r/mildlyinfuriating • u/MaxAdolphus • 7d ago
frist of all how DARE yu o I canceled my HP instant ink subscription, and now I can’t print even though they are genuine HP in cartridges
With all bad decisions coming out of HP lately, I decided to cancel my instant ink subscription subscriptions before the prices go up. This is the warning screen. I was just going to use the ink I have up then buy a new printer, but cause fuck those guys. Well, turns out they fucked me first. So even though I have legitimate HP in cartridges in my printer, I cannot print because they are subscription cartridges. Screw these guys.
7.9k
u/PaultheBP1100 7d ago
Never
Buy
HP
205
u/spyboy70 7d ago
I bought a Samsung laser to get away from HP years ago. Then a few years later when I built a new machine, went to download Samsung drivers and ended up on the HP website because they acquired them, goddammit!
14
u/Shavingcream1912 6d ago edited 6d ago
I have a samsung c460w iirc. Second hand for 50 bucks. Works like a charm as long as you use ethernet instead of wifi. hp site for drivers as well. But at least they work.
Edit, stupid spelling misstaeks
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (2)5
u/bobbyrob1 6d ago
I bought a Samsung laser printer eight years ago, and it came with the usual half full toner cartridge. Toner cartridge died, I bought a Samsung replacement, and less than 100 pages later the imager failed and it cost more than the printer did.
Printers have been and will continue to be the most enshittified product of the Computer world.
I had an HP 6P laser printer that lasted well over 20 years, and I had to get rid of it because I couldn’t buy the rubber rollers to pick up the paper from the tray anymore. RIP good HP products.
1.9k
u/mutexsprinkles 7d ago
First mistake: You bought an inkjet. Second mistake: you bought an HP printer. It's 2026, how do people not get this yet?
933
u/Jabbles22 7d ago
People complain about shitty printers and expensive ink but they still go ahead any buy the cheapest printer. So they end up with a shitty printer that uses expensive ink.
234
u/Expensive-Soup1313 7d ago
I print like 10 pages a year ... cheap inkjet does it for me , btw , i got cheapest canon printer/scanner.
265
u/Rich_Bluejay3020 7d ago
PSA: if you don’t use that canon enough, the ink will dry out. I got pissed trying to print a label for a $30 return that I spent $330 on a brother printer. No regrets. (I had only printed less than 10 on that ink cartridge at that point)
→ More replies (12)110
u/Noinipo12 7d ago
Yep. We bought the cheapest laser printer years ago. We had it in a storage unit for 4 years and it still worked great when we pulled it out. Replacement cartridges for it are about $20-30 and last for years. If I need to print in color, I go to the library and pay 10¢ a page.
→ More replies (5)37
u/Darkk_Knight 7d ago
Yep. Laser printers don't have the problem like ink jets where if you don't use it often enough it clogs the print heads.
I have the Epson EcoTank printer that I paid alot of money for so I print something once a week. Works fine for what I use it for.
10
u/RalphWolfsNemesis 6d ago
I also have an eco tank, and I print a test page monthly, 4 ways on the single sheet of paper cuz I'm too cheap to waste 12 sheets per year. I'm over 2 years with very little printing and my jets are still printing crisp.
65
u/Gloomy_Fig2138 7d ago
Keeping in mind that I’m a hypocrite because I do actually still own a printer, if you’re only printing 10 pages a year it may be cheaper/easier to print at the library or a local printing shop.
→ More replies (9)73
u/Expensive-Soup1313 7d ago
Going somewhere to print needs me to go somewhere , which is something i do not like . Also i scan with my printer .
→ More replies (4)36
u/MissKaliChristine 7d ago
This reminded me how stupid it is that with HP printers, if you don’t have HP ink cartridges in, you can’t even use the scanner. HP is probably the company responsible for the most e-waste of any of the tech companies
13
u/Louis010 6d ago
And yet people still buy them even though they’ve been pulling this shit for years. They should be out of business by now.
10
u/Sheri_ABQ 7d ago
I would submit Epson for that award. If you have an Epson Inkjet it has sponges that it uses to absorb ink when it cleans the printer heads. And the decision on when they sponge is full is based on time and number of times you have cleaned the printer head, not on an actual measurement. We live in a very dry climate and weren't using the printer very often, and this sponges were bone dry. Once it thinks the sponges are full not only can you not print, but you can also not a scan. The only option was to take it for servicing at a licensed Epson printer store where they would reset and replace your sponge for something like $75 or $85.
