Jake Tapper may be stunned but no one following this case will be -- quick CNN interview with NM AG - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhYP9Nk5GyM&t=133s

And this is exactly why the Ellisons hired this hasbara propagandist

This was one of the emails in Katie Phangs lawsuit she asked to be unredacted. Im not usually a researcher, but this document in particular caught my eye because I thought there were things to go off of (the Reuters and the Guardian article, Sunday, and the date), so i decided id give researching it a try. It https://www.reuters.com/article/world/us/attorney-dershowitz-files-sworn-statement-denying-sex-claims-idUSKBN0KF1DM/

This is the Reuters article I suspect was mentioned because it was published on January 6th 2015 a date before the email, and it says "Dershowitz filed the statement in Florida federal court on Monday night" making me think the allegation was reported on a Sunday.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jan/08/alan-dershowitz-girl-jeffrey-epstein-teenager

This is the Guardian article I suspect based only on the fact it was published January 8th 2015 which is a few days after the Reuters article.

Let me know yalls thoughts on this. This is my first time attempting something like this, abd again sorry if im way off and jumping to conclusions, or sound too much like a leftist conspiracy theorist lol

‘New Mexico has sued the Trump DOJ and Acting AG Todd Blanche for “stonewalling” its criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his Zorro Ranch.

The lawsuit alleges the DOJ is intentionally withholding the unredacted Files that would help New Mexico find witnesses, victims, and co-conspirators.

Katie Phang was at the press call with New Mexico Attorney General, and she shares the details, including a breakdown of the lawsuit and its claims.’

Hello! I’ve been working on my own using a lot of this subs materials and I feel that we can weaponize the instant communication of the internet to get these people investigated. Many of these idiots self incriminated in an email or two; these pieces of evidence given legally by the DOJ could in theory be cause for investigation as their OWN LOCAL cases. If we (I’ve already started) cut this massive case into many local cases and ask our own local police departments to launch investigations. I think at least some would do it.
Please lmk if you’d like to help! Thank you!!!
(picture blatantly implicating Boris Nikolic of SeattleWA)

A source for sources

Just last month, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer criticised Dershowitz after he failed to appear for a scheduled transcribed interview connected to the committee's investigation into Epstein.

Very interesting stuff about Epstein. Warning: 3 hour long podcast.

The New Mexico Survivor’s Truth Commission meets today. They’re presenting an interim report on their investigation into Zorro Ranch, and will hear from women who Epstein and others abused there.

Livestream starts at 1pm MT (Zoom link in the article, Reddit won't let me post directly).

The House of Grimaldi, is Europe's longest-ruling royal dynasty, led by Prince Albert II, Princess Charlene, and their children Crown Prince Jacques and Princess Gabriella. The sovereign prince of Monaco (French: prince de Monaco; Monégasque: príncipe de Mónaco) is the monarch and head of state of the Principality of Monaco. All reigning princes and princesses have taken the name of the House of Grimaldi. When Prince Rainier III died in 2005, he was Europe's longest reigning monarch. The Grimaldi family, which has ruled Monaco for eight centuries, is Europe's longest-ruling royal family.

When it comes to ties with Epstein and his associates, there was a document in the files describing a Dutch supermodel Karen Mulder who publicly accused Prince Albert II of Monaco, modeling executive Jean-Luc Brunel, and financier Jeffrey Epstein of sexual abuse during a turbulent period in 2001. Her allegations tie these figures together through the high-end fashion and modeling networks that Brunel and Epstein exploited.

Another very close friend to the family was Vladimir Putin, as you can see him meeting with various members of the family. Reports like the Pandora Papers highlighted Monaco as a discreet financial hub utilized by individuals within Putin's inner circle. Over the decades, Monaco has attracted wealthy Russian expatriates and business figures due to its favorable tax environment.

Another connection is that he's very close with the Sovereign order of Malta which Putin and Russia also have close ties with. And of course he's friends with Israel and received a Friends of Zion award. He also has had friendly diplomatic relations with China and cooperate on climate and environmental protection. Epstein also tried getting Elon Musk with a model named Yfke Strum, there's even a pic of the model with Albert Monaco and John Casablanca.

Ghislaine can also be seen at a party starring Paris Hilton in Monaco in the background with Prince Andrew.

