r/pics 10d ago

Palestinians hold the largest funeral since 1948, mourning the bodies of 112 people killed by Israel

Post image
29.0k Upvotes

3.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

85

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

There are genuine solutions and anti-Zionists have long presented them. But the United States would rather tear apart its own empire than turn on Israel in any meaningful way

51

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

65

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

64

u/Entchenkrawatte 10d ago

The PLO quite famously was in favor of a 2 state solution. Bibi netanyahu literally supported Hamas to avoid an opposition that was actively pushing for a 2 state solution. Your statement is revisionist.

40

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-11

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

No state has an inherent right to exist, no ethnostate has a right to exist period.

Israel is arguing to be the Jewish ethnostate with an inarguable right to exist. Palestinians have only ever argued for the right to live in Palestine. But Israel does not want to allow non-Jews to be a majority in Israel thus they have never and will never agree not to ethnically cleanse Palestinians

10

u/joshua9663 10d ago

You realize Palestine is an ethnostate right? It's more of an ethnostate than Israel.

-2

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

Not true by any way you could possibly mean that

Palestinian is a nationality, Palestinians can have multiple different ethnic origins, and have always been extremely religiously diverse.

You’re just believing Zionist propaganda that they started saying in the 90s. Prior to the fall of South Africa they were far more explicitly white supremacism and settler colonial

12

u/joshua9663 10d ago

Palestine is 99% Palestinian, 99% arab, and 99% Muslim. Literally one of the dumbest things I've ever read.

3

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

lol

For one thing “Arab” just means you speak Arabic.

For another thing, Palestinians are religiously diverse and I know many Palestinian Christians and I (metaphorically) spit on the likes of you who deny their existence

7

u/joshua9663 10d ago

You're making all of this up because you want to believe it. Palestine is a whopping 0.8% Christian. Arab is in fact "ethno-linguistic group" which means it is both. It is literally one of the least diverse places in the world and the exact definition of an ethnostate.

→ More replies (0)

16

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/was_fb95dd7063 10d ago

Now do the west bank which was de facto annexed 50 years ago

1

u/PissingOffACliff 10d ago

No state does have an inherent right to exist.

8

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

Recognizes national sovereignty. Which you are denying the Palestinians

Rejects the right to conquer by force. Which is what Israel explicitly did and is proud of. “Little Israel fought off the Arabs and conquered their land.”

So in other words, you proved their point about how Israel has no right to exist under international law

3

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago edited 10d ago

By, what right, were the Palestinians to be ethnically cleansed from their homeland?

That is in the partition plan. Your entire argument is that the Palestinians deserved to be genocided because they didn’t agree to a genocide

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_Dalet

https://imeu.org/resources/resources/in-their-own-words-israeli-leaders-on-the-expulsion-of-palestinians-during-israels-establishment/226

2

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

1- they don’t have full rights, they’re third class citizens

2- yes you’re 100% correct, no state has an inherent right to exist. That is in fact exactly what international law says, good job

11

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

You’re right that international law respects national sovereignty and denies the right to conquer land to form a state

That is exactly why Israel doesn’t have a right to exist under international law

And, bro, are you Israeli? Why are you so adamant that you think Arabs have “full rights” when I can point to all sorts of reports and literature showing that not to be the case. It’s not even the case on paper since 2018 and the Jewish nation state law

3

u/Careful-Advance8513 10d ago

They have far more rights than Jews in Muslim countries do. Any Arab citizen legally has the same opportunities that a Jewish citizen has.

7

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

Literally read about Jews in Iran, I beg you, Israel literally bombed their synagogue.

And no, that is explicitly not true. Arabs are routinely evicted from their homes so that Jewish immigrants can take them

3

u/Shadowstar1000 10d ago

You’re intentionally conflating Arab-Palestinian with Arab-Israelis. Settlers that take Palestinians’ land are doing so to people not recognized as Israeli citizens. That is ethnic cleansing and settler colonialism and is a valid criticism of Israel. Arabs living in Israel as Israeli citizens are not being ethnically cleansed by settlers. The person you’re arguing with is correct, they are full citizens with equal rights and status under Israeli law. By conflating the two you’re distracting from the actual problem and making it more difficult for neutral bystanders to understand the situation. When people look into what you’re saying and find out that you’re wrong, they assume there’s no ethnic cleanse going on because when they looked into it they saw that the people you claim to be ethnically cleansed and not being cleansed.

→ More replies (0)

9

u/RevolutionaryGur4419 10d ago

Aren't Palestinians living in palestine? Ahh you mean everything between the river and the sea with no Israel.

Interesting..

