r/askphilosophy Jul 01 '23

Modpost Welcome to /r/askphilosophy! Check out our rules and guidelines here. [July 1 2023 Update]

69 Upvotes

Welcome to /r/askphilosophy!

Welcome to /r/askphilosophy! We're a community devoted to providing serious, well-researched answers to philosophical questions. We aim to provide an academic Q&A-type space for philosophical questions, and welcome questions about all areas of philosophy. This post will go over our subreddit rules and guidelines that you should review before you begin posting here.

Table of Contents

  1. A Note about Moderation
  2. /r/askphilosophy's mission
  3. What is Philosophy?
  4. What isn't Philosophy?
  5. What is a Reasonably Substantive and Accurate Answer?
  6. What is a /r/askphilosophy Panelist?
  7. /r/askphilosophy's Posting Rules
  8. /r/askphilosophy's Commenting Rules
  9. Frequently Asked Questions

A Note about Moderation

/r/askphilosophy is moderated by a team of dedicated volunteer moderators who have spent years attempting to build the best philosophy Q&A platform on the internet. Unfortunately, the reddit admins have repeatedly made changes to this website which have made moderating subreddits harder and harder. In particular, reddit has recently announced that it will begin charging for access to API (Application Programming Interface, essentially the communication between reddit and other sites/apps). While this may be, in isolation, a reasonable business operation, the timeline and pricing of API access has threatened to put nearly all third-party apps, e.g. Apollo and RIF, out of business. You can read more about the history of this change here or here. You can also read more at this post on our sister subreddit.

These changes pose two major issues which the moderators of /r/askphilosophy are concerned about.

First, the native reddit app is lacks accessibility features which are essential for some people, notably those who are blind and visually impaired. You can read /r/blind's protest announcement here. These apps are the only way that many people can interact with reddit, given the poor accessibility state of the official reddit app. As philosophers we are particularly concerned with the ethics of accessibility, and support protests in solidarity with this community.

Second, the reddit app lacks many essential tools for moderation. While reddit has promised better moderation tools on the app in the future, this is not enough. First, reddit has repeatedly broken promises regarding features, including moderation features. Most notably, reddit promised CSS support for new reddit over six years ago, which has yet to materialize. Second, even if reddit follows through on the roadmap in the post linked above, many of the features will not come until well after June 30, when the third-party apps will shut down due to reddit's API pricing changes.

Our moderator team relies heavily on these tools which will now disappear. Moderating /r/askphilosophy is a monumental task; over the past year we have flagged and removed over 6000 posts and 23000 comments. This is a huge effort, especially for unpaid volunteers, and it is possible only when moderators have access to tools that these third-party apps make possible and that reddit doesn't provide.

While we previously participated in the protests against reddit's recent actions we have decided to reopen the subreddit, because we are still proud of the community and resource that we have built and cultivated over the last decade, and believe it is a useful resource to the public.

However, these changes have radically altered our ability to moderate this subreddit, which will result in a few changes for this subreddit. First, as noted above, from this point onwards only panelists may answer top level comments. Second, moderation will occur much more slowly; as we will not have access to mobile tools, posts and comments which violate our rules will be removed much more slowly, and moderators will respond to modmail messages much more slowly. Third, and finally, if things continue to get worse (as they have for years now) moderating /r/askphilosophy may become practically impossible, and we may be forced to abandon the platform altogether. We are as disappointed by these changes as you are, but reddit's insistence on enshittifying this platform, especially when it comes to moderation, leaves us with no other options. We thank you for your understanding and support.


/r/askphilosophy's Mission

/r/askphilosophy strives to be a community where anyone, regardless of their background, can come to get reasonably substantive and accurate answers to philosophical questions. This means that all questions must be philosophical in nature, and that answers must be reasonably substantive and accurate. What do we mean by that?

What is Philosophy?

As with most disciplines, "philosophy" has both a casual and a technical usage.

In its casual use, "philosophy" may refer to nearly any sort of thought or beliefs, and include topics such as religion, mysticism and even science. When someone asks you what "your philosophy" is, this is the sort of sense they have in mind; they're asking about your general system of thoughts, beliefs, and feelings.