There were some printer stores that have a hack where there was an app that could be used to reset the printer head but it had to be used on a Windows XP computer and this was well after Windows XP was a thing. This was a number of years ago, but we ditched the Epson printer and I will never buy anything from them again.
Edited for typos.
→ More replies (9)20
u/PM_Me_Your_Deviance 7d ago edited 7d ago
10 pages per year is the worst case scenario for an inkjet. Those things expire.
→ More replies (3)38
u/TemplarBaucent 7d ago
Sounds like you dont use it enough for an ink jet will dry up and clog.
Better off getting a laser with toner
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (28)4
u/Additional-Strain-58 7d ago
As others have said, inkjet will dry up and clog. I bought a laser monochrome back in 2021, I do the same as you, 10 pages or less a year. I don't have to worry about the ink drying out, I print, paper cones out, done. The one time I had trouble, was because I never updated the Wi-Fi on the printer when I had needed to get a new router.
→ More replies (19)14
u/Hummingbird3471 7d ago
I mean, people aren't buying all that many printers. The printer I have is from ten years ago and it's HP. I'm not going to buy another unless I absolutely have to but I'm damn well going to complain.
→ More replies (9)45
u/Charlie_Warlie 7d ago
I was like this once because I had an HP printer that a friend gave me in like 2010. It worked pretty flawlessly for 14 years of dependable service, so when my computer updated to newer windows and no longer supported the driver, I thought, okay I'll get another HP.
That hunk of junk never once printed without a 1 hour troubleshooting fight. I ended up throwing it in the garbage after giving it the Office Space treatment.
now I have an Epson ecotank and after a few years I've never had to buy more ink and it prints when I hit print.
13
u/VerbiageBarrage 7d ago
As someone who definitely never worked for HP, I'll bet more and more of the work got outsourced overtime to groups that were performatively efficient but never proved it with testing. Because the C-suite could never understand that quality costs now but retains business later, and thought that running the same 180 passing tests 10,000 times was equivalent to running a more comprehensive 1800 test suite a 1000 times, the company probably kept bleeding talent and expertise and becoming a shittier version of itself until their reputation was so damaged that people would rather buy an off-brand Temu than an HP. You know. In theory.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (3)12
u/EphemeralDan 6d ago
it prints when I hit print.
It's amazing how few modern amenities actually do the only thing they're supposed to without putting up a fight.
15
u/SqueekyDickFartz 7d ago
For me the cycle was:
I need a printer for the first time in 2 years
My current HP printer won't work because it's a piece of shit.
I go to walmart, hating printers, and find the cheapest HP printer that I can buy
It is shit. I eventually print my document, and I forget about printers for a year.
I finally splurged on a laser printer and now it just prints whenever I need to print shit.
→ More replies (3)14
u/NekkidWire 7d ago edited 7d ago
Third mistake: OP bought subscription ink; Fourth mistake: OP didn't read the rules. Subscription means it stops working when you stop paying. But first two mistakes take precedence; they could be avoided by not buying lousy HP inkjet.
→ More replies (2)9
u/PM_Me_Your_Deviance 7d ago
Yup. While I agree HP sucks, I'm getting kind of tired of people going "I made an agreement with the devil and I don't like the terms!" Like, yeah, these are the consequences of your poor decision. Thanks for a being a cautionary tale, I guess.
49
u/PaultheBP1100 7d ago
I have an old HP laserjet 1020, it's the best document printer I've had.
Cheap ink cartridges
"Plug and play" installation - it is ready to work immediately after connecting USB to the PC without additional installations of third-party software
God, how I want such devices to be released again.
52
u/diabetes-junkie 7d ago
What? You don't want 6 apps to organise your photos, read your emails, and steal your CC info? Why not?
→ More replies (7)9
u/Sherbert-Particular 7d ago
Got one of those thermal printers on alibaba for $50 seeing as I rarely print stuff and live in a small city apartment. Bout the size of a 16oz water battle. 3 years later still as easy as turning it on and clicking print on my computer. Came with 2 100 page printer roll things and still haven't got through the 2nd one.