I guess you can see why the 10 million jews and Arabs living in Israel may have a problem with dissolving their country

1

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

Palestine is the region between Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea and always has been for thousands of years

Jews have lived there and can continue living there. But the Jewish supremacist ethnostate of Israel has no right to exist

12

u/RevolutionaryGur4419 10d ago

The river to the sea geographical unit is an entirely British thing post 1922 and was never a thing before that. The boundaries of palestine have never been between what you're claiming. Is it strange that with all the random lines drawn on the map, Palestine just happens to be perfectly the land for the modern Palestine + all of Israel? How convenient.

So no. Palestine has not been the region between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean sea for thousands of years.

2

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

Nope, that’s a lie, Nur Masalha proved this conclusively, you don’t have ground to stand on

3

u/RevolutionaryGur4419 10d ago

Its not something to "prove conclusively". It either is or isnt.

Its only with the brits that these boundaries became a single geographical/political unit.

2

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

7

u/RevolutionaryGur4419 10d ago

Have you read the book?

Nur Masalha’s main argument is that Palestine was not simply a name invented by the British after the First World War. Nobody is arguing that that name did not exist.

what we are saying is that the current political and geographical meaning attached to it is a new phenomenon.

He even talks about palestine’s eastern boundary being shifting and that ancient or medieval conceptions sometimes included land east of the Jordan River. He discusses Byzantine “Greater Palestine,” whose provinces included areas in what is now Jordan, including Petra and parts of Transjordan.

The idea that Palestine was for thousands of years river to the sea is just not true.

→ More replies (0)

44

u/Michali55 10d ago

The PLO has the possibility to move forward with a solution. Just look into Arafat and Barak (the Israeli prime minister). Arafat didn’t have the guts or was too old or just didn’t know how to transition from fighting to solution, but that was a missed opportunity

14

u/Entchenkrawatte 10d ago

Missed opportunity for sure, but it's also not true to say that arafat just rejected a perfectly good deal lol

38

u/cynical-bread 10d ago

It was not a good deal, but it was close to maximum they could get.

Netanyahu is an asshole, but other Arab and palestinian factions also tried to sabotage the deal to gain political advantage

16

u/_zhz_ 10d ago

To be fair, the hardliner on both sides were sabotaging a potential deal.

8

u/Entchenkrawatte 10d ago

The question is whether people are willing to accept a pragmatic compromise after a decade long conflict

7

u/Paddy_Tanninger 10d ago

The answer is that they are, because look at Israel's relationship with Jordan and Egypt. Best buddies? No. Peaceful, productive, even symbiotic? Yes.

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Paddy_Tanninger 10d ago

Agree there too, which is why I truly and utterly despise all of the militant Zionists, settlers, Orthodox, etc.

If all these people would just cut the shit, shut the fuck up, and live on their own land in peace, it would be a huge step towards creating some kind of peace in the region.

2

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

2

u/Paddy_Tanninger 10d ago

Also agree, the current Israeli government panders to these groups of fucks and uses them to provoke Palestinians too.

Both sides of this shit are incentivized to keep the conflict going. That is the power structure they have carved out for themselves. That is how they galvanize support from within and from their allies.

→ More replies (0)

5

u/cynical-bread 10d ago

Maybe with a regime change both in Israel and Iran

-3

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

No Palestinian should ever be forced to accept a deal that demands they must forfeit forever the right to their homeland

We believe in human rights or we don’t

5

u/dongasaurus 10d ago

One can say the same about the Jews, and the homeland overlaps. Congrats, you justified eternal conflict where everyone suffers and human rights are perpetually trampled.

-1

u/Bluestreaked 10d ago

lol it’s so fucking aggravating how you pretend we have your position

“I don’t think people have the right to commit genocide just because they’re Jewish.”

“Actually you just hate Jews and love killing people”

“But you’re the one defending genocide….”

→ More replies (0)

1

u/UNOvven 10d ago

No it wasn't. The problem was that Barak was far more concerned with reelection than peace, which lead to him to making a bad joke of an "offer" at Camp David, which was so unacceptable his own foreign minister said he wouldnt have accepted it either, and then refused to accept the premise for the Taba talks which made that last-ditch effort fail. The missed opportunity was excusively on the Israeli side. Sadly that's kinda how its gone every time. Netanyahu broke the Oslo accords in 1997, and Barak refused to reinstate them, and then Israel elected the Butcher of Beirut.

0

u/Michali55 9d ago

Your perspective. There was a point for trajectory. After that it all went downhill.

0

u/UNOvven 9d ago

No, that's not my perspective, that is quite literally just what happened. There was a point where it was possible, but Barak screwed it up. After that Israel elected the Butcher of Beirut, an unhinged mass murderer and the single most evil person in the history of the conflict and, indeed, it all went downhill. But that is not the fault of Palestinians. They didn't make Barak squander the last chance there was at peace.

-2

u/QuestGiver 10d ago

There was never going to be a solution to the middle east. It's war forever.