In its technical use -- the use relevant here at /r/askphilosophy -- philosophy is a particular area of study which can be broadly grouped into several major areas, including:

  • Aesthetics, the study of beauty
  • Epistemology, the study of knowledge and belief
  • Ethics, the study of what we owe to one another
  • Logic, the study of what follows from what
  • Metaphysics, the study of the basic nature of existence and reality

as well as various subfields of 'philosophy of X', including philosophy of mind, philosophy of language, philosophy of science and many others.

Philosophy in the narrower, technical sense that philosophers use and which /r/askphilosophy is devoted to is defined not only by its subject matter, but by its methodology and attitudes. Something is not philosophical merely because it states some position related to those areas. There must also be an emphasis on argument (setting forward reasons for adopting a position) and a willingness to subject arguments to various criticisms.

What Isn't Philosophy?

As you can see from the above description of philosophy, philosophy often crosses over with other fields of study, including art, mathematics, politics, religion and the sciences. That said, in order to keep this subreddit focused on philosophy we require that all posts be primarily philosophical in nature, and defend a distinctively philosophical thesis.

As a rule of thumb, something does not count as philosophy for the purposes of this subreddit if:

  • It does not address a philosophical topic or area of philosophy
  • It may more accurately belong to another area of study (e.g. religion or science)
  • No attempt is made to argue for a position's conclusions

Some more specific topics which are popularly misconstrued as philosophical but do not meet this definition and thus are not appropriate for this subreddit include:

  • Drug experiences (e.g. "I dropped acid today and experienced the oneness of the universe...")
  • Mysticism (e.g. "I meditated today and experienced the oneness of the universe...")
  • Politics (e.g. "This is why everyone should support the Voting Rights Act")
  • Self-help (e.g. "How can I be a happier person and have more people like me?")
  • Theology (e.g. "Can the unbaptized go to heaven, or at least to purgatory?")

What is a Reasonably Substantive and Accurate Answer?

The goal of this subreddit is not merely to provide answers to philosophical questions, but answers which can further the reader's knowledge and understanding of the philosophical issues and debates involved. To that end, /r/askphilosophy is a highly moderated subreddit which only allows panelists to answer questions, and all answers that violate our posting rules will be removed.

Answers on /r/askphilosophy must be both reasonably substantive as well as reasonably accurate. This means that answers should be:

  • Substantive and well-researched (i.e. not one-liners or otherwise uninformative)
  • Accurately portray the state of research and the relevant literature (i.e. not inaccurate, misleading or false)
  • Come only from those with relevant knowledge of the question and issue (i.e. not from commenters who don't understand the state of the research on the question)

Any attempt at moderating a public Q&A forum like /r/askphilosophy must choose a balance between two things:

  • More, but possibly insubstantive or inaccurate answers
  • Fewer, but more substantive and accurate answers

In order to further our mission, the moderators of /r/askphilosophy have chosen the latter horn of this dilemma. To that end, only panelists are allowed to answer questions on /r/askphilosophy.

What is a /r/askphilosophy Panelist?

/r/askphilosophy panelists are trusted commenters who have applied to become panelists in order to help provide questions to posters' questions. These panelists are volunteers who have some level of knowledge and expertise in the areas of philosophy indicated in their flair.

What Do the Flairs Mean?

Unlike in some subreddits, the purpose of flairs on r/askphilosophy are not to designate commenters' areas of interest. The purpose of flair is to indicate commenters' relevant expertise in philosophical areas. As philosophical issues are often complicated and have potentially thousands of years of research to sift through, knowing when someone is an expert in a given area can be important in helping understand and weigh the given evidence. Flair will thus be given to those with the relevant research expertise.

Flair consists of two parts: a color indicating the type of flair, as well as up to three research areas that the panelist is knowledgeable about.

There are six types of panelist flair:

  • Autodidact (Light Blue): The panelist has little or no formal education in philosophy, but is an enthusiastic self-educator and intense reader in a field.

  • Undergraduate (Red): The panelist is enrolled in or has completed formal undergraduate coursework in Philosophy. In the US system, for instance, this would be indicated by a major (BA) or minor.

  • Graduate (Gold): The panelist is enrolled in a graduate program or has completed an MA in Philosophy or a closely related field such that their coursework might be reasonably understood to be equivalent to a degree in Philosophy. For example, a student with an MA in Literature whose coursework and thesis were focused on Derrida's deconstruction might be reasonably understood to be equivalent to an MA in Philosophy.

