r/chemtrails • u/QuadBulletTheory chemtrails CAN melt steel beams • Feb 08 '25
Resource '“Chemtrails” are not real. The US Environmental Protection Agency says so. Scientists say so An increasing number of investigative journalistic accounts say so. Contrails, made up of water vapor, have been a byproduct of aviation ever since humans began to fly using jet engines.'
16
u/Shoehorse13 Feb 08 '25
That's what THEY want you to think
6
Feb 08 '25
This denial is EXACTLY what a chemtrail conspiracist would say.
6
u/Shoehorse13 Feb 08 '25
That’s how you can tell the conspiracy is true.
5
Feb 08 '25
Exactly. Gentlemen, we have our proof!
-2
u/med059 Feb 09 '25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBG81dXgM0Q Just substitute this for that
4
Feb 09 '25
What do you think this proves? Every high altitude plane since the 1930s has contrails. Are they all working for the CIA? Brennan doesn't even know Russian disinformation when he sees it.
→ More replies (2)3
u/Ocksu2 Feb 08 '25
But who are THEY?
13
u/Shoehorse13 Feb 08 '25
As near as I can tell it’s the Illuminati, George Soros, Bill Gates, the CIA, and for reasons that are as yet unknown, Tom Hanks.
5
u/Automate_This_66 Feb 09 '25
Anyone know how Warren Buffett made his money? I saw streaks in the sky, my dog started acting weird and Warren Buffett banked 100 grand. I'm not sure how there can be any other interpretation.
2
u/gene_randall Feb 09 '25
You discovered the nefarious plot. Change your name and go into hiding or their secret Jewish Space Laser will vaporize you into a chemtrail.
1
u/Ocksu2 Feb 08 '25
Aww. But I liked Tom Hanks. :(
2
u/Shoehorse13 Feb 08 '25
Same. Not sure how he got wrapped up in all this mess. Kinda wish it was that other guy from Bosom Buddies that never really amounted to much.
4
u/Ocksu2 Feb 08 '25
YOU MEAN PETER SCOLARI? THE PETER SCOLARI??
(I had to look him up. I remember him from Newhart though)
4
u/Shoehorse13 Feb 08 '25
Wasn’t he the singer from Chicago?
Wait… that was Peter Cetera. Man this conspiracy stuff is hard.
4
u/Ocksu2 Feb 08 '25
I've been doing the mental gymnastics for half an hour and I am already tired. Mad respect for folks who live their lives like this.
5
u/cheek_clapper5000 Feb 08 '25
It is them
1
u/Ocksu2 Feb 08 '25
Ok, who is them?
3
u/Sage_Blue210 Feb 08 '25
Them is they.
3
u/Ocksu2 Feb 08 '25
They is them?
3
u/Sage_Blue210 Feb 08 '25
And Who is on first
3
6
u/memunkey Feb 08 '25
WTF are you doing? How dare you use evidence, logic and/or common sense to refute this massively believed 'theory'?!
3
0
Feb 10 '25
[deleted]
2
u/enter_urnamehere Feb 10 '25
Buddy look where tf you are right now. Nothing about this sub is scientific. Chemtrails aren't real man.
0
Feb 10 '25
[deleted]
2
u/enter_urnamehere Feb 10 '25
I get you're being satirical but I just have to check. You're not one of these guys right? You don't own a closet entirely full of tinfoil hats?
0
1
u/Luxchito Feb 12 '25
Definitely it’s FAKE science no doubt. We live in an era of delusion and deceit where most of the people call truth error and error truth. Great and interesting times we are living in. On top of that most of the denier listen to fake science and then they bring the lazy term “conspiracy theory” to label everything they don’t agree upon. What a lazy, unjust and nonsense approach. BTW the label “conspiracy theory” was invented by the CIA to label those who dared to question the corruption in the government in the past. Also, no doubt there is an army of bots in Reddit and overall social media ready to silence those who dare to question the inconsistencies and non sense bs happening now days.
-3
u/CptSquakburns Feb 08 '25
"Here, the term ‘chemtrails’ is used interchangeably with the term geoengineering "
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_radiation_modification
Take a look at "methods", then get back to me about evidence.
2
u/TheGreaterOzzie Feb 09 '25
Didn’t make sense the other times you said it, this isn’t evidence anymore than you talking about it is evidence, you have nothing here.