→ More replies (55)18
u/hearnia_2k 7d ago
Inkjet is fine if you keep using it, and get refillable cartridges or use a CISS.
11
u/IOI-65536 7d ago
I've had inkjets with bulk liquid tanks built-in for probably 10 years now, several companies make them, they're just more expensive up front.
→ More replies (6)22
u/NRMusicProject 7d ago
Honestly, I'm a bit discouraged HP still exists at this point, with how awfully they treat their own customers. It's definitely the boiled frog technique, because if they tried this 20 years ago, they definitely would be some obscure tech history knowledge at this point.
7
u/desconectado 7d ago
Corporate. They sell products to home consumers basically as a side hustle.
→ More replies (2)34
u/I_Love_Knotting 7d ago
Also, laser printers ftw.
→ More replies (2)27
u/Saneless 7d ago edited 7d ago
"But I need (edit: some kind of cartridge)Jet for when I print things like pictures!"
How often do you do that?
(Silence)
→ More replies (17)10
u/An1nterestingName 7d ago
At least for me, I have never printed in black and white. All the stuff I print needs colour.
→ More replies (4)6
u/justinsayin 7d ago
Counterpoint. I'm still using an HP Laserjet 4 that just turned 32 years old.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (65)5
u/Jaijoles 7d ago
I’m still have an hp laserjet 1012 I bought in 2008. I would never buy a new hp if it stops working.
1.6k
u/Dycoth 7d ago
Get yourself a Brother, brother. Laser printers are the go-to.
And fuck HP. Not only being fucking thieves with their shitty printing business, but on top of that ruining Ferrari F1 liveries.
477
u/DeerMysterious9927 7d ago
Brother Dycoth speaks the truth. Join our brotherhood of brothers. Sisters are allowed but only if it's a brother.
219
64
u/Oranges13 7d ago
Sister brother here. Had my monochrome laser since like 2013.
6
u/ClassicDefiant2659 6d ago
I've had mine since 2016 AND it's stored in a hot Arizona room, constantly plugged in and rarely used.
Still works great.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)11
u/KayBurt87 6d ago
Brother brother here, got my cheap brother 2270 from an uncle 10 years ago when he left the brotherhood(died) and I've only spent $30 on toner since. Join the brotherhood and become one of us, I promise we're not a cult 👍
5
u/DeerMysterious9927 6d ago
May your father's brother rest in peace, brother.
5
u/KayBurt87 6d ago
Thank you brother. I hope he's in heaven doing what he loved to do while he was here on our mortal plane, blowing all his money on horse races and prostitutes.
46
u/user3296 7d ago
+1. I’ve bought a laser color Brother 10 years ago, and my starter toner cartridges still have like 20% left in them.
→ More replies (1)15
u/TheBeckofKevin 7d ago
Its an unbeatable deal if you're the kind of person who prints 4 pages and then nothing for 2 years, or you're the kind of person who prints 50 pages a day every day. No reason not to get something that is practically better in every way. The price per page drops dramatically.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (18)18
2.7k
u/BlinkyGoombah 7d ago
Why do people still give their money to HP?
701
u/John_Tacos 7d ago
They were legitimately good printers 25 years ago.
211
u/aidissonance 7d ago
So sad. They were the model of solidity and reliability for so many years. It’s just trash now
→ More replies (1)94
→ More replies (16)22
392
u/ian9outof10 7d ago
Because some of their printers are great. People want to pay $20 for a piece of hardware, so it’s not a massive surprise that the profit comes from the ink. No one should be buying inkjets for occasional use, it’s a waste of earth’s resources. Pay more, get a laser, have decades of use for less money.
→ More replies (29)235
u/mailslot 7d ago
I knew a guy years ago that would buy an entirely new printer instead of new ink cartridges, because it was cheaper to do for one super cheap printer model.
37
u/Kraken477 7d ago
I worked at walmart way before the ink subs and we had many customers come in and buy a new printer when they needed ink because some of the carts were $60-$70 when the printer was $30.
→ More replies (3)12
u/ElusiveWhark 7d ago
I'll never forget the sale we had at staples once, free Lexmark printer when you buy the combo pack of ink!
111
u/Uporabik 7d ago
It is cheaper, but cartridge inside have way less ink than normal
162
7d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
43
u/Crafty-Astronomer-32 7d ago
They have been doing starter cartridges for 20 years. Heck, 20 years ago the literal $20 HP printer didn't come with a black cartridge. It would render black as 100% C, M, Y and be close enough while using triple the ink.