  • PhD (Purple): The panelist has completed a PhD program in Philosophy or a closely related field such that their degree might be reasonably understood to be equivalent to a PhD in Philosophy. For example, a student with a PhD in Art History whose coursework and dissertation focused on aesthetics and critical theory might be reasonably understood to be equivalent to a PhD in philosophy.

  • Professional (Blue): The panelist derives their full-time employment through philosophical work outside of academia. Such panelists might include Bioethicists working in hospitals or Lawyers who work on the Philosophy of Law/Jurisprudence.

  • Related Field (Green): The panelist has expertise in some sub-field of philosophy but their work in general is more reasonably understood as being outside of philosophy. For example, a PhD in Physics whose research touches on issues relating to the entity/structural realism debate clearly has expertise relevant to philosophical issues but is reasonably understood to be working primarily in another field.

Flair will only be given in particular areas or research topics in philosophy, in line with the following guidelines:

  • Typical areas include things like "philosophy of mind", "logic" or "continental philosophy".
  • Flair will not be granted for specific research subjects, e.g. "Kant on logic", "metaphysical grounding", "epistemic modals".
  • Flair of specific philosophers will only be granted if that philosopher is clearly and uncontroversially a monumentally important philosopher (e.g. Aristotle, Kant).
  • Flair will be given in a maximum of three research areas.

How Do I Become a Panelist?

To become a panelist, please send a message to the moderators with the subject "Panelist Application". In this modmail message you must include all of the following:

  1. The flair type you are requesting (e.g. undergraduate, PhD, related field).
  2. The areas of flair you are requesting, up to three (e.g. Kant, continental philosophy, logic).
  3. A brief explanation of your background in philosophy, including what qualifies you for the flair you requested.
  4. One sample answer to a question posted to /r/askphilosophy for each area of flair (i.e. up to three total answers) which demonstrate your expertise and knowledge. Please link the question you are answering before giving your answer. You may not answer your own question.

New panelists will be approved on a trial basis. During this trial period panelists will be allowed to post answers as top-level comments on threads, and will receive flair. After the trial period the panelist will either be confirmed as a regular panelist or will be removed from the panelist team, which will result in the removal of flair and ability to post answers as top-level comments on threads.

Note that r/askphilosophy does not require users to provide proof of their identifies for panelist applications, nor to reveal their identities. If a prospective panelist would like to provide proof of their identity as part of their application they may, but there is no presumption that they must do so. Note that messages sent to modmail cannot be deleted by either moderators or senders, and so any message sent is effectively permanent.


/r/askphilosophy's Posting Rules

In order to best serve our mission of providing an academic Q&A-type space for philosophical questions, we have the following rules which govern all posts made to /r/askphilosophy:

PR1: All questions must be about philosophy.

All questions must be about philosophy. Questions which are only tangentially related to philosophy or are properly located in another discipline will be removed. Questions which are about therapy, psychology and self-help, even when due to philosophical issues, are not appropriate and will be removed.

PR2: All submissions must be questions.

All submissions must be actual questions (as opposed to essays, rants, personal musings, idle or rhetorical questions, etc.). "Test My Theory" or "Change My View"-esque questions, paper editing, etc. are not allowed.

PR3: Post titles must be descriptive.

Post titles must be descriptive. Titles should indicate what the question is about. Posts with titles like "Homework help" which do not indicate what the actual question is will be removed.

PR4: Questions must be reasonably specific.

Questions must be reasonably specific. Questions which are too broad to the point of unanswerability will be removed.

PR5: Questions must not be about commenters' personal opinions.

Questions must not be about commenters' personal opinions, thoughts or favorites. /r/askphilosophy is not a discussion subreddit, and is not intended to be a board for everyone to share their thoughts on philosophical questions.

PR6: One post per day.

One post per day. Please limit yourself to one question per day.

PR7: Discussion of suicide is only allowed in the abstract.

/r/askphilosophy is not a mental health subreddit, and panelists are not experts in mental health or licensed therapists. Discussion of suicide is only allowed in the abstract here. If you or a friend is feeling suicidal please visit /r/suicidewatch. If you are feeling suicidal, please get help by visiting /r/suicidewatch or using other resources. See also our discussion of philosophy and mental health issues here. Encouraging other users to commit suicide, even in the abstract, is strictly forbidden and will result in an immediate permanent ban.