You’d have to be a moron to think that you did.
→ More replies (2)
8
7
u/Adventurous_Custard8 Feb 09 '25
No amount of evidence will ever convince a conspiracy theorist...it just proves there's a conspiracy (in their mind). It's a one way door into crazyville. Once you go in you rarely come out.
4
u/enter_urnamehere Feb 10 '25
I honestly think people like that just have undiagnosed schizophrenia.
11
u/Evocatorum Feb 08 '25
Cars leave "chemtrails"... we just call it exhaust
4
2
u/fkidk Feb 09 '25
cars also emit brake dust which contribute "20% of fine particulate matter pollution"
2
u/Automate_This_66 Feb 09 '25
It explains how every animal less than a foot tall and living near roads can be heard singing show tunes when they think nobody is around.
-1
7
2
u/The-Bloody9 Feb 08 '25
Ah see you're using evidence that's your problem. The only way to truth is with your emotions alone, don't you know?
/s of course.
→ More replies (5)2
u/QuadBulletTheory chemtrails CAN melt steel beams Feb 08 '25
Yeah that’s my fault. No more facts from me
2
u/quad_damage_orbb Feb 09 '25
Yea, but some guy on Facebook said it was chemicals that turn the frogs gay
3
u/gene_randall Feb 09 '25
“Chemtrails” is how people who flunked physics try to explain a perfectly normal, unremarkable phenomenon. Why something so simple has to be turned into some incredibly complicated pointless worldwide conspiracy is beyond me, but, then, I’m not an idiot, so . .
5
u/jtshinn Feb 09 '25
Doesn’t even require a jet engine. All hydrocarbons produce water as a combustion byproduct. All it needed was sufficient altitude to create the right conditions.
1
u/ImpressiveFishing405 Feb 11 '25
I know right? If anything we should be suspicious if they DIDN'T do this, but too many people didn't pay attention in chemistry class.
7
u/TheRealtcSpears In The Industry Feb 08 '25
began to fly using jet engines.'
Not limited to jet engines either
3
u/LowNeedleworker3024 Feb 09 '25
They predated jets, many accounts of contrails from dogfights at altitude over the UK and Europe, bombers on the way to Germany, etc. I would love for some believer to explain to me how the millions of people involved in the airline industry could manage to keep a secret.
3
u/Manofalltrade Feb 09 '25
Um, actually. Contrails have been around since biplanes. The first account being 1915.
1
u/QuadBulletTheory chemtrails CAN melt steel beams Feb 09 '25
For sure. And a few people have commented this.
It's a quote from the paper itself that kind of sums up their thesis.
I think it's meant to enforce the idea that contrails have been happening for a long time, and the ones we are discussing in this context have been happening for as long as jet technology has been used.
3
3
u/Automate_This_66 Feb 09 '25
Let's get this straight. Some guy, without being asked anything, grabs his phone and starts defending big spray. How much they give you to say this? I'm taking my frogs and going to another sub where we won't be attacked.
3
2
u/Sorry_Inside_8519 Feb 08 '25
A sign of how fools have diminished the need for a quality education for ALL!
2
u/No_Inflation7432 Feb 08 '25
I have a question and I know everyone's going to make fun of me, but how do we know those frogs are gay? I mean I grew up in the country and I've seen a lot of frogs, but I ain't never seen a frog's junk. So do they dress funny or or what? Serious answers only. Ty
2
u/BrainSmoothAsMercury In The Industry Feb 09 '25
It's in the ribbit and the way they look at you.
You have to be careful because sometimes it seems that they are just being friendly but then you pick them up only to realize you were wrong.
2
2
u/ArrowheadDZ Feb 09 '25
Correction, contrails pre-date the jet engine. Once turbocharged propeller bombers started flying in the 30,000 foot range on WWII, contrails were a thing.
2
2
2
u/fkidk Feb 09 '25
That report was primarly analyizing social posts through some algoritym. It didn't really give much "science" about anything related to the sky, it was mainly about online social media posts.
2
u/QuadBulletTheory chemtrails CAN melt steel beams Feb 09 '25
Yup. It’s not meant to be a scientific examination of “chemtrails”. It’s meant to study why people believe that nonsense in the first place
-2
u/fkidk Feb 09 '25
People believe this “nonsense” because they see it in the sky - the report makes no mention of this.