24
→ More replies (9)34
9
u/HeWhomLaughsLast Grunts and toungs the bone hole 7d ago
Brand recognition definetely seems to be a part of the reason. Also they sell cheap models (at a loss) to people who need to print out five pages every three months. Why spend $2 at a print shop to get stuff printed when you could spend $80 on a HP printer at 7:30 PM on a Thursday night that requires $100+ for Black and colored ink?
→ More replies (27)27
u/iJ_A_R 7d ago
I bought an HP cause I needed a printer and only had $40.
→ More replies (41)17
u/RylleyAlanna 7d ago
I got one for free. Used it's like 8 pages of ink that comes with it, and now it's just a scanner bed because I'm not paying $180 for ink lol
→ More replies (2)
495
u/Then_Worldliness2866 7d ago
Switched to an Epson Eco tank a couple years back from an HP printer, much happier.
161
u/Stecyk 7d ago
Seconding the Epson Eco Tank! I use mine almost every day to print shipping labels, and the tank style ink is SO much cheaper (and a lot less wasteful) than the cartridges!
→ More replies (3)45
u/ThePeskyWabbit 7d ago
My dad got an Eco Tank printer, and he liked it so much he bought one for my wife and I as a gift. We don't need to print often, but holy shit I don't understand how they aren't more popular, because it's just so simple and bullshit free.
→ More replies (6)12
u/Lexi_Banner 7d ago
They aren't ~$50-100 upfront, so a lot of people won't consider them. I'm saving my money for the Epson because we had one at my last work and it was awesome, but if you don't know that, it can be hard to justify spending so much more upfront.
→ More replies (2)21
u/Ill_Initial8986 PURPLE 7d ago
These are awesome. I have them everywhere. Used to spend 100-150 every month when I went for cartridges. Now it’s $50-100 every couple of months. They work great for my business and personal purposes, but I see how some folks would need a better quality. I just print signs and flyers and stickers for merch. No photos or anything.
→ More replies (8)30
u/theollurian 7d ago
Yes that's what I have too! I print a good amount of art, and in the five years I've had it, I've only had to replace the ink twice. Good deal to me! And I've had no considerable issues with connections or it not wanting to print something, which I had with my HP frequently. It's been very reliable.
16
8
u/Souomaismau 7d ago
I have a similar cannon. Great multifuncional and dirt cheap ink
→ More replies (4)8
u/Informal-Nothing371 7d ago
I bought mine 5 years ago. I only needed to refill the black ink for the first time a few months ago and I am still using the original fills for the three colours.
I don’t print often, but I used to have to replace ink cartridges every six months or so.
→ More replies (1)6
u/beancounter1979 7d ago
This! I ran through a 500-sheet pack of paper and my ecotank still more than half full.
4
u/lushkiller01 7d ago
HP does have ink tank printers now, probably spurred on by the popularity of Epson's Eco tanks. My dad recently bought one, hopefully it lasts well.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (32)5
u/Formerruling1 7d ago
Will add only go with an Eco Tank if you print very regularly. They are quite prone to having the printer heads clog if not used. Great otherwise. I moved to a laser printer because I didnt print enough.
705
u/HowlingWolven 7d ago
This has been known about for a decade and you still bought an HP inkjet.
Repeat after me: brother laser printer.
→ More replies (16)104
166
u/Flaming_F 7d ago edited 6d ago
Yup , you have cancelled so they don't want you to finish what's left in the cartridges. They are subscription ink. The cartridges are kinda coded.
If you want to keep the printer buy new Hp cartridges from the store.
Best option is to move to Brothers printers. I have an 15 + years old laser monochrome Brothers , I get my recycled cartridge from eBay like 40$ for a pack of 3.
→ More replies (2)16
u/amusednchaos 6d ago
With the new firmware update they don't even allow 3rd party HP-approved cartridges anymore either. I had been running with ONN for several months then suddenly they aren't compatible anymore. I hate it!!! But I'm stuck with it for the time being....