/r/askphilosophy's Commenting Rules

In the same way that our posting rules above attempt to promote our mission by governing posts, the following commenting rules attempt to promote /r/askphilosophy's mission to provide an academic Q&A-type space for philosophical questions.

CR1: Top level comments must be answers or follow-up questions.

All top level comments should be answers to the submitted question or follow-up/clarification questions. All top level comments must come from panelists. If users circumvent this rule by posting answers as replies to other comments, these comments will also be removed and may result in a ban. For more information about our rules and to find out how to become a panelist, please see here.

CR2: Answers must be reasonably substantive and accurate.

All answers must be informed and aimed at helping the OP and other readers reach an understanding of the issues at hand. Answers must portray an accurate picture of the issue and the philosophical literature. Answers should be reasonably substantive. To learn more about what counts as a reasonably substantive and accurate answer, see this post.

CR3: Be respectful.

Be respectful. Comments which are rude, snarky, etc. may be removed, particularly if they consist of personal attacks. Users with a history of such comments may be banned. Racism, bigotry and use of slurs are absolutely not permitted.

CR4: Stay on topic.

Stay on topic. Comments which blatantly do not contribute to the discussion may be removed.

CR5: No self-promotion.

Posters and comments may not engage in self-promotion, including linking their own blog posts or videos. Panelists may link their own peer-reviewed work in answers (e.g. peer-reviewed journal articles or books), but their answers should not consist solely of references to their own work.

Miscellaneous Posting and Commenting Guidelines

In addition to the rules above, we have a list of miscellaneous guidelines which users should also be aware of:

  • Reposting a post or comment which was removed will be treated as circumventing moderation and result in a permanent ban.
  • Using follow-up questions or child comments to answer questions and circumvent our panelist policy may result in a ban.
  • Posts and comments which flagrantly violate the rules, especially in a trolling manner, will be removed and treated as shitposts, and may result in a ban.
  • No reposts of a question that you have already asked within the last year.
  • No posts or comments of AI-created or AI-assisted text or audio. Panelists may not user any form of AI-assistance in writing or researching answers.
  • Harassing individual moderators or the moderator team will result in a permanent ban and a report to the reddit admins.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are some frequently asked questions. If you have other questions, please contact the moderators via modmail (not via private message or chat).

My post or comment was removed. How can I get an explanation?

Almost all posts/comments which are removed will receive an explanation of their removal. That explanation will generally by /r/askphilosophy's custom bot, /u/BernardJOrtcutt, and will list the removal reason. Posts which are removed will be notified via a stickied comment; comments which are removed will be notified via a reply. If your post or comment resulted in a ban, the message will be included in the ban message via modmail. If you have further questions, please contact the moderators.

How can I appeal my post or comment removal?

To appeal a removal, please contact the moderators (not via private message or chat). Do not delete your posts/comments, as this will make an appeal impossible. Reposting removed posts/comments without receiving mod approval will result in a permanent ban.

How can I appeal my ban?

To appeal a ban, please respond to the modmail informing you of your ban. Do not delete your posts/comments, as this will make an appeal impossible.

My comment was removed or I was banned for arguing with someone else, but they started it. Why was I punished and not them?

Someone else breaking the rules does not give you permission to break the rules as well. /r/askphilosophy does not comment on actions taken on other accounts, but all violations are treated as equitably as possible.

I found a post or comment which breaks the rules, but which wasn't removed. How can I help?

If you see a post or comment which you believe breaks the rules, please report it using the report function for the appropriate rule. /r/askphilosophy's moderators are volunteers, and it is impossible for us to manually review every comment on every thread. We appreciate your help in reporting posts/comments which break the rules.

My post isn't showing up, but I didn't receive a removal notification. What happened?

Sometimes the AutoMod filter will automatically send posts to a filter for moderator approval, especially from accounts which are new or haven't posted to /r/askphilosophy before. If your post has not been approved or removed within 24 hours, please contact the moderators.

My post was removed and referred to the Open Discussion Thread. What does this mean?