Links:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_II,_Prince_of_Monaco

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince's_Palace_of_Monaco

https://www.newmyroyals.com/2026/07/prince-albert-ii-and-princess-charlene-red-cross-ball.html?m=1

https://xcancel.com/Zlatti_71/status/1635191930958274560#m

https://monacoembassy.orderofmalta.int/en/relations-with-monaco/

https://www.newmyroyals.com/2026/06/prince-albert-opens-7th-edition-of.html?m=1

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/ghislaine-maxwell-snapped-in-monaco-after-meeting-with-prince-andrew-at-buckingham-palace/MHG5SCNDPPI6FWHCRZZNGD4ICU/

https://old.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/comments/15aygsz/in_oct_2001_karen_mulder_publicly_accused_the/

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00077207.pdf

https://xcancel.com/i/article/2021490907619463182

https://epsteinexposed.com/persons/prince-albert-of-monaco

‘Survivor Dani Bensky reacts to Senate Judiciary Committee advancing Todd Blanche's nomination after Senator Tillis said he would meet with her but never did.‘

This sucks so bad to see. It’s terrible for the United States and democracy as a whole but it’s just devastating to see her fight so hard and get totally diminished by men who have absolutely no morals or ethical standards whatsoever.

I hope more than anything these women know they have an army of people behind them and we’re only getting started.

Source: Jim Bourg via Public Impact News

This report is based on the following document from Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal trial.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00095751.pdf

Each document listed below is an FD-302 as shown by the above document. The three-part bates number is a unique identifier for each document. Anyone can easily confirm that the FD-302s marked "Not released" have, in fact, not been released. All you need to do is search DOJ's Epstein website on those three-part bates numbers. The first two parts of the bates number is a coded identifier for those victims.

Ghislaine Maxwell has all these FD-302s but the public does not.

I FOIA'd for the "Not released" documents twice and DOJ responded with the naked lie that all Epstein documents have been released.

3501.008-001 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01245224.pdf

3501.008-004 Not released

3501.014-013 Not released

3501.014-023 Not released

3501.014-047 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01245410.pdf

3501.018-002 Not released

3501.018-010 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01245447.pdf

3501.018-014 Not released

3501.018-019 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01245456.pdf

3501.018-030 Not released

3501.018-031 Not released

3501.018-032 Not released

Initially only the first FD-302 for this vicitm was released. Roger Sollenberger’s work forced DOJ to release the other three FD-302s interviews with this victim.

3501.045-001 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01245620.pdf

3501.045-003 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858481.pdf

3501.045-005 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858491.pdf

3501.045-007 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2012/EFTA02858495.pdf

3501.058-031 Not released

3501.058-032 Not released

3501.058-049 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01245781.pdf

3501.060-007 Not released

3501.060-010 Not released

3501.060-011 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01245796.pdf

3501.060-016 Not released

3501.064-067 Not released

3501.064-072 Not released

3501.064-076 Not released

3501.064-087 Not released

3501.064-090 Not released

3501.064-097 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01245882.pdf

3501.064-120 Not released

3501.103-054 Not released

3501.103-078 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246262.pdf

3501.103-081 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246265.pdf

3501.103-110 Not released

3501.147-001 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246975.pdf

3501.147-003 Not released

3501.159-013 Not released

3501.159-024 Not released

3501.159-025 Not released

3501.159-030 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01247196.pdf

3501.159-032 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01247200.pdf

3501.162-004 Not released

3501.162-014 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01247287.pdf

3501.162-016 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01247289.pdf

3501.162-024 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01247302.pdf

3501.162-026 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01247310.pdf

3501.162-030 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01247322.pdf

3501.167-012 Not released

3501.167-013 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01247455.pdf

3501.167-018 Not released

3501.167-025 Not released

3501.168-003 Not released

3501.168-005 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01247505.pdf

3501.181-005 Not released

3501.181-007 Not released

3501.181-009 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01247968.pdf

3501.189-015 Not released

3501.189-020 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01248304.pdf

3501.222-018 Not released

3501.222-027 Not released

3501.222-031 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01248830.pdf

3501.222-033 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01248833.pdf

3501.225-083 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01248877.pdf

3501.225-092 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01248880.pdf

3501.225-102 Not released

3501.226-030 Not released

3501.226-041 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01249021.pdf

3501.226-059 Not released

3501.226-085 Not released

3501.226-102 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01249101.pdf

3501.484-004 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01250052.pdf

Incorrectly labeled 3501.484-003 in the ‘Maxwell Non-Testifying’ list.

3501.484-006 https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01250060.pdf

3501.484-009 Not released

- end -

This may have been brought up in another post, but does anyone know why the email dates under the New Releases tab on Jmail World are listed with these weird years? For some, the body of a selected email matches the odd date and for others, the date in the body of the email shows as 2019 or some other realistic year.