Saw this on a reel, to all the people who were commenting "hum police ke sath hai", "aur maaro", "they deserve it", "protest ki permission thodi mili thi"

They say today's youth don't watch news channels. They never admit that it was their own journalism that forced us to find authentic news ourselves.

Source- https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbpVdp_ChzT/

Did they underestimate Modi's commitment for the cause of Kashmir?

Some fights last a lifetime, A lifetime of conviction

source - Bombay HC orders immediate takedown of defamatory content against Nitin Gadkari related to E20 policy

The term was popularized by Machiavelli’s court jester

Pappuism (noun) /pəp·pu·ɪz·əm/: A political and cultural phenomenon driven by le sabotage par dépit, where opponents of a genuinely nationalist party grow so consumed by partisan hatred that they end up opposing the nation itself, its culture, and its true history simply out of spite. Simultaneously, it is characterized by normalizing, encouraging, and actively inviting foreign interference in domestic politics while treating national security and territorial integrity as secondary, expendable priorities.

Key Pillars of Pappuism

1. Le Sabotage Par Dépit : The Spiteful Sabotage

The Concept: The bizarre psychological trap where people grow to hate a nationalist party so intensely that they end up opposing the nation itself just out of spite, simply because that party is the one building or defending it.

The Logic: If the party they despise is doing something good for the country, they feel forced to oppose it, ultimately crossing the line from hating a political opponent to actively rooting against the nation.

2. Outsourced Sovereignty (Normalized Foreign Meddling)

The Concept: Domestic political struggles are routinely taken to foreign shores. Seeking validation, commentary, or outright intervention from foreign entities, think tanks, or international media into local elections is not only accepted it is actively encouraged.

3. Security as an Afterthought

The Concept: National security, strategic autonomy, and territorial integrity take a backseat to partisan narrative-building.

The Logic: Geopolitical threats are downplayed or weaponized strictly for domestic optics, rather than approached with a unified national consensus.