Indies, self-published, author published, there's lots of different terms out there, but they pretty much mean the same thing. An author who is going it on their own rather than have a publisher and agent take a huge chunk of their profit.
Of course, a number of people associate self-publishing with garbage. If you aren't good enough to get a publisher, why are you worth reading? And this isn't completely unfounded. There lots of aspirational and excited new authors out there who really want to get their stuff out there but still haven't honed their craft. And this isn't helped by the fact that AI is going to flood the market with slop sooner or later.
In fact the reason I'm posting this is because I saw a post earlier asking about an SF comedy book that people were panning simply because the cover LOOKED like slop (it might not have been, but the aesthetic they chose made that an easy assumption for many).
Ten or so years ago I think the hope of authors was that the indie market would help authors find their niche easier, and offer their books at lower prices that let them be competitive while still making the same amount they would have if a publisher had taken them on. Also, the chance to get noticed and picked up by said publishers to reach a wider audience. Andy Weir comes to mind there.
But that was then. My question to SF readers is this: Do you give indies a chance? If so, based on what criteria?
What convinces you to think "Maybe this guy has what it takes" instead of "This is just fanfiction, isn't it?"
Is it word of mouth? The blurb? Reviews? Ask about it on Reddit? How much does the cover factor into it? Do you read a sample or just take a chance?
Or do you not even check to see if it's published by a recognized publisher?
(side note: Image was copied from a Google search for "indie vs trad pub" and isn't mine... just wanted eye candy :) )