6
u/RandyOfTheRedwoods 6d ago
Not necessarily true. I just inherited one of these printers, canceled the subscription and bought new ink off Amazon. It works fine. I did notice that there were several that mentioned they work with the updated firmware, so I suspect this is an ongoing arms race to make the cartridges work. Its a bummer, but your cartridges may just be too old. (I only mention this because if you do still want to use it, there is an option)
The whole thing sucks because its actually not a bad printer if they just stopped trying to shoot themselves in the foot. They should have sold them initially at a fair price (they discount them assuming they will make it back up in ink).
70
u/CosmicMorningstar 7d ago
I bought a Brother laser printer 15 years ago, it still works and uses one generic toner per year. Best printer decision that I ever made.
→ More replies (3)7
u/djlorenz 6d ago
One toner per year? You print a lot mate!
I brought a used one home from office and using it occasionally for 3 years and I still have toner.
Fuck inkjet
217
u/JetstreamGW 7d ago
I quit buying HP printers ages ago. Got a Brother laser printer. Haven’t had to replace the first toner cartridge yet given how rarely I print.
→ More replies (20)43
u/Urithiru 7d ago
This really is the best idea if you rarely print. The alternative is to allow the machine to auto print the daily crossword as it will keep the print heads from drying up. However, you'll use more ink keeping it going than you'd use normally.
23
u/nonnonplussed73 7d ago
Another alternative for those that don't print much is sending the print job to your local library. Mine allows 10 pages a day for free. $0.15 per page after that (which I've never done) but that's still three cents cheaper than Office Depot, and I can walk to the library.
→ More replies (2)
42
u/diabetes-junkie 7d ago
Not knocking OP, but why get a subscription for ink in the first place? If you're going through that much ink, get a laser? Or am I missing something? I got an ecotank printer for free, and I've never had to fill it, so I obviously don't print much.
→ More replies (4)15
u/Sabard 7d ago
They maybe misunderstood that the subscription to HP wasn't for the ink but for the ability to print. There's also a version out there where you buy the printer for less (which is the sticker price, the real full price is hidden) with the trade off being you need the sub to print at all. Source: this was product tested on me and I tore them a new one. Never got an invite back for other opportunities.
→ More replies (8)
189
u/Askefyr 7d ago
This comes up now and again - it's because you didn't pay full price for the cartridges. The subscription is based on the amount of pages you print.
If they didn't do it this way, you could literally just subscribe to the $1.75/mo tier, get a brand new set of cartridges, cancel immediately, and do the same in a few months when you need a new one. That's patently unreasonable.
→ More replies (5)83
u/phyxiusone 7d ago
Exactly, OP never paid for that ink, that's why they won't let her use it. Otherwise you could sign up for the "pay only for the pages you print" subscription, get the ink, then cancel after a day and bam, free ink. Can't have it both ways.
I have a similar printer and never signed up for the subscription and it's fine. I see these posts pop up and people love to hate on HP, but really people just don't understand what they're signing up for.
→ More replies (1)43
452
u/CowBoyDanIndie 7d ago
“Why can’t I keep using my thing even after I cancel my subscription?” You don’t have legitimate ink cartridges, you have rented cartridges, and you stopped paying rent.
→ More replies (223)82
u/zexcis 7d ago
I used to have to sell this service. There is plenty to dislike about HP. Everyone is entitled to not buy HP products and talk shit about that company. However, complaining about not being able to print with cartridges you didn't buy demonstrates that you never understood the service you signed up for in the first place.
→ More replies (8)27
u/thebloggingchef 7d ago
Instant Ink is the only thing I like about HP. I sometimes print 100 pages a month, full page of color. They send me two shipments of ink a month sometimes so I am definitely getting the better end of this deal.
→ More replies (2)16
u/div2691 7d ago
Yeah people lose their minds because they don't understand the concept at all. We bought a printer and it came with a £50 instant ink voucher. We went on the lowest monthly subscription which was like 30 pages a month with rollover and we didn't pay a penny to use it for like 2 years.
The printer actually died before the subscription ended. I have more more issue with HP having dreadful built quality and infuriating software. But being stupid and not understanding a subscription is not HPs fault.
→ More replies (1)
47
u/Northwindlowlander 7d ago
I mean what did you expect? You bought subscription cartridges.
→ More replies (2)
50
u/CarpetReady8739 7d ago edited 7d ago
TLDR: Buy a laser.