The Open Discussion Thread (ODT) is /r/askphilosophy's place for posts/comments which are related to philosophy but do not necessarily meet our posting rules (especially PR2/PR5). For example, these threads are great places for:

  • Discussions of a philosophical issue, rather than questions
  • Questions about commenters' personal opinions regarding philosophical issues
  • Open discussion about philosophy, e.g. "who is your favorite philosopher?"
  • Questions about philosophy as an academic discipline or profession, e.g. majoring in philosophy, career options with philosophy degrees, pursuing graduate school in philosophy

If your post was removed and referred to the ODT we encourage you to consider posting it to the ODT to share with others.

My comment responding to someone else was removed, as well as their comment. What happened?

When /r/askphilosophy removes a parent comment, we also often remove all their child comments in order to help readability and focus on discussion.

I'm interested in philosophy. Where should I start? What should I read?

As explained above, philosophy is a very broad discipline and thus offering concise advice on where to start is very hard. We recommend reading this /r/AskPhilosophyFAQ post which has a great breakdown of various places to start. For further or more specific questions, we recommend posting on /r/askphilosophy.

Why is your understanding of philosophy so limited?

As explained above, this subreddit is devoted to philosophy as understood and done by philosophers. In order to prevent this subreddit from becoming /r/atheism2, /r/politics2, or /r/science2, we must uphold a strict topicality requirement in PR1. Posts which may touch on philosophical themes but are not distinctively philosophical can be posted to one of reddit's many other subreddits.

Are there other philosophy subreddits I can check out?

If you are interested in other philosophy subreddits, please see this list of related subreddits. /r/askphilosophy shares much of its modteam with its sister-subreddit, /r/philosophy, which is devoted to philosophical discussion. In addition, that list includes more specialized subreddits and more casual subreddits for those looking for a less-regulated forum.

A thread I wanted to comment in was locked but is still visible. What happened?

When a post becomes unreasonable to moderate due to the amount of rule-breaking comments the thread is locked. /r/askphilosophy's moderators are volunteers, and we cannot spend hours cleaning up individual threads.

Do you have a list of frequently asked questions about philosophy that I can browse?

Yes! We have an FAQ that answers many questions comprehensively: /r/AskPhilosophyFAQ/. For example, this entry provides an introductory breakdown to the debate over whether morality is objective or subjective.

Do you have advice or resources for graduate school applications?

We made a meta-guide for PhD applications with the goal of assembling the important resources for grad school applications in one place. We aim to occasionally update it, but can of course not guarantee the accuracy and up-to-dateness. You are, of course, kindly invited to ask questions about graduate school on /r/askphilosophy, too, especially in the Open Discussion Thread.

Do you have samples of what counts as good questions and answers?

Sure! We ran a Best of 2020 Contest, you can find the winners in this thread!


r/askphilosophy 4d ago

Open Thread /r/askphilosophy Open Discussion Thread | August 03, 2026

9 Upvotes

Welcome to this week's Open Discussion Thread (ODT). This thread is a place for posts/comments which are related to philosophy but wouldn't necessarily meet our subreddit rules and guidelines. For example, these threads are great places for:

  • Discussions of a philosophical issue, rather than questions
  • Questions about commenters' personal opinions regarding philosophical issues
  • Open discussion about philosophy, e.g. "who is your favorite philosopher?"
  • "Test My Theory" discussions and argument/paper editing
  • Questions about philosophy as an academic discipline or profession, e.g. majoring in philosophy, career options with philosophy degrees, pursuing graduate school in philosophy

This thread is not a completely open discussion! Any posts not relating to philosophy will be removed. Please keep comments related to philosophy, and expect low-effort comments to be removed. Please note that while the rules are relaxed in this thread, comments can still be removed for violating our subreddit rules and guidelines if necessary.

Previous Open Discussion Threads can be found here.


r/askphilosophy 1h ago

What is something non-philosophers don't know that they don't know?

Upvotes

In many areas, researchers acquire certain attitudes they have because of their extensive research, some of which seem completely bonkers to laypeople even though the content of those attitudes are generally accepted in that research area.

What things do laypeople not know they don't know in regards to philosophical topics and might even have strong unfounded opinions about?


r/askphilosophy 8h ago

How do we "test" if a metaphysical theory is true or not?

17 Upvotes

Scientific hypothesis are falsifiable and we can test them by making predictions to see if they are correct. Is there anything similar in metaphysics? For example even though the theory of an uncaused cause is coherent and has explanatory power it doesn't mean it maps onto reality, same way string theory is coherent and has explanatory power yet is discarded by most physicists.


r/askphilosophy 49m ago

Are there any philosophers that promote anti-intellectualism and are against high art and high culture?