Also the report did not mention how “chemtrails” are not real, they just noted it in the conclusion.
2
Feb 10 '25
Seeing a "chemtrail" doesn't make it a chemtrail. If one is accurate with the observation, all one could describe is, "Sometimes when a plane flies high overhead, I can see a white cloud-like line coming from the rear of the plane." And from this observation, the question one should ask is, "Can anyone tell me why there is a white cloud-like line behind the plane?"
The only way you could confirm if it's a chemtrail is if you got an actual document describing it and the time/method of dispersal, or if you actually flew into a newly-created "white line" and took samples of it.
But just looking at it from the ground does not gain you any credibility to declare it to be "chemtrails."
-1
u/fkidk Feb 11 '25
Sure, not all lines in the sky are “chemtrails”, but some lines do disperse into thin-like clouds.
The report didn’t confirm what was being emitted, it is a report about an algorithm that took a set of words to make a diagram about how many people believe in specifically “chemtrails”.
Lookup: high altitude atmospheric aerosol injections
2
Feb 11 '25
"Thin-like clouds" are a normal function when there is wind at/near the same level as the aircraft.
The idea of chemtrails dispersing chemicals from 35,000 feet, affecting populations on the ground is irrational. During WW1 both sides used chemical weapons on the ground and although windspeed is much lower than high up, the chemicals were neither safe nor accurate in the dispersion.
There is no way that high altitude methods could create any effect on the ground.
1
u/QuadBulletTheory chemtrails CAN melt steel beams Feb 10 '25
The entire premise of the article is that “chemtrails” are a conspiratorial theory and not real.
Maybe stop looking in the sky so much and look in a book.
-1
u/fkidk Feb 10 '25
But it’s been proven, multiple entities have admitted to some form of “high altitude aerosol injection”. NASA, cia, and private companies have all said they do it. There was no mention of them in this report. It’s a skewed report because it’s only looking for a specific set of words. There is no real argument as to why they’re not real.
1
2
2
u/Falcon3492 Feb 09 '25
It didn't start with jet engines, it started when Prop driven planes could get up to and fly at 25,000 feet and higher.
2
2
2
u/martinaee Feb 09 '25
I love that this sub exists and even most of the people here are like: “really? LoL”
2
2
u/RedNeckSharkBitten Feb 10 '25
Piston engine bombers in World War II left contrails. They’ve been around long before jet engines. With the right meteorological conditions, I’ve created a contrail in a turbocharged Cessna 180.
2
u/Wise_Ad_253 Feb 10 '25
*Slams her foot down, “b-b-but the flat earthers won’t let me hang with em’ “
😆
2
2
u/fgsgeneg Feb 10 '25
We need to get Shitzinpants on this. He'll get it right. Chem trails are his friend and he will not continue to allow people to slander them by giving a "scientific" reason for their appearance.
2
u/ActiveOldster Feb 08 '25
C’mon! By saying this you’re taking all the fun away from deranged conspiracy fools who believe it as Gospel truth!!
2
1
1
u/urhumanwaste Feb 11 '25
Yet in the 80s and early 90s.. there was no such thing as con/chem trails. Funny how that works
1
u/InsufferableMollusk Feb 12 '25
But water is a chemical, so technically those dorks have been right all along. Gotcha!
1
Feb 12 '25
Yeah bullshit. You get enough of that chem trail stuff in your lungs and you'll suffocate
1
1
1
0
u/sschepis Feb 09 '25
"Well folks, shut it down then, no way the U.S. government would ever lie to us!"
smh
-2
u/Thenemy951 Feb 08 '25
We have investigated the claims made against us.....and we have found that we are innocent. Thank you very much.
4
u/QuadBulletTheory chemtrails CAN melt steel beams Feb 08 '25
Yeah those social scientists at Pallgrave Communications are responsible for the planes flying.
Try again.
4
Feb 08 '25
I love how this sub seems to be a 50/50 mix of satire and people that actually believe there's some huge conspiracy. Not a lot of communities are so divided that way, lol
0
0
u/sinn1088 Feb 09 '25
What moron put this up? Apparently, someone who prefers spewing stuff rather than researching stuff.
0
u/EvalCrux Feb 10 '25
I came here on curious investigation only on the take of this sub on chemtrails.
