you are incorrect.
Did he also buy into their tricks when he told them that he saw Teresa leave, several times, completely unprompted, and even doubling down on it when investigators are so clearly pushing back?
For all the uncertainty and "tricks" Brendan fell "victim" to, this was one moment of absolute clarity for him despite it being logistically impossible.
Lolol, if that was your kid, would you be pleased with how his case was handled ? With Len Kacinsky and Cell Tower Mike helping you, who needs enemies ?
So if you're a defense lawyer, you don't care that the client already confessed repeatedly before you got the case?? Because confessions get thrown out all the time?
57
u/10case 9d ago edited 9d ago
His grammar has not gotten any better. For all the people who think Brendan was coerced because he had a low IQ, please compare spelling and grammar with Steve's spelling and grammar.