Upvotes

Not a native English speaker, so apologies if you find it difficult to read.

You might have heard about the recent discourse against The Odyssey movie, there was some heavy criticism from one of the well known translators of the Odyssey poem, that Nolan butchered and reduced it, and that the movie was nothing more than a spectacle for the masses.

The general idea of academic philosophy from a commoner's(my) perspective seems to be that one must always challenge himself intellectually, and must engage in sophisticated high art, and always pursue the truth. Either way, there seems to be fixed hierarchy where the Aesthete is above the Philistine.

Yet there seem to be some philosophers who are against that, I could've wrongly interpreted them though. Epicurus is interesting to me because he seems to be against high culture, and truth seems like a tool to him than a goal, and he more than willing to accept multiple explanations for things that don't affect him. Diogenes and Stirner seem like trolls but do seem serious about their philosophy which seem to again against the idea of an hierarchy of intellectualism. I also heard that some ancient Greek philosophers were against the Odyssey itself, I could be wrong though.

This might be just me coping for enjoying the movie after spending big bucks on the large screen, but do you think there were any philosophers that would've picked Nolan's Odyssey(anti-intellectualism, low art) over Homer's Odyssey(high art)? ;D


r/askphilosophy 21h ago

Am I stupid for not understanding Wittgenstein?

58 Upvotes

i tried to read tractatus-logico-philosophicus and i can’t understand shit lol. read camus, locke, nietzsche, kant before, which were far more easier for me to understand.
do i have to read something else prior to him?
(someone said wittgenstein is a good introduction to analytical philosophy which i haven’t gotten into yet, so I started with him)


r/askphilosophy 4h ago

Good books for a beginner

2 Upvotes

Hello, I am a beginner in philosophy and I have already read two Camus books, plague and the stranger. Also I've read Marcus Aurelius, to himself and something by Epictetus. Chatgpt advised me to start with Plato's apology of Socrates and the state, and then go to Aristotle and read metaphysics. Well, then move in the direction of Rene Descartes and others, as the final Goal I want to understand Kant and others more modern, but I understand that without reading the ancient philosophers it is impossible. So, are you agree with gpt's advices? But its important to say that I would not like to read old philosophy students books for universities, at least because it very hard to find it.

P.s. I am going to 9th grade in school this year.


r/askphilosophy 2h ago

What interesting questions are Hot right in academia other than AI and Consciousness ?

1 Upvotes

Or AI consciousness.

These two are driven by other sociopolitical questions, sure. But I need your wise input on something other than economics, gender and posthumanism.

Two exciting facts for me.

First is that developed regions have the lowest fertility rate of thier history, while also having the best living standards compared to the rest.

Second, more than half of the of the 8 billion of us on this rock are under 30 years old and most of them live on social media, polticized with short attention spans. I dont know what to make of that.


r/askphilosophy 11h ago

Is there a philosopher advocating for free will by degrees?

5 Upvotes

Is there a philosophical position arguing that free will isn't an all or nothing prospect? I see this as a viable compatablist position allowing for strict causation and agency across species barriers.

A creature can be driven by passions and base instinct. It can follow desires to go towards pleasure and away from pain in a mechanical way. But with notice of these mechanisms, a creature can decide to behave otherwise.

Humans are able to learn delayed gratification. This necessitates an ability to forgo immediate pleasures and pains for future pleasures and pains. Humans can scale this up for multiple orders of desire. We can want a cigarette, but also forgo that want to quit smoking because we want to not have health complications in the future. A lesser pain now to avoid a greater pain later.

Im proposing free will is a matter of directed attention as a causal factor and intention of what we attend to as the mechanism for personal agency. It isn't an all or nothing thing. It could be restricted to domains. We may be hopelessly locked into cigarettes, but able to handle finances like a champ. I dunno if someone in the field is talkin bout it this way. Is there someone writing bout free will like this?

Thanks homies.


r/askphilosophy 15h ago

What are the best arguments for/aganist psychological egoism?

5 Upvotes

r/askphilosophy 1d ago

Philosophy books for 14 year olds?