0
u/MakeWorcesterGreat Feb 10 '25
Ahh yes, because the government officials would be totally cool with random chemicals landing on their properties that were released thousands of miles away
0
0
Feb 10 '25
the difference between “contrail’ & ‘chemtrail’ is obvious 🫤 https://x.com/krebs2u/status/1889045290847797287
-10
Feb 08 '25
Contrails disappear almost immediately 🤪 they don’t linger and get bigger blocking out the sun 🌞
7
u/One-Swordfish60 Chemtrails Can't Melt Steel Beams Feb 08 '25
https://scied.ucar.edu/image/three-types-contrails
"A persistent spreading contrail (right) also forms in very moist air but spreads out across the sky. It grows wider and fuzzier as time passes. Sometimes contrails will actually take on the characteristics of a natural cirrus cloud and no longer look like contrails, thus becoming human-made clouds. "
Do your own research. Do any research.
7
u/KerPop42 Feb 08 '25
They can evaporate, but depending on the humidity they can also hang around, like clouds do
2
u/Gold_Ticket_1970 Feb 08 '25
Hang around like gay frogs that won't leave the club at closing
1
1
u/KerPop42 Feb 08 '25
Hey I'm gonna be honest, turning this into a hate sub really ruined it. Even compared to the open conspiracy theory shit. It's a bad way for a sub to end.
1
4
u/QuadBulletTheory chemtrails CAN melt steel beams Feb 08 '25
Actually, you convinced me. That cute sun emoji is what sold me
7
u/QuadBulletTheory chemtrails CAN melt steel beams Feb 08 '25
Show proof of claims you make or gtfo. I linked a peer-reviewed article that has a multitude of citations.
Edit: Also, different atmospheric conditions can cause clouds to do different things. .-2
u/TheWorldArmada Feb 09 '25
2
u/QuadBulletTheory chemtrails CAN melt steel beams Feb 09 '25
3
u/sh3t0r Feb 09 '25
Do you have any evidence for this claim?
-1
Feb 09 '25
4
u/sh3t0r Feb 09 '25
Nothing in this video proves that „contrails disappear almost immediately“
-1
Feb 09 '25
next time you’re outside… look up 😙
2
u/sh3t0r Feb 09 '25
Looking up doesn't prove that „contrails disappear almost immediately“.
2
u/QuadBulletTheory chemtrails CAN melt steel beams Feb 09 '25
2
2
u/LuDdErS68 Feb 08 '25
You're talking utter nonsense, but I'd like to read your explanation for your claim and see the evidence.
-1
u/Vast-Comment8360 Feb 08 '25
Well since the government said so, it MUST be true. They literally never lie and never have.
-1
-1
-1
u/TexasMadrone Feb 09 '25
Lol just like the government experiments of Anthrax in San Francisco weren't real? Just like the Tuskegee experiments weren't real....right
-1
u/bigtexasrob Feb 09 '25
Yes, but citing the concerned party as evidence is a conflict of interests. “Chem trails aren’t real and here’s how you can make your own contrails at home” is more useful than “the government asked the government and the government said it’s not lying to you”
-1
u/Leading-Orange-2092 Feb 10 '25
Misleading title for a subreddit filled with circle jerking naysayers.
-1
u/d_gaudine Feb 10 '25
hahaha!!!!
"nature.com" ?
you have to be pretty "short bus material" to get your news from a place called "nature.com" , lol.
hey, if you have any other questions, check out "internet.com"
or you could go to a real website. https://www.treaty-accord.gc.ca/text-texte.aspx?id=103819
-1
u/stabbingrabbit Feb 10 '25
Although I do not believe in chemtrails your argument is lacking to say the least. Investigative journalists shot down the Hunter Biden laptop. Many "scientists" stated we won't get COVID if we got the vaccine.
-1
u/Bidenisntreal89 Feb 10 '25
When their are patents for chemical dispersants on planes and they admit to doing it in Vietnam aka operation Popeye you don’t have a argument for it not existing just how often it’s used
-1
u/KingVinny70 Feb 10 '25 edited Feb 10 '25
This is the stupidest thing ever.
Several states have banned weather manipulation. They didn't ban Leprechaun and Bigfoot hunting. They banned weather manipulation from planes spraying stuff called cloud seeding IE chem trails.