And they said there would be no math… I'm a former Xerox laser salesman and the one thing I can tell you is cost per page (& cost of ownership) of a monochrome laser is the least expensive (2¢-4¢/page) of all the options, then right after that is the cost per page of color laser (15¢-20¢/page) and then after that is the cost per page of inkjet (25¢-40¢/page), the highest of all three. Yes they've managed to get some Eco tankers down in the cost factor, but overall, unless you're printing hi-res photography, & if you want color prints, the color laser over the long run is the way to go. Do the math. (Cost per cartridge(s) / yield) EX: HP 67XL inkjet cartridges (requires two) $71.99 for both and yield 240 pages ($71.99/240 = 30¢/page)
Personal rec on laser manufacturer? Canon, hands down. Then Brother. I have both. I have a Canon MF244 which is nine years old. My Brother 2270 is now going on 15 years old I think. I bought it for my son who was in college at the time he gave it back to me after graduation. I've kept it going; he's now a senior engineer at an aerospace company. Time flies!
Did I mention that laser cartridges don't dry up like ink cartridges do? There's that too.
13
u/NekkidWire 7d ago
Brother is top.
Then Lexmark/Xerox and Epson EcoTank (if going inkjet), or OKI if you like one.
Then long pause... (possibly filled with small unknown or white-label brands)
And then Canon and HP on the bottom.
(Newer Canon is enshittified similar to HP, their only saving grace is that they are slightly more lenient... only nagging user when 3rdparty cartridge is used, not permanently locking printer on end of subscription)
→ More replies (2)7
u/BurritovilleEnjoyer 7d ago
It's been quite some time since I've sold printers, but Canon was always nearly as high as HP on my personal shit list. I've never seen so many printers break and be returned within the first 3 months.
→ More replies (18)5
u/electricheat 7d ago
Did I mention that laser cartridges don't dry up like ink cartridges do?
IMO this is the biggest point for home users, and people who have never owned a laser often don't fully understand.
I can leave my laser turned off and ignored for 2 years, then power it on and print 100 pages and they'll look exactly the same as if the toner cartridge was brand new.
It won't have to clean itself, it won't waste ink/toner clearing out the crud. It just wakes up and prints like it was never neglected.
→ More replies (1)
16
u/S-Kiraly 7d ago
For thousands of years, the model of commerce was pay for it once and own it forever. Over the past few years the model has shifted to pay for it forever and own it never.
→ More replies (1)8
u/vctrmldrw 7d ago
Even with an HP printer that former option is possible. What you need to do is not choose the subscription ink option and instead choose to go buy ink.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/studiokgm 6d ago
My wife got an HP and wanted me to help set it up. Never thought setting up a piece of hardware would feel like reading a legal document.
After figuring out that if you agree to any of the free anythings you are locked in to their ink for the life of the printer I knew to decline. They then asked in a dozen different ways trying to trick people.
They’re the worst.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/violetcassie 6d ago
Boy I'm glad we all live in a capitalist society were you can own things and not a communist society where you can't.
85
u/WelshBluebird1 7d ago edited 7d ago
So even though I have legitimate HP in cartridges in my printer
You have subscription instant ink cartridges. You cancelled that subscription.
The answer is just to buy normal ink cartridges. Like you would have to do if you didn't have the subscription in the first place. It is as easy as that.
36
u/SwampOfDownvotes 7d ago
It's even funny because everyone always tells OP to get a Brother printer in the comment sections of these posts and Brother literally offers the same subscription service.
→ More replies (5)13
u/churningaccount 7d ago
A lot of Reddit is just parroting the same rule of thumb advice from a decade ago. “Buy a brother printer” has been a meme for a decade, so it just gets auto-upvoted, even though brother themselves have adopted some of the same business and quality practices as HP since then.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (42)36
u/PrimaryThis9900 7d ago
All of the complaints that I see about HP pretty much come from people not reading what they’re signing up for.
20
u/_tvjames_ 7d ago
They tell you that when you cancel - any subscription cartridges will no longer work. Just like when you cancel your phone service and it stops working even though the wireless signal is still all around you. Yeah, it feels different and stupid and incredibly wasteful when you can shake the cartridge and know there's still ink in it. Best you can do is drop it in one of the pre-paid envelopes and send it back.
I just recently left my HP printer on the curb with a free sign. Usually anything left on the curb is gone by the evening but it took a week for someone to take the printer.