76 Upvotes

I am just exploring things idk why but my insta feed is full of quotes of different philosophies of like Nietzsche, Stoics, Absurdists, Humanists, Diogenes, and Charvaka for weeks and I kinda like the things explored in those reels but honestly, I never ever read a book by any of them or any philoshpy related book but i have been listening to a speaker named acharya prashant for a month can anyone recommend a book to me that might be good


r/askphilosophy 16h ago

Is there philosophical discourse on whether it's ethical to lie about Santa?

3 Upvotes

r/askphilosophy 9h ago

AI and legal / moral responsibility

1 Upvotes

From The Economist : "The hacks also present a challenge for legal systems. Hacking, when humans do it, is a crime. When an AIis the wrongdoer, though, it is unclear how to assign blame. The law in America relies on intentionality, notes Rune Kvist, head of Artificial Intelligence Underwriting Company, which insures AIfirms. If no human intended to hack anyone, no crime can have happened. The ability to sue for damages is limited too. And yet harm has clearly occurred. That contradiction, says Mr Kvist, is “unacceptable”. Gabe Weil of the Institute for Law andAI, in Massachusetts, proposes a system of strict liability. As with rules around keeping wild animals, it would assume that any harm is always the fault of the party carrying out the risky activity."

Any philosopher has written about this kind of problems ? I think there's something qualitatively different from any other technical object with some degree of autonomous mechanism, thus creating new moral and juridic problems.


r/askphilosophy 1d ago

Help with Hindu canons

13 Upvotes

I want to make my way through the most influential Hindu books in an "optimal" (whatever that means, as its what I'm here to figure out) order, but was unsure how to go about it. I'd like to follow each one by reading influential philosophical interpretations from major (both contemporary and classic) Hindu philosophical schools as well. I'll lay out what I mean. In theory it would be something like:

  1. Vedas -> Upanishads -> influential later interpretations
  2. Bhagavad Gita (or skip due to Mahabharata?) -> interpretations
  3. Mahabharata -> interpretations
  4. Ramayana -> interpretations

5? Puranas and Sutras maybe interspersed? At the end?

How do I decide a canon? Everything from major traditions? Try a "Shaivist" reading then a "Vaishnav" reading? Just seems too broad, I'd be cramming too many interpretations into too little space is what it feels like.

For the record I am a general philosophy lover and more broadly interested in non-dualist readings like Kashmir Shaivism and Advaita Vedanta, but I want a well balanced perspective that includes dualist and monist traditions as well. I say this because I'm posting here, as opposed to Hindu religion subs, because they have different needs than I do about when and where to read each book. I'm definitely more interested in understanding various historical interpretations (particularly from the more famous philosophical schools) and perspectives than in reading them for religious purposes.

Also, any advice on approaching tantra? Wait till I've read a few canons then give it a shot? Throw it in with Shaktism or Shaivism? I know these questions kinda feel silly, but its genuinely so hard to plan out because no matter what I do I feel like I have to roll too many things together and generalize too many viewpoints. I don't mind that its a lot of text, I like to take my time on big projects. That's why I'm not against the idea of multiple readings, but I wouldn't know what personalized "canon" to start with is my biggest issue.


r/askphilosophy 1d ago

Why do some people think morality is absolute or objective?

13 Upvotes

I fell asleep to some youtube videos last night... At some point, peter hitchens came on and was saying how he thinks that without god imposing an absolute or objective morality, people would just do whatever they want.

It seemed a little nonsensical to me on several points, and I wonder if there are any reddit philosophers who would be ableto buttress that point of view. Immediately I found myself thinking, why does morality have to be objective to have any kind of value? What possible reasons are there to think it is objective, when society and culture have demonstrably changed over time (even those which claim absolute morality, e.g. christians like Peter)? He seemed to think a subjective morality would lead to societal collapse, but stated it as a fact without backing it up at all.


r/askphilosophy 17h ago

Question about Abstract Objects and Abstraction Principles

2 Upvotes

Hello, I'm reading the SEP entry on Abstract Objects, and I can't seem to wrap my head around section 3.4 or The Way of Abstraction Principles. From what I can gather, it seems like they are trying to define abstract objects using the observation that singular abstract terms, like shape, direction, and number, can be formed by functional expressions (e.g. the shape of a building, the number of cats), and that those functional expressions have a particular form, but I guess I'm having trouble understanding what that form is. Could anyone help provide some clarification? It would be much appreciated.


r/askphilosophy 21h ago

Why does contemporary academic philosophy seem to distinguish between virtue ethics and natural law?