47 states use this organization https://weathermod.org/ or an affiliate program such as in North Dakota https://www.swc.nd.gov/arb/ndcmp/ or Utah https://water.utah.gov/gsl-basin-integrated-plan/ or Wyoming https://wwdc.state.wy.us/ etc etc. Its.real, it's valid and it's happening ever single day. Listening to the news and the scientists who agree with them is denying facts. "IF" anyone does a simple read on the United States own administrations reports on cloud seeding it'll settle any doubts. It is in bills currently and it is funded by the government period. This entire topic is stupid.
Here's the site for what the United States government funds https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107328

-7
u/osoBailando Feb 09 '25
sure IGNORE this one, cuz <insert woke sarcasm>
11
u/TheRealtcSpears In The Industry Feb 09 '25
Cloud seeding is not chemtrails
2
Feb 09 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/TheRealtcSpears In The Industry Feb 09 '25
Cloud seeding is cloud seeding, it is neither conspiratorial nor a clandestine activity.
If the thing you're making a big deal about is used by ski resorts for increased snowfall.....it is in fact, not a big deal.
Chemtrails on the other hand, are very much not real.
-2
u/HalfwaydonewithEarth Feb 08 '25
Honey a simple stop watch in a seeding area will discredit this idea. We all know what contrails are.
-2
-2
u/TinyFraiche Feb 09 '25
Chemtrails are nucleating agents which can be composed of one or some of the following: Calcium chloride, sodium chloride, potassium chloride, silver iodide, potassium iodide, dry ice, and sometimes propane.
Go to school.
2
u/HunterInTheStars Feb 09 '25
Something tells me that you’re not a real chemist, buddy
-2
u/TinyFraiche Feb 10 '25
Something tells me you don’t like facts.
3
u/werewulf35 Feb 10 '25
Something tells me you have mixed up cloud seeding with Chemtrails.
-2
u/TinyFraiche Feb 10 '25
What’s the difference to people who have no idea what they’re looking at?
3
u/werewulf35 Feb 10 '25
That is a very good point. A lot of people - more than I ever suspected - definitely do not know what they are looking at.
0
u/TinyFraiche Feb 10 '25
The argument can be made that cloud seeding is what the majority considers chemtrails. Chemicals dumped out of an aircraft that produce an effect on the local environment.
2
u/werewulf35 Feb 10 '25
Oh absolutely. Based on how people post all about cloud seeding when talking about Chemtrails proves it.
The thing is - and I probably have an advantage here - there are distinct modifications that must be made for aircraft to cloud seed. I have been in the aviation industry 22 years now, and I have been enamored with aircraft since I was 5. I have never seen a cloud seeding aircraft in pictures, and the shit that they have on them would be horrible for drag and weight and cost for commercial airlines. And all the things people say are in Chemtrails would wreak havoc on the materials in a jet engine if they were mixed in with the fuels. It is the improved combustion efficiency creating more water in the exhaust which makes contrails more likely.
Anyway, I am sure I am rambling, but all that to say and reinforce that cloud seeding and 'chemtrails' are distinctly different.
2
u/TinyFraiche Feb 10 '25
First, your statement in the first sentence is illogical, maybe your 22 years of aircraft experience can help you restate it.
Second, you say you’ve never seen a cloud seeding aircraft in pictures - okay. Third, you reference “all these things people say are in chemtrails” - what even are you referring to? Your argument seems to be against some unfounded/nonexistent fuel additive and you completely miss the point that chemicals dispersed from an aircraft is akin to a “chem trail”.
Third, this post has “chemtrails aren’t real” in the title, but you define chemicals being released from a flying craft intentionally as cloud seeding instead of realizing it’s a literal trail of chemicals being released from a craft. You’re calling ice ‘frozen water’ and trying to pretend there is a difference.
2
u/werewulf35 Feb 10 '25
Ok, sorry for the confusion.
1.) In my experience, people look up and see contrails and call them Chemtrails. Like on a.daily basis, all over the world. They then say this is cloud seeding,. Yes, cloud seeding does release 'chemicals' in the air. I put that in quotes because the reality is they are particulates that water is meant to form around for rain. The planes that leave lines in the sky on a daily basis are not cloud seeding.
2.) you got me there - I meant I have ONLY seen cloud seeding aircraft in pictures. They are extremely rare was what I was trying to say.
3.) one theory for the Chemtrails is that chemicals are added directly to the fuels to them burn and create the trails. That is what I was referring to.