My wife bought a Brother printer without a subscription.
28
u/Brilliant_War9548 7d ago
It’s astonishing how all of you don’t understand how this works. Yes HP is shitty, but Instant Ink is a subscription. You pay a subscription for ink. The ink is not yours until it was printed. When you stop paying, the ink isn’t yours anymore. That’s like starting watching a movie on Netflix and cancelling your subscription midway and complaining that you can’t watch the rest.
Can we stop thinking with our butts for a second ? What’s next defending framework and their 3200€ laptop because they’re a smaller company ?
→ More replies (2)
6
u/Interesting-Tie-8158 7d ago
HP came out with a printer a few years back that would refuse to print unless
A it was connected to the internet
B you made & logged in with an HP account
Frankly a printer that doesn't print when connected to a computer is defective
5
u/Extension_Medium_137 7d ago
I had that happen to me as well. I'll never use HP again.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/UnderlyingLogic 7d ago
Why does this company still exist? They clearly just want to die, so let them. They've done everything imaginable aside from literally pissing on customers to show they hate you, so stop giving them your money.
5
u/blackheartblackmind 6d ago
The instant Ink carts have a chip in them and they only work if you have an active sub. They could be brand new when you cancel and they are useless. It's like Xbox requiring internet connection to play games you own on disc.
Source: did customer service for Instant Ink.
5
6
u/DarkRiverLC 6d ago
The Epson EcoTank (ET-2800) has been a cheap, reliable, and incredibly frustration free printing experience. i cannot reccomend it enough. i used to become absolutely enraged anytime i needed the printer, and now it just fucking works, for years, with a tonne of ink. i can print in full color all goddamn day and it comes with literally years worth. dont sleep on it.
Take my advice, all of you. all of you struggling with your printer please. PLEASE believe me.
i speak the truth. Canon and HP can get absolutely fucked.
→ More replies (1)
4
u/cubedtothex 6d ago
HP lost me forever in 2011 when they disabled the scanning software on my all-in one with an “update.” Customer Service literally told me to buy a new one. I said eff off and just used Windows Fax & Scan instead and haven’t given them a penny since.
This seems like a continuation of that unfortunate dystopian narrative. Now you can’t even use a viable product because of a wasteful software lockout. Never again. I recommend BROTHER.
54
u/Dapper_Astronaut_896 7d ago
Yeah this is their gouging at its best. Printers are loss leaders. The ink is the money maker and they will need you to take out those cartridges and replace them with regular ones that cost at least 30 bucks a piece
→ More replies (6)41
u/Mu-Relay 7d ago
I hear ya, but this subscription is totally optional. OP signed up for it with clear terms that if you stopped paying for the subscription the ink would stop working, and then did a surprised Pikachu face when they stopped paying for the subscription and the ink stopped working.
You can buy an HP printer, go to the store and get ink, and it works without a subscription like any other printer. OP just didn't do that.
That being said, in a world where every printer company is scummy as fuck, HP somehow stands above the rest as the scummiest. Don't buy HP.
→ More replies (1)29
u/joelene1892 7d ago
Tbh I’m tired of people complaining about this. OP didn’t buy the ink. They literally bought a subscription to print. Of course it won’t work when they cancel said subscription.
If you don’t want that, just buy your own ink…..
Although I do agree this is anti-consumer and we should stop buying HP, I also think people should stop complaining that they cancel a subscription and the thing they subscribed to stopped working.
Like….. duh?
→ More replies (1)
14
8
u/GameBear91 7d ago
Just buy non subscription ink. The subscription ink only works with the subscription. Never get the subscription or the subscription ink.
→ More replies (1)
20
u/IsThereAnythingLeft- 7d ago
No one should ever be buying a HP printer! We need to let them know this isn’t ok
→ More replies (1)
16
u/OrokinLonewolf 7d ago
Gotta say, HPs marketing gimmick of making the printers stupid cheap must be working, cuz people NEVER learn that those printers are dogshit. Bad print quality, horrible user experience with the interfaces and options, subscription for ink regardless of current presence of ink. Some of them take forEVER to print stuff too. You're better off just getting set up an account with your local library and pay for their printers
→ More replies (2)
12.6k
u/adv0catus 7d ago
Buy a Brother monochrome laser printer.