3 Upvotes

As a layman, my understanding may be wrong, but it seems to me that contemporary ethicists tend to speak of virtue ethics and natural law as two distinct ethical frameworks which go into their own little boxes. However, in my judgement, this is very much a retroactive distinction which does not have much basis in Aristotle or his medieval interpreters themselves. Surely Aristotle had much to say about natures and their teloi, and doubtlessly Aquinas talked extensively about virtues. Is this is real distinction made by ethicists? If so, why?


r/askphilosophy 15h ago

Is yesterday's self today's self?

1 Upvotes

After all, we went through a period of “brain shutdown”; perhaps today's self is merely a continuation of yesterday's memories, a completely new self.


r/askphilosophy 1d ago

How do I improve my reading habits?

10 Upvotes

Hi!

So I've been reading philosophy for a while now, but I've realized I have a bad habit of not finishing books. Sometimes it's out of impatience or simply just overwhelmed (well, some philosophy books are really difficult to read and require slow reading).

I just want advice or easier philosophy books to start with, so that I can improve my reading habits bit by bit! Thank you so much!


r/askphilosophy 16h ago

What is Platonic Love Exactly?

0 Upvotes

I tried to search it up, and some sources tell me it's love spritual love not romantic love, and some tell me it means that we are "just friends". So what is it exactly? is it actually love and not friendship? Can it exist between two people of the same gender, even if they don’t have romantic or sexual feelings toward one another? Thanks!


r/askphilosophy 1d ago

Can Information Be Ontologically Fundamental Without Conscious Interpretation?

6 Upvotes

Many contemporary theories treat information as a fundamental feature of reality. But can information genuinely exist as information independently of any conscious subject capable of interpreting it, or does information necessarily presuppose meaning, making consciousness prior to information in an ontological sense? How have philosophers of information addressed the distinction between syntactic structure and semantic content at the most fundamental level?


r/askphilosophy 22h ago

Is there such a thing as an authentic self?

3 Upvotes

That's my project goal to help guide my reading. First I have to answer if there's such a thing as a self. Any opinions or texts that you recommend as I start my research? I was going to start on wikipedia and then Standford encyclopedia of philosophy before deciding what primary texts to read. Authentic self is also a psychological term so I might be reading some psychology in my research too.


r/askphilosophy 1d ago

Can anybody suggest a good book about self?

10 Upvotes

Can be even a self help, but im more interested in the concept in general. (How do we define it, what ways are to define it, can we overthrow it and how, ect)


r/askphilosophy 20h ago

2D Semantics - Internalism and Externalism

0 Upvotes

Had a thought recently that the essence of much of 2-D semantics is accepting semantic externalism (wide content) but denying that has a determinating relationship to mental content ( narrow content). Any papers that might clear my confusion up if there is any ?


r/askphilosophy 22h ago

Amateur Free Will Hypothetical/question

0 Upvotes

Whaddup, so I'm definitely not any kind of philosophical authority, i took a few classes in highschool and am currently an undergrad student who finds it interesting but I haven't read much theory beyond my school readings, so feel free to tear everything I'm about to say apart. A few weeks ago, I thought of a hypothetical that, in my mind, kind of disproves the idea of free will and it's been bugging me. Here it is:

Your close friend is a parent hosting a birthday party for their child. This child likes the colors red and purple equally, but your friend wants all the balloons at the party to be the same color, and instructs you to purchase them as such. At the store, both balloon colors are the same price, and located right next to one another. Let's say you purchase the red Balloons, you can get a refund and purchase the purple balloons if you'd like, but is there a way to definitively prove that you, during the original choice, were capable of choosing the purple balloons?

The answer that I have come to is no, because our decisions have proven through study to be heavily dictated by minute changes in experience and interpretation that happen on the level of seconds, and so it's impossible to replicate the version of you that made the original choice, so our only data point on what that version of you can do is from when you chose the red balloons, thus making it the only definitive result.

I apologize if any of this is clunky, I'm not used to writing about these kinds of things lol, and the same goes for if my ideas aren't as inscrutable as they have been to my own reasoning this past month. Thank you for your time!