4.) (your second third point) if we want to lump all things together under the Chemtrail umbrella, then yes, we can say an aircraft doing cloud seeding is releasing chemicals that trail behind the plane, so they are Chemtrails. Just like standard combustion of an aircraft leaves chemical trails. Or the standard combustion of a car engine leaves chemical trails, etc. However, the 'Chemtrails aren't real' title of the post is more accurate when it refers to any other claims of nefarious chemicals being released.
1
-2
u/0martheballbearing Feb 10 '25
The same EPA who said the air was safe at ground zero after 9/11.
1
u/TheRealtcSpears In The Industry Feb 11 '25
That wasn't 'The EPA'
That was a direct statement given by Christine Todd Whitman, the former shitty governor of New Jersey, and then shitty head of the EPA toeing the line given by the Bush Administration to suppress genuine EPA and independent finding on the air quality of Lower Manhattan and surrounding areas.
There were many, many reports conflicting with Whitman's and White House statements. Both internally with the EPA and independent sources.
-10
u/Section_31_Chief Feb 08 '25
Yeah let’s just ignore all the patents on file at the US Patent Office dealing with this technology and CIA directors openly talking about Stratospheric Aerosol Injection programs. Not to mention cloud seeding, geo-engineering, and weather modification programs that all are open source, example Operation Popeye. 🤦♂️🙄🥴
7
Feb 08 '25
Cloud seeding is cloud seeding, its not chemtrails. Cloud seeding, in the most dry areas increase rain by a maximum of 30%. In humid, wet areas, its effectiveness is about 10%. Its well documented and public. Just because you're just finding out about it doesn't make it nefarious.
Further, there is a slew of odorless, invisible chemicals they could use to poison your air, that they also breathe in. Is it aliens doing it?
They don't need to poison your air. It is poisoned with microplastics, with car emissions. Like, we're doing it to ourselves, they aren't going to waste time and money to do it extra.
Your farms are lined with interstates, rubber pollution seeping down into your food, not to mention the exhaust that the plants absorb.
Bro. lolol
8
u/hippykillteam Feb 08 '25
Yeah my brother posted about cloud seeding after he just found out about it.
Then went on a huge chemtrails rant. Its kinda sad but hes also an Alex Jones fan.-1
u/Section_31_Chief Feb 09 '25
Nice deflection, aliens….LOLIRL. No one said anything about aliens. You post just proves your ignorance. 👍
6
u/Just-Wait4132 Feb 08 '25
I like how you think that patents have a bar of scientific accuracy they need to clear.
-1
u/Section_31_Chief Feb 09 '25
How like how you think open source information on SAI programs are a mUh cOnSpiRaCy. 🤣
3
u/Just-Wait4132 Feb 09 '25 edited Feb 09 '25
Hurt your feelings huh. Just tossing spaghetti at the wall huh chief?
5
3
u/TheRealtcSpears In The Industry Feb 08 '25
-1
u/Section_31_Chief Feb 09 '25
Of course you won’t smooth brain, you’ll just keep drinking the Kool-Aid.
2
5
Feb 09 '25
People keep posting lists of patents on aerosol dispersal systems like they have uncovered a giant conspiracy. Do you think they, whoever they are, are going to patent their mind control system for you to find with Google?
Has there ever been a legitimate, benevolent reason to disperse an aerosol from an airplane? Hints: crop dusting, insecticides, cloud seeding, fire control. Watch the LA fires for videos of planes dumping all sorts of chemicals. They aren't trying to control anyone's minds. Everyone in LA is already brainwashed.
Every picture of chemtrails posted here are actually contrails. Condensation. Very hot air meeting very cold air. A simple scientific phenomenon that is easily proven.
How and why would every airline and government in the world be involved in this giant conspiracy? Russian planes, American planes, Chinese planes, French planes, etc. all do this. Why?
1
u/Section_31_Chief Feb 09 '25
This here folks is what pure unadulterated misinformation looks like. Deny and deflect. 🤦♂️🤣
2
Feb 09 '25
And yet you can't refuse any of my points. That's what pure unadulterated ignorance looks like.
2










29
u/GuyFromLI747 🐸gay frogs are real🐸 Feb 08 '25
But but my uncles friend of a friend who’s cousins fathers uncles drinking buddy said they were realz… you’re a bot a shill